Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 The effect of cropload on the volatile aroma characteristics of ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ red wine

The effect of cropload on the volatile aroma characteristics of ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ red wine

Abstract

Beihong and Beimei were bred as winemaking cultivars released by Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2008. The cultivars are selected from the population of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ (Vitis vinifera) ×V. amurensis. They are extended to most provinces in North of China because they have strong resistance to cold and disease and need not be buried in soil in winter. To better understand the effect of cropload on volatile compounds during wine-making, we surveyed volatiles composition and content of different cropload level in 3-years-old ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ vines which planted in east foot of Helan mountain of Ningxia (EHN). The cropload were controlled at 3 t, 5.2 t and 7.5 t/ha for ‘Beihong’, 3 t, 4.5 t and 6 t/ha for ‘Beimei’, respectively, through thinning clusters at the 2nd July in 2014. All clusters were sampled in 29th September. The volatiles compound were surveyed in ripening berry (RB), during fermentation processing (FP), completed fermentation (CF) and after 5 months of wine clarification (5MC). The lower cropload level had the less volatiles content in RB. The total volatile contents were 494.5, 1077.9 and 1610.9 µg/kg FW in 3 t, 5.2 t and 7.5 t/ha cropload in the berries of ‘Beihong’ and 1268.6, 1920.9, 3997.7 µg/kg FW in cropload of 3 t, 4.5 t and 6 t/ha for ‘Beimei’, respectively. During FP, the volatile compositions and contents increased sharply in all cropload levels in both cultivars, and increased more quickly in low cropload than that in high cropload. They increased 95.5, 45.5 and 29.3 times (in ‘Beihong’), and 34.2, 20.7, 8.8 times (in ‘Beimei’) from low to high cropload, respectively. The total volatile contents of low cropload were close or exceed to the high cropload when fermentation finished in both cultivars. During 5MC, the volatile compositions and the contents were reduced largely. The volatiles reduced more slowly in low cropload than that in high cropload. The remained total volatile contents after 5MC were 10.3%, 9.1% and 8.9% in ‘Beihong’, and 11.3%, 10.1% and 10.5% in ‘Beimei’, respectively. Consequently, the total volatile contents in low cropload were higher than that in high cropload in both cultivars. Thirty one and 35 volatile compounds were detected in ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ wine before bottling, respectively. Among these compounds, esters were dominant (86.3%-89.8% and 78.3%-87.3% of the total volatile in ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’, respectively), and followed by alcohols (8.8% – 10.8% and 7.7%- 10.2%, respectively). In addition, two terpenoids compounds (1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl- and 2,6-Octadien-1-ol,3,7-dimethyl-, (Z)-. 2) were found in ‘Beimei’ wine. The blind wine tasting showed that the assessment scores were higher in 3 t, 5.2 t /ha cropload than 7.5 t/ha cropload for ‘Beihong’, and 3 t /ha cropload was highest in ‘Beimei’.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Zhenchang Liang*, Benhong Wu, Peige Fan, Qiajun Li, Qiong Ma, Shaohua Li, Weidong Huang, Yan Chen

*Institute of Botany

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

On the losses of dissolved CO2 during champagne aging

A misconception lingers in the minds of some wine consumers that Champagne wines don’t age. It’s largely a myth, certainly as far as the best cuvees are concerned. Actually, during the so-called autolysis period of time (in the closed bottle, after the “prise de mousse”), complex chemical reactions take place when the wine remains in contact with the dead yeast cells, which progressively bring complex and very much sought-after aromas to champagne. Nevertheless, despite their remarkable impermeability to liquid and air, caps or natural cork stoppers used to cork the bottles are not 100% hermetic with regard to gas transfers. Gas species therefore very slowly diffuse through the cap or cork stopper, along their respective inverse partial pressure. After the “prise de mousse”, because the partial pressure of CO2 in the bottleneck reaches up to 6 bars (at 12 °C), gaseous CO2 progressively diffuse from the bottle to the ambient air
(where the partial pressure of gaseous CO2 is only of order of 0,0004 bar).

Metabolomics of grape polyphenols as a consequence of post-harvest drying: on-plant dehydration vs warehouse withering

A method of suspect screening analysis to study grape metabolomics, was developed [1]. By performing ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) – high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analysis of the grape extract, averaging 320-450 putative grape compounds are identified which include mainly polyphenols. Identification of metabolites is performed by a new HRMS-database of putative grape and wine compounds expressly constructed (GrapeMetabolomics) which currently includes around 1,100 entries.

Assessing the effect of oak derived aromas on mouthfeel perception in Chardonnay wine

Mouthfeel is an important quality parameter for Chardonnay wines, particularly those aged in oak. While research on mouthfeel has traditionally focused on the impact of non-aromatic compounds, the role of aroma compounds has largely been over looked. However, in wine as well as other food interactions between retronasal aroma and mouthfeel have been noted. The goal of this research was to investigate the impact of wine aroma on the perception of mouthfeel. Because of the importance of oak aging in the development of Chardonnay mouthfeel, the impact of oak aromas on perceived mouthfeel was explored. Aroma compounds associated with oak (ethyl palmitate, eugenol, furfural, isoeugenol, syringaldehyde, vanillin and whiskey lactone) were added to two different Chardonnay wines; one with no oak influence and one fermented in neutral oak. Low and high concentrations of the compounds were added based on concentrations typically found in barrel aged Chardonnay wine.

Using elicitors in different grape varieties. Effect over their phenolic composition

Phenolic compounds are very important in crop plants and have been the subject of a large number of studies. Three main reasons can be cited for optimizing the level of phenolic compounds in crop plants: their physiological role in plants, their technological significance for food processing, and their nutritional characteristics1 Indeed, an enormous diversity of phenolic antioxidants is found in fruits and vegetables, and their presence and roles can be affected or modified by several pre- and postharvest cultural practices and/or food processing technologies (Ruiz-García et al. 2012, Goldman et al. 1999, Tudela et al. 2002). In winegrapes, the technological importance of phenolic compounds, mainly flavonoids, is well-known.

Impact of varying ethanol and carbonation levels on the odor threshold of 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphtalene (petrol off-flavor) and role of berry size and Riesling clones

1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphtelene (TDN) evokes the odor of “petrol” in wine, especially in the variety Riesling. Increasing UV-radiation due to climate change intensifies formation of carotenoids in the berry skins and an increase of TDN-precursors1. Exploring new viticultural and oenological strategies to limit TDN formation in the future requires precise knowledge of TDN thresholds in different matrices. Thresholds reported in the literature vary substantially between 2 µg/L up to 20 µg/L2,3,4 due to the use of different methods. As Riesling grapes are used for very different wine styles such as dry, sweet or sparkling wines, it is essential to study the impact of varying ethanol and carbonation levels.