terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Winemaking processes and oenological practices 9 Further insight on the use of yeast derivative products as alcoholic fermentation enhancers

Further insight on the use of yeast derivative products as alcoholic fermentation enhancers

Abstract

Issues that can arise during the alcoholic fermentation are frequently attributed to imbalances or deficiencies in the nutrient composition of the fermentation medium. In particular, insufficient levels of assimilable nitrogen,high ethanol concentrations and certain yeast metabolic by-products, such as short and medium-chain fatty acids, could cause fermentation issues by inhibiting yeast activity [1]. Yeast derivative products (YDPs) have been widely employed in order to minimize these issues as they could supplement assimilable nitrogen. YDPs can also detoxify the fermentation matrix by neutralizing short and medium-chain fatty acids. Previous studies indicated that YDPs could release of long-chain fatty acids, which may improve membrane transport activity in yeast cells [2]. YDPs were also used in winemaking in order to enhance the rehydration of active dry yeast (ADY), thereby improving fermentation kinetics and reducing its duration. This could be due to the release of yeast cell wall fragments containing sterols which integrates in the membranes of ADY cells, facilitating their repairment after the damages sustained during the dehydration process [3].

In this study, the impact of YDPs on alcoholic fermentation was investigated.

Trials were carried out with 6 YDPs belonging to different classes added either in must or during the rehydration of ADY. In addition, a Response surface methodology approach was performed considering 3 different musts fermented at 3 different temperatures, in the presence of 3 YDPs added at 3 concentrations. The fermentation kinetics were monitored and the resultant wines were characterized in terms of chemical parameters, color parameters, volatile compounds (VOCs) and sensory characteristics.

Results showed no relevant difference in fermentation kinetics and chemical parameters due to the YDPs addition performed both in must and during the rehydration. Similarly, increasing concentration of YDPs did not affect neither the fermentation kinetics nor the general composition. This could be probably due to adequate content of readily assimilable nitrogen of the must. However, the determination of VOCs and the sensory analysis evidenced the YDPs led to changes of volatile profile and appreciation. These aspects were influenced by the addition of YDPs in must or in pied de cuve, the concentration employed and the fermentation temperature. The interactions between these parameters should be carefully considered during the winemaking operations as they could play a relevant impact on the characteristics of the resulting wine.

References

[1] Alexandre, H., Charpentier, C. (1998). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 20(1), 20–27.

[2] Gonzalez-Marco, A., Jimenez Moreno, N., Ancín Azpilicueta, C. (2006). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86(13), 2221–2227

[3] Soubeyrand, V., Luparia, V., Williams, P., Doco, T., Vernhet, A., Ortiz-Julien, A., Salmon, J. M. (2005). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53(20), 8025–8032.

Publication date: June 4, 2025

Type: Poster

Authors

Alessio Altomare1, Giulio Staffieri1, Denis Allieri1, Maria Manara2, Daniela Fracassetti1,*

1 Università degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente. Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.
2 Ricerca e Sviluppo, Dal Cin S.p.a., Via I Maggio 67, 20863 Concorezzo (MB), Italy.

Contact the author*

Keywords

yeast derivatives, alcoholic fermentation, volatile compounds, design of experiment

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Influence of social interaction levels on panel effectiveness in developing wine sensory profiles using consensus method

The development of sensory profiles is crucial for quality control and innovation in the wine industry. If quantitative descriptive analysis is the most commonly used method for establishing sensory profiles due to its robustness, it presents significant limitations.

Metal reducing agents (Fe and Al) as possible agents to measure the dimensions of the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) pool of precursors in wines

Reductive wine fault is characterized by the presence of odors such as rotten eggs or spoiled camembert cheese, originating from hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methanethiol (MeSH) [1]. These compounds stabilize in polysulfide forms, creating a complex pool of precursors that will revert to both molecules when the environment becomes anoxic [2].

The Albariño route in Uruguay: A clonal selection process to produce quality wines

In recent years, Uruguay has embraced the Albariño grape variety (Vitis vinifera L.) as one of the most promising for commercial growth. Originally cultivated in Galicia and northern Portugal, Albariño has risen to prominence in the global wine market, driving strong demand and significantly increasing grape prices [1].

Comparison of the principal production methods for alcohol-free wine based on analytical parameters

Production, demand, and brand awareness of dealcoholized wine (<0.5% v/v) is steadily increasing worldwide. However, there have been few studies to date investigating and comparing the different physical processes for dealcoholizing wine.

Comparison between non-Saccharomyces yeasts for the production of Nero d’Avola wine

Wine production with non-Saccharomyces yeasts is getting larger application due to the positive impact of these yeasts on wine composition. Previous studies showed notably differences in chemical composition of Merlot wines obtained with Torulaspora delbrueckii.