Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

Abstract

Tyrosol (TYR) and hydroxytyrosol (HYT) are bioactive phenols present in olive oil and wine, basic elements of the Mediterranean diet. TYR is reported in the literature for its interesting antioxidant, cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In wine, its concentration can reach values as high as about 40 mg/L [Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007] but, more frequently, this phenol – derived from yeast metabolism of tyrosine during fermentation – is present at lower levels, generally higher in red wines compared to whites. HYT was measured for the first time by Di Tommaso et al. [1998] in Italian wines – with maximum values of 4.20 mg/L and 1.92 mg/L for red and white wines, respectively – while definitely lower concentrations have been found later in Greek samples. Concentrations of about 2-3 mg/L have been reported by Minuti et al. [2006] for red wines while Romboli et al. [2015] observed definitely higher concentrations – up to 25 mg/L – in case of slow fermentations of Sangiovese wines processed in lab-scale. Oddly, in spite of the non-negligible concentration of these compounds in wine, few data are available regarding the concentration variability of TYR and HYT due to not genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains available on the market and used in winery conditions. To investigate this variability, 7 yeast strains (Zymaflore VL1; Fermol Arome Plus; AWRI 796; La Claire EM2; Anchor VIN13; Zymaflore VL3; Mycoferm CRU 31) were used (15 g/hL) to ferment – on semi-industrial scale, at 18-21°C – five Pinot gris juices achieved from different vineyards. They were adequately provided with natural assimilable nitrogen (163-214 mg/L), and had been well settled (36 h, 10°C, < 100 NTU) and supplemented with 20-30 mg/L SO2. After alcoholic fermentation, wines were sulphited (80 mg/L) and maintained sur lies under argon blanketing (4°C x 90 days), with batonnage 1 time a week on average. In the transition from juice to wine, the mean concentrations of TYR and HYT increased about 60 and 20 times. In wine, TYR ranged between 4.20 and 15.51 mg/L, and HYT between 0.33 and 3.45 mg/L confirming the values in the literature. Statistically significant differences have been observed between yeast strains, both for TYR and HYT, and maximum variability between strain mean concentrations was about 35%, corresponding to a range of about 2.2 mg/L TYR and 0.55 mg/L HYT. In any case, the variability linked to the origin of the juice was higher than that linked to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007]. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 57(3), 146-152 Di Tommaso et al. (1998). J. High Res. Chromatography 21(10), 549-553 Minuti et al. (2006). J. Chromatography A, 1114, 263-268 Romboli et al. (2015). W. J. Microbiol. Biotech. 31(7), 1137-1145.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Tomàs Villegas*, Chiara Barnaba, Giorgio Nicolini, Luca Debiasi, Roberto Larcher, Tiziana Nardin

*fondazione E.Mach

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Comparison of aroma-related compounds of carbonic maceration and traditional young red winemaking in case of Merlot by means of targeted metabolomic approach

Winemaking decisions and techniques are known to affect the final aromatic composition of red wines. Winemakers put a constant effort into the improved controlling of vinification procedures to achieve better quality. Anyway an increased customer’s demand for uniqueness is often forcing them to adjust and offer new and new interesting products. To support the producers, an improved knowledge on aromatic potential as affected by classical and alternative strategies is needed.

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary step in the vinification process and it follows alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is predominantly carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two processes result in the degradation of metabolites to produce secondary metabolites which also contribute to the final wine flavour and quality. AF results in the production of ethanol and carbon dioxide from sugars and MLF stems from the degradation of L-malic acid (a dicarboxylic acid) to L-lactic acid (a monocarboxylic acid). The latter process results in a smoother texture as the acidity of the wine is reduced by the process, it also adds to the flavour complexity of the wine.

Metabolomics of grape polyphenols as a consequence of post-harvest drying: on-plant dehydration vs warehouse withering

A method of suspect screening analysis to study grape metabolomics, was developed [1]. By performing ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) – high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analysis of the grape extract, averaging 320-450 putative grape compounds are identified which include mainly polyphenols. Identification of metabolites is performed by a new HRMS-database of putative grape and wine compounds expressly constructed (GrapeMetabolomics) which currently includes around 1,100 entries.

Some applications come from a method to concentrate proteins

All techniques usually used to assay proteins was not reliable in vegetable extract due to interferences with the components included in extracts like polyphenols, tanins, pectines, aromatics compounds. Absorbance at 280nm, Kjeldhal assay, Biuret and Lowry methods, Acid Bicinchonique technique and Bradford assay give the results depending on the composition of extract, on the presence or not of detergent and on the raw material (Marchal, 1995). Another difficulty in these extracts for the quantification of proteins comes from the large amount of water included in vegetable and the low concentration of proteins. Thus in red wines, proteins are usually not taken into account due to their low concentration (typically below 10 mgL-1) and to the presence of anthocyanis and polyphenols.