OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Aroma chemical profiles characterization of wines produced with moristel grapes harvested at different time points

Aroma chemical profiles characterization of wines produced with moristel grapes harvested at different time points

Abstract

The wine aroma is constituted by hundred of volatile chemical compounds that depend on many viticultural and oenological factors. One of the most important factors that will unequivocally affect the final wine pro-perties is the grape maturity level. Grape ripening is an extremely complex process, in which the metabolites and precursors concentrations change significantly with time. However, the knowledge of how grape ripe-ning affects wine aroma composition is still quite limited. Nowadays, wineries measure parameters such as sugar, pH, acidity and colorimetric tests to evaluate the degree of maturity of the vintage and decide the harvest data, but these analysis do not take into consideration the aromatic potential of the grape. The objective of the present work is to understand the differences in the aroma chemical profile of Moristel wines from different vineyards harvested at different time points. So, three different vineyards of Moris-tel grape variety in D.O. Somontano were selected, in two consecutive vintages: two in 2016 and one in 2017. Each block was harvested at different time points followed by microvinifications applying the same fermentation protocol. All of them have been elaborated in triplicated. This was assessed by the analysis of major aroma compounds (GC-FID), trace aroma compounds (GC-MS), methoxypyrazines (TD-GCxGC-MS), polyfunctionalmercaptans (SPE GC-MS), volatile sulfur compounds (BR-VSCs) and total acetaldehyde (HPLC-UV/VIS). The most important result is that the grapes harvested at 42 days postveraison, that is the “green” ones, pro-duce wines with high concentration of acetaldehyde and low IPT. Hence, low concentration of polyphenols facilitate the accumulation of this compound. Another reason for these acetaldehyde high concentrations could be problems associated with the lack of reduction factors (NADH or NADPH). This fact is also corroborated with the decreases of branched acid / fusel alcohol and branched ester/fu-sel alcohol ratios during the maturity. These facts can have very important sensory repercussion, the acetaldehyde and fusel alcohol are components of aroma buffer.

Finally, the evolution of certain maturity markers (c-3-hexenol, Y-nonalactona, rotundone) has been also observed, but these target compounds, by themselves, do not seem to have great sensory relevance in the final wines. This study has help to elucidate how grape maturity state contributes to final Moristel wine aroma profile and possible self-life.

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the Spanish MINECO (Project AGL2014-59840, RTC 2015-3379 and RTC-2016-4935-2) and partly co-funded by the European Union (FEDER). I.A. has re-ceived a grant from the Spanish FPU programs. Funding from D.G.A. (T53) and Fondo Social Europeo is acknowledged.

DOI:

Publication date: June 9, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Ignacio Arias, Sara Ferrero-del-Teso, María Pilar Sáenz-Navajas, Purificación Fernández-Zurbano,Blanca Lacau, Jesús Astraín, Cristina Barónv Vicente Ferreira, Ana Escudero

Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y el Vino (ICVV) (Universidad de La Rioja-CSIC-Gobierno de La Rioja), Carre-tera de Burgos Km. 6, Finca La Grajera, 26007 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
Laboratorio de análisis del aroma y enología (LAAE). Department of Analytical Chemistry, Universidad de Zaragoza, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2) (UNIZAR-CITA). Calle Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza

Contact the author

Keywords

Wine aroma, maturity, acetaldehyde, reduction factors

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

Mapping and tracking canopy size with VitiCanopy

Understanding vineyard variability to target management strategies, apply inputs efficiently and deliver consistent grape quality to the winery is essential. However, despite inherent vineyard variability, the majority are managed as if they are uniform. VitiCanopy is a simple, grower-friendly tool for precision/digital viticulture that allows users to collect and interpret objective spatial information about vineyard performance. After four years of field and market research, an upgraded VitiCanopy has been created to achieve a more streamlined, technology-assisted vine monitoring tool that provides users with a set of superior new features, which could significantly improve the way users monitor their grapevines. These new features include:
• New user interface
• User authentication
• Batch analysis of multiple images
• Ease the learning curve through enhanced help features
• Reporting via the creation of colour maps that will allow users to assess the spatial differences in canopies within a vineyard.
Use-case examples are presented to demonstrate the quantification and mapping of vineyard variability through objective canopy measurements, ground-truthing of remotely sensed measurements, monitoring of crop conditions, implementation of disease and water management decisions as well as creating a history of each site to forecast quality. This intelligent tool allows users to manage grapevines and make informed management choices to achieve the desired production targets and remain profitable.

