terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Winemaking processes and oenological practices 9 Understanding aroma loss during partial wine dealcoholization by vacuum distillation

Understanding aroma loss during partial wine dealcoholization by vacuum distillation

Abstract

Dealcoholization of wine has gained increasing attention as consumer preferences shift toward lower-alcohol or alcohol-free beverages. This process meets key demands, including health-conscious lifestyles, regulatory compliance, and the expanding non-alcoholic market [1-3]. While traditional winemaking naturally produces alcohol, dealcoholization techniques reduce its content while preserving wine’s sensory and chemical integrity. Various methods, such as membrane processes, reverse osmosis, spinning cone column technology, and thermal distillation [4], offer different advantages and challenges, particularly regarding wine volume loss, aroma retention, and overall quality. Among these, vacuum distillation (VD) is promising for partial or complete dealcoholization by operating at lower pressures and temperatures.

This study investigates VD for partial dealcoholization (~2°). First, in a model wine, we analyze the impact of VD parameters—including number of columns, column packing type, and pressure—on aroma variation. Second, we evaluate VD’s effect on the chemical composition and sensory profile of white, rosé, and red wines using a selected VD setup.

The analysis of VD in model wine shows that higher alcohols are partially lost in the distillate (59–78% v/v ethanol), with 35% reduction for 2-methylpropanol and 3-methylbutanol, while methanol loss remains minimal (~2%). Aldehydes exhibit higher loss rates, with 60% loss for ethanal and 80% for ethyl acetate. Esters show 74–99% loss, depending on type. Results indicate that pressure significantly impacts aroma retention: lowering the pressure from 150 mbar to 50 mbar enhances ester retention, while 150 mbar increases higher alcohol and aldehyde removal.

In wines, partial dealcoholization (~2°) extracts mostly ethyl acetate (~90%), small amounts of methanol (1–10%), and 20–40% of higher alcohols. Larger esters (C8+ and cyclic esters) are less affected by VD, suggesting their lower volatility helps retain them in the wine, preserving some aromatic complexity. However, 80–100% of short-chain (C2–C4) and medium-chain (up to C6) esters are lost in the distillate, significantly altering the wine’s aroma. These esters exhibit high Henry’s law constants, explaining their volatility and major impact on wine aroma.

To conclude, even at the early stages of dealcoholization (~2° reduction), most wine aromas are lost in the first distillate fraction, highlighting the challenge of preserving fruity notes while separating them from ethanol.

References

[1] Ohana-Levi, N.; Netzer, Y. Long-Term Trends of Global Wine Market. Agriculture, 2023, 13 (1), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010224.

[2] Anderson, B. O.; Berdzuli, N.; Ilbawi, A.; Kestel, D.; Kluge, H. P.; Krech, R.; Mikkelsen, B.; Neufeld, M.; Poznyak, V.; Rekve, D.; et al. Health and Cancer Risks Associated with Low Levels of Alcohol Consumption. Lancet Public Heal., 2023, 8 (1), e6–e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(22)00317-6.

[3] Tempere, S.; Pérès, S.; Espinoza, A. F.; Darriet, P.; Giraud-Héraud, E.; Pons, A. Consumer Preferences for Different Red Wine Styles and Repeated Exposure Effects. Food Qual. Preference, 2019, 73, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.12.009.

[4] Sam, F. E.; Ma, T.-Z.; Salifu, R.; Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.-M.; Zhang, B.; Han, S.-Y. Techniques for Dealcoholization of Wines: Their Impact on Wine Phenolic Composition, Volatile Composition, and Sensory Characteristics. Foods, 2021, 10 (10), 2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102498.

Publication date: June 5, 2025

Type: Oral communication

Authors

Marion Breniaux1,*, Rémy Ghidossi1

1 Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRAE, OENO, UMR 1366, ISVV, F-33140 Villenave-d’Ornon, France.

Contact the author*

Keywords

partial dealcoholization, vacuum distillation, aromas, esters, higher alcohols

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Effects of winemaking variables on the chemical and sensory quality of Schiava wines up to one year storage in bottle

The interactive effects of three major enological variables were evaluated on the quality of Schiava wine up to one year of storage in bottle.

Mannoproteins from oenological by-products as tartaric stabilization and color agents in white and red wines

Climate change is drastically modifying grape composition and wine quality. As consequence, must and wines are becoming unbalanced, with high sugar concentration, increased alcohol content, lower acidity, excessive astringency, color instability and also a rise in the incidence of tartaric instability is being showed.

Metal reducing agents (Fe and Al) as possible agents to measure the dimensions of the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) pool of precursors in wines

Reductive wine fault is characterized by the presence of odors such as rotten eggs or spoiled camembert cheese, originating from hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methanethiol (MeSH) [1]. These compounds stabilize in polysulfide forms, creating a complex pool of precursors that will revert to both molecules when the environment becomes anoxic [2].

Evolution of oak barrels C-glucosidic ellagitannins in model wine solution

Oak wood has a significant impact on the chemical composition of wine, leading to transformations that influence its organoleptic properties, such as its aroma, structure, astringency, bitterness and color. Among the main extractible non-volatile polyphenol compounds released from oak wood, the ellagitannins are found [1].

Key learnings about the chemical bases of wine uniqueness and quality, essential companions for future developments

This presentation aims to demonstrate that the value attributed to wine as we today know it is based on three factors: 1) sensory balance, 2) personality, and 3) bioactivity.