IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Exploring the influence of terroir on the sensorial and aroma profiles of wines – An application to red wines from AOC Corbières

Exploring the influence of terroir on the sensorial and aroma profiles of wines – An application to red wines from AOC Corbières

Abstract

The aromatic profile of a wine is the result of volatile molecules present in grapes (varietal or primary aromas) and those produced during the winemaking process of fermentation (secondary aromas) and during wine aging (tertiary aromas). Depending on their concentrations and interactions with other molecules, aromatic compounds contribute, to different extents, to the final bouquet of the wines. The analysis of the profile of volatile compounds of a wine can help exploring the chemical link between the product and the terroir from which it originates. Indeed, when referring to the concept of terroir, grape variety expression in wine results from an interaction between the place (climate, soil) and the people (tradition, viticultural practices and winemaking) [2,3]. These parameters can influence the final concentration of aromas, thus contributing to the overall sensory perception. To explore the influence of “terroir” factors on the aromatic and sensory profile of wines, red wines from the AOC Corbières were subjected to a global aromatic and sensory analysis. The aim is to identify the “molecular markers” that can characterise the different wines and to assess whether these markers are related to each other and explained by their area of origin. The aromatic profile was evaluated by HS-SPME-GC-MS and the sensory analysis was performed by a QDA (Quantitative Descriptive Analysis) profile method.  The terroir and winemaking parameters (type of winemaking, yeast, blending) were considered and multifactorial analysis were performed to link these data to the aromatic and/or sensory profiles. Statistical analysis highlight differences either between the samples and the study areas. Differences in the aroma profile were mainly attributed to some fermentative (e.g. acetate and ethyl esters) and varietal (e.g. terpenols and C13-norisoprenoids) aromas. Sensory analysis showed significant differences between samples on some quality descriptors (e.g. cooked red fruit). New interpretation leads are being explored to connect these first results to future experiments.The aromatic profile of a wine is the result of volatile molecules present in grapes (varietal or primary aromas) and those produced during the winemaking process of fermentation (secondary aromas) and during wine aging (tertiary aromas). Depending on their concentrations and interactions with other molecules, aromatic compounds contribute, to different extents, to the final bouquet of the wines. The analysis of the profile of volatile compounds of a wine can help exploring the chemical link between the product and the terroir from which it originates. Indeed, when referring to the concept of terroir, grape variety expression in wine results from an interaction between the place (climate, soil) and the people (tradition, viticultural practices and winemaking) [2,3]. These parameters can influence the final concentration of aromas, thus contributing to the overall sensory perception. To explore the influence of “terroir” factors on the aromatic and sensory profile of wines, red wines from the AOC Corbières were subjected to a global aromatic and sensory analysis. The aim is to identify the “molecular markers” that can characterise the different wines and to assess whether these markers are related to each other and explained by their area of origin. The aromatic profile was evaluated by HS-SPME-GC-MS and the sensory analysis was performed by a QDA (Quantitative Descriptive Analysis) profile method.  The terroir and winemaking parameters (type of winemaking, yeast, blending) were considered and multifactorial analysis were performed to link these data to the aromatic and/or sensory profiles. Statistical analysis highlight differences either between the samples and the study areas. Differences in the aroma profile were mainly attributed to some fermentative (e.g. acetate and ethyl esters) and varietal (e.g. terpenols and C13-norisoprenoids) aromas. Sensory analysis showed significant differences between samples on some quality descriptors (e.g. cooked red fruit). New interpretation leads are being explored to connect these first results to future experiments.

References

[1] Falqué, E., Fernandez, E., & Dubourdieu, D. (2001). Differentiation of white wines by their aromatic index. Talanta, 54, 271–281.
[2] Kustos, M., Gambetta, J., Jeffery, D.W., Heymann, H., Goodman, S., & Bastiana, S.E.P. (2020). A matter of place: Sensory and chemical characterisation of fine Australian Chardonnay and Shiraz wines of provenance. Food Research International, 130, 2-11.
[3] Vaudour, E. (2002). The quality of grapes and wine in relation to geography: Notions of terroir at various scales. Journal of Wine Research, 13(2), 117–141.

