OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Aroma chemical profiles characterization of wines produced with moristel grapes harvested at different time points

Aroma chemical profiles characterization of wines produced with moristel grapes harvested at different time points

Abstract

The wine aroma is constituted by hundred of volatile chemical compounds that depend on many viticultural and oenological factors. One of the most important factors that will unequivocally affect the final wine pro-perties is the grape maturity level. Grape ripening is an extremely complex process, in which the metabolites and precursors concentrations change significantly with time. However, the knowledge of how grape ripe-ning affects wine aroma composition is still quite limited. Nowadays, wineries measure parameters such as sugar, pH, acidity and colorimetric tests to evaluate the degree of maturity of the vintage and decide the harvest data, but these analysis do not take into consideration the aromatic potential of the grape. The objective of the present work is to understand the differences in the aroma chemical profile of Moristel wines from different vineyards harvested at different time points. So, three different vineyards of Moris-tel grape variety in D.O. Somontano were selected, in two consecutive vintages: two in 2016 and one in 2017. Each block was harvested at different time points followed by microvinifications applying the same fermentation protocol. All of them have been elaborated in triplicated. This was assessed by the analysis of major aroma compounds (GC-FID), trace aroma compounds (GC-MS), methoxypyrazines (TD-GCxGC-MS), polyfunctionalmercaptans (SPE GC-MS), volatile sulfur compounds (BR-VSCs) and total acetaldehyde (HPLC-UV/VIS). The most important result is that the grapes harvested at 42 days postveraison, that is the “green” ones, pro-duce wines with high concentration of acetaldehyde and low IPT. Hence, low concentration of polyphenols facilitate the accumulation of this compound. Another reason for these acetaldehyde high concentrations could be problems associated with the lack of reduction factors (NADH or NADPH). This fact is also corroborated with the decreases of branched acid / fusel alcohol and branched ester/fu-sel alcohol ratios during the maturity. These facts can have very important sensory repercussion, the acetaldehyde and fusel alcohol are components of aroma buffer.

Finally, the evolution of certain maturity markers (c-3-hexenol, Y-nonalactona, rotundone) has been also observed, but these target compounds, by themselves, do not seem to have great sensory relevance in the final wines. This study has help to elucidate how grape maturity state contributes to final Moristel wine aroma profile and possible self-life.

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the Spanish MINECO (Project AGL2014-59840, RTC 2015-3379 and RTC-2016-4935-2) and partly co-funded by the European Union (FEDER). I.A. has re-ceived a grant from the Spanish FPU programs. Funding from D.G.A. (T53) and Fondo Social Europeo is acknowledged.

DOI:

Publication date: June 9, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Ignacio Arias, Sara Ferrero-del-Teso, María Pilar Sáenz-Navajas, Purificación Fernández-Zurbano,Blanca Lacau, Jesús Astraín, Cristina Barónv Vicente Ferreira, Ana Escudero

Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y el Vino (ICVV) (Universidad de La Rioja-CSIC-Gobierno de La Rioja), Carre-tera de Burgos Km. 6, Finca La Grajera, 26007 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
Laboratorio de análisis del aroma y enología (LAAE). Department of Analytical Chemistry, Universidad de Zaragoza, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2) (UNIZAR-CITA). Calle Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza

Contact the author

Keywords

Wine aroma, maturity, acetaldehyde, reduction factors

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

VineyardFACE: Investigation of a moderate (+20%) increase of ambient CO2 level on berry ripening dynamics and fruit composition

Climate change and rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is a concern for agriculture, including viticulture. Studies on elevated carbon dioxide have already been on grapevines, mainly taking place in greenhouses using potted plants or using field grown vines under higher CO2 enrichment, i.e. >650 ppm. The VineyardFACE, located at Hochschule Geisenheim University, is an open field Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experimental set-up designed to study the effects of elevated carbon dioxide using field grown vines (Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon). As the carbon dioxide fumigation started in 2014, the long term effects of elevated carbon dioxide treatment can be investigated on berry ripening parameters and fruit metabolic composition.
The present study aims to investigate the effect on fruit composition under a moderate increase (+20%; eCO2) of carbon dioxide concentration, as predicted for 2050 on both Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon. Berry composition was determined for primary (sugars, organic acids, amino acids) and secondary metabolites (anthocyanins). Special focus was given on monitoring of berry diameter and ripening rates throughout three growing seasons. Compared to previous results of the early adaptative phase of the vines [1], our results show little effect of eCO2 treatment on primary metabolites composition in berries. However, total anthocyanins concentration in berry skin was lower for eCO2 treatment in 2020, although the ratio between anthocyanins derivatives did not differ.
[1] Wohlfahrt Y., Tittmann S., Schmidt D., Rauhut D., Honermeier B., Stoll M. (2020) The effect of elevated CO2 on berry development and bunch structure of Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon. Applied Science Basel 10: 2486

