terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Identifying physiological and genetic bases of grapevine adaptation to climate change with maintained quality: Genome diversity as a driver for phenotypic plasticity  (‘PlastiVigne’ project)

Identifying physiological and genetic bases of grapevine adaptation to climate change with maintained quality: Genome diversity as a driver for phenotypic plasticity  (‘PlastiVigne’ project)

Abstract

In the face of climate change, new grapevine varieties will have to show an adaptive  phenotypic plasticity to maintain production with erratic water resources, and still ensure the quality of the final product. Their selection requires a better knowledge of the genetic basis of those traits and of the elementary processes involved in their variability. ‘PlastiVigne’, an emblematic project of the Vinid’Occ key challenge, funded by the Occitanie Region (France), tackles this issue with innovative genomic and physiological tools implemented on a unique panel of grape genetic resources representing the genetic diversity of Vitis vinifera. A graph-pangenome is developed from a representative set of high-quality genomes to study the extent and impact of structural genome variations and chromosomal rearrangements in the rapid adaptation capacity of grapevine. We will characterize structural variants potentially related to differential expression or alternative spicing of candidate genes for stress tolerance in individual grape berries. Markers derived from structural variants mapped on the pangenome, as well as new sets of SNP markers, will allow the identification of genomic regions associated to leaf water and carbon balance under several water stress regimes, its  plasticity, adaptation traits like phenology, genomic vulnerability, and to some traits related to the aromatic potential of grape berries. They represent new tools for grape breeding. More detailed functional analysis of leaf and berry phenotypic plasticity in response to water deficit will be then conducted, on a subset of contrasted varieties. We will present the project strategy and highlight a few preliminary results.

DOI:

Publication date: June 13, 2024

Issue: Open GPB 2024

Type: Poster

Authors

Dominique This 1, Roberto Bacilieri1, Eva Coindre1,4, Olivia di Valentin2, Baptiste Pierre1, Flora Tavernier1, Thomas Baerenzung dit Baron 3, Gautier Sarah1, Vincent Segura 1, Agnès Doligez1, Charles Romieu1, Thierry Lacombe1, Sylvain Santoni1, Christine Tollon-Cordet1, Audrey Weber1, Aude Coupel-Ledru 4, Thierry Simonneau4, Benoit Pallas4, Gaelle Rolland4, Stéphane Berthezène4, Romain Boulord4, Julien Pirrello2, Farid Regad2, Olivier Geffroy 3, Olivier Rodrigues3, Aurélie Roland5, Somaya Sachot5, Nicolas Saurin6, Emmanuelle Garcia-Adrados6, Cécile Marchal7, Sandrine Dedet7, Anne Mocoeur7, Alban Jacques3, Patrice This1*

1 AGAP Institute, Univ Montpellier – CIRAD – INRAE, Institut Agro, F-34398 Montpellier, France
2 LRSV,  Université de Toulouse – INP – Purpan, 31076 Toulouse, France
3 PPGV, Université de Toulouse -, INP – Purpan, 31076 Toulouse, France
4 LEPSE, Univ Montpellier – INRAE – Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
5 SPO, INRAE – Institut Agro -University Montpellier, 34060 Montpellier, France
6 Domaine de Pech Rouge, Univ Montpellier – INRAE, F-11430 Gruissan, France
7 Domaine de Vassal, INRAe, route de Sète, 34340 Marseillan, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

Vitis vinifera, plasticity, pangenome, water/carbon balance, aroma

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Open GPB | Open GPB 2024

Citation

Related articles…

Deciphering the hormonal regulatory networks underlying grape berry resistance to Botrytis cinerea

Botrytis cinerea is a major fungal pathogen affecting viticulture, causing substantial economic losses due to reduced fruit quality and subsequent yield.

Simulating the impact of climate change on viticultural systems in various European vineyards

Aim: Global climate change affects regional climates and hold implications for wine growing regions worldwide (Jones, 2007, 2015; van Leeuwen and Darriet, 2016). The prospect of 21st century climate change consequently is one of the major challenges facing the wine industry (Keller, 2010).

Retallack Viticulture EcoVineyards video

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" text_orientation="center" custom_margin="65px||18px||false|false"...

Modernizing grapevine rootstock breeding at UC Davis: strategies, tools, and early outcomes

Soil salinity is an increasingly critical challenge for grapevine production, particularly in Mediterranean climates like California. Chloride (Cl-) accumulation, in particular, severely impacts vine growth, productivity, and fruit quality.

Delaying irrigation initiation linearly reduces yield with little impact on maturity in Pinot noir

When to initiate irrigation is a critical annual management decision that has cascading effects on grapevine productivity and wine quality in the context of climate change. A multi-site trial was begun in 2021 to optimize irrigation initiation timing using midday stem water potential (ψstem) thresholds characterized as departures from non-stressed baseline ψstemvalues (Δψstem). Plant material, vine and row spacing, and trellising systems were concomitant among sites, while vine age, soil type, and pruning systems varied. Five target Δψstem thresholds were arranged in an RCBD and replicated eight times at each site: 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 MPa (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively). When thresholds were reached, plots were irrigated weekly at 70% ETc. Yield components and berry composition were quantified at harvest. To better generalize inferences across sites, data were analyzed by ANOVA using a mixed model including site as a random factor. Across sites, irrigation was initiated at Δψstem = 0.24, 0.50, 0.65, 0.93, and 0.98 MPa for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Consistent significant negative linear trends were found for several key yield and berry composition variables. Yield decreased by 12.9, 15.9, 19.5, and 27.4% for T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively, compared to T1 (p < 0.0001) across sites that were driven by similarly linear reductions in berry weight (p < 0.0001). Comparatively, berry composition varied little among treatments. Juice total soluble solids decreased linearly from T1 to T5 – though only ranged 0.9 Brix (p = 0.012). Because producers are paid by the ton, and contracts simply stipulate a target maturity level, first-year results suggest that there is no economic incentive to induce moderate water deficits before irrigation initiation, regardless of vineyard site. Subsequent years will further elucidate the carryover effects of delaying irrigation initiation on productivity over the long term.