DOI:

Publication date: June 23, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Argentero Alice1, Caille Soline1, Nolleau Valérie1, Godet Teddy1, Verneuil Catherine2, Mouls Laetitia1 and Rigou Peggy1

1UMR SPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro
2Syndicat Général de l’AOC Corbières

List of affiliations ¹ ² ³

Contact the author

Keywords

Terroir, molecular marker, Aroma compounds, HS-SPME-GC-MS, Sensorial analysis

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Mapping and tracking canopy size with VitiCanopy

Understanding vineyard variability to target management strategies, apply inputs efficiently and deliver consistent grape quality to the winery is essential. However, despite inherent vineyard variability, the majority are managed as if they are uniform. VitiCanopy is a simple, grower-friendly tool for precision/digital viticulture that allows users to collect and interpret objective spatial information about vineyard performance. After four years of field and market research, an upgraded VitiCanopy has been created to achieve a more streamlined, technology-assisted vine monitoring tool that provides users with a set of superior new features, which could significantly improve the way users monitor their grapevines. These new features include:
• New user interface
• User authentication
• Batch analysis of multiple images
• Ease the learning curve through enhanced help features
• Reporting via the creation of colour maps that will allow users to assess the spatial differences in canopies within a vineyard.
Use-case examples are presented to demonstrate the quantification and mapping of vineyard variability through objective canopy measurements, ground-truthing of remotely sensed measurements, monitoring of crop conditions, implementation of disease and water management decisions as well as creating a history of each site to forecast quality. This intelligent tool allows users to manage grapevines and make informed management choices to achieve the desired production targets and remain profitable.

Updating the Winkler index: An analysis of Cabernet sauvignon in Napa Valley’s varied and changing climate

This study aims to create an updated, agile viticultural climate index (similar to the Winkler Index) by performing in-depth analyses of current and historical data from industry partners in several major winegrowing regions. The Winkler Index was developed in the early twentieth century based on analysis of various grape-growing regions in California. The index uses heat accumulation (i.e. Growing Degree Days) throughout the growing season to determine which grape varieties are best suited to each region. As viticultural regions are increasingly subject to the complexity and uncertainty of a changing climate, a more rigorous, agile model is needed to aid grape growers in determining which cultivars to plant where. For the first phase of this study, 21 industry partners throughout Napa Valley shared historical phenology, harvest, viticultural practice, and weather data related to their Cabernet sauvignon vineyard blocks. To complement this data, berry samples were collected throughout the 2021 growing season from 50 vineyard blocks located throughout 16 American Viticultural Areas that were then analyzed for basic berry chemistry and phenolics. These blocks have been mapped using a Geographic Information System (GIS), enabling analysis of altitude, vineyard row orientation, slope, and remotely sensed climate data. Sampling sites were also chosen based on their proximity to a weather station. By analyzing historical data from industry partners and data specifically collected for this study, it is possible to identify key parameters for further analysis. Initial results indicate extreme variability at a high spatial resolution not currently accounted for in modern viticultural climate indices and suggest that viticultural practices play a major role. Using the structure of data collection and analyses developed for the first phase, this project will soon be expanded to other wine regions globally, while continuing data collection in Napa Valley.

Modelling vine water stress during a critical period and potential yield reduction rate in European wine regions: a retrospective analysis

Most European vineyards are managed under rainfed conditions, where seasonal water deficit has become increasingly important. The flowering-veraison phenophase represents an important period for vine response to water stress, which is seldomly thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, we aim to quantify the flowering-veraison water stress levels using Crop Water Stress Indicator (CWSI) over 1986–2015 for important European wine regions, and to assess the respective potential Yield Lose Rate (YLR). Additionally, we also investigate whether an advanced flowering-veraison phase may help alleviating the water stress with improved yield. A process-based grapevine model STICS is employed, which has been extensively calibrated for flowering and veraison stages using observed data at 38 locations with 10 different grapevine varieties. Subsequently, the model is being implemented at the regional level, considering site-specific calibration results and gridded climate and soil datasets. The findings suggest wine regions with stronger flowering-veraison CWSI tend to have higher potential YLR. However, contrasting patterns are found between wine regions in France-Germany-Luxembourg and Italy-Portugal-Spain. The former tends to have slight-to-moderate drought conditions (CWSI<0.5) and a negligible-to-moderate YLR (<30%), whereas the latter possesses severe-to-extreme CWSI (>0.5) and substantial YLR (>40%). Wine regions prone to a high drought risk (CWSI>0.75) are also identified, which are concentrated in southern Mediterranean Europe. An advanced flowering-veraison phase may have benefited from cooler temperatures and a higher fraction of spring precipitation in wine regions of Italy-Portugal-Spain, resulting in alleviated CWSI and moderate reductions of YLR. For those of France-Germany-Luxembourg, this can have reduced flowering-veraison precipitation, but prevalent alleviations of YLR are also found, possibly because of shifted phase towards a cooler growing season with reduced evaporative demands. Overall, such a retrospective analysis might provide new insights towards better management of seasonal water deficit for conventionally vulnerable Mediterranean wine regions, but also for relatively cooler and wetter Central European regions.

