IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Assessment of Mineral Elements in Wine Spirits Aged with Chestnut Wood

Assessment of Mineral Elements in Wine Spirits Aged with Chestnut Wood

Abstract

The mineral composition of wine spirit (WS) is of relevant interest due to its potential effect on physicochemical stability, sensory characteristics, and safety.1 Calcium (Ca) and iron (Fe) can form insoluble compounds, negatively affecting the WS clarity. Transition metals, e.g. Fe and copper (Cu), seem to play an important catalytic role on oxidation reactions involving phenolic compounds and other substrates for oxidation in WS. Other elements such as Cu, zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb), are of concern due to their toxicological or physiological properties. The ageing of WS is traditionally performed in wooden barrels. In spite of the high quality achieved by the WS, this is a time-consuming and costly ageing technology, among other drawbacks. For these reasons, in recent years, special attention has been devoted to alternative ageing technologies, namely the application of wood fragments to WS kept in stainless steel, often combined with micro-oxygenation (MOX). Having in mind that wood ash main inorganic components are potassium (K), Ca and magnesium (Mg), but also sodium (Na) and Fe, the potential transference of these and other metals to the WS during ageing is expected. However, in spite of substantial understanding of the organic extractable compounds, little has been published on mineral elements extraction from wood to WS and even to wine, 2,3 and with the exception of a recent study of the authors focused on Fe and Cu, no data is available for chestnut wood.4 This study, developed within the Project Oxyrebrand (https://projects.iniav.pt/oxyrebrand/index.php/pt/), aimed to examine the effect of WS’s ageing with chestnut wood (Castanea sativa Mill.), considering traditional and alternative technologies, on the beverage mineral composition. A wine distillate was aged in 250 L chestnut barrels (traditional ageing) and in 50 L glass demijohns with chestnut wood staves combined with three levels of MOX and nitrogen application (alternative ageing technology), with two replicates. Sampling was carried out after 3 weeks, 2, 6, 9 and 12 months of ageing, and the WS was assessed in terms of mineral elements composition by adapting an Q-ICP-MS semi-quantitative method previously developed and validated. 5 A full mass spectrum (m/z = 6–240, omitting the mass ranges 16–18; 40, 41, 211–229) was obtained by full mass range scanning. ANOVA was performed to examine the influence of the ageing modality and ageing time on the mineral composition. At the end of the ageing essay, and for most part of the elements, no significant differences between WS from different ageing modalities were found. Ageing time had significant effect on most of the elements, with different trends and distinct magnitude of changes being observed, depending on the element. In general, the concentrations of the mineral elements found in the WS were quite low, which is positive from the WS quality point of view.

References

1 Catarino S., Curvelo-Garcia A.S., Bruno de Sousa R., 2008. Contaminant elements in wines: A review. Ciência Téc. Vitiv., 23, 3-19.
2 Pilet A., Bruno de Sousa R., Ricardo-da-Silva J.M., Catarino S., 2019. Barrel-to-barrel variation of phenolic and mineral composition of red wine. Bio Web Conf., 12,  02011.
3 Kaya A., Bruno de Sousa R., Curvelo-Garcia A.S., Ricardo-da-Silva J.R., Catarino S., 2017. Effect of wood aging on mineral composition and wine 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratio. J. Agric. Food Chem., 65, 4766-4776.
4 Canas S., Danalache F., Anjos O., Fernandes T.A., Caldeira I., Santos N., Fargeton N., Boissier B., Catarino S., 2020. Behaviour of Low Molecular Weight Compounds, Iron and Copper of Wine Spirit Aged with Chestnut Staves under Different Levels of Micro-Oxygenation. Molecules, 25, 5266.
5 Catarino S., Curvelo-Garcia A.S., Bruno de Sousa, R., 2006. Measurements of contaminant elements of wines by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: a comparison of two calibration approaches. Talanta, 70, 1073–1080.

DOI:

Publication date: June 23, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Catarino Sofia1,2, Vasiliki Thanasi1, Ofélia Anjos3,4,5, Tiago A. Fernandes6,7, Ilda Caldeira8,9, Laurent Fargeton10, Benjamin Boissier10 and Sara Canas8,9

1LEAF-Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food-Research Center, Associated Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa

2CEFEMA – Center of Physics and Engineering of Advanced Materials, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa
3Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Quinta da Senhora de Mércules
4CEF, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda
5Centro de Biotecnologia de Plantas da Beira Interior
6CQE, Centro de Química Estrutural, Associação do Instituto Superior Técnico para a Investigação e Desenvolvimento (IST-ID), Universidade de Lisboa
7DCeT – Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Aberta
8Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Quinta de Almoínha
9MED – Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Instituto de formação avançada, Universidade de Évora
10Vivelys, Domaine du Chapître

Contact the author

Keywords

wine spirit ageing, mineral composition, chestnut wood, barrel, micro-oxygenation

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Impact of climate change on the viticultural climate of the Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (SE Spain)

Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (PDO Jumilla) is located in the Spanish provinces of Albacete and Murcia, in the South-eastern part of the Iberian Peninsula, where most of the models predict a severe impact of climate change in next decades. PDO Jumilla covers an area of 247,054 hectares, of which more than 22,000 hectares

Is wine terroir a valid concept under a changing climate?

