GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2019 9 Climate change 9 Sustaining grape production under challenging climate change circumstances

Sustaining grape production under challenging climate change circumstances

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study ‐ Grapevines are an important economic crop grown in temperate climates of both hemispheres characterized by short‐term heat spells and heat waves due to the distinct th st seasonality. However, these events have worsened during the late 20 and early 21 centuries due to accelerated climate change and is expected to exacerbate with even more intensity and frequency in the foreseeable future. This unprecedented speed in climate change has spawned major scientific and viticultural challenges as grape berries particularly exhibit high sensitivities to heat waves during ripening, the key phenophase determining fruit quality, time of harvest, and eventually the economic viability of wine industry. Given that the projections of worsening heat wave events are an immediate concern to the high socio‐economic value of grapes, it is imperative that heat stress be curbed to ensure sustainability of grape production in a challenging environment. Therefore, the objective of this study was to mitigate the impact of heat waves by understanding the response of different grapevine cultivars to heat stress and various protective measures.

Material and methods – The experiment was conducted with field‐grown own‐rooted red and white cultivars. Individual clusters of these cultivars were enclosed using white paper bags and cheese cloth before veraison. Close to harvest, enclosed clusters as well as clusters that developed under ambient growing conditions (heat waves) were sampled and analyzed for primary and secondary metabolites.

Results – The berries of exposed clusters developed typical symptoms of sunburn, which included loss of crystalline structure of epicuticular wax resulting in a shiny surface. Such morphology was due to degradation and transitioning of wax platelets into amorphous masses creating a rough surface with poor development of color. However, the quercetin levels were higher than the enclosed clusters. The juice composition entailing Brix, pH, titratable acidity, content of malic and tartaric acids, sugars, and the levels of predominant mineral nutrient potassium, were compromised in sunburned berries. Furthermore, the response of various secondary metabolites such as tannins, polymeric anthocyanins, methoxypyrazines, guaiacal, and 4‐methylguaiacal varied among exposed (sunburn) and enclosed (protected by bags and cheese cloth) berries. Overall, the enclosed clusters developed with better fruit quality attributes suggesting that cluster enclosure could be an effective strategy to mitigate the ill effects of heat waves

DOI:

Publication date: June 19, 2020

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Bhaskar BONDADA

Washington State University, Richland, WA 99354, USA

Contact the author

Keywords

 Climate change, Heat wave, Phenolics, Sugars, Sunburn

Tags

GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Intelligent article to control the internal pressure in continue in bottles

An intelligent packaging might, among others, provide information and allow monitoring of the quality of the packed product or its surrounding environment. A recent project on micro-flow wine bottles closed with aluminium screw cap and tightness liner, highlighted the importance of monitoring the internal overpressure continuously, in real-time and at least for 72 hours, since the internal pressure on the tightness liner and the micro-flow are related. Real-time and continuous measurements are not the standard methods of measurement of the overpressure, yet. The most used equipment for the determination of the pressure in wine bottle is the aphrometer, a destructive device that supplies a single value of pressure.

Inert gases persistence in wine storage tank blanketing

It is common to find tanks in the winery with wine below their capacity due to wine transfers between tanks of different capacities or the interruption of operations for periods of a few days. This situation implies the existence of an ullage space in the tank with prolonged contact with the wine causing its absorption/oxidation. Oxygen uptake from the air headspace over the wine due to differences in the partial pressure of O2 can be rapid, up to 1.5 mL of O2 per liter of wine in one hour and 100 cm2 of surface area1 and up to saturation after 4 hours.

Delimitation of Saint-Bris AOC: example of reasonning delimitation criteria from production customs

La définition de l’Appellation d’Origine précise que les caractères du produit doivent être dus au milieu géographique, celui-ci intégrant des facteurs naturels et humains.

Organic volatile compounds as suitable markers of grapevine response to defense elicitors in the vineyard

In greenhouse, emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC) by grapevine leaves has already been reported in response to the defence elicitor sulfated laminarin (PS3) [1]. In order to check that this response was not specific to PS3, experiments were conducted on Vitis cv Marselan plantlets with several other elicitors of different chemical structures: i.e. Bastid® (COS-OGA),

Additives od aids? Evaluation of aroma compounds release from oenological tannins of different botanical origins.

Oenological tannins are products extracted from various botanical sources, such as mimosa,
acacia, oak gall, quebracho, chestnut and tara. The polyphenolic component is obtained through a solid-liquid extraction also using specific solvents, then removed by evaporation or freeze-drying. Tannins are employed in two phases of winemaking, during the pre-fermentative phase or during fining with different purposes such as modulate antioxidant activity, colour stabilization, bacteriostatic activity, protein stabilization and modulation of sensory properties. To date, the current regulatory framework is not very clear. In fact, the Codex Alimentarius classifies commercial tannins as “food additives” but also as
“processing aids”. The main distinction is that “additives” have a technological function in the final food, whereas “processing aids” do not. In this sense, oenological tannins, despite the technological treatments, could contain aromatic compounds of the botanical species they belong to and release them to the wine.