GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2019 9 A few observations on double sigmoid fruit growth

A few observations on double sigmoid fruit growth

Abstract

Context and purpose ‐ Many fleshy fruit, including the grape berry, exhibit a double‐sigmoid growth (DSG) pattern. Identification of the curious DSG habit has long been attributed to Connors’ (1919) work with peaches. Connors’ description of a three‐stage pattern consisting of two growth stages (Stage I and Stage III) separated by a rest period (Stage II) has become textbook material. The growth of grapes was described similarly by Winkler and Williams (1936), Nitsch et al. (1960), and most subsequent authors. Prior to Connors, grape berry development was described as a two‐stage process, in French periode herbacee and periode maturation, but this description refers to fruit ripening and has little or nothing to do with growth.

Material and Methods ‐ A review of grape literature reveals that the characteristic DSG habit was reported several times prior to Connors’ discovery in peaches. Analyses of berry size, turgor, firmness, and composition during Stage II and into Stage III are interpreted in the context of the growth habit.

Results ‐ It will be argued that one researcher in particular, Carl Neubauer, should be credited with the discovery of DSG and its description as a three‐stage phenomenon in fleshy fruits. It is widely reported that DSG in fleshy fruit is a consequence of within‐fruit partitioning (to endocarp or seed rather than pericarp/flesh). However, DSG is observed in berry dry weight and in seedless berries, which negate the common explanations. Thus, one hundred‐fifty years later, the nature of double‐sigmoid growth is still not understood. It is the resumption of rapid growth that is most curious. Various lines of evidence from our studies suggest that a suite of physiological changes during Stage II lead to the transition from Stage II lag phase to Stage III growth, paradoxically implicating a role of low cell turgor. Turgor declines and berries soften during Stage II. These changes occur in conjunction with increased apoplastic solutes and ABA, followed by increased sugar influx and upregulation of cell wall loosening enzymes. Because growth increases in the face of very low turgor, Stage III growth is hypothesized to result from cell wall loosening or even wall degradation without addition of new wall material.

DOI:

Publication date: June 19, 2020

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Mark MATTHEWS

Dept. of Viticulture and Enology, Univ. California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616

Contact the author

Keywords

berry, fruit, growth, water relations, turgor, cell wall, ABA

Tags

GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Back to the roots: how an underutilised biotechnological tool can support research to improve grapevine resilience against biotic stressors in an unpredictable future

Hairy roots (HRs) are a symptom of a natural genetic modification by the soil-borne phytopathogen Rhizobium rhizogenes.

Influence of plant growth regulators and water deficit on cv. Krissy table grape

Context and purpose of the study. The quality of table grape clusters significantly affects consumer perception and market value, with berry size, texture, color, and overall appearance playing key roles.

The effects of cover cropping systems on vine physiology, berry and wine quality in a climate change scenario in Switzerland

Sustainable weed control with little detrimental effects on vine physiology, yield, berry quality, soil structure, health and biodiversity is a key factor in vineyard management. Few options are available to avoid herbicide utilization and minimize negative effects of frequent tillage on soil quality. The present project aims to investigate and develop different cover management strategies in a cool climate viticultural region in Switzerland. The impact of different treatments on vine, must and wine has been studied in an experimental vineyard in Changins, Switzerland for one year and will be continued over the next three years.

Empreinte carbone et environnementale du vin en France : chiffres d’impact et bonnes pratiques à mettre en œuvre

Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere due to human activities are leading to a rise in the average temperature of the atmosphere. among the scenarios established by the un’s intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), only two enable us to achieve the minimum objective of the paris agreements signed at cop 21 in 2015: staying below +2°c after 2050. both scenarios forecast a rapid reduction in GHG emissions as early as 2025, thanks to strong international cooperation, the priority given to sustainable development and responsible consumer choices.

Climate change impacts: a multi-stress issue

With the aim of producing premium wines, it is admitted that moderate environmental stresses may contribute to the accumulation of compounds of interest in grapes. However the ongoing climate change, with the appearance of more limiting conditions of production is a major concern for the wine industry economic. Will it be possible to maintain the vineyards in place, to preserve the current grape varieties and how should we anticipate the adaptation measures to ensure the sustainability of vineyards? In this context, the question of the responses and adaptation of grapevine to abiotic stresses becomes a major scientific issue to tackle. An abiotic stress can be defined as the effect of a specific factor of the physico-chemical environment of the plants (temperature, availability of water and minerals, light, etc.) which reduces growth, and for a crop such as the vine, the yield, the composition of the fruits and the sustainability of the plants. Water stress is in many minds, but a systemic vision is essential for at least two reasons. The first reason is that in natural environments, a single factor is rarely limiting, and plants have to deal with a combination of constraints, as for example heat and drought, both in time and at a given time. The second reason is that plants, including grapevine, have central mechanisms of stress responses, as redox regulatory pathways, that play an important role in adaptation and survival. Here we will review the most recent studies dealing with this issue to provide a better understanding of the grapevine responses to a combination of environmental constraints and of the underlying regulatory pathways, which may be very helpful to design more adapted solutions to cope with climate change.