terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Microbial ecosystems in wineries – molecular interactions between species and modelling of population dynamics

Microbial ecosystems in wineries – molecular interactions between species and modelling of population dynamics

Abstract

Microbial ecosystems are primary drivers of viticultural, oenological and other cellar-related processes such as wastewater treatment. Metagenomic datasets have broadly mapped the vast microbial species diversity of many of the relevant ecological niches within the broader wine environment, from vineyard soils to plants and grapes to fermentation. The data highlight that species identities and diversity significantly impact agronomic performance of vineyards as well as wine quality, but the complexity of these systems and of microbial growth dynamics has defeated attempts to offer actionable tools to guide or predict specific outcomes of ecosystem-based interventions. The application of such tools in future will depend on our understanding of the physiological and molecular drivers that govern microbial ecosystems. Here we describe several integrated approaches to characterize the molecular interactions between species within the fermentation and the waste-water ecosystem and to model the development of these ecosystems. Binary (two species) and consortia-based approaches indicate ecosystem-specific developmental patterns in these systems. On a molecular level, data strongly support that cell-wall related properties of yeast species impact the development of fermentation ecosystems during wine making and highlight the importance of physical contacts between species in these ecological processes. To model the wine yeast fermentation ecosystem, high-throughput flow cytometry-based approaches were developed, and specific models based on a machine-learning approach were developed. In winery wastewater, laboratory-based evolution of two species exposed to biotic selection pressure in a synthetic environment, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the microalga Chlorella sorokiniana, identified two specific genes involved in carbon and nitrogen catabolite repression that facilitate mutualistic behaviors between yeast and microalgae when inactive. Taken together the data suggest novel strategies for microbial ecosystem-based decision making in wine making and improved integration of natural microbial biodiversity in the process.

DOI:

Publication date: February 11, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Florian F. Bauer, Cleo Conacher, Jennifer Oosthuizen, Georgia Strydom, Evodia Setati, Rene Naidoo-Blassoples

South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

UNEXPECTED PRODUCTION OF DMS POTENTIAL DURING ALCOOLIC FERMENTATION FROM MODEL CHAMPAGNE-LIKE MUSTS

The overall quality of aged wines is in part due to the development of complex aromas over a long period (1.) The apparition of this aromatic complexity depends on multiple chemical reactions that include the liberation of odorous compounds from non-odorous precursors. One example of this phenomenon is found in dimethyl sulphide (DMS) which, with its characteristic odor truffle, is a known contributor to the bouquet of premium aged wine bouquet (1). DMS supposedly accumulates during the ten first years of ageing thanks to the hydrolysis of its precursor dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSp.) DMSp is a possible secondary by-product from the degradation of S-methylmethionine (SMM), an amino acid iden- tified in grapes (2), which can be metabolized by yeast during alcoholic fermentation.

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: EVOLUTION IN BOTTLED WINE

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors. The impact on wine aroma is mainly attributed to volatile phenols, while in-mouth hydrolysis of glycosylated forms may be responsible for long-lasting “ashy” aftertastes (1).

OENOLOGICAL TANNINS FOR PREVENTING THE LIGHT-STRUCK TASTE IN WHITE AND ROSÉ WINES

The light exposure of wine can be detrimental as a relevant loss of aromas takes place [1] and light-induced reactions can occur. The latter involves riboflavin (RF), a photosensitive compound, that is fully reduced by acquiring two electrons. When the electron-donor is methionine, the light-struck taste (LST) can appear leading to cooked cabbage, onion and garlic odours-like [2]. The use of oenological tannins can limit the appearance of LST in both model wine [3] and white wine [4]. This research aimed to evaluate the impact of certain oenological tannins, selected in a previous study as the most effective against LST [5], in both white and rosé wines.

Searching for the sweet spot: a focus on wine dealcoholization

It is well known that the vinification of grapes at full maturation can produce rich, full-bodied wines,
with intense and complex flavour profiles. However, the juice obtained from such grapes may have very
high sugar concentration, resulting in wines with an excessive concentration of ethanol. In addition, the decoupling between technological maturity and phenolic/aromatic one due to global warming, exacerbates this problem in some wine-growing regions. In parallel with the increase of the mean alcohol content of wines on the market, also the demand for reduced alcohol beverages has increased in recent years, mainly as a result of health and social concerns about the risks related to the consumption of alcohol.

EVIDENCE OF THE INTERACTION OF ULTRASOUND AND ASPERGILLOPEPSINS I ON UNSTABLE GRAPE PROTEINS

Most of the effects of ultrasound (US) result from the collapse of bubbles due to cavitation. The shockwave produced is associated with shear forces, along with high localised temperatures and pressures. However, the high-speed stream, radical species formation, and heat generated during sonication may also affect the stability of some enzymes and proteins, depending on their chemical structure. Recently, Ce-lotti et al. (2021) reported the effects of US on protein stability in wines. To investigate this further, the effect of temperature (40°C and 70°C; 60s), sonication (20 kHz and 100 % amplitude, for 20s and 60s, leading to the same temperatures as above, respectively), in combination with Aspergillopepsins I (AP-I) supplementation (100 μg/L), was studied on unstable protein concentration (TLPs and chitinases) using HPLC with an UV–Vis detector in a TLPs-supplemented model system and in an unstable white wine.