IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Exploring and unravelling the complex toasted oak wood (Q. sp.) volatilome using GCxGC-TOFMS technique

Exploring and unravelling the complex toasted oak wood (Q. sp.) volatilome using GCxGC-TOFMS technique

Abstract

For coopers, toasting process is considered as a crucial step in barrel production where oak wood develops several specific aromatic nuances released to the wine during its maturation. Toasting is applying varying degrees of heat to a barrel over a specific amount of time. Today it is well known that as the temperature increases, thermal degradation of oak wood structure produces a huge range of chemical compounds. Indeed, many works were conducted to identify key aroma volatile compounds (e.g., whisky-lactone, furfural, maltol, eugenol, guaiacol, vanillin) using the traditional gas chromatography coupled with olfactometry and mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS).

Inspired by recent untargeted approaches in food “omics”, this work aims at expanding our knowledge on oak wood volatile composition by bi-dimensional comprehensive gas chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS, BT4D, Leco).

In a first experiment, five toasting levels were selected and applied to Q. sessilis oak wood samples (control, 160 °C, 180 °C, 200 °C and 220 °C, 30 min, n=3). Organic extracts were prepared (dichloromethane, 50 g/L) and analysed by GCxGC-TOFMS on conventional column combination nonpolar/midpolar (DB-5ms/Rxi-17Sil). The separation was followed by a non-targeted approach for data processing. The resulting mass spectra (TIC) were de convoluted (ChromaTOF software) and compared to spectra from a database for tentative peak identification. It was necessary to restrict the number of processed peaks by applying some “filters” such as signal to noise (S/N > 50), linear retention index (LRI ± 30), mass spectra similarity (> 750) and repeatability level. Supervised multivariate and univariate statistical approaches were used to identify potential markers of toasting intensity. Thanks to R script, reproducible peaks number was reduced from about 15000 to 568. By comparing observed retention indices with those found in the literature, 77 of the identifications have been confirmed and associated with an increase in toasting intensity. Some of them were sensory active and well known in oak wood, such as guaiacol, creosol and isoeugenol. Others were identified for the first time in toasted oak wood such as 2-methylbenzofurane (burnt) and 2-hydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one (caramel).Additional results were also discussed on the capability of GCxGC-TOFMS to identify oak wood botanic origins (Q. robur, Q. alba

DOI:

Publication date: June 23, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Article

Authors

Courregelongue Marie1,², Albertin Warren1,³, Prida Andrei2 and Pons Alexandre1,²

¹UMR ŒNOLOGIE (OENO), ISVV, UMR 1366, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux INP
²Tonnellerie Seguin Moreau, Merpins, France
³ENSCBP, Bordeaux INP, 33600, Pessac, France

Contact the author

Keywords

non-targeted analysis, GCxGC-TOFMS, oak wood, toasting process, volatile compounds

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Preliminary characterisation of mannoproteins from different wine yeast strains and impact on wine properties

Mannoproteins (MPs) are released from the yeast cell wall during alcoholic fermentation and aging on the lees, and influence aspects of wine quality such as haze formation and colour stability. Yet, as this is a slow process with microbiological and sensory risks, the exogenous addition of extracted MPs poses an efficient alternative. While Saccharomyces cerevisiae has long been studied as a prominent source for MPs extraction, their structure and composition greatly differ between yeast species. This may influence their behaviour in the wine matrix and subsequent impact on wine properties. However, although wine yeast species other than S. cerevisiae possibly present an untapped source of MPs, they are still ill-characterised in terms of chemical composition and influence on wine.

Architecture, microclimate, vine regulation, grape berry and wine quality: how to choose the training system according to the wine type ?

This synthetic presentation deals with :
• A description of the variability and the main models of grapevine canopy architecture in the world.
• A precision on the model « potential exposed leaf area SFEp », which estimates the potential of net carbon balance of the plant, and shows a regulating effect of high SFEp levels on production decrease.

Influence of dehydration and maceration conditions on VOCs composition and olfactory profile of Moscato Bianco passito sweet wine

Among the Vitis vinifera L. cv. Moscato, Moscato Bianco is the oldest and most cultivated one in Europe (1). According to the OIV Focus 2015, Italy is the country with the largest cultivated area of Moscato Bianco with about 12500 hectares (2), that is used to produce well-known wines (i.e., Moscato Passito in Piedmont, Moscato di Trani in Puglia, and Moscatello di Montalcino in Tuscany), mainly obtained from partially dehydrated grapes (1). Different dehydration techniques can strongly modify the chemical compounds of oenological interest, among which Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) (1) that are the main responsible for the varietal sensory character of the final wine.

Are dicysteinyl polysulfanes responsible for post-bottling release of hydrogen sulfide?

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has a significant impact on wine aroma attributes and wine quality when present at concentrations above its aroma threshold of 1.1 to 1.6 μg/L.

Bioprotective non-Saccharomyces yeast as an alternative to sulfites for the winemaking process

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is used in winemaking due of its antioxidant, antioxydasic and antiseptic properties. Excessive amount of SO2 can negatively impact wine sensory perception and be detrimental for health. Agri-food industries are more transparent towards consumers concerning addition of sulfites, and oenology is no exception in this clairvoyance. As a consequence, the increase of consumers preference for wine with low or absent of sulfites addition is notorious. In this context, the impact of low/zero sulfites winemaking process on the microbial community should be evaluated. Moreover, microbial agents corresponding to bioprotective cultures represent a growing interest as an alternative to sulfites preservation in the early stages of vinification. However, scientific studies conducted to demonstrate their real effect are almost rare.