Bioclimatic shifts and land use options for Viticulture in Portugal

Land use, plays a relevant role in the climatic system. It endows means for agriculture practices thus contributing to the food supply. Since climate and land are closely intertwined through multiple interface processes, climate change may lead to significant impacts in land use. In this study, 1-km observational gridded datasets are used to assess changes in the Köppen–Geiger and Worldwide Bioclimatic (WBCS)

Influence of grapevine rootstock/scion combination on rhizosphere and root endophytic microbiomes

Soil is a reservoir of microorganisms playing important roles in biogeochemical cycles and interacting with plants whether in the rhizosphere or in the root endosphere. The composition of the microbial communities thus impacts the plant health. Rhizodeposits (such as sugar, organic and amino acids, secondary metabolites, dead root cells …) are released by the roots and influence the communities of rhizospheric microorganisms, acting as signaling compounds or carbon sources for microbes. The composition of root exudates varies depending on several factors including genotypes. As most of the cultivated grapevines worldwide are grafted plants, the aim of this study was to explore the influence of rootstock and scion genotypes on the microbial communities of the rhizosphere and the root endosphere. The work was conducted in the GreffAdapt plot (55 rootstocks x 5 scions), in which the 275 combinations have been planted into 3 blocks designed according to the soil resistivity. Samples of roots and rhizosphere of 10 scion x rootstock combinations were first collected in May among the blocks 2 and 3. The quantities of bacteria, fungi and archaea have been assessed in the rhizosphere by quantitative PCR, and by cultivable methods for bacteria and fungi. The communities of bacteria, fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was analyzed by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene, ITS and 28S rRNA gene, respectively. The level of mycorrhization was also evaluated using black ink coloration of newly formed roots harvested in October. The level of bacteria, fungi and archaea was dependent on rootstock and scion genotypes. A block effect was observed, suggesting that the soil characteristics strongly influenced the microorganisms from the rhizosphere and root endosphere. High-throughput sequencing of the different target genes showed different communities of bacteria, fungi and AMF associated with the scion x rootstock combinations. Finally, all the combinations were naturally mycorrhized. The root mycorrhization intensity was influenced by the rootstock genotype, but not by the scion one. Altogether, these results suggest that both rootstock and scion genotypes influence the rhizosphere and root endophytic microbiomes. It would be interesting to analyze the biochemical composition of the rhizodeposition of these genotypes for a better understanding of the processes involved in the modulation of these microbiomes. Moreover, crossing our data with the plant agronomic characteristics could provide insights into their roles on plant fitness.

Variety and climatic effects on quality scores in the Western US winegrowing regions

Wine quality is strongly linked to climate. Quality scores are often driven by climate variation across different winegrowing regions and years, but also influenced by other aspects of terroir, including variety. While recent work has looked at the relationship between quality scores and climate across many European regions, less work has examined New World winegrowing regions. Here we used scores from three major rating systems (Wine Advocate, Wine Enthusiast and Wine Spectator) combined with daily climate and phenology data to understand what drives variation across wine quality scores in major regions of the Western US, including regions in California, Oregon and Washington. We examined effects of variety, region, and in what phenological period climate was most predictive of quality. As in other studies, we found climate, based mainly on growing degree day (GDD) models, was generally associated with quality—with higher GDD associated with higher scores—but variety and region also had strong effects. Effects of region were generally stronger than variety. Certain varieties received the highest scores in only some areas, while other varieties (e.g., Merlot) generally scored lower across regions. Across phenological stages, GDD during budbreak was often most strongly associated with quality. Our results support other studies that warmer periods generally drive high quality wines, but highlight how much region and variety drive variation in scores outside of climate.

Grapevine yield estimation in a context of climate change: the GraY model

Grapevine yield is a key indicator to assess the impacts of climate change and the relevance of adaptation strategies in a vineyard landscape. At this scale, a yield model should use a number of parameters and input data in relation to the information available and be able to reproduce vineyard management decisions (e.g. soil and canopy management, irrigation). In this study, we used data from six experimental sites in Southern France (cv. Syrah) to calibrate a model of grapevine yield limited by water constraint (GraY). Each yield component (bud fertility, number of berries per bunch, berry weight) was calculated as a function of the soil water availability simulated by the WaLIS water balance model at critical phenological phases. The model was then evaluated in 10 grapegrowers’ plots, covering a diversity of biophysical and technical contexts (soil type, canopy size, irrigation, cover crop). We identified three critical periods for yield formation: after flowering on the previous year for the number of bunches and berries, around pre-veraison and post-veraison of the same year for mean berry weight. Yields were simulated with a model efficiency (EF) of 0.62 (NRMSE = 0.28). Bud fertility and number of berries per bunch were more accurately simulated (EF = 0.90 and 0.77, NRMSE = 0.06 and 0.10, respectively) than berry weight (EF = -0.31, NRMSE = 0.17). Model efficiency on the on-farm plots reached 0.71 (NRMSE = 0.37) simulating yields from 1 to 8 kg/plant. The GraY model is an original model estimating grapevine yield evolution on the basis of water availability under future climatic conditions.  It allows to evaluate the effects of various adaptation levers such as planting density, cover crop management, fruit/leaf ratio, shading and irrigation, in various production contexts.