terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 REVEALING THE ORIGIN OF BORDEAUX WINES WITH RAW 1D-CHROMATOGRAMS

REVEALING THE ORIGIN OF BORDEAUX WINES WITH RAW 1D-CHROMATOGRAMS

Abstract

Understanding the composition of wine and how it is influenced by climate or wine-making practices is a challenging issue. Two approaches are typically used to explore this issue. The first approach uses che-mical fingerprints, which require advanced tools such as high-resolution mass spectrometry and mul-tidimensional chromatography. The second approach is the targeted method, which relies on the widely available 1-D GC/MS, but involves integrating the areas under a few peaks which ends up using only a small fraction of the chromatogram.

Here, we employ state-of-the-art machine learning methods to optimize the analysis of 1-D GC/MS chromatograms. Specifically, we aim to determine whether these chromatograms contain valuable in-formation beyond the manually extracted peaks typically utilized in the targeted approach.

To explore those questions, we analyzed 4 different types of 1-D raw chromatograms (3 SIM and 1 full-scan) of 80 wines (12 vintages from 7 estates of the Bordeaux area. We first applied nonlinear dimensio-nality reduction techniques (T-SNE and UMAP) to the chromatograms to obtain 2D maps. In the resul-ting maps, wines of the same estates across multiple vintages tended to form clear clusters, whose spatial distribution reflected the geography of the Bordeaux wine region. This indicated that, for this particular set of wine, the raw chromatograms are highly informative about terroir and wine identity.

Next, we applied cross-validated classifiers to the raw chromatograms and found that we could recover perfectly well estates identity independent of vintage. By contrast, performance on vintage classifica-tion was much lower with a maximum performance of 50% correct.

Crucially, we found that the entire chromatogram is informative with respect to both of these variables. Thus, the extraction of specific peaks of the chromatogram to quantify the concentration of 32 known chemical compounds–discarding the rest of the chromatograms–led to worse classification perfor-mance, suggesting that estate identity is distributed over a large chemical spectrum, including many molecules that have yet to be identified.

In addition, the GC raw data can be used to predict the ratings of a professional wine critic (Robert Par-ker) above chance, thus suggesting that GC might also contain information about the organoleptic pro-perties of wine.

Overall, this study demonstrates the strong potential of raw chromatogram analysis for wine characte-rization and identification.

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Michael Schartner¹, Jeff M. Beck², Justine Laboyrie³, Laurent Riquier³, Stephanie Marchand3*, Alexandre Pouget4*

1. Center for the Unknown. Champalimaud Institute. Lisbon. Portugal. 
2. Duke university. USA
3. Université de Bordeaux, ISVV, INRAE, UMR 1366 OENOLOGIE, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
4. Département des neurosciences fondamentales. Université de Genève. Suisse. 

Contact the author*

Keywords

Machine learning, Wine composition, Sensorial classification, Terroir

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

INOCULATION OF THE SELECTED METSCHNIKOWIA PULCHERRIMA MP1 AS A BIOPROTECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO SULFITES TO PREVENT BROWNING OF WHITE GRAPE MUST

Enzymatic browning (BE) of must is caused by polyphenol oxidases (PPOs), tyrosinase and laccase. Both PPOs can oxidize diphenols such as hydroxycinnamic acids (HA) to quinones, which can later polymerize to form melanins [1], which are responsible of BE in white wines and of oxidasic haze in red wines. SO₂ is the main tool used to protect must from BE thanks to its capacity to inhibit PPOs [2]. However, the current trend in winemaking is to reduce and even eliminate this unfriendly additive. Among the different possible alternatives for protecting must against BE, the inoculation with a selected Metschnikowia pulcherrima MP1 is without any doubt one of the most promising ones.

EFFECTS OF BIODYNAMIC VINEYARD MANAGEMENT ON GRAPE RIPENING MECHANISMS

Biodynamic agriculture, founded in 1924 by Rudolph Steiner, is a form of organic agriculture. Through a holistic approach, biodynamic agriculture seeks to preserve the diversity of agriculture and the existing interactions between the mineral world and the different components of the organic world. Biodynamic grape production involves the use of composts, herbal teas and mineral preparations such as 500, 501 and CBMT.
Several scientific studies have provided evidence on the effects of biodynamic farming on the soil, the plant and the wine. Numerous empirical opinions of wine growers support the existence of differences brought by such a management.

EFFECT OF WHOLE BUNCH VINIFICATION ON THE ABUNDANCE OF A SWEETENING COMPOUND

In classic red wine-making process, grapes are usually destemmed between harvest and the filling of the vat. However, some winemakers choose to let all or a part of the stems in contact with the juice during vatting, this is called whole bunch vinification. For instance, this practice is traditionally used in some French wine regions, notably in Burgundy, Beaujolais and the Rhone Valley. The choice to keep this part of the grape is likely to affect the sensory properties of wine, as its gustatory perception1,2.

WINE CONSUMER TRADE-OFF BETWEEN ORGANOLEPTIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SUSTAINABLE CLAIMS. AN EXPERIMENT ON RED WINES FROM BORDEAUX REGION

In economics, the perception of wine quality is not limited to sensorial characteristics: an indication of the region of production significantly affects the perception of quality and consumers’ WTP ([1]; [2]). However, [3] or more recently [4] show that even if a wine has an organic label, the taste of wine remains the predominant criterion in consumer preferences. The contribution of our experiment is to evaluate the impact of responsible attributes (organic label, Non Added Sulfites, HVE certification) on the appreciation of several red wines on the market. More than 280 consumers participated to the present study and they perform 25 tastings divided into 5 different sessions. 20 different red wines from Bordeaux Area are tasted.

IMPACT OF ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON BIOADHESION PROPERTIES OF BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS

Brettanomyces bruxellensis is an ubiquitous yeast associated with different fermentation media such as beer and kombucha, where its presence is beneficial to bring an aromatic typicity. However, it is a main spoilage yeast in wines, in which it produces volatile phenols responsible for organoleptic deviations causing significant economic losses (Chatonnet et al., 1992). Cellar and winery equipment’s are considered as the first source of contamination, during fermentation and wine ageing process (Connel et al., 2002). Indeed, it is possible to find B. bruxellensis in the air, on walls and floors of the cellars, on small materials, vats and barrels.