Influence of climatic conditions on grape composition of Tempranillo in La Mancha DO (Spain)

The aim of this work was to analyze the variability in grape composition of the Tempranillo cultivar related to climatic conditions, in La Mancha Designation of Origin. Grape composition (sugar content, total acidity, pH, malic acid, and total and extractable anthocyanins) recorded during ripening, were analysed for the period 2000-2019. The weather conditions at daily time scale, recorded during the same period, were also evaluated. The relationships between grape parameters with climatic variables related to temperature and to water deficits, referring different periods between phenological events along the growing cycle, were evaluated using regression analysis. High variability in grape composition was observed in the period analysed. Total acidity varied between 3.7 and 7.3 gL-1 while malic acid varied between 1.2 and 4 gL-1. The extractable anthocyanins ranged between 526 and 972 mgL-1, and total anthocyanins ranged between 922 and 1388 mgL-1, being the lowest values recorded in the hottest year (2017). Total acidity decreased 0.77 gL-1 for an increase of 100 GDD, while malic acid decrease in 0.42 gL-1 for the same GDD increase, being the period between veraison and harvest the one that seemed to have higher influence on acidity. In addition, it was confirmed that increasing water deficits decreased acidity. Total and extractable anthocyanins increased in about 210 and 105 mgL-1, respectively, with an increase of 100 GDD from veraison to harvest, and the increase in water deficits favour the increase of anthocyanins, both total and extractable anthocyanins. Total and extractable anthocyanins concentration increased in 35 and 22 mgL-1 per an increase of 10 mm in the water deficit. These results can be of interest to understand the potential changes that grapes composition may suffer under future warmer climates.

Ecophysiological performance of Vitis rootstocks under water stress

The use of rootstocks tolerant to soil water deficit is an interesting strategy to cope with limited water availability. Currently, several nurseries are breeding new genotypes, but the physiological basis of its responses under water stress are largely unknown. To this end, an ecophysiological assessment of the conventional 110-Richter (110R) and SO4, and the new M1 and M4 rootstocks was carried out in potted ungrafted plants. During one season, these Vitis genotypes were grown under greenhouse conditions and subjected to two water regimes, well-watered and water deficit. Water potentials of plants under water deficit down to < -1.4 MPa, and net photosynthesis (AN) <5 μmol m-2 s-1 did not cause leaf oxidative stress damage compared to well-watered conditions in any of the genotypes. The antioxidant capacity was sufficient to neutralize the mild oxidative stress suffered. Under both treatments, gravimetric differences in daily water use were observed among genotypes, leading to differences in the biomass of root, shoot and leaf. Under well-watered conditions, SO4 and 110R were the most vigorous and M1 and M4 the least. However, under water stress, SO4 exhibited the greatest reduction in biomass while M4 showed the lowest. Remarkably, under these conditions, SO4 reached the least negative stem water potential (Ψstem), while M1 reduced stomatal conductance (gs) and AN the most. In addition, SO4 and M1 genotypes also showed the highest and lowest hydraulic conductance values, respectively. Our results suggest that there are differences in water use regulation among genotypes, not only attributed to differences in stomatal regulation or intrinsic water use efficiency at the leaf level. Therefore, because no differences in canopy-to-root ratio were achieved, it is hypothesized that xylem vessel anatomical differences may be driving the reported differences among rootstocks performance. Results demonstrate that each Vitis rootstock differs in its ecophysiological responses under water stress.