IVAS 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 IVAS 9 IVAS 2022 9 Enzymes Impact During Fermentation On Volatile And Sensory Profile Of White Wines

Enzymes Impact During Fermentation On Volatile And Sensory Profile Of White Wines

Abstract

Favoring the formation of volatile compounds and their precursors in must and wine represent one of the principal goals during winemaking technology. In recent years, most attention has been placed on using glycosidases to enlarge the aroma profile of white wines. The effect of enzymes makes odorless glycosidically-bound precursors be converted into aromatic compounds. This paper focuses to study the influence of enzymes (pectolytic and β-glycosides) administered before alcoholic fermentation, even if most studies analyze their use in different winemaking stages. Two semi-aromatic varieties such as Fetească regală and Sauvignon blanc were chosen.
Identification and separation of volatile compounds were performed using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatography system coupled with a mass spectrometer detector 5975 C inert XL EI/CI MSD. The sensory profile of the wines was evaluated by a panel of 20 licensed tasters, consisting of 12 men and 8 women. Data processing and statistical representation (Principal Components Analysis, Anova, Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, Pearson correlation coefficient) was performed using Statgraphics® software 19.  
Following the analyses performed by gas chromatography, there were identified over 65 volatile compounds, depending on the grape variety. Fetească regală wines were described by higher proportions of ethyl octanoate (peach, pear, exotic fruits notes), 3-methylbutyl acetate (with fruity, pear, banana aroma), hexanoic acid (lactate, phenolic and exotic fruits odors), propan-2-yl acetate ethereal, ripe fruits, banana odor) and ethyl decanoate (floral, fruity, woody notes), while Sauvignon blanc wines were distinguished by considerable proportions of 2-methylpropan-1-ol (with spirits and solvent odor), 3-methylbutan-1-ol (banana, solvent notes), diethyl butanoate (fruity, floral, waxy, dusty odors), 1-phenylethanol (floral and honey flavors), and acetic acid (vegetal, rancid, sour perceptions). Numerous positive correlation were identified in both varieties, including propan-1-ol vs 3-methylbutan-1-ol, 3-methylbutyl acetate vs ethyl hexanoate and butan-1-ol vs octandecanoic acid in Fetească regală wines and diethyl butanoate vs 3-methylbutan-1-ol, ethyloctanoate vs propan-2-yl acetate, ethyl octanoate vs ethyl 4-hydroxybutanoate in Sauvignon blanc. Data confirmed a significant influence.

DOI:

Publication date: June 24, 2022

Issue: IVAS 2022

Type: Poster

Authors

Cotea Valeriu1, Scutarasu Elena Cristina1, Luchian Camelia Elena1, Colibaba Lucia Cintia1, Nagy Katalin2 and Trincă Lucia Carmen1

1Iași University of Life Sciences
2″Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Cluj-Napoca

Contact the author

Keywords

wines, enzymes, fermentation, volatile profile, sensory analysis

Tags

IVAS 2022 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Phenotypical impact of a floral somatic mutation in the cultivar Listán Prieto

The accession Criolla Chica Nº2 (CCN2) is catalogued as a floral mutation of cultivar Criolla Chica (synonym for cv. Listán Prieto). Contrary to what is observed in hermaphrodite-cultivated varieties like Criolla Chica, CCN2 exhibits a prevalence of masculinized flowers. Aiming to study the incidence and phenotypical implications of this mutation, CCN2 plants were deeply studied using Criolla Chica ‘Ballista’ (CCBA) as control plants. For each CCN2 plant, two inflorescences per shoot were sampled and segmented into proximal, mid and distal positions, relative to the pedicel. Flowers were observed through magnifying lens and classified according to OIV151 descriptor.

Digitising the vineyard: developing new technologies for viticulture in Australia 

New and developing technologies, that provide sensors and the software systems for using and interpreting them, are becoming pervasive through our lives and society. From smart phones to cars to farm machinery, all contain a range of sensors that are monitored automatically with intelligent software, providing us with the information we need, when we need it. This technological revolution has the potential to monitor all aspects of vineyard activity, assisting growers to make the management choices they need to achieve the outcomes they want. For example, a future vineyard may possess automated imaging that generates a three dimensional model of the vine canopy, highlighting differences from the desired structure and how to use canopy management to improve fruit composition, or generates maps with yield estimates and measurements of berry composition throughout the growing season.

New biotechnological approaches for a comprehensive characterization of AGL11 and its molecular mechanism underlying seedlessness trait in table grape

In table grapes seedlessness is a crucial breeding target, mainly results from stenospermocarpy, linked to the Thompson Seedless variety. Several studies investigated the genetic control of seedlessness identifying AGL11, a MADS-box transcription factor, as a crucial gene.
We performed a deep investigation of the whole AGL11 gene sequence in a collection of grapevine varieties revealing three different promoter-CDS combinations. By investigating the expression of the three AGL11 alleles and evaluating their ability to activate the promoter region, we show that AGL11 regulates its transcription in a specific promoter-CDS manner. By a multi-AGL11 co-expression analysis we identified a methyl jasmonate esterase, an indole-3-acetate beta-glucosyltransferase, and an isoflavone reductase as top AGL11 candidate targets. In vivo experiments further confirmed AGL11 role in regulating these genes, demonstrating its significant influence in seed development and thus in seedlessness trait.

Greffadapt: a relevant experimental vineyard to speed up the selection of grapevine rootstocks

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.20.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.