Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Terroir Conferences 9 Terroir 2020 9 History and innovation of terroir 9 Within-vineyard variability in grape composition at the estate scale can be assessed through machine-learning modeling of plant water status in space and time. A case study from the hills of Adelaida District AVA, Paso Robles, CA, USA

Within-vineyard variability in grape composition at the estate scale can be assessed through machine-learning modeling of plant water status in space and time. A case study from the hills of Adelaida District AVA, Paso Robles, CA, USA

Abstract

Aim: Through machine-learning modelling of plant water status from environmental characteristics, this work aims to develop a model able to predict grape phenolic composition in space and time to guide selective harvest decisions at the estate scale.

Methods and Results: Work was conducted during two consecutive seasons in a ~40ha (100ac) premium wine estate located in the Adelaida District AVA of Paso Robles, CA, USA. The vineyard topography was very diverse, with a large variation in slope grade (0-30%) and exposure (0-359). One hundred experimental units were identified by a maximum dissimilarity sampling algorithm based on environmental attributes derived from a digital elevation model and a soil map. Reflecting the estate varietal distribution, ~70% were Cabernet-Sauvignon units, 20% Cabernet-Franc, and 10% Petit-Verdot units grafted on 1103P or 420A (~50-50%). Grapevine water status was monitored by weekly measurements of stem water potentials, Ψstem, and analysis of carbon isotope discrimination of grape musts, δ13C, at harvest. The grape composition during ripening was assessed by measuring total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and pH of musts and by a comprehensive assessment of skin phenolic composition with HPLC-DAD. Additional field measurements included shoot-count and yield assessment. Vegetation indexes were derived from canopy reflectance obtained from ~3m resolution CubeSat satellites. Irrigation amounts were provided by the grower, and weather data were obtained from three on-site stations. 

Grapevine Ψstem was modelled from weather data (temperature, relative humidity, rainfall), irrigation amounts, vegetation indexes, topographic attributes, soil type using a gradient-boosting-machine algorithm. The model was able to predict plant water status with <0.1 MPa of error (estimated as root mean squared error in a cross-validation procedure). Significant differences in water status were observed between rootstocks and main environmental drivers were slope grade and aspect (i.e. exposure). External validation of the model was carried out by correlating predictions with δ13C. The model allowed obtaining high-resolution daily mapping of Ψstem at the estate scale. Time-series of grapevine Ψstem were significantly correlated with the content of total soluble solids of musts, grape anthocyanin amounts, and the ratio of tri-hydroxylated to di-hydroxylated compounds at harvest and mapped. Spatial-clustering of grape anthocyanin composition was obtained from Ψstem model-estimates and used to guide harvest selectively. 

Conclusion: 

Grapevine water status confirmed to be an important driver in the variability of grape composition, even though the vineyard was irrigated. Variability in water status was related to environmental attributes (slope, aspect, incoming radiation) and the machine-learning approach proved to be useful to predict and understand plant-environment interactions and effects on grape composition in a varied and large dataset.

Significance and Impact of the Study: Vineyards are often located on slopes and accurate modelling of grapevine water status in hillslope conditions is a challenging task. This research demonstrates for the first time that it is possible to obtain daily estimates of grapevine water status at the estate scale by re-elaborating routine measurements with machine-learning technologies. This information can be used to drive selective harvest decisions and clustering within-vineyard variability at the estate scale to easily implement selective harvest decisions.

DOI:

Publication date: March 19, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video

Authors

Luca Brillante

California State University Fresno, Fresno, United States

Contact the author

Keywords

Grapevine water status, machine learning, phenolic composition

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Effect of grape polysaccharides on the volatile composition and aromatic profile of Viura wines

AIM: Many research studies have analyzed the effect of polysaccharides in the aromatic composition of white wines.

Soil mineral nitrogen dynamics in cover-cropped irrigated vineyards with contrasting soil textures

Context and purpose of the study. Cover cropping in vineyards supports grape yield, quality, and soil health.

Changing New Zealand climate equals a changing New Zealand terroir?

Changing New Zealand climate equals a changing New Zealand terroir

Weather classification over the Western Cape (February, 1996 – 2000) and viticultural implications in the Stellenbosch wine district

Une étude préliminaire des situations météorologiques journalières a été réalisée pour l’Afrique du Sud et pour les mois de février (période de maturation des raisins dans la Province occidentale du Cap), à l’image de la classification synoptique réalisée aux latitudes tempérées en France (Jones & Davis, 2000), afin d’étudier les relations entre le climat et la viticulture à des latitudes plus basses.

REGULATION OF CENTRAL METABOLISM IN THE LEAVES OF A GRAPE VINES VA- RIETAL COLLECTION ON A TEMPERATURE CLINE

Grape (Vitis vinifera) is one of the world’s oldest agricultural fruit crops, grown for wine, table grape, raisin, and other products. One of the factors that can cause a reduction in the grape growing area is temperature rise due to climate change. Elevated temperature causes changes in grapevine phenology and fruit chemical composition. Previous studies showed that grape varieties respond differently to a temperature shift of 1.5°C; few varieties had difficulties in the fruit development or could not reach the desired Brix level.