terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 PROGRESS OF STUDIES OF LEES ORIGINATING FROM THE FIRST ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION OF CHAMPAGNE WINES

PROGRESS OF STUDIES OF LEES ORIGINATING FROM THE FIRST ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION OF CHAMPAGNE WINES

Abstract

Champagne wines are produced via a two-step process: the first is an initial alcoholic fermentation of grape must that produces a still base wine, followed by a second fermentation in bottle – the prise de mousse – that produces the effervescence. This appellation produces non-vintage sparkling wines composed of still base wines assembled from different vintages, varieties, and regions. These base wines, or “reserve wines,” are typically conserved on their fine lies and used to compensate for quality variance between vintages (1). Continuously blending small amounts of these reserve wines into newer ones also facilitates preserving the producer’s “house style.” Some of these wines therefore possess the potential to age and maintain their organoleptic quality for even decades. Despite this potential, while the prise de mousse and final product have been extensively studied, far less research has been realised on the Champagne base wines and lies.

The aim of our ongoing study is to apply a multi-disciplinary strategy to study Champagne base wine lies. First, lies production was standardized on a laboratory scale at differing volumes (125 mL, 1 L, 5 L) for both synthetic solutions modelled on Champagne grape musts, and actual musts originating from the region. Confocal microscopy was then utilised to observe yeasts cells present in the wines and lees, as well as any enzymatic activity, creating a visual reference of autolytic dynamics over a one-year period. Simultaneously, these solutions were analysed for volatile odorous compounds and their precursors, including dimethyl sulphide (DMS,) monoterpenes, and heterocycles. Particular attention was given to amino acid concentrations, as previous studies show the importance of lees and amino acid content on ageing potential of reserve wines(2). Initial results show a dynamic evolution of volatile compounds in the early stages of aging, highlighting the potential contribution of lies to the longevity of still base wines. In addition, chemical analyses revealed unexpected data concerning the production of DMS in wines. This tandem approach allowed a preliminary analysis of Champagne reserve wine kinetics and the corresponding release of volatile compounds during the initial stages of lees aging.

 

1. Le Menn N, Marchal R, Demarville D, Casenave P, Tempere S, Campbell-Sills H, et al. Development of a new sensory analysis methodology for predicting wine aging potential. Application to champagne reserve wines. Food Qual Prefer. 2021;94.
2. Le Menn N, Marchand S, De Revel G, Demarville D, Laborde D, Marchal R. N,S,O-Heterocycles in Aged Champagne Reserve Wines and Correlation with Free Amino Acid Concentrations. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65(11):2345-56. 

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Sera Goto1, 2; Nicolas Le Menn1, 2; Marina Bely¹; Laura Chasseriaud ¹; Stephani Marchand ¹

1. Université de Bordeaux, ISVV, EA 4577, INRA, USC 1366 OENOLOGIE, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
2. Champagne Veuve Clicquot, 13 rue Albert Thomas, 51100 Reims, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

Champagne, Lees, Fermentation, Aroma

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

IMPACT OF HARVEST DATE ON THE FINE MOLECULAR COMPOSITION OF MUST AND BORDEAUX RED WINE (VAR. MERLOT, CABERNET SAUVIGNON). FOCUS ON ACIDITY AND SENSORY IMPACT AFTER FIVE YEARS OF AGING

Climate change has brought several impacts that are becoming increasingly intense during the last few years and put at risk the quality of the berries or even the plant’s sustainability. Such extreme climatic events impact the composition of the wine while modulating its quality and the consumer preferences (Tempère et al., 2019). The three most important changes that take place in the must are: 1) decrease acidity, 2) increase of the concentration of sugar, hence increase of alcohol in the wine, and 3) modification
of the sensory balance and the development for example of cooked fruit aromas.

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: LEVELS AND PATTERNS OBSERVED IN 2020 WINES FROM THE UNITED STATES WEST COAST

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors, described as “smoky”, “bacon”, “campfire” and “ashtray”, often long-lasting and lingering on the palate. In cases of large wildfire events, economic losses for all wine industry actors can be devastating.

FUNCTIONALIZED MESOPOROUS SILICA IS A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO BENTONITE FOR WINE PROTEIN STABILIZATION

The presence of grape-derived heat unstable proteins can lead to haze formation in white wines [1], an instability prevented by removing these proteins by adding bentonite, a hydrated aluminum silicate that interacts electrostatically with wine proteins leading to their flocculation. Despite effective, using bentonite has several drawbacks as the costs associated with its use, the potential negative effects on wine quality, and its environmental impact, so that alternative solutions are needed.

IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL CHEMICAL MARKERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMISSIVENESS OF BORDEAUX RED WINES AGAINST BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS USING UNTARGETED METABOLOMICS

All along the red winemaking process, many microorganisms develop in wine, some being beneficial and essential, others being feared spoilers. One of the most feared microbial enemy of wine all around the world is Brettanomyces bruxellensis. Indeed, in red wines, this yeast produces volatile phenols, molecules associated with a flavor described as “horse sweat”, “burnt plastic” or “leather”. To produce significant and detectable concentrations of these undesired molecules, the yeasts should first grow and become numerous enough. Even if the genetic group of the strain present and the cellar temperature may modulate the yeast growth rate¹ and thus the risk of spoilage, the main factor seems to be the wines themselves, some being much more permissive to B. bruxellensis development than others.

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: EVOLUTION IN BOTTLED WINE

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors. The impact on wine aroma is mainly attributed to volatile phenols, while in-mouth hydrolysis of glycosylated forms may be responsible for long-lasting “ashy” aftertastes (1).