OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 OENO IVAS 9 OENO IVAS 2019 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 A tool for catching mice in wine: development and application of a method for the detection of mousy off-flavour compounds in wine

A tool for catching mice in wine: development and application of a method for the detection of mousy off-flavour compounds in wine

Abstract

Over the past two years, the AWRI has received 69 wine samples suspected of being affected by mousy off-flavour. The character has been mostly observed in white wines. Possible reasons for this could be the increased use of white winemaking techniques such as high grape solids ferments and extended lees ageing to add textural components to white wine, and higher pH, lower sulfur dioxide and minimal clarification or filtration practices. 

Mousy character is an off-flavour in wine that has been described as similar to the smell of caged mice. Although generally infrequent, its detrimental effect on wine quality can cause economic loss to wine producers and, in severe cases, can render wine unpalatable. Mousy off-flavour is a unique wine fault which, due to its chemical nature in wine pH, is rarely perceived by aroma but instead is detected retronasally after affected wine is swallowed or expectorated. There is a wide variation in the ability or sensitivity of individuals to perceive this character, with some tasters unable to perceive it at all. This creates problems for wine producers if they do not have the ability to detect the character during production and therefore do not take remedial action. 

The compounds responsible for this off-flavour in wine reportedly include 2-acetyltetrahydropyridine (ACTPY), 2-acetylpyrroline (ACPY), 2-acetylpyridine (AP) and 2-ethyltetrahydropyridine (ETPY). However, the contribution and importance of these individual compounds to mousiness in spoiled wines has not been demonstrated. The unavailability of a practical and reliable method for the detection and quantification of mousy-related compounds in wine has impeded objective measurement of mousy-affected wines and further research in preventing or reducing the occurrence of this fault in wine. 

The authors have recently developed a HPLC-MS method for the quantitation of ACTPY, ACPY and AP in wine. The method is simple and rapid and requires only filtration and basification for sample preparation. The analytical run time is approximately 17 minutes for one sample. Precision and accuracy tests confirm that the method is highly reliable and robust. The AWRI has implemented the developed method as a tool for the investigation of wines suspected of being affected by mousiness. A description of the method development and its application to off-flavour investigations will be presented and discussed.

DOI:

Publication date: June 10, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Yoji Hayasaka, Geoff Cowey, Adrian Coulter

The Australian Wine Research Institute, Hartley Grove cnr Paratoo Road, Urrbrae, South Australia 5064, Australia

Contact the author

Keywords

Off-flavour, Mousiness, HPLC-MS, Wine fault 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

The potential of some native varieties of Argentina for the production of sparkling wines. Effect of lees contact time 

Grapevine varieties from South-America, commonly known as criollas, originated because of the natural crossbreeding of grapevine varieties brought by the Spaniards. The objective of this work was to evaluate the potential of some varieties to produce sparkling wines considering the effect of lees contact time. The following varieties were used: Moscatel Rosado, Criolla Chica, Pedro Gimenez, Blanca Oval, Canelón, and the European variety Chardonnay (control), planted in the ampelographic collection of EEA Mendoza INTA (Argentina). Pilot-scale vinifications were carried out to obtain the base wines, in 20 L glass containers. The second fermentation was performed through the traditional method.

Accelerated circadian cycles of photoperiod favor photosynthetic efficiency and growth in grapevine

Climate change presents a challenge for agriculture worldwide. Yet, crop productivity is negatively impacted by abiotic hazards such as high temperatures and water deficit.

Caractérisation du terroir en Espagne : méthodologie de l’évaluation et de la validation

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in characterizing the ecological environment of vineyard production, and the growing need to delimit and characterize with precision the different homogeneous viticultural units. This has allowed the development of new studies which have as their objective the Vineyard Zoning. The delimitation and characterization of wine-growing areas poses specific problems in Spain, not only linked to the specific characteristics of the territory, but also to the size, distribution and index of viticultural occupation in the designations of origin.

Chitosan from sustainable source: antimicrobial activity against undesirable yeasts for production of low-sulphite wine

The addition of sulphur dioxide (SO2) is the method traditionally used for wine stabilisation, due to its broad spectrum of action against unwanted microorganisms and its ability to prevent oxidative phenomena.

Late frost protection in Champagne

Probably one of the most counterintuitive impacts of climate change on vine is the increased frequency of late frost. Champagne, due to its septentrional position is historically and regularly affected by this meteorological hazard. Champagne has therefore developed a strong experience in frost protection with first experiments dating from the end of 19th century. Frost protection can be divided in two parts: passive and active. Passive protection includes all the methods that do not seek to modify the vine’s environment or resistance at the time of frost. The most iconic passive protection in Champagne is the establishment of the individual reserve. This reserve allows to stock a certain quantity of clear wine during a surplus year to compensate a meteorological hazard like frost during the following years. Other common passive methods are the control of planting area (walls, bushes, topography), the choice of grape variety, late pruning, or the impact of grass cover and tillage. Active frost protection is also divided in two parts. Most of the existing techniques tend to modify vine’s environment. Most of the time they provide warmth (candles, heaters, windmills, heating cables…), or stabilise bud’s temperature above a lethal threshold (water sprinkling). The other way to actively fight is to enhance the resistance of buds to frost (elicitors). The Comité Champagne evaluates frost protection methods following three main axes: the efficiency, the profitability, and the environmental impact through a lifecycle assessment. This study will present the results on both passive and active protection following these three axes.