GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Effects of severe shoot trimming at different phenological stages on the composition of Merlot grapes

Effects of severe shoot trimming at different phenological stages on the composition of Merlot grapes

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – High concentration of sugars in grapes and alcohols in wines is one of the consequences of climate change on viticulture production in several wine regions. One of the options to alleviate this potential problem is to perform severe shoot trimming of the vines to limit the production of carbohydrates. Two different studies were performed in order to investigate the effects of severe shoot trimming on the composition of Merlot grapes; in a first study severe shoot trimming was performed at three different phenological stages (at berry set, at the beginning of veraison and at the end of veraison), while in a second study two trimming treatments (standard shoot trimming and severe shoot trimming performed at the end of veraison) were combined with two shoot densities in order to evaluate the relative impact of these treatments on Merlot grape composition.

Material and methods – In a study conducted during years 2013 and 2014 severe shoot trimming (65 cm shoot height) was performed at berry set (berries 2-4 mm in diameter), at the beginning of veraison (when <5% of berries had changed color), and at the end of veraison (when >80% of berries had changed color). These treatments were compared with a standard canopy treatment (125 cm shoot height). Another study was conducted during years 2015 and 2016, where standard canopy treatment (125 cm shoot height) and severe shoot trimming at the end of veraison (65 cm shoot height) were combined with two shoot densities per vine (obtained with 35% shoot thinning vs. untreated).

Results – Severe shoot trimming at all the three investigated stages reduced sugars in grapes, although this effect was the greatest in the two veraison treatments. Severe shoot trimming at berry set and at the beginning of veraison reduced also the concentration of total anthocyanins in grapes, while severe shoot trimming at the end of veraison obtained similar values of total anthocyanins to the standard canopy treatment. Photosynthetic active radiation in the cluster zone was greater in all treatments with severe shoot trimming because of greater light penetration from the upper part of the canopy. We hypothesize that greater light penetration around clusters in combination to the intensive accumulation of anthocyanins during the first weeks of berry ripening, enabled the treatment of severe shoot trimming at the end of veraison to obtain similar values of total anthocyanins to the standard canopy treatment. No effects on yield components, titratable acidity, pH and total phenolics in berries were observed in any of these treatments. In a study where standard and severe shoot trimming were combined with two shoot densities, a consistent effect on the reduction of grape sugar concentration was achieved only with late severe shoot trimming. Higher shoot density reduced sugars in grapes only in one season, while at the same time reduced the concentration of total anthocyanins in berries.

DOI:

Publication date: September 29, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Marijan BUBOLA1*, Sanja RADEKA1, Sara ROSSI1, Tomislav PLAVŠA1, Milan OPLANIĆ1, Ádám István HEGYI2, László LAKATOS2, Kálmán Zoltán VACZY2

1 Institute of Agriculture and Tourism, Karla Huguesa 8, HR-52440 Poreč, Croatia
2 Eszterházy Károly University, Food and Wine Research Institute, Leányka utca 6, H-3300 Eger, Hungary

Contact the author

Keywords

severe shoot trimming, shoot thinning, Brix, anthocyanins, phenolics

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Climate, Viticulture, and Wine … my how things have changed!

The planet is warmer than at any time in our recorded past and increasing greenhouse emissions and persistence in the climate system means that continued warming is highly likely. Climate change has already altered the basic framework of growing grapes for wine production worldwide and will likely continue to do so for years to come. The wine sector can continue to play an important role in leading the agricultural sector in addressing climate change. From developing on…

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.

Understanding graft union formation by using metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches during the first days after grafting in grapevine

Since the arrival of Phyloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifolia) in Europe at the end of the 19th century, grafting has become essential to cultivate Vitis vinifera. Today, grafting provides not only resistance to this aphid, but it used to adapt the cultivars according to the type of soil, environment, or grape production requirements by using a panel of rootstocks. As part of vineyard decline, it is often mentioned the importance of producing quality grafted grapevine to improve vineyard longevity, but, to our knowledge, no study has been able to demonstrate that grafting has a role in this context. However, some scion/rootstock combinations are considered as incompatible due to poor graft union formation and subsequently high plant mortality soon after grafting. In a context of climate change where the creation of new cultivars and rootstocks is at the centre of research, the ability of new cultivars to be grafted is therefore essential. The early identification of graft incompatibility could allow the selection of non-viable plants before planting and would have a beneficial impact on research and development in the nursery sector. For this reason, our studies have focused on the identification of metabolic and transcriptomic markers of poor grafting success during the first days/week after grafting; we have identified some correlations between some specialized metabolites, especially stilbenes, and grafting success, as well as an accumulation of some amino acids in the incompatible combination. The study of the metabolome and the transcriptome allowed us to understand and characterise the processes involved during graft union formation.

A blueprint for managing vine physiological balance at different spatial and temporal scales in Champagne

In Champagne, the vine adaptation to different climatic and technical changes during these last 20 years can be seen through physiological balance disruptions. These disruptions emphasize the general grapevine decline. Since the 2000s, among other nitrogen stress indicators, the must nitrogen has been decreasing. The combination of restricted mineral fertilizers and herbicide use, the growing variability of spring rainfall, the increasing thermal stress as well as the soil type heterogeneity are only a few underlying factors that trigger loss of physiological balance in the vineyards. It is important to weigh and quantify the impact of these factors on the vine. In order to do so, the Comité Champagne uses two key-tools: networking and modelization. The use of quantitative and harmonized ecophysiological indicators is necessary, especially in large spatial scales such as the Champagne appellation. A working group with different professional structures of Champagne has been launched by the Comité Champagne in order to create a common ecophysiology protocol and thus monitor the vine physiology, yearly, around 100 plots, with various cultural practices and types of soil. The use of crop modelling to follow the vine physiological balance within different pedoclimatic conditions enables to understand the present balance but also predict the possible disruptions to come in future climatic scenarios. The physiological references created each year through the working group, benefit the calibration of the STICS model used in Champagne. In return, the model delivers ecophysiology indicators, on a daily scale and can be used on very different types of soils. This study will present the bottom-up method used to give accurate information on the impacts of soil, climate and cultural practices on vine physiology.