Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Development and validation of a standardized oxidation assay for the accurate measurement of the ability of different wines to form “de novo” oxidation-related aldehydes

Development and validation of a standardized oxidation assay for the accurate measurement of the ability of different wines to form “de novo” oxidation-related aldehydes

Abstract

From the standpoint of wine aroma oxidation there are two effects observed: aroma degradation of oxygen sensitive compounds (polyfunctional mercaptans) and the appearance of new substances with high aromatic power (acetaldehyde, methional, phenylacetaldehyde, sotolon, alkenals, isobutanal and 2, 3-metylbutanals) (1-5). According to our experience, Strecker aldehydes are compounds with highest sensory relevance in the oxidative degradation of many wines (5-7). Based on previous research, it was observed that these compounds can be already present in freshly bottled wines, free from any sign of oxidation; forming stable, non-volatile and odorless complexes with sulfur dioxide (8). During storage in the bottle these compounds are released as the level of free SO2 decreases by oxidation causing a shift in the SO2-aldehyde adduct chemical equilibria. Moreover, wine aldehydes can be formed throught direct oxidation of their precursors (“de novo” formation), when the free SO2 level is under 5 mg/l (7-8). The main goal of this work is to study the intrinsic ability of the wines for the formation of “aldehydes de novo”. Hence, a method to consume oxygen at controlled doses, at 45 ° C, has been developed. This oxidation method allows to reach de novo formation of aldehydes on a fast way (2-7 days) depending on the wine. The validation of this method is carried out maintaining the same oxidation conditions at 25º C. In addition, the same wines have been submitted to consecutive air saturation cycles (9) for means of comparation. The proposed strategy comprises the study of eight red wines in duplicate, each wine underwent three increasing oxygen doses. The analysis carried out at the beginning at the and end of the oxidation were: aminoacids, metals, free and total SO2, total carbonyl compounds, acetaldehyde, color, IPT, Folin, as well as major and trace aroma compounds. The results show that this is a reproducible method of oxidation, which allows to reach de novo formation of aldehydes at all doses studied. Different profiles of oxygen consumption are obtained depending on the age and previous contact with oxygen, temperature had a strong effect on the formation of Strecker aldehydes with respect to the oxygen consumed.

1. Wildenradt et al., AJEV,1974, 25, 119 2. Escudero et al., JAFC, 2000, 48, 4268 3. Ferreira, A.C.S et al., JAFC, 2003, 51, 1377 4. Cutzach et al., JISVV, 1998, 32, 211 5. Culleré et al., JAFC, 2007, 55, 876 6. San Juan et al., JAFC, 2012, 60, 5045 7. Ferreira et al., JAFC, 2014,62, 10015 8. Bueno et al., JAFC., DOI 10.102117acs.jafc5b04634 9. Ferreira et al. ., JAFC., 2015, 63, 10928

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Almudena Marrufo-Curtido*, Ana Escudero, Ignacio Ontañon, Mónica Bueno, Vanesa Carrascon, Vicente Ferreira

*

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Anti/prooxidant activity of wine polyphenols in reactions of adrenaline auto-oxidation

Adrenaline (epinephrine) belongs to catecholamine class. It is a neurotransmitter and both a hormone which is released by the sympathetic nervous system and adrenal medulla in response to a range of stresses in order to regulate blood pressure, cardiac stimulation, relaxation of smooth muscles and other physiological processes. Adrenaline exhibits an effective antioxidant capacity (1). However, adrenalin is capable to auto-oxidation and in this case it generates toxic reactive oxygen intermediates and adrenochrome. Under in vitro conditions, auto-oxidation of adrenaline occurs in an alkaline medium (2).

Comparative proteomic analysis of wines made from Botrytis cinerea infected and healthy grapes reveal interesting parallels to the gushing phenomenon in sparkling wine

In addition to aroma compounds also protein composition strongly influences the quality of wines. Proteins of wine derive mainly from the plant Vitis vinifera and may be influenced by abiotic stress as well as fermentation conditions or fining. Additionally, fungal infections can affect the protein content as well by introducing fungal proteins or affecting grape protein composition. An infection of the vine with the plant pathogenic fungus Botrytis (B.) cinerea was shown to cause a degradation of proteins in the resulting wine. Moreover, it influences the foaming properties in sparkling wine.

Influence of methyl jasmonate foliar application to vineyard on grape volatile composition over three consecutive vintages

An alternative to improve grape quality is the application to the vineyard of elicitors. Although these compounds were first used to increase resistance of plants against pathogens, it has been found that they are also able to induce mechanisms involved in the synthesis of phenolic compounds and some amino acids. However, researches about the influence of elicitors on grape volatile composition are scarcely. Therefore, the aim of this work was to study the influence of methyl jasmonate (MeJ) foliar application on grape aroma composition over three consecutive vintages. MeJ was applied to Tempranillo grapevines at a concentration of 10 mM in 2013, 2014, and 2015 years. Control plants were sprayed with water.

A combination of biotechnology tools and coopers elements for an alternative the addition of SO2 at the end of the malolactic fermentation in red wines or at the “mutage” for the “liquoreux” wines

In red wines the post-MLF SO2 addition is an essential event. It is also the case for the “mutage” during the elaboration of the “liquoreux”. At these moments SO2 plays an antimicrobial action and an antioxidant effect. But at current pH of wines, ensuring a powerful molecular SO2 has become very difficult. Recent work on Brettanomyces strains have also shown that some strains are resistant up to 1.2 mg / L of molecular SO2. It’s also the case of the some Saccharomuces or Zygosaccharomyces strains suitable to re-ferment “liquoreux” wines after the “mutage”.

Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary step in the vinification process and it follows alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is predominantly carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two processes result in the degradation of metabolites to produce secondary metabolites which also contribute to the final wine flavour and quality. AF results in the production of ethanol and carbon dioxide from sugars and MLF stems from the degradation of L-malic acid (a dicarboxylic acid) to L-lactic acid (a monocarboxylic acid). The latter process results in a smoother texture as the acidity of the wine is reduced by the process, it also adds to the flavour complexity of the wine.