GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Effect of rootstock and preplant fumigation on plant parasitic nematode development in Washington wine grapes

Effect of rootstock and preplant fumigation on plant parasitic nematode development in Washington wine grapes

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – In Washington State, the majority of winegrape (Vitis vinifera) vineyards are planted to their own roots. This practice is possible due to the lack of established phylloxera populations, and is preferred due to the ease of retraining after damaging winter cold events. However, own-rooted V. vinifera is generally susceptible to most plant parasitic nematodes that attack grape. In Washington State, management of nematodes is dominated by preplant soil fumigation. One practice that may mitigate economic loss due to nematodes is the adoption of nematode-“resistant” rootstocks. There is little information on the performance of most rootstocks against northern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne hapla), the main plant-parasitic nematode species in the state, and even less information on dual performance against dagger nematode (Xiphinema sp.).

Material and methods – Partnering with a commercial vineyard, we established a 3 hectare, long-term trial evaluating currently-available rootstocks in 2015, with the intent to continue the trial through vineyard establishment to vineyard production maturity (until 2025). This vineyard was undergoing replanting after 20+ years of production in own-rooted V. vinifera ‘Chardonnay’; the intent of the replant was to maintain vineyard infrastructure, but to manage for plant parasitic nematodes. The rootstocks being evaluated are: 101-14 Mtg, 1103 P, Harmony, Teleki 5C, an own-rooted control, and a self-grafted control. The scion is Chardonnay. All vines were certified through the Washington State Department of Agriculture’s certification program. The rootstock treatments were planted in 4 replicated plots of soil treatments consisting of fumigated (metam sodium through the existing drip irrigation lines), nonfumigated, and nonfumigated inoculated with M. hapla, creating low, moderate, and high nematode pressure locations under which to evaluate rootstock performance.

Results – Preplant fumigation was only effective at reducing M. hapla population densities for the first 6 months after application, yet it reduced densities of Xiphinema for 2 growing seasons. Rootstocks were poor hosts for M. hapla relative to own-rooted V. vinifera, but all were acceptable hosts for Xiphinema sp. Several rootstocks (e.g., Harmony, 101-14, 1103 P) had greater shoot biomass at the end of year 3 (end of the establishment period) compared to own-rooted V. vinifera, indicating that longer-term impacts on vigor is likely a primary driver behind the resistance phenotype these rootstocks impart under nematode feeding pressure. The goal of this project is to understand the long-term performance of rootstocks and the impacts of nematodes on vineyard lifespan in Washington State.

DOI:

Publication date: September 26, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Michelle M. MOYER1*, Katherine EAST1, and Inga ZASADA2

1 Washington State University, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, 24106 N. Bunn Rd., Prosser, WA, USA
2 USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, 3420 NW Orchard Ave, Corvallis, OR, USA

Contact the author

Keywords

rootstock, vineyard establishment, nematodes, preplant fumigation, resistance, tolerance

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Acetaldehyde-induced condensation products in red wines affect the precipitation of salivary proteins. Will this impact astringency?

Acetaldehyde is a common component of wine. It is already formed during the fermentation being an intermediate in the production of ethanol. Moreover, it can derive from the oxidation of ethanol during the wine production and aging. In wine, concentrations of acetaldehyde range from 30 to 130 mg/L. Acetaldehyde in wine can react with many compounds such as SO2, amino acids and

Typology of wines in touch with environmental factors of terroirs and grapevine. Application to the Chinon vineyard

According to the vintage, it may be difficult for vine growers to make a decision regarding the type of wine in relation with the soils.

Analysis of the oenological potentials of different oak forests in Hungary

Like France, Hungary has many oak forests used for making barrels since many years. But if the differences between the woods of the North, the East and the South-West forests of France are well known, this is probably not the case of Hungarian forests. However taking into account the essential differences of climates and soils, differences must be significant and the general name “Hungarian oak” must not have any real meaning. We have studied precisely (determination of concentrations of volatile and non-volatile wood compounds, anatomical criteria, measurement of antioxidant capacity) of oaks collected from northeastern Hungary and others collected from the Danube valley in the northwest of the country.

Antociani ed acidi cinnamici per la caratterizzazione di vitigni in zone diverse della Toscana

The phenolic compounds (cathechins, cynnamic acids, anthocyanidins) in wines made from 6 vine-varieties (Sangiovese, Cabernet S., Nero d’Avola, Foglia Tonda, Pinot N., Mazzese) grown in 4 different pedoclimatic zones of Tuscany (Arezzo, Grosseto, Pisa and Lucca) have been analyzed by HPLC.

NACs intra-family hierarchical transcriptional regulatory network orchestrating grape berry ripening

Considering that global warming is changing berry ripening timing and progression, uncovering the molecular mechanisms and identifying key regulators governing berry ripening could provide important tools in maintaining high quality grapes and wine. NAC (NAM/ATAF/CUC) transcription factors represent an interesting family due to their key role in the developmental processes control, such as fruit-ripening-associated genes expression, and in the regulation of multiple stress responses. Between the 74 NAC family members, we selected 12 of them as putative regulators of berry ripening: NAC01, NAC03, NAC05, NAC11, NAC13, NAC17, NAC18, NAC26, NAC33, NAC37, NAC60 and NAC61.