Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 The effect of cropload on the volatile aroma characteristics of ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ red wine

The effect of cropload on the volatile aroma characteristics of ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ red wine

Abstract

Beihong and Beimei were bred as winemaking cultivars released by Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2008. The cultivars are selected from the population of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ (Vitis vinifera) ×V. amurensis. They are extended to most provinces in North of China because they have strong resistance to cold and disease and need not be buried in soil in winter. To better understand the effect of cropload on volatile compounds during wine-making, we surveyed volatiles composition and content of different cropload level in 3-years-old ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ vines which planted in east foot of Helan mountain of Ningxia (EHN). The cropload were controlled at 3 t, 5.2 t and 7.5 t/ha for ‘Beihong’, 3 t, 4.5 t and 6 t/ha for ‘Beimei’, respectively, through thinning clusters at the 2nd July in 2014. All clusters were sampled in 29th September. The volatiles compound were surveyed in ripening berry (RB), during fermentation processing (FP), completed fermentation (CF) and after 5 months of wine clarification (5MC). The lower cropload level had the less volatiles content in RB. The total volatile contents were 494.5, 1077.9 and 1610.9 µg/kg FW in 3 t, 5.2 t and 7.5 t/ha cropload in the berries of ‘Beihong’ and 1268.6, 1920.9, 3997.7 µg/kg FW in cropload of 3 t, 4.5 t and 6 t/ha for ‘Beimei’, respectively. During FP, the volatile compositions and contents increased sharply in all cropload levels in both cultivars, and increased more quickly in low cropload than that in high cropload. They increased 95.5, 45.5 and 29.3 times (in ‘Beihong’), and 34.2, 20.7, 8.8 times (in ‘Beimei’) from low to high cropload, respectively. The total volatile contents of low cropload were close or exceed to the high cropload when fermentation finished in both cultivars. During 5MC, the volatile compositions and the contents were reduced largely. The volatiles reduced more slowly in low cropload than that in high cropload. The remained total volatile contents after 5MC were 10.3%, 9.1% and 8.9% in ‘Beihong’, and 11.3%, 10.1% and 10.5% in ‘Beimei’, respectively. Consequently, the total volatile contents in low cropload were higher than that in high cropload in both cultivars. Thirty one and 35 volatile compounds were detected in ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ wine before bottling, respectively. Among these compounds, esters were dominant (86.3%-89.8% and 78.3%-87.3% of the total volatile in ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’, respectively), and followed by alcohols (8.8% – 10.8% and 7.7%- 10.2%, respectively). In addition, two terpenoids compounds (1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl- and 2,6-Octadien-1-ol,3,7-dimethyl-, (Z)-. 2) were found in ‘Beimei’ wine. The blind wine tasting showed that the assessment scores were higher in 3 t, 5.2 t /ha cropload than 7.5 t/ha cropload for ‘Beihong’, and 3 t /ha cropload was highest in ‘Beimei’.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Zhenchang Liang*, Benhong Wu, Peige Fan, Qiajun Li, Qiong Ma, Shaohua Li, Weidong Huang, Yan Chen

*Institute of Botany

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Quantification of the production of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 during wine oxidation

Chemical studies aiming at assessing how a wine reacts towards oxidation usually focus on the characterization of wine constituents, such as polyphenols, or oxidation products. As an alternative, the key oxidation intermediate hydrogen peroxide H2O2 has never been quantified, although it plays a pivotal role in wine oxidation. H2O2 is obtained from molecular oxygen as the result of a first cascade of oxidation reactions involving metal ions and polyphenols. The produced H2O2 then reacts in a second cascade of oxidation to produce reactive hydroxyl radicals that can attack almost any chemical substrate in wine.

Correlations between sensory characteristics and colloidal content in dry white wines

Must clarification is an important step occurring just after grape extraction in the elaboration of white wine, consisting in a solid-liquid separation. Traditionally, low must turbidity, around 50-150 NTU, is generally reached in white winemaking in order to prevent reductive aromas and facilitating alcoholic fermentation. Alternatively, a higher turbidity (300 NTU or above) can be sought for reasons such as a better expression of grapes identity (terroir), or for getting a must matrix that could supposedly lead to wines having greater ageing potential.

Correlations between N,S,O-heterocycle levels and age of Champagne base wines

Champagne regulation allows winegrowers to stock small amounts of still wines in order to compensate vintages’ quality shifts mainly due to climate variations. According to their technical requirements and house style some Champagne producers (commonly named “Champagne houses”) use these stored wines in the blend in order to introduce an element of complexity. These wines possess the particularity of being aged on fine lees in thermo-regulated stainless steel tanks. The Champagne house of Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin has several wines stored this way.

Efficiency of alternative chemical and physical treatments in reducing Brettanomyces Bruxellensis from oak wood

Oak barrels form an integral part of wine production, especially that of high quality wines. However, due to its porosity, wood presents an ecological niche for microbial proliferation and is highly susceptible to microbial spoilage which could cause considerable economic losses. Brettanomyces bruxellensis, the most commonly encountered microorganism responsible for spoilage during barrel ageing, can remain in barrels after barrel sanitation to contaminate new batches of wine after refilling. Therefore, effective sanitation treatments are of utmost importance to prevent recurring wine spoilage.

Bentonite fining in cold wines: prediction tests, reduced efficiency and possibilities to avoid additional fining treatments

Bentonite fining is widely used to prevent protein haze in white wines. Most wineries use laboratory-scale fining trials to define the appropriate amount of bentonite to be used in the cellar. Those pre-tests need to mimic as much as possible the industrial scale fining procedure to determine the exact amount of bentonite necessary for protein stability. Nevertheless it is frequent that, after fining with the recommended amount of bentonite, wines appear still unstable and need an additional fining treatment. It remains a major challenge to understand why the same wine, fined with the same dosage of the same bentonite, achieves stability in the lab, but not in the cellar.