terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Winemaking processes and oenological practices 9 Unveiling Metschnikowia spp.: mechanisms and impacts of bioprotection in winemaking

Unveiling Metschnikowia spp.: mechanisms and impacts of bioprotection in winemaking

Abstract

Bioprotection, leveraging beneficial microorganisms, has emerged as a sustainable approach to modern winemaking, minimizing reliance on chemical preservatives like as sulfur dioxide (SO2). Among these microorganisms, non-Saccharomyces yeasts, particularly Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP), have garnered significant attention. By establishing a favorable microbial environment during the early stages of fermentation, MP reduces the risk of undesirable fermentations and spoilage caused by lactic acid bacteria, Brettanomyces bruxellensis, or acetic acid bacteria (AAB). Pulcherriminic acid, an iron-chelating compound responsible for the red pigment, pulcherrimin, has long been considered the key mediator of MP bioprotection through iron deprivation.  This yeast species also plays a dual role in shaping microbial dynamics and enhancing wine quality.

This study explored the broader bioprotective potential of Metschnikowia species, including those other than MP, against a model AAB. The strains demonstrating the most effective bioprotection (BP) were further assessed for their oenological suitability and the underlying mechanisms supporting their BP activity were investigated.

In a first step, forty-six strains of Metschnikowia spp. were co-inoculated with the AAB Gluconobacter oxydans (Go), responsible for acetic souring in commercial grape juice. Monitoring bacterial growth over time revealed three distinct yeast BP profiles. Only one strain (M. reukaufii) exhibited no BP capacity. The majority of Metschnikowia strains (43) significantly delayed Go growth, but resulted in only a modest reduction in bacterial population after 7 days of incubation. Two strains (MP) demonstrated highly effective BP capacity, with minimal bacterial growth observed even after 7 days.

The four MP strains with the highest bioprotective effect were then evaluated for their on Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation and their bioprotection in Chardonnay must. Their presence had no significantly effect on fermentation duration, though slightly reducing S. cerevisiae fermentation rate. Analysis of central carbon metabolism and volatile organic compounds revealed that MP positively interacted with S. cerevisiae in sequential inoculation, with an increase in glycerol and acetate ester content.

In the last phase of the study, we quantified pulcherrimin in the medium by its absorbance (550 nm) and of pulcherriminic acid precursor by LC-MS/MS, and no significant correlation between the presence of these compounds and the BP capacity of Metschnikowia strains against Go was detected. To further evaluate alternative mechanisms, we assessed the influence of nutritional limitation (nitrogen sources, sugar, oxygen and iron), inhibitory compounds production and cell-cell contact, using differential bacterial growth media. Interestingly, Go growth was inhibited only in the presence of MP cells, regardless the medium composition, suggesting a key role of cell contact in the BP capacity of MP. These findings provide new insights into the efficient use of Metschnikowia as a natural alternative to sulfite addition for controlling specific spoilage microorganisms in winemaking.

References

Aragno J, Fernandez-Valle P, Thiriet A, Grondin C, Legras JL, Camarasa C, Bloem A. Two-Stage Screening of Metschnikowia spp. Bioprotective Properties: From Grape Juice to Fermented Must by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microorganisms. 2024 Aug 13;12(8):1659. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12081659. PMID: 39203501; PMCID: PMC11356803.

Publication date: June 4, 2025

Type: Poster

Authors

Julie Aragno1, Angèle Thiriet1,2, Lucas Suc1, Cécile Grondin1,2, Aurélie Roland1, Jean-Luc Legras1,2, Carole Camarasa1, Audrey Bloem1,*

1 SPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34060 Montpellier, France
2 Microbial Research Infrastructure, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal

Contact the author*

Keywords

wine fermentation, bioprotection, Metschnikowia, diversity

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Composition and biological potential of grape and wine phenolic compounds

Polyphenols are common in human diets, primarily in plant-derived food and beverages. They influence multiple sensory properties such as aroma, flavour, colour, and taste, such as astringency and bitterness [1]. The major phenolic compounds in grapes and wines are anthocyanins and tannins (proanthocyanidins or condensed tannins).

Isolation, biofilm formation and control of the wine spoilage yeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis

Brettanomyces bruxellensis, commonly referred to as “Brett,” is one of the most notorious microorganisms implicated in wine spoilage. This yeast species has developed a noteworthy resistance to sulfur dioxide, a widely used preservative in winemaking, prompting the wine industry to seek new antimicrobial agents.

Enhancing sustainability in winemaking: the role of PIWI in South Tyrol

The adoption of PIWI (Pilzwiderstandsfähige) grape cultivars, bred for resistance to fungal diseases, is a transformative step towards sustainable winemaking.

Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry (GCO) screening of odorant compounds associated with the tails-off flavour in wine distillates

The development of off-flavours in wine distillates, particularly those associated with the tails fraction, is a key issue in the production of high-quality spirits.

Sensory and chemical effects of postharvest grape cooling on wine quality

Wine cellars are affected by seasonally fluctuating workloads and face challenges especially in the harvest period connected to the required timely processing of the harvested grapes.