GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Diffuse light due to wildfire smoke enhances gas exchange of shaded leaves

Diffuse light due to wildfire smoke enhances gas exchange of shaded leaves

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – The risk of wildfires is increasing as the frequency and severity of drought and heat waves continue to rise. Wildfires are associated with the combustion of plant materials and emit smoke. In the atmosphere, smoke may spread readily across large areas. Smoke is composed of solid and liquid phase particulates and gases and has been identified as a causal agent of “smoke taint” in wine. On a smoky day, the intensity of direct light decreases because these particulates scatter sunlight. Even though this effect is frequently assumed to decrease plant photosynthesis, this assumption ignores the potential changes in diffuse light and may be based on scant evidence. This study compared leaf gas exchange on the sunny and shaded sides of a grapevine canopy during a very smoky, and thus hazy, day.

Material and methods – Five own-rooted Cabernet Sauvignon vines were used in a north-south oriented vineyard row in warm and arid eastern Washington during wildfire events in North America. Vines were drip-irrigated, spur-pruned, and trained to a loose vertical shoot-positioning system. Leaves at a height of 1.5 m were sampled on both sides of the canopy. Leaf temperature, light intensity, stomatal conductance, and gas exchange were measured with a portable infrared gas analyzer on 9 August 2018, in the afternoon about 4:00 PM. The diffuse light was estimated by blocking the direct light to the quantum sensor facing the sun.

Results – Diffuse light accounted for 40% of the incoming light. On the sun-exposed west side of the canopy, the light intensity in the afternoon was 1000 µmol m-2 s-1, while on the east side the light intensity was slightly above 100 µmol m-2 s-1. Leaves on the west-facing side of the canopy were 2°C warmer than leaves on the other side, and the former also had higher photosynthesis and transpiration rates, but leaves on both sides had the same stomatal conductance. Only receiving 10% sunlight, the shaded leaves maintained positive net carbon assimilation and had photosynthesis rates of 25% compared to the fully exposed leaves. While the leaves on the west side transpired at a rate of 7.6 mmol m-2 s-1, their counterparts on the east side maintained a rate of 6.1 mmol m-2 s-1.Therefore, the water use efficiency (WUE) was 27% lower for the east-facing canopy than for the opposite side. These results indicate leaves on the sunny side still received light at saturation level and leaves on the shaded side may provide surplus photosynthates on a smoky day. Further, in a well-watered vineyard, shaded leaves open their stomata once there is enough sunlight for photosynthesis even if the leaves are operating at lower WUE.

DOI:

Publication date: September 18, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Ben-Min CHANG1, Markus KELLER1*

Washington State University-Irrigated Agriculture Research & Extension Center, 24106 N. Bunn Rd., Prosser, Washington, USA

Contact the author

Keywords

photosynthesis, transpiration, stomata conductance, water use efficiency, light intensity

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Bioclimatic shifts and land use options for Viticulture in Portugal

Land use, plays a relevant role in the climatic system. It endows means for agriculture practices thus contributing to the food supply. Since climate and land are closely intertwined through multiple interface processes, climate change may lead to significant impacts in land use. In this study, 1-km observational gridded datasets are used to assess changes in the Köppen–Geiger and Worldwide Bioclimatic (WBCS)

Influence of weather and climatic conditions on the viticultural production in Croatia

The research includes an analysis of the impact of weather conditions on phenological development of the vine and grape quality, through monitoring of four experimental cultivars (Chardonnay, Graševina, Merlot and Plavac mali) over two production years. In each experimental vineyard, which were evenly distributed throughout the regions of Slavonia and The Croatian Danube, Croatian Uplands,

