Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

Abstract

Tyrosol (TYR) and hydroxytyrosol (HYT) are bioactive phenols present in olive oil and wine, basic elements of the Mediterranean diet. TYR is reported in the literature for its interesting antioxidant, cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In wine, its concentration can reach values as high as about 40 mg/L [Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007] but, more frequently, this phenol – derived from yeast metabolism of tyrosine during fermentation – is present at lower levels, generally higher in red wines compared to whites. HYT was measured for the first time by Di Tommaso et al. [1998] in Italian wines – with maximum values of 4.20 mg/L and 1.92 mg/L for red and white wines, respectively – while definitely lower concentrations have been found later in Greek samples. Concentrations of about 2-3 mg/L have been reported by Minuti et al. [2006] for red wines while Romboli et al. [2015] observed definitely higher concentrations – up to 25 mg/L – in case of slow fermentations of Sangiovese wines processed in lab-scale. Oddly, in spite of the non-negligible concentration of these compounds in wine, few data are available regarding the concentration variability of TYR and HYT due to not genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains available on the market and used in winery conditions. To investigate this variability, 7 yeast strains (Zymaflore VL1; Fermol Arome Plus; AWRI 796; La Claire EM2; Anchor VIN13; Zymaflore VL3; Mycoferm CRU 31) were used (15 g/hL) to ferment – on semi-industrial scale, at 18-21°C – five Pinot gris juices achieved from different vineyards. They were adequately provided with natural assimilable nitrogen (163-214 mg/L), and had been well settled (36 h, 10°C, < 100 NTU) and supplemented with 20-30 mg/L SO2. After alcoholic fermentation, wines were sulphited (80 mg/L) and maintained sur lies under argon blanketing (4°C x 90 days), with batonnage 1 time a week on average. In the transition from juice to wine, the mean concentrations of TYR and HYT increased about 60 and 20 times. In wine, TYR ranged between 4.20 and 15.51 mg/L, and HYT between 0.33 and 3.45 mg/L confirming the values in the literature. Statistically significant differences have been observed between yeast strains, both for TYR and HYT, and maximum variability between strain mean concentrations was about 35%, corresponding to a range of about 2.2 mg/L TYR and 0.55 mg/L HYT. In any case, the variability linked to the origin of the juice was higher than that linked to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007]. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 57(3), 146-152 Di Tommaso et al. (1998). J. High Res. Chromatography 21(10), 549-553 Minuti et al. (2006). J. Chromatography A, 1114, 263-268 Romboli et al. (2015). W. J. Microbiol. Biotech. 31(7), 1137-1145.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Tomàs Villegas*, Chiara Barnaba, Giorgio Nicolini, Luca Debiasi, Roberto Larcher, Tiziana Nardin

*fondazione E.Mach

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Novel contribution to the study of mouth-feel properties in wines

In general, there is a well-established lexicon related to wine aroma and taste properties; however mouth-feel-related vocabulary usually includes heterogeneous, multimodal and personalized terms. Gawel et al.
(2000) published a wheel related to mouthfeel properties of red wine. However, its use in scientific publications has been limited. The authors accepted that the approach had certain limitations as it included redundant and terms with hedonic tone and some others were absent. It is of high interest to generate a mouth-feel lexicon and finding the chemical compound or group of compounds responsible for such properties in red wine. In the present work a chemical fractionation method has been developed.

Use of glutathione under different grape processing and winemaking conditions and its impact on the formation of sulfide off-flavors, colour, and sensory characteristics of Riesling, Sauvignon blanc, and Chardonnay

The use of glutathione (GSH) in winemaking has been legitimated recently, according to OIV resolutions OENO 445-2015 and OENO 446-2015 a maximum dose of 20 mg/L is now allowed to use in must and wine. Several studies have proven the benefits of GSH, predominantly in Sauvignon blanc. Thus, oxidative coloration of must and wine is limited, aroma compounds such as volatile thiols are preserved, and the development of ageing flavors such as sotolon and 2-aminoacetophenone is impeded. The protective effect may be explained by the high affinity of GSH to bind o-quinones which are formed during phenolic oxidation and which are known to initiate browning and other oxidative changes. Some researchers have proposed the hydroxycinnamic acid to GSH ratio (HGR) as an indicator of oxidation susceptibility of must and could show that lower ratios yielded lighter musts.

Characterizing the effects of nitrogen on grapevines with different scion/rootstock combinations: agronomic, metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches

Most vineyards are grafted and include a variety (Vitis vinifera) grafted over a wild Vitis rootstock (hybrids of V. berlandieri, riparia and rupestris). Grape berry quality at harvest depends on a subtle balance between acidity and the concentrations of sugars, polyphenols and precursors of aroma compounds. The mechanisms controlling the balance of sugars/acids/polyphenols are influenced by the abiotic environment, in particular nitrogen supply, and interact with the genotypes of both the scion variety and the rootstock. Previous work suggests that some of the effects of water stress are in fact linked to a nitrogen deficiency driven indirectly by the reduction of water absorption.

Partial dealcoholisation of red wine by reverse osmosis-evaporative perstraction: impact on wine composition

Around the world, the alcohol content of wine has been steadily increasing; partly as a consequence of climate change, but also due to improvements in viticultural management practices and winemaking techniques [1,2]. Concurrently, market demand for wines with lower alcohol levels has increased as consumers seek to reduce alcohol intake for social and/or health reasons [3]. As such, there is increasing demand for both innovative methods that allow winemakers to produce ‘reduced alcohol wines’ (RAW) and a better understanding of the impact of such methods on the composition of RAW. This study therefore aimed to investigate compositional changes in two red wines resulting from partial alcohol removal following treatment by one such method, involving a combination of reverse osmosis and evaporative perstraction (RO-EP).

Moscatel vine-shoot extracts as grapevine biostimulant to increase the varietal aroma of Airén wines

There is a growing interest in the exploitation of vine-shoots waste, since they are often left or burned. Sánchez-Gómez et al. [1] have shown that vines-shoots aqueous extracts have significant contents of bioactive compounds, among which several polyphenols and volatiles are highlighted. Recent studied had demonstrated that the chemical composition of vine-shoots is enhanced when vine-shoots are toasted
[2,3]. The application of vegetable products in the vineyards has led to significant changes towards a more “Sustainable Viticulture”. An innovative foliar application for Airén vine-shoot extracts have been carried out to the vineyard. It has been shown that they act as grape biostimulants, improving certain wine quality characteristics [4].