The OIV[i] defines terroir as a concept referring to an area in which collective knowledge of the interactions between the physical and biological environment (soil, topography, climate, landscape characteristics and biodiversity features) and vitivinicultural practices develops, providing distinctive wine characteristics. Those are perceptible in the taste of wine, which drives consumer preference and, therefore, wine’s value in the marketplace. Geographical indications (GI) are recognized regulatory constructs formalizing and protecting the nexus between wine taste and the terroir generating it. Despite considering updates, GIs do not consider the nexus as a dynamic one and do not anticipate change, namely of climate. Being climate a fundamental feature of terroir, it strongly impacts wine characteristics, such as taste. According to IPCC[ii], many widespread, rapid and unprecedented changes of climate occurred, some being irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. Climatic shifts and atmospheric-driven extreme events have been widely reported worldwide. Recent climatic trends are projected to strengthen in upcoming decades, whereas extremes are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, forcing wines away from GI definitions. Geographical shifts of viticultural suitability are projected, often moving into regions and countries different from current ones. Some authors propose adaptation in viticulture, winemaking and product innovation. We show evidence of climate changing wine characteristics in the Douro valley, home of 270-year-old Port GI. We discuss herein resist or adapt stances for when climate changes the nexus between terroir and wine characteristics. Using the MED-GOLD[iii] dashboard, a tool allowing for easy visual navigation of past and future climates, we demonstrate how policymakers can identify future moments, throughout the 21st century under different emission scenarios, when GI specifications will likely need updates (e.g., boundaries, varieties) to reduce climate-change impacts.

How distinctive are single vineyard Gewürztraminer musts and wines from Alto Adige (Italy) based on untargeted analysis, sensory profiling, and chemometric elaboration?

Vitis vinifera L. ‘Gewürztraminer’ is a historical grape variety of Alto Adige (Südtirol), Italy, which is widely grown in the area of Tramin an der Weinstraße, but is also grown globally. It produces highly aromatic wines that are strongly influenced by the terroir of the vineyard sites where they are grown. This study looked at musts and young wines from ‘Gewürztraminer’ grapes harvested in seven distinct vineyards near Tramin and then processed at Cantina di Termeno, minimizing winemaking protocol variability. Samples were profiled using bidimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography coupled to electrochemical detection, and near-IR spectrometry. The data were subjected to Principle Component Analysis and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis. Sensory discriminant testing was undertaken using the sorting method with a semi-trained panel, and the data were processed using Multidimensional Scaling. Seven must/wine pairs could be distinguished based on their untargeted volatilome profiles and on sensory evaluation. As expected, there were greater differences in the volatile compounds between the wines than between the musts. The wines from vineyards 4 and 5 were nonetheless quite homogenous in terms of chemical and sensory analyses, as were the wines from vineyards 1 and 3. For the phenolic profile, differences were noted between the musts and wines of vineyards 2, 3, and 4, but the musts from vineyards 5 and 7 were similar. Sensory analysis showed the wines from vineyards 6 and 7 to be distinct from the rest. These results reinforce that the composition of ‘Gewürztraminer’ musts and wines is strongly determined by vineyard site, even in a small geographic area with high variability of the terroir (soil and microclimate), and that these differences are apparent in the flavours and aromas of the finished wines. Further confirmation would require a larger sample of wines, preferably from several vintages.

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Projected changes in vine phenology of two varieties with different thermal requirements cultivated in La Mancha DO (Spain) under climate change scenarios

The aim of this work was to analyze the phenology variability of Tempranillo and Chardonnay cultivars, related to the climatic characteristics in La Mancha Designation of Origin, and their potential changes under climate change scenarios. Phenological dates referred to budbreak, flowering, veraison and harvest were analyzed for the period 2000-2019. The weather conditions at daily time scale, recorded during the same period, were also evaluated. The thermal requirements to reach each of these phenological stages were calculated and expressed as the GDD accumulated from DOY=60. Changes in phenology were projected by 2050 and 2070 taking into account those values and the projected temperatures and precipitation, simulated under two Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios –RCP4.5 and RCP8.5– using an ensemble of models. The average phenological dates during the period under study were, April 16th ± 6.6 days and April 5th ± 6.0 days for budbreak, May 31st ± 6.0 days and May 27th ± 5.3 days for flowering, July 26th ± 5.6 days and July 25th ± 5.8 days for veraison, and Ago 23rd ± 10.8 days and Ago 17th ± 9.0 days for harvest, respectively, for Tempranillo and Chardonnay. The projected changes in temperature imply an average change in the maximum growing season (April-August) temperatures of 1.2 and 1.9°C by 2050, and 1.6 and 2.6°C by 2070, under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively. A reduction in precipitation is predicted, which vary between 15% for 2050 under RCP4.5 scenario and up to 30% by 2070 under RCP8.5. The advance of the phenological dates for 2050, could be of 6, 7, 7, and 8 days for Tempranillo and 4, 6, 6 and 9 days for Chardonnay, respectively for budbreak, flowering, veraison and harvest under the RCP4.5 scenario. Under the RCP8.5 emission scenario, the advance could be up to 30% higher.