GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Behaviour of two training systems for mechanical pruning combined with different nitrogen fertilizations on cv. Colombard

Behaviour of two training systems for mechanical pruning combined with different nitrogen fertilizations on cv. Colombard

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Today winegrowers involved in mechanical winter pruning are applying this viticultural technique on two main training systems, the free cordon, appearing to be the more efficient, and the trellised vertical shoot positioning (VSP) system. The main reasons for maintaining the trellis are generally due to common habits in vineyard management, risk of wind damage for the shoots, or risk of decrease in photosynthesis potential. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of the two training systems on vine. In addition, different nitrogen fertilization levels were applied on the two systems to evaluate the best combination to achieve yield and grape quality.

Material and methods – Free cordon and spur pruned VSP system were compared during 3 vintages, from 2016 to 2018, on a rainfed cv. Colombard, planted in 2012 in Gascony vineyard, south-west of France. The trial was run on a young plot, planted in 2012, with a production goal of around 15 tons per hectare. Four strategies of nitrogen fertilization were applied on each system including soil mineral supplies (40N and 80N/ha) and foliar spraying (25N/ha) combined with green manure on each treatment (control). Total foliar area, yield, pruning weight, nitrogen and water status were controlled each year. Grapes composition at harvest and wine quality also allowed to compare the different treatments.

Results – The results showed different behavior of the vine according to the training systems. Total leaf area and yield were significantly lower for the free cordon system each of the tree years, regardless of nitrogen fertilizations. With the same leaf-fruit ratio, in 2017 and 2018, the free cordon grapes contained less sugar than VSP grapes. To explain some of these differences, discussion will take place around plot’s age and on plant development delay due to higher height of the supporting wire for free cordon system. Also, in our conditions, the rainfed free cordon development appeared to be very dependent on the height and period of shoot trimmings. The different fertilization strategies induced significant results on chlorophyll index of the leaves every year and on yeast assimilable nitrogen of grapes after the second year. The berries from the control treatment presented the lowest concentration of nitrogen and the foliar treatment the highest. But, the nitrogen fertilization supplies did not modify yield and pruning weight for both systems. The three-year treatments were not sufficient to induce major differences in these cases.

DOI:

Publication date: September 28, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Thierry DUFOURCQ1,2, Elodie GASSIOLLE1, Frédéric LOPEZ1, Laure GONTIER2, Christophe GAVIGLIO2

1 IFV Sud-Ouest, Château de Mons, 32100 Caussens, France
2 IFV Sud-Ouest, V’innopôle, 81 310 Lisle Sur Tarn, France

Contact the author

Keywords

free cordon, Vertical Shoot Positioning, nitrogen fertilization, Colombard

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Investigation of VvDXS function and its effects on muscat flavor levels

In the present study the connection between the positional candidate gene VvDXS and muscat flavor was evaluated by investigating the expression profiles in the berries from a Muscat-type cultivar and a neutral cultivar and its nucleotide diversity of full ORF on grapevine accessions.

The vineyard of the future: producing more with less  

similar to other agricultural producers, grape growers face increasing pressure to improve productivity and production efficiency while reducing their environmental impact. Threats due to extreme climate events, as well as the uncertainty of available water and labor, provide significant challenges to the future of grape production. This presentation will provide an integrated overview of the tools and technologies being developed to address these issues and to help growers manage vineyards in the future, including vineyard design, remote and proximal sensing, automation, data management and decision support systems, and germplsm improvement. The potential impact of these advancements on vineyard productivity, fruit quality, and sustainability will be discussed.

Managing soil health in vineyards: knowns and unknowns 

The use of soil conservation practices in wine grape production is becoming common throughout the world in response to an increased awareness of the value of soil health to maintain crop productivity and environmental quality. However, little information is available on the meaning of soil health within a viticultural context, and what soil properties should be targeted to achieve both the agronomic and environmental goals of wine grape producers. Conservation practices lead to increases in soil organic matter which may improve soil water retention, and increase soil C content therefore constituting a potential avenue to adapt to droughts and sequester C. Well-known management practices such as the use of cover crops, compost or no-till, although effective, seem to result in highly variable outcomes in soil organic matter and other soil health indicators. This variability is likely associated to the application of the practices in different soils and climates. Thus, integration of soil health building practices needs a thorough understanding of their efficacy under different conditions. Furthermore, additions of soil organic matter could trigger emissions of CO2 and N2O, a potent greenhouse gas that could represent a potential tradeoff of soil conservation practices. Finally, nutrient and water availability may be affected by the increase in soil organic matter having consequences for vine balance and grape quality.

Méthode et outils de valorisation des terroirs en cave coopérative

Depuis le début des années 90, les vignerons des Caves Coopératives de l’Appellation “Côtes du Rhône” se sont penchés, au sein des structures de réflexion du Syndicat Général, sur deux axes de réflexion:
– Détermination des critères de sélection et de rémunération différenciée des apports de vendange;
– Organisation des sélections de vendanges sur la base des terroirs afin d’augmenter quantitativement le potentiel de sélection au sein de l’unité de production.

Characterization of vineyard sites for quality wine production. German experiences

The quality of grapevines measured by yield and must density in the northern part of Europe conditons can be characterized as a type of “cool climate” – vary strongly from year to year and from one production site to another. One hundred year observations in Johannisberg from 1890 to 1991 demonstrate for the yield formation a clear dependancy from the year combined with a steady increase in productivity; latter a proof of positive clonal selection efforts.