Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Aptitude du cépage Chenin à l’élaboration de vins liquoreux en relation avec certaines unités terroirs de base de A.O.C. Coteaux du Layon

Aptitude du cépage Chenin à l’élaboration de vins liquoreux en relation avec certaines unités terroirs de base de A.O.C. Coteaux du Layon

Abstract

Le cépage Chenin constitue la base des A.O.C. de vins blancs en Moyenne Vallée de la Loire, région au contact du Massif Armoricain et des premières formations sédimentaires de l’auréole Ouest du Bassin Parisien. Si on le trouve dans le monde entier (Californie, Israël, Afrique du Sud), c’est bien dans cette région qu’il affirme le mieux son identité. C’est un des cépages les plus intéressants par la variété et la complexité des vins qu’il peut produire. Il peut donner des vins très secs ou très doux, tranquilles ou pétillants, frais dans leur jeunesse et sublimes au vieillissement, exprimant tout autant les caractéristiques de chaque millésime que celles du terroir. Le Chenin est un témoin fidèle de son environnement géographique, géologique, pédologique et climatique ; il est le faire-valoir du terroir. Il a de fortes aptitudes à la production de vins liquoreux conditionnés par des raisins surmûris souvent botrytisés dans l’A.O.C. Coteaux du Layon. La richesse et la noblesse des vins issus interpellent bon nombre de connaisseurs. Les vignerons de cette zone de production veulent préserver l’identité de ces vins conformément aux lois de la nature et dans le respect des traditions (Cellier, 1996). C’est dans ce sens qu’un programme de recherche/développement a été mis en place depuis quelques années, visant à caractériser les Unités Terroir de Base qui composent la zone de production, selon une méthodologie de caractérisation intégrée (Morlat, 1989, 1996) développée par l’Unité de Recherches Vigne et Vin du Centre INRA d’Angers et à la cartographier (Bolo et al., 1996). L’Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée Coteaux du Layon présente une grande diversité de terroirs parmi lesquels différentes variantes d’altération sur diverses catégories de schistes sont très représentées. Les indices bioclimatiques viticoles classent la région en limite septentrionale de la culture de la vigne. De ce fait, le potentiel des vendanges et des vins est influencé par le millésime. Les caractéristiques climatiques en interaction avec le terroir conditionnent, d’une part la stratégie que doit adapter le viticulteur pour une récolte réalisée par tries successives, et qui s’échelonne parfois sur plus d’un mois. D’autre part, le type de surmaturité en dépend, favorisant soit le développement de la pourriture noble, soit la concentration sur souche. C’est dans ce contexte qu’un réseau de parcelles expérimentales de Chenin a été mis en place sur certaines Unités Terroir de Base du vignoble. De ce fait, et dans ces conditions, l’étude vise à mettre en évidence les aptitudes de ce cépage à la production de vins liquoreux dans l’A.O.C. Coteaux du Layon.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Issue: Terroir 1996

Type : Poster

Authors

C. ASSELIN (1), R. MORLAT (1), P. CELLIER (2), MARIE-HELENE BOUVET (1), A. JACQUET (1), M. COSNEAU (1)

(1) INRA – UVV Centre de Recherches Angers – 42, rue Georges Morel, 49071 Beaucouzé
(2) INAO Angers – Hôtel des vins La Godeline, 73, rue plantagenêt, 49000 Angers 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Is wine terroir a valid concept under a changing climate?

The OIV[i] defines terroir as a concept referring to an area in which collective knowledge of the interactions between the physical and biological environment (soil, topography, climate, landscape characteristics and biodiversity features) and vitivinicultural practices develops, providing distinctive wine characteristics. Those are perceptible in the taste of wine, which drives consumer preference and, therefore, wine’s value in the marketplace. Geographical indications (GI) are recognized regulatory constructs formalizing and protecting the nexus between wine taste and the terroir generating it. Despite considering updates, GIs do not consider the nexus as a dynamic one and do not anticipate change, namely of climate. Being climate a fundamental feature of terroir, it strongly impacts wine characteristics, such as taste. According to IPCC[ii], many widespread, rapid and unprecedented changes of climate occurred, some being irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. Climatic shifts and atmospheric-driven extreme events have been widely reported worldwide. Recent climatic trends are projected to strengthen in upcoming decades, whereas extremes are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, forcing wines away from GI definitions. Geographical shifts of viticultural suitability are projected, often moving into regions and countries different from current ones. Some authors propose adaptation in viticulture, winemaking and product innovation. We show evidence of climate changing wine characteristics in the Douro valley, home of 270-year-old Port GI. We discuss herein resist or adapt stances for when climate changes the nexus between terroir and wine characteristics. Using the MED-GOLD[iii] dashboard, a tool allowing for easy visual navigation of past and future climates, we demonstrate how policymakers can identify future moments, throughout the 21st century under different emission scenarios, when GI specifications will likely need updates (e.g., boundaries, varieties) to reduce climate-change impacts.

