IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Exploring the influence of terroir on the sensorial and aroma profiles of wines – An application to red wines from AOC Corbières

Exploring the influence of terroir on the sensorial and aroma profiles of wines – An application to red wines from AOC Corbières

Abstract

The aromatic profile of a wine is the result of volatile molecules present in grapes (varietal or primary aromas) and those produced during the winemaking process of fermentation (secondary aromas) and during wine aging (tertiary aromas). Depending on their concentrations and interactions with other molecules, aromatic compounds contribute, to different extents, to the final bouquet of the wines. The analysis of the profile of volatile compounds of a wine can help exploring the chemical link between the product and the terroir from which it originates. Indeed, when referring to the concept of terroir, grape variety expression in wine results from an interaction between the place (climate, soil) and the people (tradition, viticultural practices and winemaking) [2,3]. These parameters can influence the final concentration of aromas, thus contributing to the overall sensory perception. To explore the influence of “terroir” factors on the aromatic and sensory profile of wines, red wines from the AOC Corbières were subjected to a global aromatic and sensory analysis. The aim is to identify the “molecular markers” that can characterise the different wines and to assess whether these markers are related to each other and explained by their area of origin. The aromatic profile was evaluated by HS-SPME-GC-MS and the sensory analysis was performed by a QDA (Quantitative Descriptive Analysis) profile method.  The terroir and winemaking parameters (type of winemaking, yeast, blending) were considered and multifactorial analysis were performed to link these data to the aromatic and/or sensory profiles. Statistical analysis highlight differences either between the samples and the study areas. Differences in the aroma profile were mainly attributed to some fermentative (e.g. acetate and ethyl esters) and varietal (e.g. terpenols and C13-norisoprenoids) aromas. Sensory analysis showed significant differences between samples on some quality descriptors (e.g. cooked red fruit). New interpretation leads are being explored to connect these first results to future experiments.The aromatic profile of a wine is the result of volatile molecules present in grapes (varietal or primary aromas) and those produced during the winemaking process of fermentation (secondary aromas) and during wine aging (tertiary aromas). Depending on their concentrations and interactions with other molecules, aromatic compounds contribute, to different extents, to the final bouquet of the wines. The analysis of the profile of volatile compounds of a wine can help exploring the chemical link between the product and the terroir from which it originates. Indeed, when referring to the concept of terroir, grape variety expression in wine results from an interaction between the place (climate, soil) and the people (tradition, viticultural practices and winemaking) [2,3]. These parameters can influence the final concentration of aromas, thus contributing to the overall sensory perception. To explore the influence of “terroir” factors on the aromatic and sensory profile of wines, red wines from the AOC Corbières were subjected to a global aromatic and sensory analysis. The aim is to identify the “molecular markers” that can characterise the different wines and to assess whether these markers are related to each other and explained by their area of origin. The aromatic profile was evaluated by HS-SPME-GC-MS and the sensory analysis was performed by a QDA (Quantitative Descriptive Analysis) profile method.  The terroir and winemaking parameters (type of winemaking, yeast, blending) were considered and multifactorial analysis were performed to link these data to the aromatic and/or sensory profiles. Statistical analysis highlight differences either between the samples and the study areas. Differences in the aroma profile were mainly attributed to some fermentative (e.g. acetate and ethyl esters) and varietal (e.g. terpenols and C13-norisoprenoids) aromas. Sensory analysis showed significant differences between samples on some quality descriptors (e.g. cooked red fruit). New interpretation leads are being explored to connect these first results to future experiments.

References

[1] Falqué, E., Fernandez, E., & Dubourdieu, D. (2001). Differentiation of white wines by their aromatic index. Talanta, 54, 271–281.
[2] Kustos, M., Gambetta, J., Jeffery, D.W., Heymann, H., Goodman, S., & Bastiana, S.E.P. (2020). A matter of place: Sensory and chemical characterisation of fine Australian Chardonnay and Shiraz wines of provenance. Food Research International, 130, 2-11.
[3] Vaudour, E. (2002). The quality of grapes and wine in relation to geography: Notions of terroir at various scales. Journal of Wine Research, 13(2), 117–141.

DOI:

Publication date: June 23, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Argentero Alice1, Caille Soline1, Nolleau Valérie1, Godet Teddy1, Verneuil Catherine2, Mouls Laetitia1 and Rigou Peggy1

1UMR SPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro
2Syndicat Général de l’AOC Corbières

List of affiliations ¹ ² ³

Contact the author

Keywords

Terroir, molecular marker, Aroma compounds, HS-SPME-GC-MS, Sensorial analysis

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Grapevine sugar concentration model in the Douro Superior, Portugal

Increasingly warm and dry climate conditions are challenging the viticulture and winemaking sector. Digital technologies and crop modelling bear the promise to provide practical answers to those challenges. As viticultural activities strongly depend on harvest date, its early prediction is particularly important, since the success of winemaking practices largely depends upon this key event, which should be based on an accurate and advanced plan of the annual cycle. Herein, we demonstrate the creation of modelling tools to assess grape ripeness, through sugar concentration monitoring. The study area, the Portuguese Côa valley wine region, represents an important terroir in the “Douro Superior” subregion. Two varieties (cv. Touriga Nacional and Touriga Franca) grown in five locations across the Côa Region were considered. Sugar accumulation in grapes, with concentrations between 170 and 230 g l-1, was used from 2014 to 2020 as an indicator of technological maturity conditioned by meteorological factors. The climatic time series were retrieved from the EU Copernicus Service, while sugar data were collected by a non-profit organization, ADVID, and by Sogrape, a leading wine company. The software for calibrating and validating this model framework was the Phenology Modeling Platform (PMP), version 5.5, using Sigmoid and growing degree-day (GDD) models for predictions. The performance was assessed through two metrics: Roots Mean Square Error (RMSE) and efficiency coefficient (EFF), while validation was undertaken using leave-one-out cross-validation. Our findings demonstrate that sugar content is mainly dependent on temperature and air humidity. The models achieved a performance of 0.65

