IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Bunch placement effects on dehydration kinetics and physico-chemical composition of Nebbiolo grapes

Bunch placement effects on dehydration kinetics and physico-chemical composition of Nebbiolo grapes

Abstract

Sforzato di Valtellina DOCG is a special reinforced red wine produced using withered Nebbiolo grapes. The withering process takes place in traditional rooms under natural environmental conditions; it starts immediately after the harvest and ends not before the 1st December of the same year. The process can be performed with different bunch placements that can influence the grapes features.The purpose of the study is to compare the effect on grape physico-chemical parameters for four withering bunch placement systems: hanged clusters (HC), plastic crates (CT), breathable mesh fabric on wooden frames panels (MF), and reed mats (RM). For all the systems studied, the withering length was two months at a temperature between 6 and 19 °C and a relative humidity of 41-88%. The grapes were sampled at the beginning, at half time, and at the end of withering. For each sampling point, weight loss rate, skins mechanical properties (i.e. hardness and thickness), must technological parameters, and skins and seeds extractable polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and condensed tannins were studied. At the end of withering, the berry weight loss resulted very different among the systems, ranging from 18.79 to 12.73%. HC showed the fastest weight loss, followed by MF, CT, and RM. Interestingly, the dehydration kinetics showed different trends over the process: for HC the rate of weight loss (WLR, %/day) resulted higher in the first half of the process and then decreased; on the contrary, the kinetics of CT and MF were slower at the beginning of withering compared with the second phase; for RM, instead, the WLR remained fairly constant throughout the entire period.These differences yielded different consequences on the complex balance between concentration-synthesis and loss of compounds during withering. HC led to a significantly higher sugar content than the others after two months of withering. Instead, no significant differences were found among the systems for total acidity, pH, acetic acid, and glycerol (markers of microbial development), and mechanical properties. As regards phenolics, RM led to a significant reduction in skin extractable polyphenols and flavonoids when expressed as mg/kg berries, possibly because the lower concentration effect did not exceed the greater loss of these compounds compared to the other placements. No significant differences were found among systems in seeds polyphenols.In conclusion, under the same environmental conditions bunch placement influenced weight loss, dehydration kinetics, skins polyphenols, and to a lesser extent also the sugar content. The best compromise between weight loss and grape features seems to be the use of plastic crates, whereas hanged clusters placement allowed to achieve the same weight loss faster, although resulting in a higher sugar content. Therefore, these results can provide knowledge to choose the withering system with awareness according to the established oenological objective.

DOI:

Publication date: June 24, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Scalzini Giulia1, Giacosa Simone1, Paissoni Maria Alessandra1, Río Segade Susana1, Rolle Luca1 and Gerbi Vincenzo1

1University of Turin, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences

Contact the author

Keywords

bunch placement, grape dehydration, weight loss rate, physico-chemical parameters, special wines

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Can grapevine tolerance to bunch rot be directly induced by groundcover management?

Botrytis bunch rot occurrence is the most important limitation for the wine industry in humid environments. The effect of grapevine vegetative growth on bunch rot expression results from direct effects (cluster architecture, nitrogen status among others) and indirect ones (via microclimate). Previous studies of our group showed strong differences in bunch rot incidence between floor management treatments: cover crop (CC) vs weed-free strips under the trellis with herbicide (H). We observed that in some circumstances this reduction in bunch rot incidence occurred without major vine growth differences among treatments. The aim of the present study was to test the general hypothesis that other factors unrelated to grapevine vegetative expression could be more relevant to grapevine susceptibility to bunch rot.

Effects of Non-Grape Materials (MOG) on wine quercetin composition: insights from synthetic and Merlot grape juice fermentation

Quercetin precipitation has become an increasingly common issue in red wine, often resulting in visually unpleasant sediments and diminished product quality.

Les AOC : un frein ou un moteur à l’innovation ? Retour sur l’histoire économique, scientifique, sociale et technique des vins d’appellation au XXe siècle en France

At a time when the world’s winegrowing industry is having to adapt to a number of challenges, winegrowers are wondering about the consequent changes they will have to make (grape varieties, changes in vineyard and cellar techniques). For winegrowers and consumers alike, there is also the question of how these changes will affect the taste of their wines. This research, based on the study of numerous sources and archives from the 20th century, some of which have never been published before, aims to show that, in the recent past, the winegrowing world has shown incredible resilience in the face of crises, and that the taste and perception of fine wines has changed considerably in 100 years.

Sensory evaluation of ‘Sauvignon blanc’ grapes by a trained panel

The study described the effect of sensory analysis on commercial ‘Sauvignon blanc’ vineyards within the Stellenbosch Wine of Origin District. The sensorial evaluation of the berries was able to give a description of each parcel type and relate it to the cultural practices.

WINE SWIRLING: A FIRST STEP TOWARDS THE UNLOCKING OF THE WINE’STASTER GESTURE

Right after the pouring of wine in a glass, a myriad of volatile organic compounds, including ethanol, overwhelm the glass headspace, thus causing the so-called wine’s bouquet [1]. Otherwise, it is worth noting that during wine tasting, most people automatically swirl their glass to enhance the release of aromas in the glass headspace [1]. About a decade ago, Swiss researchers revealed the complex fluid mechanics underlying wine swirling [2]. However, despite mechanically repeated throughout wine tasting, the consequences of glass swirling on the chemical space found in the headspace of wine glasses are still barely known.