Influence of weather and climatic conditions on the viticultural production in Croatia

The research includes an analysis of the impact of weather conditions on phenological development of the vine and grape quality, through monitoring of four experimental cultivars (Chardonnay, Graševina, Merlot and Plavac mali) over two production years. In each experimental vineyard, which were evenly distributed throughout the regions of Slavonia and The Croatian Danube, Croatian Uplands,

Understanding graft union formation by using metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches during the first days after grafting in grapevine

Since the arrival of Phyloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifolia) in Europe at the end of the 19th century, grafting has become essential to cultivate Vitis vinifera. Today, grafting provides not only resistance to this aphid, but it used to adapt the cultivars according to the type of soil, environment, or grape production requirements by using a panel of rootstocks. As part of vineyard decline, it is often mentioned the importance of producing quality grafted grapevine to improve vineyard longevity, but, to our knowledge, no study has been able to demonstrate that grafting has a role in this context. However, some scion/rootstock combinations are considered as incompatible due to poor graft union formation and subsequently high plant mortality soon after grafting. In a context of climate change where the creation of new cultivars and rootstocks is at the centre of research, the ability of new cultivars to be grafted is therefore essential. The early identification of graft incompatibility could allow the selection of non-viable plants before planting and would have a beneficial impact on research and development in the nursery sector. For this reason, our studies have focused on the identification of metabolic and transcriptomic markers of poor grafting success during the first days/week after grafting; we have identified some correlations between some specialized metabolites, especially stilbenes, and grafting success, as well as an accumulation of some amino acids in the incompatible combination. The study of the metabolome and the transcriptome allowed us to understand and characterise the processes involved during graft union formation.

What are the optimal ranges and thresholds for berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis?

In wine grape production, canopy management practices are applied to control the source-sink balance and improve the cluster microclimate to enhance berry composition. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal ranges of berry solar radiation exposure (exposure) for upregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and thresholds for their degradation, to evaluate how canopy management practices such as leaf removal, shoot thinning, and a combination of both affect the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) yield components, berry composition, and flavonoid profile under context of climate change. First experiment assessed changes in the grape flavonoid content driven by four degrees of exposure. In the second experiment, individual grape berries subjected to different exposures were collected from two cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot). The third experiment consisted of an experiment with three canopy management treatments (i) LR (removal of 5 to 6 basal leaves), (ii) ST (thinned to 24 shoots per vine), and (iii) LRST (a combination of LR and ST) and an untreated control (UNT). Berry composition, flavonoid content and profiles, and 3-isobutyl 2-methoxypyrazine were monitored during berry ripening. Although increasing canopy porosity through canopy management practices can be helpful for other purposes, this may not be the case of flavonoid compounds when a certain proportion of kaempferol was achieved. Our results revealed different sensitivities to degradation within the flavonoid groups, flavonols being the only monitored group that was upregulated by solar radiation. Within different canopy management practices, the main effects were due to the ST. Under environmental conditions given in this trial, ST and LRST hastened fruit maturity; however, a clear improvement of the flavonoid compounds (i.e., greater anthocyanin) was not observed at harvest. Methoxypyrazine berry content decreased with canopy management practices studied. Although some berry traits were improved (i.e. 2.5° Brix increase in berry total soluble solids) due to canopy management practices (ST), this resulted in a four-fold increase in labor operations cost, two-fold decrease in yield with a 10-fold increase in anthocyanin production cost per hectare that should be assessed together as the climate continues to get hot.

The impact of sustainable management regimes on amino acid profiles in grape juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids

One of the biggest challenges of agriculture today is maintaining food safety and food quality while providing ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation, pest and disease control, ensuring water quality and supply, and climate regulation. Organic farming was shown to promote biodiversity and carbon sequestration, and is therefore seen as one possibility of environmentally friendly production. Consumers expect organically grown crops to be free from chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers and often presume that the quality of organically grown crops is different or higher compared to conventionally grown crops. Integrated, organic, and biodynamic viticulture were compared in a replicated field trial in Geisenheim, Germany (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling). Amino acid profiles in juice, grape skin flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids were monitored over three consecutive seasons beginning 7 years after conversion to organic and biodynamic viticulture, respectively. In addition, parameters such as soil nutrient status, yield, vigor, canopy temperature, and water stress were monitored to draw conclusions on reasons for the observed changes. Results revealed that the different sustainable management regimes highly differed in their amino acid profiles in juice and also in their skin flavonol content, whereas differences in the flavanol and hydroxycinnamic acid content were less pronounced. It is very likely that differences in nutrient status and yield determined amino acid profiles in juice, although all three systems showed similar amounts of mineralized nitrogen in the soil. Canopy structure and temperature in the bunch zone did not differ among treatments and therefore cannot account for the observed differences in favonols. A different light exposure of the bunches in the respective systems due to differences in vigor together with differences in berry size and a different water status of the vines might rather be responsible for the increase in flavonol content under organic and biodynamic viticulture.