GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Effect of climate and soil on phenology and ripening of Vitis vinifera cv Touriga acional in the Dão region

Effect of climate and soil on phenology and ripening of Vitis vinifera cv Touriga acional in the Dão region

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – “Terroir” has been acknowledged as an important factor in wine quality and style. It can be defined as an interaction between climate, soil, vine (cultivar, rootstock) and human factors such as viticultural and enological techniques. Soil and climate are the two components of the “Terroir” with an important role on the vine development and berries ripening. The present study is focused on the effects of the weather conditions and the soil characteristics on the phenological and berries ripening dynamics of the “Touriga Nacional” in Dão region.

Material and methods – This assay was carried out during 2017 and 2018 in four commercial vineyards at different places at Dão Region, centre of Portugal, with red grapevine variety Touriga Nacional. For each field were defined 3 plots were defined, and the observations were carried out in 10 plants per plot. Meteorological data was recorded at automatic stations localized next each vineyard. For the soil characterization, soil samples were taken in three layers until the 200 cm depths. Between budburst and veraison, the phenological stages were monitored using the E-L modify scale. During the ripening period, weekly, samples with 200 berries per plot were taken, determined their weights and juice volumes, and analysed their sugar contents, total acidity and pH. The anthocyanins accumulation was indirectly monitored, using the fluorescence optical sensor Multiplex, on six clusters per plot.

Results – The results showed similar characteristics of soils at the different vineyard, but different weather condition between places and years. The lag of the chronological evolution of the phenology and ripening between places and years was mainly due to the different thermal conditions of each place in each year.

DOI:

Publication date: September 8, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Pedro RODRIGUES1,2,3, Vanda PEDROSO4, Alexandre PINA1, Gonçalo LOURENÇO1, António CAMPOS1, Sérgio SANTOS1, Tiago SANTOS1, Sílvia LOPES 1, João GOUVEIA1, Carla HENRIQUES1,2, Ana MATOS1,2, Cristina AMARO DA COSTA1,2, Fernando GONÇALVES1,2,3

1 Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Campus Politécnico, Viseu, Portugal
2 Centro de Estudos em Educação, Tecnologia e Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Viseu, Portugal
3 CERNAS, Centro de Estudos de Recursos Naturais, Ambiente e Sociedade, Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Campus Politécnico, Viseu, Portugal
4 Centro Estudos Vitivinícola do Dão. Direção Regional de Agricultura e Pescas do Centro, Nelas, Portugal

Contact the author

Keywords

soil, climate, phenology, ripening, Touriga Nacional

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

A predictive model of spatial Eca variability in the vineyard to support the monitoring of plant status

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

20-Year-Old data set: scion x rootstock x climate, relationships. Effects on phenology and sugar dynamics

Global warming is one of the biggest environmental, social, and economic threats. In the Douro Valley, change to the climate are expected in the coming years, namely an increase in average temperature and a decrease in annual precipitation. Since vine cultivation is extremely vulnerable and influenced by the climate, these changes are likely to have negative effects on the production and quality of wine.
Adaptation is a major challenge facing the viticulture sector where the choice of plant material plays an important role, particularly the rootstock as it is a driver for adaptation with a wide range of effects, the most important being phylloxera, nematode and salt, tolerance to drought and a complex set of interactions in the grafted plant.
In an experimental vineyard, established in the Douro Region in 1997, with four randomized blocs, with five varieties, Touriga Nacional, Tinta Barroca, Touriga Franca and Tinta Roriz, grafted in four rootstocks, Rupestris du Lot, R110, 196-17C, R99 and 1103P, data was collected consecutively over 20 years (2001-2020). Phenological observations were made two to three times a week, following established criteria, to determine the average dates of budbreak, flowering and veraison. During maturation, weekly berry samples were taken to study the dynamics of sugar accumulation, amongst other parameters. Climate data was collected from a weather station located near the vineyard parcel, with data classified through several climatic indices.
The results achieved show a very low coefficient of variations in the average date of the phenophases and an important contribution from the rootstock in the dynamic of the phenology, allowing a delay in the cycle of up to10-12 days for the different combinations. The Principal Component Analysis performed, evaluating trends in the physical-chemical parameters, highlighted the effect of the climate and rootstock on fruit quality by grape varieties.

Effects of graft quality on growth and grapevine-water relations

Climate change is challenging viticulture worldwide compromising its sustainability due to warmer temperatures and the increased frequency of extreme events. Grafting Vitis vinifera L.

Late season canopy management practices to reduce sugar loading and improve color profile of Cabernet-Sauvignon grapes and wines in the high irradiance and hot conditions of California Central Valley

Global warming is accelerating grape ripening, leading to unbalanced wines from fruit with high sugar content but poor aroma and colour development. Reducing the size of the photosynthetic apparatus after veraison has been shown to delay technological ripeness in cool climates, but methods have not been tested in areas with high irradiance and temperature where fruit exposure could have disastrous effects on berry composition. In this Cabernet-Sauvignon trial, we compared the application of an antitranspirant (pinolene), to severe canopy topping and above bunch zone leaf removal, all performed at mid-ripening, with an untouched control. We monitored the vines weekly by measuring stem water potential, gas exchange, fruit zone light exposure. We sampled berries to measure berry weight, total soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, and the anthocyanin profile. At harvest, we assessed yield components, measured carbon isotope discrimination, rated sunburn on clusters, and produced experimental wines. We submitted harvest samples to metabolomic profiling through PFP-Q Exactive MS/MS and wines to sensory analysis. Application of the antitranspirant significantly reduced stomatal conductance and assimilation rate but did not affect the stem water potential. Inversely, leaf removal and topping increased water potential but did not affect leaf gas exchange. The late topping was the only treatment able to decrease sugar content (up to 2Bx), increase titratable acidity and pH, and improve anthocyanin content because of lower degradation of di-hydroxylated forms. Late leaf removal above the bunch zone increased lightning conditions in the canopy and produced the most significant damage on fruits. Yield components were not affected. This work suggests that late-season canopy management can effectively control ripening speeds and improve grapes and wines. Still, the effect on grape exposure in a critical time must be well balanced to avoid problems with the appropriate technique.