terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Microbial ecosystems in wineries – molecular interactions between species and modelling of population dynamics

Microbial ecosystems in wineries – molecular interactions between species and modelling of population dynamics

Abstract

Microbial ecosystems are primary drivers of viticultural, oenological and other cellar-related processes such as wastewater treatment. Metagenomic datasets have broadly mapped the vast microbial species diversity of many of the relevant ecological niches within the broader wine environment, from vineyard soils to plants and grapes to fermentation. The data highlight that species identities and diversity significantly impact agronomic performance of vineyards as well as wine quality, but the complexity of these systems and of microbial growth dynamics has defeated attempts to offer actionable tools to guide or predict specific outcomes of ecosystem-based interventions. The application of such tools in future will depend on our understanding of the physiological and molecular drivers that govern microbial ecosystems. Here we describe several integrated approaches to characterize the molecular interactions between species within the fermentation and the waste-water ecosystem and to model the development of these ecosystems. Binary (two species) and consortia-based approaches indicate ecosystem-specific developmental patterns in these systems. On a molecular level, data strongly support that cell-wall related properties of yeast species impact the development of fermentation ecosystems during wine making and highlight the importance of physical contacts between species in these ecological processes. To model the wine yeast fermentation ecosystem, high-throughput flow cytometry-based approaches were developed, and specific models based on a machine-learning approach were developed. In winery wastewater, laboratory-based evolution of two species exposed to biotic selection pressure in a synthetic environment, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the microalga Chlorella sorokiniana, identified two specific genes involved in carbon and nitrogen catabolite repression that facilitate mutualistic behaviors between yeast and microalgae when inactive. Taken together the data suggest novel strategies for microbial ecosystem-based decision making in wine making and improved integration of natural microbial biodiversity in the process.

DOI:

Publication date: February 11, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Florian F. Bauer, Cleo Conacher, Jennifer Oosthuizen, Georgia Strydom, Evodia Setati, Rene Naidoo-Blassoples

South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY IN MONITORING THE WINE PRODUCTION

The complexity of the wine matrix makes the monitoring of the winemaking process crucial. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) along with chemometrics is considered an effective analytical tool combining good accuracy, robustness, high sample throughput, and “green character”. Portable and non-portable FTIR devices are already used by the wine industry for routine analysis. However, the analytical calibrations need to be enriched, and some others are still waiting to be thoroughly developed.

CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID RED WINE COLOR IN RELATION TO ANTHOCYANIN PROFILE AND CHEMICAL COLOR PARAMETERS

Interspecific hybrid winegrapes are of growing interest in the context of climate change based on their disease resistance and cold hardiness. In addition to a need for increased understanding of their chemical composition, there is little empirical evidence on the consumer perception of non-vinifera wine. Phenolic compounds, and particularly color, play an important organoleptic and quality determination role in wine, but can vary significantly in interspecific hybrid wines compared to wines produced from Vitis vinifera cultivars [1, 2, 3]. Anecdotally, the variation in anthocyanin species, interactions, and concentrations in interspecific hybrids could result in a variance from“vinifera-like” wine color.

HOW DO ROOTSTOCKS AFFECT CABERNET SAUVIGNON AROMATIC EXPRESSION?

Grape quality potential for wine production is strongly influenced by environmental parameters such as climate and agronomic factors such as rootstock. Several studies underline the effect of rootstock on vegetative growth of the scions [1] and on berry composition [2, 3] with an impact on wine quality. Rootstocks are promising agronomic tools for climate change adaptation and in most grape-growing regions the potential diversity of rootstocks is not fully used and only a few genotypes are planted. Little is known about the effect of rootstock genetic variability on the aromatic composition in wines; thus further investigations are needed.

AGEING BOTTLED WINES SUBMERGED IN SEA: DOES IT IMPACT WINE COMPOSITION?

Aging wines is a common practice in oenology, which in recent years has undergone some innovations. Currently, we are witnessing the practice of aging bottled wine in depth, immersed in the sea or in reservoirs, for variable periods of time, but so far, little is known about the impact of aging in depth on the physicochemical properties, of wines.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the impact of this practice on the physicochemical characteristics, in particular to verify changes in the volatile composition of wines bottled and subsequently immersed in depth. A red wine from Cabernet Sauvignon was bottled and a set of bottles were submerged from July to February (2020), another set of bottles were submerged from February to September (2020) and another set was kept in the wine cellar. Bottles from each set were analyzed (in triplicate) in July 2021.

Rootstock mediated responses of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) metabolism and physiology to combined water deficit and salinity stress in Syrah grafts

Water deficit and salinity are increasingly affecting the viticulture and wine industry. These two stresses are intimately related; understanding the physiological and metabolic responses of grapevines to water deficit, salinity and combined stress is critical for developing strategies to mitigate the nega- tive impacts of these stresses on wine grape production. These strategies can include selecting more tolerant grapevine cultivars and graft combinations, improving irrigation management, and using soil amendments to reduce the effects of salinity. For this purpose, understanding the response of grape- vine metabolism to altered water balance and salinity is of pivotal importance.