IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Controlling Wine Oxidation: Effects of pH on Key Reaction Rates

Controlling Wine Oxidation: Effects of pH on Key Reaction Rates

Abstract

Acidity is often touted as a predictor of wine ageability, though surprisingly few studies have systematically investigated the chemical basis for this claim. The effects of pH on the rates of several key reactions in the wine oxidation pathway were evaluated in model wine. Wine oxidation starts with the redox cycling of iron between two oxidation states: iron(II) is oxidized by oxygen while iron(III) is reduced by phenols. While iron(III) reduction slowed as pH was increased from 3 to 4, oxygen consumption by iron(II) accelerated. However, pseudo-first order rate constants for oxygen consumption remained at least ten times lower than those of iron(III) reduction, suggesting that iron(II) oxidation is the rate-determining reaction for wine oxidation, and wine aging is thus limited by oxygen ingress. Despite this, different wines subject to the same oxidative conditions will often vary in their rate of maturation, indicating another control point “downstream” in the oxidation pathway. Hydrogen peroxide formed upon the reduction of oxygen can react in one of two ways: the iron-catalyzed Fenton oxidation of ethanol into acetaldehyde, or quenching by sulfur dioxide. Acetaldehyde production from added H2O2 was faster at pH 4 than at pH 3, while the efficacy of SO2 as an antioxidant was diminished, lending credence to the notion that high-pH wines deteriorate more quickly than more acidic wines. These observations may be explained by the pH-dependent complexation of iron by tartrate and other carboxylic acids in wine, which determines the reduction potential of iron and controls its reactivity. Findings overall suggest viticultural and winemaking practices, as they pertain to the management of wine acidity, may have significant long-term repercussions on aging.

DOI:

Publication date: June 23, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Article

Authors

Nguyen Thi1

1Weincampus Neustadt, Institute for Viticulture and Oenology, Dienstleistungszentrum Ländlicher Raum (DLR), Breitenweg 71, 67435 Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Germany

Contact the author

Keywords

wine ageing, oxidation, iron, acidity, Fenton

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Using remotely sensed (UAV) and in situ field measurements to describe grapevine canopy characteristics

Row orientation and canopy management are essential for high quality grapevine production. Microclimatic conditions of the leaves and fruits can be influenced by the canopy geometry. Remote sensing is a very promising tool to describe vegetative growth and physiological behavior of vineyards. However, the correlation between remotely sensed data and in situ field measurements has been described scarcely in the scientific literature so far. The aim of the study was to correlate remotely sensed data obtained with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with in situ field measurements to describe canopy structure.

Read More

Legal protection of the vitivinicultural terroirs in Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan

This study analyses the actual situation regarding the legal protection of the vitivinicultural terroirs in Yamanashi Prefecture, the centre of Japanese wine industry with more than 150 years of wine-making tradition.

Read More

Terroir and climate: the role of homoclime matching

Climate is an important component or determinant of terroir, especially at the regional level. One can define three levels of terroir. These are the macro– or regional scale, which applies over tens of kilometres of the landscape. The second level is the meso- scale, which applies over kilometres or hundreds of meters, at the individual vineyard scale.

Read More

Inert gases persistence in wine storage tank blanketing

It is common to find tanks in the winery with wine below their capacity due to wine transfers between tanks of different capacities or the interruption of operations for periods of a few days. This situation implies the existence of an ullage space in the tank with prolonged contact with the wine causing its absorption/oxidation. Oxygen uptake from the air headspace over the wine due to differences in the partial pressure of O2 can be rapid, up to 1.5 mL of O2 per liter of wine in one hour and 100 cm2 of surface area1 and up to saturation after 4 hours.

Read More

The economic impact of drones on viticultural processes

Nowadays there are many challenges facing both winegrowers and workers, in other agricultural practices, related to the growing demand for food products, the safety and quality of these products, and the preservation of the environment…

Read More