Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Efficiency of alternative chemical and physical treatments in reducing Brettanomyces Bruxellensis from oak wood

Efficiency of alternative chemical and physical treatments in reducing Brettanomyces Bruxellensis from oak wood

Abstract

Oak barrels form an integral part of wine production, especially that of high quality wines. However, due to its porosity, wood presents an ecological niche for microbial proliferation and is highly susceptible to microbial spoilage which could cause considerable economic losses. Brettanomyces bruxellensis, the most commonly encountered microorganism responsible for spoilage during barrel ageing, can remain in barrels after barrel sanitation to contaminate new batches of wine after refilling. Therefore, effective sanitation treatments are of utmost importance to prevent recurring wine spoilage. Since a moratorium on the use of sulphur dioxide, the most widely used biocide for barrel sanitation, has been issued by the European Commission, there is a drastic need to evaluate alternative sanitation methods. Literature on the effectiveness of barrel sanitation treatments is scattered and presents inconclusive results. Furthermore, all studies have used culture-dependent methods to detect Brettanomyces which has been reported to attain a viable but non-culturable state [1,2]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate several physical and chemical sanitation treatments in their efficiency to eliminate B. bruxellensis from oak wood. French oak wood was contaminated with different B. bruxellensis strains and subsequently subjected to several chemical and physical sanitation treatments. The methods included, among others, ozone gas, ozonated water, high pressure ultrasound, steam, peracetic acid, sodium percarbonate and microwave. After their extraction from the oak wood, Brettanomyces cells were subjected to a fluorescence-based live/dead staining and detected by means of flow cytometry. The treatments differed greatly in their ability to reduce B. bruxellensis cells with ozone gas showing promising results. Sodium percarbonate and steam treatments were also effective in reducing cells. This study presents the first evaluation of alternative barrel sanitation treatments by flow cytometry, a culture-independent method, and is also the first study to compare an array of barrel sanitation treatments under controlled conditions.

1. Agnolucci, M., Rea, F., Sbrana, C., Cristani, C., Fracassetti, D., Tirelli, A., Nuti, M., 2010. Sulphur dioxide affects culturability and volatile phenol production by Brettanomyces/ Dekkera bruxellensis. International Journal of Food Microbiology 143, 76-80. 2. Serpaggi, V., Remize, F., Recorbet, G., Gaudot-Dumas, E., Sequeira-Le Grand, A., Alexandre, H., 2012. Characterization of the “viable but nonculturable”(VBNC) state in the wine spoilage yeast Brettanomyces. Food Microbiology 30, 438-447.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Engela Kritzinger*, Maren Scharfenberger-Schm, Ulrich Fischer

*DLR Rheinpfalz

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Anthropogenic factors in modulations of fungal populations from grapes to wines and their repercussions on wine characteristics

The effects of anthropogenic activities on vineyard (different plant protections) and in winery
(pressing/clarification step, addition of sulfur dioxide) on fungal populations from grape to wine were studied. The studied anthropogenic activities modify the fungal diversity. Thus, lower biodiversity of grapes from organic modality was measured for the three vintages considered compared to biodiversity from ecophyto modality and conventional modality. The pressing / clarification steps strongly modify fungal populations and the influence of the winery flora is highlighted.

Ethyl esters interact with the major wine Thaumatin Like Protein VVTL1

The interactions among aromatic compounds and proteins is an important issue for the quality of foods and beverages. In wine, the loss of flavor after vinification is associated to bentonite treatment and this effect can be the result of the removal of aroma compounds which are bound wine proteins. This phenomenon was recently demonstrated for long chain fatty acids and their ethyl esters (1). Since these latter compounds are spectroscopically silent, their association with proteins is not easy to measure.

Modulating role of SO2 in white wine protein haze formation

Despite the extensive research performed during the last decades, the multifactorial mechanism responsible for the white wine protein haze formation is not fully characterized. Herein, a new model is proposed, which is based on the experimental identification of sulfur dioxide as a major modulating factor inducing wine protein haze upon heating. As opposed to other reducing agents, such as 2-mercaptoethanol, dithiothreitol and tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), the addition of SO2 to must/wine upon heating cleaves intraprotein disulfide bonds, hinders thiol-disulfide exchange during protein interactions and can lead to the formation of novel inter/intraprotein disulfide bonds. Those are eventually responsible for wine protein aggregation which follows a nucleation-growth kinetic model as shown by dynamic light scattering [1].

Extraction of pathogenesis-related proteins and phenolics in Sauvignon Blanc as affected by different

The composition of wine is largely determined by the composition of pre-fermentation juice, which is influenced by extraction of grape components. Different grape harvesting and processing conditions could affect the extraction of grape components into juice. Among these grape components, pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins are of great concern for white wine maker as they are the main cause of haze formation in finished white wine. If not removed before bottling, these PR proteins may progress into haze through the formation of complex with phenolics under certain conditions. Thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs) and chitinases are the main constituents of PR proteins found in protein haze.

Using elicitors in different grape varieties. Effect over their phenolic composition

Phenolic compounds are very important in crop plants and have been the subject of a large number of studies. Three main reasons can be cited for optimizing the level of phenolic compounds in crop plants: their physiological role in plants, their technological significance for food processing, and their nutritional characteristics1 Indeed, an enormous diversity of phenolic antioxidants is found in fruits and vegetables, and their presence and roles can be affected or modified by several pre- and postharvest cultural practices and/or food processing technologies (Ruiz-García et al. 2012, Goldman et al. 1999, Tudela et al. 2002). In winegrapes, the technological importance of phenolic compounds, mainly flavonoids, is well-known.