terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 The grapevine QTLome is ripe: QTL survey, databasing, and first applications

The grapevine QTLome is ripe: QTL survey, databasing, and first applications

Abstract

Overarching surveys of QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) studies in both model plants and staple crops have facilitated the access to information and boosted the impact of existing data on plant improvement activities. Today, the grapevine community is ready to take up the challenge of making the wealth of QTL information F.A.I.R.. To ensure that all valuable published data can be used more effectively, the myriad of identified QTLs have to be captured, standardised and stored in a dedicated public database.
As an outcome of the GRAPEDIA initiative, QTL-dedicated experts from around the world have gathered to compile the grapevine QTLome: the complete information (e.g., map positions, associated phenotypes) describing all experimentally supported QTLs for a specific trait. This has led to the collection of more than 150 published QTL papers and to the FAIRification of the fields relevant to the grapevine QTL database. A grapevine-QTL frontend application for uploading data has been developed to support QTL curators.
For each specific trait, the QTLome will be anchored firstly to the grapevine reference PN40024.T2T(v5) genome/annotation and secondly to the published diverse genome assemblies. The generated “Grapevine QTL browser” will (i) enhance the understanding of the genetic architecture of diverse phenotypes, (ii) reveal consistent QTLs across studies (consensus genomic intervals), which are particularly valuable for marker-assisted breeding, (iii) assist the identification of candidate genes (relevant alleles) and their integration into biological/biotechnological applications. The potential of this resource will be demonstrated by a case study.

DOI:

Publication date: June 14, 2024

Issue: Open GPB 2024

Type: Article

Authors

Silvia Vezzulli1*§, Marco Moretto, Paola Bettinelli1, Javier Tello2, Pablo Carbonell-Bejerano2, Agnès Doligez3, Elsa Chedid4, Marina de Miguel4, Elisa Marguerit4, Éric Duchêne5, Ludger Hausmann6, Franco Röckel6, Daniela Holtgräwe7, Noam Reshef8, Varoostha Govender9, Justin Lashbrooke9, Claudia Muñoz-Espinoza10, Marco Meneses11, Patricio Hinrichsen11, Summaira Riaz12, Chin Feng Hwang13, Lance Cadle-Davidson14, Diana Bellin15, Alessandra Amato15, Marianna Fasoli15, José Tomás Matus16, Lakshay Anand17, Camille Rustenholz5, Laura Costantini1

1 Fondazione Edmund Mach, Research and Innovation Centre, San Michele all’Adige, Trento, Italy
2 Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino, CSIC, Universidad de la Rioja, Gobierno de La Rioja, Logroño, Spain
3 AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
4 EGFV, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRAE, ISVV, Villenave d’Ornon, France
5 SVQV, INRAE-University of Strasbourg, Colmar, France
6 Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, Siebeldingen, Germany
7 Genetics and Genomics of Plants, CeBiTec & Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
8 Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel
9 Department of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
10 Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile
11 Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA La Platina, Santiago, Chile
12 Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research Unit, USDA-ARS San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, Parlier, California, USA
13 State Fruit Experiment Station at Mountain Grove Campus, Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri, USA
14 USDA-ARS Grape Genetics Research Unit, Geneva, New York, USA
15 Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
16 Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Universitat de València-CSIC, Paterna, Valencia, Spain
17 Environmental Epigenetics and Genetics Group, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

§ equally contributed

Contact the author*

Keywords

QTL browser, database, manual curation, Vitis ontology, FAIR

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Open GPB | Open GPB 2024

Citation

Related articles…

Sustainable viticulture’ the “semi‐minimal” pruned “hedge” system for grape vines long term experience on cv. Sangiovese (Vitis vinifera L.)

In previous experiments carried out in Bologna on Sangiovese grapevines raised with the Australian “Minimal Pruning” system, it has been shown that this system left an excessive burden of buds on the vine.

Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) According to the Chenin blanc Association of South Africa, there are three recognized dry wine styles, Fresh and Fruity (FF), Rich and Ripe Unwooded (RRU), and Rich and Ripe Wooded (RRW), classically attributed with the help of sensory evaluation. One of the “rapid methods” has drawn our attention for the purpose of simplifying and making style attribution for large sample sets, evaluated during different sessions, more robust. Polarized Projective Mapping (PPM) is a hybrid of Projective Mapping (PM) and Polarised Sensory Positioning (PSP). It is a reference-based method in which poles
(references) are used for the evaluation of similarities and dissimilarities between samples.

Copper reduction strategy for sangiovese in organic viticulture

Organic viticulture requires copper based treatments for bunch protection even though an intensive employment is no longer admitted because of its low leaching and phytotoxicity in the soil. UE Reg. 1981/2018 set copper employment to 4 kg/ha for year or 28 during 7 years with an absolute level allowed of 6 Kg/ha although those limits were decreased frequently.

Cover crops sown in the inter-rows shape the weed communities in three vineyards across Italy

The use of cover crops (CCs) is widely proposed as an alternative to traditional soil management in vineyards to exploit a wide range of ecosystem services. The presence of a CC in the inter-row space is known to control spontaneous vegetation in vineyards, primarily through the biomass of the sown crop, which competes with other spontaneous species for soil resources.

Comparison between satellite and ground data with UAV-based information to analyse vineyard spatio-temporal variability

Currently, the greatest challenge for vine growers is to improve the yield and quality of grapes by minimizing costs and environmental impacts. This goal can be achieved through a better knowledge of vineyard spatial variability. Traditional platforms such as airborne, satellite and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) solutions are useful investigation tools for vineyard site specific management.