IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Controlling Wine Oxidation: Effects of pH on Key Reaction Rates

Controlling Wine Oxidation: Effects of pH on Key Reaction Rates

Abstract

Acidity is often touted as a predictor of wine ageability, though surprisingly few studies have systematically investigated the chemical basis for this claim. The effects of pH on the rates of several key reactions in the wine oxidation pathway were evaluated in model wine. Wine oxidation starts with the redox cycling of iron between two oxidation states: iron(II) is oxidized by oxygen while iron(III) is reduced by phenols. While iron(III) reduction slowed as pH was increased from 3 to 4, oxygen consumption by iron(II) accelerated. However, pseudo-first order rate constants for oxygen consumption remained at least ten times lower than those of iron(III) reduction, suggesting that iron(II) oxidation is the rate-determining reaction for wine oxidation, and wine aging is thus limited by oxygen ingress. Despite this, different wines subject to the same oxidative conditions will often vary in their rate of maturation, indicating another control point “downstream” in the oxidation pathway. Hydrogen peroxide formed upon the reduction of oxygen can react in one of two ways: the iron-catalyzed Fenton oxidation of ethanol into acetaldehyde, or quenching by sulfur dioxide. Acetaldehyde production from added H2O2 was faster at pH 4 than at pH 3, while the efficacy of SO2 as an antioxidant was diminished, lending credence to the notion that high-pH wines deteriorate more quickly than more acidic wines. These observations may be explained by the pH-dependent complexation of iron by tartrate and other carboxylic acids in wine, which determines the reduction potential of iron and controls its reactivity. Findings overall suggest viticultural and winemaking practices, as they pertain to the management of wine acidity, may have significant long-term repercussions on aging.

DOI:

Publication date: June 23, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Article

Authors

Nguyen Thi1

1Weincampus Neustadt, Institute for Viticulture and Oenology, Dienstleistungszentrum Ländlicher Raum (DLR), Breitenweg 71, 67435 Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Germany

Contact the author

Keywords

wine ageing, oxidation, iron, acidity, Fenton

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

Phenolic compounds of wine spirits resulting from different ageing technologies: behaviour during the storage in bottle

Phenolic compounds are released from the wood into the wine spirit (WS) during the ageing process, and are of utmost importance to the colour, flavour, taste and the overall quality acquired by this spirit drink.1 Their concentrations in the WS and the related effects mainly depend on the kind of wood (oaks vs chestnut), toasting level and ageing technology (traditional using wooden barrels vs alternative).1,2,3

Exploiting the diversity in spent yeast for its valorisation towards producing yeast-derived processing aids

In view of sustainability and zero-waste initiatives, the valorisation of sidestreams is a key emerging topic in the wine industry.

INVESTIGATION INTO MOUSY OFF-FLAVOR IN WINE USING GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY WITH STIR BAR SORPTIVE EXTRACTION

Mousy off-flavor is one of the defects of microbial origin in wine. It is described as a particularly unpleasant defect reminiscent of rodent urine (a “dirty mouse cage”), and grilled foods such as popcorn, rice, crackers, and bread crust. Prior to the 2010s, mousiness was very uncommon but it has been becoming more frequent in recent years. It is often associated with an increase in pH as well as certain oenological practices, which tend to significantly decrease the use of sulfur dioxide.

Long term influence of a cover crop in the agronomic and oenological performance of CV. Chardonnay

Cover crops are acknowledged to be an interesting tool to produce
higher quality grapes in red varieties, as they generally reduce vine vigour and yield. However, their incidence in white wine quality is not clear, since higher nitrogen availability can play an important positive
role, and cover crops may compete for this nutrient. The possible reduction in available nitrogen can also modify the fermentation processes, as well as the synthesis of aromas in the wine. The aim of this work was to evaluate the long-term effect of a grass cover crop on grape and wine quality.