Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

Abstract

Tyrosol (TYR) and hydroxytyrosol (HYT) are bioactive phenols present in olive oil and wine, basic elements of the Mediterranean diet. TYR is reported in the literature for its interesting antioxidant, cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In wine, its concentration can reach values as high as about 40 mg/L [Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007] but, more frequently, this phenol – derived from yeast metabolism of tyrosine during fermentation – is present at lower levels, generally higher in red wines compared to whites. HYT was measured for the first time by Di Tommaso et al. [1998] in Italian wines – with maximum values of 4.20 mg/L and 1.92 mg/L for red and white wines, respectively – while definitely lower concentrations have been found later in Greek samples. Concentrations of about 2-3 mg/L have been reported by Minuti et al. [2006] for red wines while Romboli et al. [2015] observed definitely higher concentrations – up to 25 mg/L – in case of slow fermentations of Sangiovese wines processed in lab-scale. Oddly, in spite of the non-negligible concentration of these compounds in wine, few data are available regarding the concentration variability of TYR and HYT due to not genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains available on the market and used in winery conditions. To investigate this variability, 7 yeast strains (Zymaflore VL1; Fermol Arome Plus; AWRI 796; La Claire EM2; Anchor VIN13; Zymaflore VL3; Mycoferm CRU 31) were used (15 g/hL) to ferment – on semi-industrial scale, at 18-21°C – five Pinot gris juices achieved from different vineyards. They were adequately provided with natural assimilable nitrogen (163-214 mg/L), and had been well settled (36 h, 10°C, < 100 NTU) and supplemented with 20-30 mg/L SO2. After alcoholic fermentation, wines were sulphited (80 mg/L) and maintained sur lies under argon blanketing (4°C x 90 days), with batonnage 1 time a week on average. In the transition from juice to wine, the mean concentrations of TYR and HYT increased about 60 and 20 times. In wine, TYR ranged between 4.20 and 15.51 mg/L, and HYT between 0.33 and 3.45 mg/L confirming the values in the literature. Statistically significant differences have been observed between yeast strains, both for TYR and HYT, and maximum variability between strain mean concentrations was about 35%, corresponding to a range of about 2.2 mg/L TYR and 0.55 mg/L HYT. In any case, the variability linked to the origin of the juice was higher than that linked to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007]. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 57(3), 146-152 Di Tommaso et al. (1998). J. High Res. Chromatography 21(10), 549-553 Minuti et al. (2006). J. Chromatography A, 1114, 263-268 Romboli et al. (2015). W. J. Microbiol. Biotech. 31(7), 1137-1145.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Tomàs Villegas*, Chiara Barnaba, Giorgio Nicolini, Luca Debiasi, Roberto Larcher, Tiziana Nardin

*fondazione E.Mach

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Merging fast sensory profiling with non-targeted GC-MS analysis for multifactorial experimental wine making

Wine aroma is influenced by several viticultural and oenological factors. In this study we used experimental wine making in a full factorial design to determine the impact of grapevine age, must turbidity, and yeast strain on the aroma of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling wines. A recently developed, non-targeted SPME-GC-MS fingerprinting approach for wine volatiles was used. This approach includes the segmentation and mathematical transformation of chromatograms in combination with Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) and subsequent deconvolution of important chromatogram segments.

Glutathione content evolution during spontaneous alcoholic fermentations of Sangiovese grapes

Glutathione is a tripeptide (γ-Glu-Cys-Gly), which can occur in grapes, in must and in wine prevalently in the reduced form as well as in the oxidized form as glutathione disulfide. The importance of the reduced form of glutathione lies in its antioxidant activity. In must, it limits browning by reducing o-quinones produced by polyphenol oxidase activity on hydroxycinnamic acids; in wine, it exerts a protective effect on various aromatic compounds. Glutathione concentration in wine is lower than in grape juice and variable as it depends on several factors, ranging from the native content of grapes to winemaking technique.

Use of glutathione under different grape processing and winemaking conditions and its impact on the formation of sulfide off-flavors, colour, and sensory characteristics of Riesling, Sauvignon blanc, and Chardonnay

The use of glutathione (GSH) in winemaking has been legitimated recently, according to OIV resolutions OENO 445-2015 and OENO 446-2015 a maximum dose of 20 mg/L is now allowed to use in must and wine. Several studies have proven the benefits of GSH, predominantly in Sauvignon blanc. Thus, oxidative coloration of must and wine is limited, aroma compounds such as volatile thiols are preserved, and the development of ageing flavors such as sotolon and 2-aminoacetophenone is impeded. The protective effect may be explained by the high affinity of GSH to bind o-quinones which are formed during phenolic oxidation and which are known to initiate browning and other oxidative changes. Some researchers have proposed the hydroxycinnamic acid to GSH ratio (HGR) as an indicator of oxidation susceptibility of must and could show that lower ratios yielded lighter musts.

Impact of non-fruity compounds on red wines fruity aromatic expression: the role of higher alcohols

A part, at least, of the fruity aroma of red wines is the consequence of perceptive interactions between various aromatic compounds, particularly ethyl esters and acetates, which may contribute to the perception of fruity aromas, specifically thanks to synergistic effects.1,2 The question of the indirect impact of non-fruity compounds on this particular aromatic expression has not yet been widely investigated. Among these compounds higher alcohols (HA) represent the main group, from a quantitative standpoint, of volatiles in many alcoholic beverages. Moreover, some bibliographic data suggested their contribution to the aromatic complexity by either increasing or masking flavors of wine, depending of their concentrations.

Identification of caffeic acid as a major component of Moscatel wine protein sediment

Proteins play a significant role in the colloidal stability and clarity of white wines [1]. However, under conditions of high temperatures during storage or transportation, the proteins themselves can self-aggregate into light-dispersing particles causing the so-called protein haze [2]. Formation of these unattractive precipitates in bottled wine is a common defect of commercial wines, making them unacceptable for sale [3]. Previous studies identified the presence of phenolic compounds in the natural precipitate of white wine [4], contributing to the hypothesis that these compounds could be involved in the mechanism of protein haze formation.