Sustaining wine identity through intra-varietal diversification

With contemporary climate change, cultivated Vitis vinifera L. is at risk as climate is a critical component in defining ecologically fitted plant materiel. While winegrowers can draw on the rich diversity among grapevine varieties to limit expected impacts (Morales-Castilla et al., 2020), replacing a signature variety that has created a sense of local distinctiveness may lead to several challenges. In order to sustain wine identity in uncertain climate outcomes, the study of intra-varietal diversity is important to reflect the adaptive and evolutionary potential of current cultivated varieties. The aim of this ongoing study is to understand to what extent can intra-varietal diversity be a climate change adaptation solution. With a focus on early (Sauvignon blanc, Riesling, Grolleau, Pinot noir) to moderate late (Chenin, Petit Verdot, Cabernet franc) ripening varieties, data was collected for flowering and veraison for the various studied accessions (from conservatory plots) and clones. For these phenological growing stages, heat requirements were established using nearby weather stations (adapted from the GFV model, Parker et al., 2013) and model performances were verified. Climate change projections were then integrated to predict the future behaviour of the intra-varietal diversity. Study findings highlight the strong phenotypic diversity of studied varieties and the importance of diversification to enhance climate change resilience. While model performances may require improvements, this study is the first step towards quantifying heat requirements of different clones and how they can provide adaptation solutions for winegrowers to sustain local wine identity in a global changing climate. As genetic diversity is an ongoing process through point mutations and epigenetic adaptations, perspective work is to explore clonal data from a wide variety of geographic locations.

Climate ethnography and wine environmental futures

Globalisation and climate change have radically transformed world wine production upsetting the established order of wine ecologies. Ecological risks and the future of traditional agricultural systems are widely debated in anthropology, but very little is understood of the particular challenges posed by climate change to viticulture which is seen by many as the canary in the coalmine of global agriculture. Moreover, wine as a globalised embedded commodity provides a particularly telling example for the study of climate change having already attracted early scientific attention. Studies of climate change in viticulture have focused primarily on the production of systematic models of adaptation and vulnerability, while the human and cultural factors, which are key to adaptation and sustainable futures, are largely missing. Climate experts have been unanimous in recognising the urgent need for a better understanding of the complex dynamics that shape how climate change is experienced and responded to by human systems. Yet this call has not yet been addressed. Climate ethnography, coined by the anthropologist Susan Crate (2011), aims to bridge this growing disjuncture between climate science and everyday life through the exploration of the social meaning of climate change. It seeks to investigate the confrontation of its social salience in different locations and under different environmental guises (Goodman 2018: 340). By understanding how wine producers make sense of the world (and the environment) and act in it, it proposes to focus on the co-production of interdisciplinary knowledge by identifying and foreshadowing problems (Goodman 2018: 342; Goodman & Marshall 2018). It seeks to offer an original, transformative and contrasted perspective to climate change scenarios by investigating human agency -individual or collective- in all its social, political and cultural diversity. An anthropological approach founded on detailed ethnographies of wine production is ideally placed to address economic, social and cultural disruptions caused by the emergence of these new environmental challenges. Indeed, the community of experts in environmental change have recently called for research that will encompass the human dimension and for more broad-based, integrated through interdisciplinarity, useful knowledge (Castree & al 2014). My paper seeks to engage with climate ethnography and discuss what it brings to the study of wine environmental futures while exploring the limitations of the anthropological environmental approach.

Impact of yeast derivatives to increase the phenolic maturity and aroma intensity of wine

Using viticultural and enological techniques to increase aromatics in white wine is a prized yet challenging technique for commercial wine producers. Equally difficult are challenges encountered in hastening phenolic maturity and thereby increasing color intensity in red wines. The ability to alter organoleptic and visual properties of wines plays a decisive role in vintages in which grapes are not able to reach full maturity, which is seen increasingly more often as a result of climate change. A new, yeast-based product on the viticultural market may give the opportunity to increase sensory properties of finished wines. Manufacturer packaging claims these yeast derivatives intensify wine aromas of white grape varieties, as well as improve phenolic ripeness of red varieties, but the effects of this application have been little researched until now. The current study applied the yeast derivative, according to the manufacture’s instructions, to the leaves of both neutral and aromatic white wine varieties, as well as on structured red wine varieties. Chemical parameters and volatile aromatics were analyzed in grape musts and finished wines, and all wines were subjected to sensory analysis by a tasting panel. Collective results of all analyses showed that the application of the yeast derivative in the vineyard showed no effect across all varieties examined, and did not intensify white wine aromatics, nor improve phenolic ripeness and color intensity in red wine.