terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 FUNGAL CHITOSAN IS AN EFFICIENT ALTERNATIVE TO SULPHITES IN SPECIFIC WINEMAKING SITUATIONS

FUNGAL CHITOSAN IS AN EFFICIENT ALTERNATIVE TO SULPHITES IN SPECIFIC WINEMAKING SITUATIONS

Abstract

The most common method to prevent or eliminate microbes in wine is sulfur dioxide (SO₂) addition. However, as risk of acute allergy exists, the European Union has classified SO₂ as one of the 14 priority food allergens (EU Regulation N°1169/2011, Annex II). The legal dose admitted in both conventional and organic farming will be downgraded probably in the near future, according to consumer’s expectations. In addition, sulfur dioxide addition does not always prevent microbial spoilage, because of the emergence of tolerant/resistant strains. Winemakers thus need alternate and efficient antiseptic methods to reduce total SO₂ content in wines. The resolutions of the 7th general assembly of the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV/OENO 338A/2009) and the European Union (EC 53/2011) authorized the addition of fungal chitosan to reduce spoilage microorganism populations especially Brettanomyces bruxellensis. Chitosan is a partially acetylated polysaccharide of glucosamine. It is positively charged at wine pH, which allows it to interact with the microorganisms and particles present in the wine. With the trend in oenology of limiting SO₂, more and more questions arise as to the impact of fungal chitosan on other microorganisms from grapes and wine-related environment. It was shown recently that most species were affected, at least transiently, by chitosan treatment (Miot-Sertier et al. 2022). However, a high variability prevails within most species and sensitive, intermediate and tolerant strains can be observed, as well as different efficiencies depending on the wine chemical parameters or the winemaking stage when the treatment is performed.

In order to have a clear opinion on the usefulness of a chitosan treatment, we have carried out tests in various situations in which sulphites were not enough to protect the wine (presence of tolerant strains in particular). Though chitosan does not solve all the microbial spoilage issues, this study reveals that chitosane can be an interesting alternative to sulphites in certain situations. Furthermore, when the antiseptic effect is clear it seems durable and hence, wines are protected for microbial spoilage over long periods.
The study also shows that structural differences among fungal chitosans impact their efficiency. The organoleptic consequences of the treatment are also evaluated on red and white wines.

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Cécile Miot-Sertier¹, Margot Paulin¹, Axel Marchal¹, Patricia Ballestra¹, Warren Albertin¹, Isabelle Masneuf Pomarède¹, Joana Coulon², Virginie Moine², Amélie Vallet-Courbin³, Julie Maupeu³, Thierry Doco⁴, Cédric Delattre5-6,Marguerite Dols-Lafargue¹

1. Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, OENO, UMR1366, ISVV, F-33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
2. Biolaffort, 11 rue Aristide Bergès, 33270 Floirac, France
3. Microflora-ADERA, UMR 1366, ISVV, F-33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
4. UMR 1083, UMR Sciences pour l’Oenologie, INRA, SupAgro, UM1, 2 place Viala, F-34060 Cedex Montpellier, France
5. Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CNRS, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
6. Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 1 Rue Descartes, 75000 Paris, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

Antiseptic, Spoilage, Chitosan, Sulfites

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

SUB-CRITICAL WATER: AN ORIGINAL PROCESS TO EXTRACT ANTIOXIDANTS COMPOUNDS OF WINE LEES

Wine lees are quantitatively the second most important wine by-product after grape stems and marc [1]. In order to recycle, distilleries recovered ethanol and tartaric acid contained in wine lees but yeast biomass is often unused. It has already been demonstrated that this yeast biomass could be upcycled to produce yeast extracts of interest for wine chemical stabilization [2]. In addition, it is well known that lees, during aging, release compounds that preserve wine from oxidation.

THE ODORIFEROUS VOLATILE CHEMICALS BEHIND THE OXIDATIVE AROMA DEGRADATION OF SPANISH RED WINES

It is a well-established fact that premature oxidation is noxious for wine aromatic quality and longevity. Although some oxidation-related aroma molecules have been previously identified, there are not works carrying out systematic research about the changes in the profiles of odour-active volatiles during wine oxidation.

Metabolomics for grape and wine research: exploring the contributions of amino acids to wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality is the overall expression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components.
Grapes directly contribute to wine only a small number of potent aroma compounds, and the unique
sensory attributes and perceived quality of a wine result from combining 100s of metabolites of grapes, yeast and bacteria, and oak wood.

IMPACT OF ACIDIFICATION AT BOTTLING BY FUMARIC ACID ON RED WINE AFTER 2 YEARS

Global warming is responsible for a lack of organic acid in grape berries, leading to wines with higher pH and lower titrable acidity. The chemical, microbiological and organoleptic equilibriums are impacted by this change of organic acid concentration. It is common practice to acidify the wine in order to prevent these imbalances that can lead to wine defects and early spoilage. Tartaric acid (TA) is most commonly used by winemaker for wine acidification purposes. Fumaric acid (FA), which is authorized by the OIV in its member states for the inhibition of malolactic fermentation, could also be used as a potential acidification candidate since it has a better acidifying power than tartaric acid.

CONSENSUS AND SENSORY DOMINANCE ARE DEPENDENT ON QUALITY CONCEPT DEFINITIONS

The definition of the term “quality” in sensory evaluation of food products does not seem to be consensual. Descriptive or liking methods are generally used to differentiate between wines (Lawless et al., 1997). Nevertheless, quality evaluation of a product such as wine can also relate to emotional aspects. As exposed by Costell (2002), product quality is defined as an integrated impression, like acceptability, pleasure, or emotional experiences during tasting. According to the ‘modality appropriateness’ hypothesis which predicts that wine tasters weigh the most suitable sensory inputs for a specific assess- ment (Freides, 1974; Welch & Warren, 1980), the nature of the quality definitions may modulate sensory influences.