Biodiversity in the vineyard agroecosystem: exploring systemic approaches

Biodiversity conservation and restoration are essential for guarantee the provision of ecosystem services associated to vineyard agroecosystem such as climate regulation trough carbon sequestration and control of pests and diseases. Most of published research dealing with the complexity of the vineyard agroecosystems emphasizes the necessity of innovative approaches, including the integration of information at different temporal and spatial scales and development of systemic analysis based on modelling. A biodiversity survey was conducted in the Franciacorta wine-growing area (Lombardy, Italy), one of the most important Italian wine-growing regions for sparkling wine production, considering a portion of the territory of 112 ha. The area was divided into several Environmental Units (EUs), defined as a whole vineyard or portion of vineyard homogenous in terms of four agronomic characteristics: planting year, planting density, cultivar, and training system. In each EU a set of compartments was identified and characterised by specific variables. The compartments are meteorology, morphology (altitude, slope, aspect, row orientation, and solar irradiance), ecological infrastructures and management. The landscape surrounding EU was also characterised in terms of land-use in a buffer zone of 500 m. For each component a specific methodology was identified and applied. Different statistical approaches were used to evaluate the method to integrate the information related to different compartments within the EU and related to the buffer zone. These approaches were also preliminarily evaluated for their ability to describe the contribution of biodiversity and landscape components to ecosystem services. This methodological exploration provides useful indication for the development of a fully systemic approach to structural and functional biodiversity in vineyard agroecosystems, contributing to promote a multifunctional perspective for the all wine-growing sector.

Impact of climate change on the viticultural climate of the Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (SE Spain)

Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (PDO Jumilla) is located in the Spanish provinces of Albacete and Murcia, in the South-eastern part of the Iberian Peninsula, where most of the models predict a severe impact of climate change in next decades. PDO Jumilla covers an area of 247,054 hectares, of which more than 22,000 hectares

How can historical cultivars mitigate the effects of climate change?

IFV, INRAe and the national network “Partenaires de la Sélection Vigne” representing 37 organizations from the different wine regions, have been working increasingly closely over the last 2 decades towards the preservation of the French varietal patrimony. There are approximately 600 patrimonial varieties according to INRAe and SupAgro Montpellier experts, including ancient cultivars (400) and intravarietal crossbreeds obtained since the 19th century. In the context of a drastic reduction in such varieties from the mid 1980’s in favor of mainstream varieties, it was essential to carry out an inventory of old vines and vineyards. INRAe Vassal collection plays a key role here as it holds the largest diversity available, along with a rich bibliography and herbariums, offering us the opportunity to document and double check the identity of a cultivar, consolidating the expertise of ampelographers. The work is carried out in several stages, from verifying the existence of a variety in a small region, through to rehabilitation. During this session, the authors present the process that leads to the official registration of a variety. After this, IFV selection center takes over to initiate the process of selection and propagation. A specific focus within regions such as the Alps, Champagne and the South-West will provide details of the full procedure. Bia, Bouysselet, Chardonnay rose, Mecle and the aptly named Tardif, are some of the cultivars that have followed this procedure. Furthermore, a recent regulation established by INAO on “varieties of interest for adaptation purposes” might boost uptake by growers. Since 2006, 36 historical cultivars have been registered. Most of these have been neglected in the past due to late maturity, lack of sugar and high titratable acidity at harvest time. Such characteristics are today considered as positive qualities, not only in mitigation of the effects of climate change, but also as an opportunity for restoring diversity…

Phenolic composition of Tempranillo Blanco grapes changes after foliar application of urea

Our research aimed to determine the effect and efficiency of foliar application of urea on the phenolic composition of Tempranillo Blanco grapes. The field experiment was carried out in 2019 and 2020 seasons and the plot was located in D.O.Ca Rioja (North of Spain). The vineyard was Vitis vinifera L. Tempranillo Blanco and grafted on Richter-110 rootstock. The treatments were control (C), whose plants were sprayed with water and three doses of urea: plants were sprayed with urea 3 kg N/ha (U3), 6 kg N/ha (U6) and 9 kg N/ha (U9). The applications were performed in two phenological stages, pre-veraison (Pre) and veraison (Ver). Also, each of the treatments was repeated one week later. Control and treatments were performed in triplicate and arranged in a randomised block design. Grapes were harvested at optimum ripening stage. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to analyse the phenolic composition of the grapes. Finally, the results obtained from the analytical determinations – flavonols, flavanols and non-flavonoid (hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids and stilbenes) – were studied statistically by analysis of variance. The results showed that, in 2019, U6-Pre and U9-Pre treatments increased the hydroxybenzoic acid content in grapes, and also all foliar treatments applied at Pre enhanced the stilbene concentration. Moreover, U3-Ver was the only treatment that rose flavonol and stilbene contents in the Tempranillo Blanco grapes. In 2020, all treatments applied at Pre enhanced the flavonol concentration in grapes. Furthermore, U3-Pre and U9-Pre treatments increased stilbene content in grapes. Nevertheless, the hydroxybenzoic acid content was improved by U6-Ver and U9-Ver and besides, hydroxycinnamic acid concentration in grapes was increased by all treatments applied at Ver. In conclusion, the lower and highest dose of urea (U3 and U9), applied at pre-veraison, were the best treatments to improve the Tempranillo Blanco grape phenolic composition.