Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 The effect of cropload on the volatile aroma characteristics of ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ red wine

The effect of cropload on the volatile aroma characteristics of ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ red wine

Abstract

Beihong and Beimei were bred as winemaking cultivars released by Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2008. The cultivars are selected from the population of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ (Vitis vinifera) ×V. amurensis. They are extended to most provinces in North of China because they have strong resistance to cold and disease and need not be buried in soil in winter. To better understand the effect of cropload on volatile compounds during wine-making, we surveyed volatiles composition and content of different cropload level in 3-years-old ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ vines which planted in east foot of Helan mountain of Ningxia (EHN). The cropload were controlled at 3 t, 5.2 t and 7.5 t/ha for ‘Beihong’, 3 t, 4.5 t and 6 t/ha for ‘Beimei’, respectively, through thinning clusters at the 2nd July in 2014. All clusters were sampled in 29th September. The volatiles compound were surveyed in ripening berry (RB), during fermentation processing (FP), completed fermentation (CF) and after 5 months of wine clarification (5MC). The lower cropload level had the less volatiles content in RB. The total volatile contents were 494.5, 1077.9 and 1610.9 µg/kg FW in 3 t, 5.2 t and 7.5 t/ha cropload in the berries of ‘Beihong’ and 1268.6, 1920.9, 3997.7 µg/kg FW in cropload of 3 t, 4.5 t and 6 t/ha for ‘Beimei’, respectively. During FP, the volatile compositions and contents increased sharply in all cropload levels in both cultivars, and increased more quickly in low cropload than that in high cropload. They increased 95.5, 45.5 and 29.3 times (in ‘Beihong’), and 34.2, 20.7, 8.8 times (in ‘Beimei’) from low to high cropload, respectively. The total volatile contents of low cropload were close or exceed to the high cropload when fermentation finished in both cultivars. During 5MC, the volatile compositions and the contents were reduced largely. The volatiles reduced more slowly in low cropload than that in high cropload. The remained total volatile contents after 5MC were 10.3%, 9.1% and 8.9% in ‘Beihong’, and 11.3%, 10.1% and 10.5% in ‘Beimei’, respectively. Consequently, the total volatile contents in low cropload were higher than that in high cropload in both cultivars. Thirty one and 35 volatile compounds were detected in ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’ wine before bottling, respectively. Among these compounds, esters were dominant (86.3%-89.8% and 78.3%-87.3% of the total volatile in ‘Beihong’ and ‘Beimei’, respectively), and followed by alcohols (8.8% – 10.8% and 7.7%- 10.2%, respectively). In addition, two terpenoids compounds (1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl- and 2,6-Octadien-1-ol,3,7-dimethyl-, (Z)-. 2) were found in ‘Beimei’ wine. The blind wine tasting showed that the assessment scores were higher in 3 t, 5.2 t /ha cropload than 7.5 t/ha cropload for ‘Beihong’, and 3 t /ha cropload was highest in ‘Beimei’.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Zhenchang Liang*, Benhong Wu, Peige Fan, Qiajun Li, Qiong Ma, Shaohua Li, Weidong Huang, Yan Chen

*Institute of Botany

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Influence of preflowering basal leaf removal on aromatic composition of cv. Tempranillo wine from semiarid climate (Extremadura Western Spain)

Abstract In this work the effects of early leaf removal performed manually at preflowering phenological stage, on the volatile composition of Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.) wines were studied. From 2009-2011 vintages 34 wine volatile compounds were identified and quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) where early leaf removal only modified 25 of them. The total C6 compounds, acetates and volatiles acids (with exception of isobutyric acid) were affected by defoliation, whereas alcohols and esters showed a minor effect. Furthermore the vintage effect also was shown.

On the losses of dissolved CO2 during champagne aging

A misconception lingers in the minds of some wine consumers that Champagne wines don’t age. It’s largely a myth, certainly as far as the best cuvees are concerned. Actually, during the so-called autolysis period of time (in the closed bottle, after the “prise de mousse”), complex chemical reactions take place when the wine remains in contact with the dead yeast cells, which progressively bring complex and very much sought-after aromas to champagne. Nevertheless, despite their remarkable impermeability to liquid and air, caps or natural cork stoppers used to cork the bottles are not 100% hermetic with regard to gas transfers. Gas species therefore very slowly diffuse through the cap or cork stopper, along their respective inverse partial pressure. After the “prise de mousse”, because the partial pressure of CO2 in the bottleneck reaches up to 6 bars (at 12 °C), gaseous CO2 progressively diffuse from the bottle to the ambient air
(where the partial pressure of gaseous CO2 is only of order of 0,0004 bar).

Full automation of oenological fermentations and its application to the processing of must containing high sugar or acetic acid concentrations

Climate change and harvest date decisions have led to the evolution of must quality over the last decades. Increases in must sugar concentrations are among the most obvious consequences, quantitatively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a robust and acid tolerant organism. These properties, its sugar to ethanol conversion rate and ethanol tolerance make it the ideal production organism for wine fermentations. Unfortunately, high sugar concentrations may affect S. cerevisiae and lead to growth inhibition or yeast lysis, and cause sluggish or stuck fermentations. Even sublethal conditions cause a hyperosmotic stress response in S. cerevisiae which leads to increased formation of fermentation by-products, including acetic acid, which may exceed legal limits in some wines.

Testing the effectiveness of Cell-Wall material from grape pomace as fining agent for red wines

Lately several works highlighted the capacity of grape cell-wall material (CWM) to interact with proanthocyanidins (PA), indicating its potential use as fining agent for red wines.1–4 However, those studies were performed by using purified PAs and very high doses of CWM (almost ten-fold higher than those used in wine industry for other commercial fining agents). The present study focuses on the applicability of CWM from Cabernet sauvignon pomace as fining agent for red wines under real winery conditions. Grapes of cultivar Cabernet sauvignon were harvested at three different maturity levels
(unripe, mature, and overripe) and used for red winemaking. The pomace of such vinifications were used as source of CWM, and applied into red wines at two different concentrations: 0.2 g/L and 2.5 g/L.

Grape metabolites, aroma precursors and the complexities of wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality from a consumer perspective is the overall impression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components. Grapes contribute some potent aroma compounds, together with a large pool of non-volatile precursors (e.g. glycoconjugates and amino acid conjugates). Aroma precursors can break down through chemical hydrolysis reactions, or through the action of yeast or enzymes, significantly changing the aroma profile of a wine during winemaking and storage. In addition, glycoconjugates of monoterpenes, norisoprenoids and volatile phenols, together with sulfur-conjugates in wine, provide a reservoir of additional flavour through the in-mouth release of volatiles which may be perceived retro-nasally.