OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 OENO IVAS 9 OENO IVAS 2019 9 Analytical developments from grape to wine, spirits : omics, chemometrics approaches… 9 Different strategies for the rapid detection of Haze‐Forming Proteins (HFPs)

Different strategies for the rapid detection of Haze‐Forming Proteins (HFPs)

Abstract

Over the last decades, wine analysis has become an important analytical field, with emphasis placed on the development of new methodologies for characterization and elaboration control. Advances in wine chemistry knowledge allow the relation of specific wine faults or defects to the compounds responsible for those unpleasant characteristics. In most cases, those compounds are already naturally present in wine, but their effect does only become noticeable when their concentration exceeds the “sensory threshold”. 

Among the different instabilities that can occur, protein haze formation is a serious quality defect because consumers perceive hazy wines as “spoiled” [1]. Protein haze is caused by aggregation of residual grape pathogenesis-related proteins, particularly, thaumatin-like proteins and chitinases upon exposure to elevated temperatures during storage or transportation. Unfortunately, a specific method for the detection, or treatment, of such proteins in affected wines does not exist, and current practice is to use fining agents such as bentonite for their removal. On the one side, this might have a negative impact on wine quality, as not only haze forming proteins (HFPs) are being removed, but also other compounds that do impact on wine flavour/ aroma. On the other side, the lack of a specific method to quantify HFPs, tends to result in over-fining, which in turn has a more detrimental impact in wine quality, fining cost and waste generation. 

Herein we investigate on the development of an easy‐to‐use sensory device that allows to detect the presence of HFPs. To this aim, three different approaches have been explored. 

On the one hand, two different impedimetric biosensors based on screen-printed electrodes were developed, and their performance assessed towards standard solutions as well as wine samples. As an alternative, Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra were collected for different wine samples and chemometric tools such as discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used to achieve the quantification of HFPs proteins. Detection of HFPs at the μg/L level has been achieved with both impedimetric biosensors in standard solutions, whereas the FT-IR-based approach allowed their quantification at the mg/L level in wine samples directly. 

[1] S.C. Van Sluyter, et al. J. Agr. Food Chem., 63 (2015) 4020-4030.

DOI:

Publication date: June 19, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Xavier Cetó, Jacqui M McRae, Nicolas H. Voelcker, Beatriz Prieto-Simón

The Australian Wine Research Institute, P.O Box 197, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
Department of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Contact the author

Keywords

haze-forming proteins, biosensor, FT-IR, chemometric analysis 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

DETERMINATION OF FREE AMINO ACIDS, AMINO ACID POTENTIAL AND PROTEASE ACTIVITY IN THE LEES AND STILL WINES OF CHAMPAGNE

Prior to winemaking, organic or mineral nitrogen compound concentrations are usually measured in the vineyard and in grape musts. These indicators facilitate vine cultivation decisions, usually through yield or vigor. During vinification, yeast and bacteria metabolize nitrogen compounds in the musts in order to generate biomass. After fermentation, the microorganisms rerelease a part of this nitrogen as soluble compounds into the wines. Another part remains bound in the lees and can be lost during racking. The must’s natural nitrogen quantities, additional supplements during fermentation, and lees contact management enhance the release of nitrogen compounds to the wines. During ageing these nitrogen compounds – primarily the amino acids – are implicated in the generation of odorous compounds such as heterocycles(1).

Effects of ethanol removal techniques on Nero d’Avola wine

Over the past two decades, climate change has contributed to an increase in sugar content in grape must, and consequently, in the ethanol levels of wines.

Sensory and chemical effects of postharvest grape cooling on wine quality

Wine cellars are affected by seasonally fluctuating workloads and face challenges especially in the harvest period connected to the required timely processing of the harvested grapes.

Carry over effect of shoot trimming and deficit irrigation on fruit yield and berry total soluble solids

The increase in air temperature that is occurring in many important wine-growing areas around the world is resulting in the decoupling between the phenolic and the technological maturity of grapevine berries. This new ripening pattern leads to the production of light-bodied high alcoholic wines, but this is in countertendency with the increasing consumers’ demand for wines with low-to-mid alcohol concentrations. The oenological techniques proposed to reduce wine alcohol content are often very expensive and lead to detrimental effects on wine quality. Many viticultural practices have been proposed to slow down sugar accumulation the berry. One possible strategy that was previously found to be suitable for Aglianico grapevine is post-veraison shoot trimming. The aim of this work was to assess the carry over effects on the following year of shoot trimming and vine water status on yield and total soluble solids because the expected reduction in vine fertility could lead to a reduction in the effectiveness of shoot trimming.

Effects of winemaking variables on the chemical and sensory quality of Schiava wines up to one year storage in bottle

The interactive effects of three major enological variables were evaluated on the quality of Schiava wine up to one year of storage in bottle.