Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Influence of toasting oak wood on ellagitannin structures

Influence of toasting oak wood on ellagitannin structures

Abstract

Ellagitannins (ETs) have been reported to be the main phenolic compounds found in oak wood. These compounds, belonging to the hydrolysable tannin class of polyphenols, are esters of hexahydroxydiphenic acid (HHDP) and a polyol, usually glucose or quinic acid. They own their name to their capacity to be hydrolysed and liberate ellagic acid and they have an impact on astringency and bitterness sensation, which is strongly dependant on their structure. The toasting phase is particularly crucial in barrels fabrication and influences wood composition. Burning the inner oak wood barrels surface with an open fire inducing severe changes in ellagitannins structures and compositions. Up to now thermal ellagitannin products or the reaction mechanisms underlying the ellagitannin degradation are not well searched, thus the goal of the present study is to research oak wood ellagitannin changes during toasting. For this purpose a purification protocol was established, 100 mg ellagitannins crude extract was fractionated on Toyopearl TSK HW-40 (F) gel from Tosoh Corp, ellagitannins were eluted in the acetone/water fraction. This fraction was fractionated for two times on a C-18 column. The final fraction containing only the eight principal ellagitannins was dry-heated in a lab oven for 60 min at 220 °C. After cooling, it was further fractionated on C-18 column and separated by means of preparative HPLC before being injected in UPLC/TOF-MS. Reduction process is occuring during toasting whereas oxydation can occur without heating; Thus vescalagin, is reduced into deoxyvescalagin whereas castalagin oxidation form is presented before and after toasting. Additionally to deoxyvescalagin, other ellagitannin derivatives which showed [M-H]-ion peak at m/z 1055.0631, 1041.0792, 1011.0756 and 971.0456 were produced by the toasting and identified for the first time. LC-MS/MS analyses gave strong evidence that decarboxylations as well as ellagic acid loss are the key steps in ellagitanin thermal degradation.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Kleopatra Chira*, Michael Jourdes, Pierre Louis Teissedre

*Institut des sciences de la vigne et du vin

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

South Africa’s top 10 Sauvignon blanc wines. How do the chemical and sensory profiles compare?

FNB Top 10 Sauvignon Blanc competition, presented by the Sauvignon Blanc Interest Group of South Africa and sponsored by First National Bank, is the country’s foremost platform for producers of this cultivar to showcase and benchmark their wines. Wines entered in the competition originated from all over the winegrowing regions of the country and the winning wines showed good representation of quality South African Sauvignon blanc wines. The ten selected wines were subjected to various chemical analyses including volatile thiol and methoxypyrazine determination, while the sensory profile of each wine was determined using projective mapping.

Impact of non-fruity compounds on red wines fruity aromatic expression: the role of higher alcohols

A part, at least, of the fruity aroma of red wines is the consequence of perceptive interactions between various aromatic compounds, particularly ethyl esters and acetates, which may contribute to the perception of fruity aromas, specifically thanks to synergistic effects.1,2 The question of the indirect impact of non-fruity compounds on this particular aromatic expression has not yet been widely investigated. Among these compounds higher alcohols (HA) represent the main group, from a quantitative standpoint, of volatiles in many alcoholic beverages. Moreover, some bibliographic data suggested their contribution to the aromatic complexity by either increasing or masking flavors of wine, depending of their concentrations.

Screening sensory-directed methodology for the selection of non-saccharomyces wine yeasts based on perceived aroma quality

The present work contributes by developing a rapid sensory-directed methodology for the screening and selection of high quality wines with different sensory profiles Therefore, Verdejo and Tempranillo musts were fermented with 50 different yeasts each under controlled laboratory conditions. Resulting samples were firstly categorized according to five levels of quality by a panel of wine professionals (Sáenz-Navajas, Ballester et al. 2013). Higher quality samples were described by flash profiling by a semi-trained panel
(Valentin, Chollet et al. 2012) and most distinctive samples were screened by gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) (López, Aznar et al. 2002).

The impact of different yeasts and harvest time on the wine quality of Beihong and Beimei (<I>V. vinifera x V. amurensis</I>)

Beihong and Beimei are two wine cultivars from ‘Muscat Hamberg’ (V. vinifera L.) and wild V. amurensis Rupr., which were released in China in 2008. Here,two enology practices were reported. Firstly, the impact of different yeasts including D254, GRE, K1, D21 and BDX on dry wine quality of Beihong and Beimei was investigated. For Beihong, among wines fermented by all yeasts, residual sugar content was the lowest, total anthocyanin and resveratrol contents were the highest in the wine by D254. However, the wine by D254 had lower titrable acid than those by the other yeasts except BDX.

Full automation of oenological fermentations and its application to the processing of must containing high sugar or acetic acid concentrations

Climate change and harvest date decisions have led to the evolution of must quality over the last decades. Increases in must sugar concentrations are among the most obvious consequences, quantitatively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a robust and acid tolerant organism. These properties, its sugar to ethanol conversion rate and ethanol tolerance make it the ideal production organism for wine fermentations. Unfortunately, high sugar concentrations may affect S. cerevisiae and lead to growth inhibition or yeast lysis, and cause sluggish or stuck fermentations. Even sublethal conditions cause a hyperosmotic stress response in S. cerevisiae which leads to increased formation of fermentation by-products, including acetic acid, which may exceed legal limits in some wines.