terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK TO PREDICT GENETIC GROUP AND SULFUR TOLERANCE OF BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS

CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK TO PREDICT GENETIC GROUP AND SULFUR TOLERANCE OF BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS

Abstract

The spoilage yeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis presents many strain dependent characteristics, particularly sulfur tolerance (1). Climate change and the evolution of oenological practices are at the origin of matrices with low levels of sulfur dioxide and higher pH. These parameters favor the development of this yeast and lead to serious financial losses for winemakers (2). Thus, it is essential to discriminate B. bruxellensis isolates at the strain level in order to predict their stress resistance capacities. Few predictive tools are available to reveal intraspecific diversity within B. bruxellensis species; also, they require expertise and can be expensive. In this study, to make analysis even faster, we further investigated the correlation between genetic groups previously described (3) and cell polymorphism using the analysis of optical microscopy images via deep learning. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was trained and allowed the discrimination of B. bruxellensis isolates in 4 of the 6 genetic groups (GG), with an accuracy of 96.6% (4). Future works will have to be done for the no tested genetic groups. But already these results confirm the possibility to develop a tool allowing to determine the tolerance of a contaminant, in a short time, in order to help wine industry professionals to choose the appropriate corrective measure.

 

1. Avramova M, Cibrario A, Peltier E, Coton M, Coton E, Schacherer J, Spano G, Capozzi V, Blaiotta G,  Salin F, Dols-Lafargue M, Grbin P, Curtin C, AlbertinW, Masneuf-Pomarede I (2018) Brettanomyces bruxellensis population survey reveals a diploid-triploid complex structured according to substrate of isolation and geographical distribution. Sci. Rep. 8, 4136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-
2. Alston J, Arvik T, Hart J. Lapsley JT (2021) Brettanomics I: The Cost of Brettanomyces in California Wine ProductionJournal of Wine Economics, Volume 16, Number 1, 2021, Pages 4–31 doi:10.1017/jwe.2020.20 
3. Lebleux M*, Abdo H*, Coelho C, Basmaciyan L, Albertin W, Maupeu J, Laurent J, Roullier-Gall C, Alexandre H, Guilloux-Benatier M, Weidmann S, Rousseaux S (2020) New advances on the Brettanomyces bruxellensis biofilm mode of life. Int J Food Microbiol, 318, pp.1084642. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108464 
4. Lebleux M, Denimal E, De Oliveira D, Marin A, Desroche N, Alexandre H, Weidmann S, Rousseaux S (2021) Prediction of genetic groups within Brettanomyces bruxellensis through cell morphology using a deep learning tool in press J. Fungi, 7(8):581 https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080581 

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Sandrine Rousseaux1, Manon Lebleux1, Emmanuel Denimal2, Stéphanie Weidmann 1

1. Laboratoire VAlMiS-IUVV, AgroSup Dijon, UMR PAM A 02.102, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000 Dijon, France
2. AgroSup Dijon, Direction Scientifique, Appui à la Recherche, 26 Boulevard Docteur Petitjean, F-21000 Dijon, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

Brettanomyces bruxellensis, deep learning, cell morphology, genetic groups

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

WINE LEES AS A SOURCE OF NITROGEN FOR OENOCOCCUS OENI TO IMPROVE MALOLACTIC FERMENTATION PERFORMANCE

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a desired process in red and acidic white wines, after alcoholic fermentation (AF), carried out by the lactic acid bacterium (LAB) Oenococcus oeni. The advantages are an increase of pH, microbiological stabilization and organoleptic improvement of the final wine. However, the presence of stress factors such as ethanol, low pH, high total SO2, lack of nutrients and presence of inhibitors, could affect the successful completion of MLF [1]. Changes in amino acid composition and deficiencies in peptides after AF, showed that MLF can be delayed, signaling its importance for bacterial growth and L-malic acid degradation during MLF [2].

RED WINE AGING THROUGH 1H-NMR METABOLOMICS

Premium red wines are often aged in oak barrel. This widespread winemaking process is used, among others, to provide roundness and complexity to the wine. The study of wine evolution during barrel aging is crucial to better ensure control of wine quality.
¹H-NMR has already been proved to be an efficient tool to monitor winemaking process [1]. Indeed, it is a non-destructive technique, it requires a small amount of sample and a short time of analysis, yet it provides clues about several chemical families.

WHICH TERROIR-RELATED FACTORS INFLUENCE THE MOST VOLATILE COMPOUND PRODUCTION IN COGNAC BASE WINE?

Cognac is a famous spirit produced in southwest France in the region of the eponymous town from wines mainly from Vitis vinifera cv. Ugni blanc. This variety gives very acidic and poorly aromatic base wines for distillation which are produced according to a very specific procedure. Grapes are picked at low sugar concentrations ranging 13-21 °Brix and musts with high turbidity (>500 NTU) are fermented without sulphite addition [1]. Fermentative aromas, as esters and higher alcohols, are currently the main quality markers considered in Cognac spirits.

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: LEVELS AND PATTERNS OBSERVED IN 2020 WINES FROM THE UNITED STATES WEST COAST

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors, described as “smoky”, “bacon”, “campfire” and “ashtray”, often long-lasting and lingering on the palate. In cases of large wildfire events, economic losses for all wine industry actors can be devastating.

METHYL SALICYLATE, A COMPOUND INVOLVED IN BORDEAUX RED WINES PRODUCED WITHOUT SULFITES ADDITION

Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) is the most commonly used additive during winemaking to protect wine from oxidation and from microorganisms. Thus, since the 18th century, SO₂ was almost systematically present in wines. Recently, wines produced without any addition of SO₂ during all the winemaking process including bottling became more and more popular for consumers. A recent study dedicated to sensory characterization of Bordeaux red wines produced without added SO₂, revealed that such wines were perceived differently from similar wines produced with using SO₂ and were characterized by specific fruity aromas and coolness1,2.