Frost risk projections in a changing climate are highly sensitive in time and space to frost modelling approaches

Late spring frost is a major challenge for various winegrowing regions across the world, its occurrence often leading to important yield losses and/or plant failure. Despite a significant increase in minimum temperatures worldwide, the spatial and temporal evolution of spring frost risk under a warmer climate remains largely uncertain. Recent projections of spring frost risk for viticulture in Europe throughout the 21st century show that its evolution strongly depends on the model approach used to simulate budburst. Furthermore, the frost damage modelling methods used in these projections are usually not assessed through comparison to field observations and/or frost damage reports.
The present study aims at comparing frost risk projections simulated using six spring frost models based on two approaches: a) models considering a fixed damage threshold after the predicted budburst date (e.g BRIN, Smoothed-Utah, Growing Degree Days, Fenovitis) and b) models considering a dynamic frost sensitivity threshold based on the predicted grapevine winter/spring dehardening process (e.g. Ferguson model). The capability of each model to simulate an actual frost event for the Vitis vinifera cv. Chadonnay B was previously assessed by comparing simulated cold thermal stress to reports of events with frost damage in Chablis, the northernmost winegrowing region of Burgundy. Models exhibited scores of κ > 0.65 when reproducing the frost/non-frost damage years and an accuracy ranging from 0.82 to 0.90.
Spring frost risk projections throughout the 21st century were performed for all winegrowing subregions of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté under two CMIP5 concentration pathways (4.5 and 8.5) using statistically downscaled 8×8 km daily air temperature and humidity of 13 climate models. Contrasting results with region-specific spring frost risk trends were observed. Three out of five models show a decrease in the frequency of frost years across the whole study area while the other two show an increase that is more or less pronounced depending on winegrowing subregion. Our findings indicate that the lack of accuracy in grapevine budburst and dehardening models makes climate projections of spring frost risk highly uncertain for grapevine cultivation regions.

Amino nitrogen content in grapes: the impact of crop limitation

As an essential element for grapevine development and yield, nitrogen is also involved in the winemaking process and largely affects wine composition. Grape must amino nitrogen deficiency affects the alcoholic fermentation kinetics and alters the development of wine aroma precursors. It is therefore essential to control and optimize nitrogen use efficiency by the plant to guarantee suitable grape nitrogen composition at harvest. Understanding the impact of environmental conditions and cultural practices on the plant nitrogen metabolism would allow us to better orientate our technical choices with the objective of quality and sustainability (less inputs, higher efficiency). This trial focuses on the impact of crop limitation – that is a common practice in European viticulture – on nitrogen distribution in the plant and particularly on grape nitrogen composition. A wide gradient of crop load was set up in a homogeneous plot of Chasselas (Vitis vinifera) in the experimental vineyard of Agroscope, Switzerland. Dry weight and nitrogen dynamics were monitored in the roots, trunk, canopy and grapes, during two consecutive years, using a 15N-labeling method. Grape amino nitrogen content was assessed in both years, at veraison and at harvest. The close relationship between fruits and roots in the maintenance of plant nitrogen balance was highlighted. Interestingly, grape nitrogen concentration remained unchanged regardless of crop load to the detriment of the growth and nitrogen content of the roots. Meanwhile, the size and the nitrogen concentration of the canopy were not affected. Leaf gas exchange rates were reduced in response to lower yield conditions, reducing carbon and nitrogen assimilation and increasing intrinsic water use efficiency. The must amino nitrogen profiles could be discriminated as a function of crop load. These findings demonstrate the impact of plant balance on grape nitrogen composition and contribute to the improvement of predictive models and sustainable cultural practices in perennial crops.

Effect of vigour and number of clusters on eonological parameters and metabolic profile of Cabernet Sauvignon red wines

Vegetative growth and yield are reported to affect grape and wine quality. They can be controlled through different techniques linked to vine management. The objective of this research was to determine the effect of vine vigour and number of clusters per vine on physicochemical composition and phenolic profile of red wines. The experiment was carried out during two vegetative cycles, with cv. Cabernet Sauvignon grafted onto Paulsen 1103. Three vine vigour were defined, according to shoot weight at previous harvests, being low, medium and high. Five treatments of number of clusters were used for each vigour, with 15, 22, 29, 36, and 45 clusters per vine. Grapes from all treatments were harvested in the same day from Brix and total acidity criteria. Thirty days after bottling, classical analyzes and phenolic compounds were performed. As results, different responses were obtained from each vintage. In 2020, a dry season from veraison to harvest, grapes and wines obtained from low vigour treatment and 45 clusters per vine was the highest in sugar and alcohol content respectively, while grapes and wines from high vigour and 15 clusters presented the lowest sugar and alcohol content. Total anthocyanins were higher in treatment with low vigour and 15 clusters, while the lowest amounts were found in low vigour with 45 clusters, as well as medium and high vigour with 36 clusters per vine. Total tannins were higher in high vigour with 22 clusters and medium vigour with 29 clusters, while were lower in low vigour with 36 clusters. In 2021, a wet season at harvest, responses were different, and great variations were observed between treatments. As conclusions, yield and vine vigour had strong influence on grape and wine quality, promoting different enological potentials on which can be indicated/used for aging strategies of red and even rosé wines.

A predictive model of spatial Eca variability in the vineyard to support the monitoring of plant status

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...