Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Terpenoid profiles and biosynthetic gene expression pattern in Asti DOCG white muscat grapes at ripening as affected by different canopy management protocols

Terpenoid profiles and biosynthetic gene expression pattern in Asti DOCG white muscat grapes at ripening as affected by different canopy management protocols

Abstract

Aim: The main goal of this study was to find an efficient canopy management to limit the high temperature-related aroma losses of White Muscat grapes, and consequently to preserve the quality standards of Asti DOCG wines.

Methods and Results: Four different strategies have been tested in two vineyards of the Asti DOCG production area: pre-flowering leaf removal (m1), post-berry set leaf removal (m2), leaf removal at veraison (m3), and clusters thinning (m4). Control vines (m0) did not receive any thinning or defoliation. Grapes were collected at four time points: seven days before the commercial harvest, at the commercial harvest scheduled for “Asti spumante” wine, at the commercial harvest scheduled for “Moscato” wine and overripening. Free and glycosylated terpenoids content (GC-MS) as well as the expression of key genes involved in terpenoids biosynthesis and metabolism (RT-qPCR) were analysed separately in skin and pulp. The results revealed a peak of volatile accumulation, which occurred early and late throughout the sampling times. The treatments m3 and m4 were, in general, those more effective in enhancing the aroma profiles in both tissues analysed. Correspondingly, in these grapes, specific genes, such as VvDXS3 and VvGT14 resulted up-regulated. Other genes, such as VvHDR, showed different expression pattern resulting, in general, more expressed in pulp than skin, regardless the applied treatment.

Conclusions:

Based on these preliminary trials carried out in a specific production area of White Muscat, it seems that m3 and m4 treatments had a significant effect on the volatile’s accumulation in both grape skin and pulp. m1 treatment resulted to be the less effective in inducing changes in the aroma profile and the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway.

Significance and Impact of the Study: Moscato d’Asti DOCG is one of the most characteristic enological products of Piemonte (North-West Italy) wine grapes-growing area. It comes exclusively from White Muscat grapes which are exalted by the climatic and geographical conditions of the production area. Indeed, the interactions between vine and environment, limestone terrain and micro-climate typical of hilly zones leads to a characteristic fruity and sweety aroma. The characteristic aroma of Muscat wine is attributed to the presence of specific terpenoids, mainly linalool, nerol, geraniol, trans-piran linalool oxide and citronellol. The grapevine terpenoids pathway is strongly regulated by endogenous and environmental factors and among them, temperature and light exposure plays a crucial role. As recently observed, the content of these compounds is strongly decreasing due to the increasing temperatures. Higher temperature during the growing season is forcing growers to find ways to reliably control grape composition preserving the typical aroma of Asti DOCG wines. The present study could offer important information to address grower’s choice in term of canopy management that are better suited to the changing climate.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type : Video

Authors

Margherita Modesti1*, Ron Shmulevitz, Stefano Brizzolara1, Daniele Eberle2, Guido Bezzo2, Pietro Tonutti1

1Life Sciences Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 50127 Pisa, Italy
2Consorzio per la Tutela dell’Asti DOCG. Piazza Roma 10, 14100 Asti, Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

Canopy management, Moscato d’Asti DOCG, terpenoid content and biosynthesis, climate change

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Grapevine yield-gap: identification of environmental limitations by soil and climate zoning in Languedoc-Roussillon region (south of France)

Grapevine yield has been historically overlooked, assuming a strong trade-off between grape yield and wine quality. At present, menaced by climate change, many vineyards in Southern France are far from the quality label threshold, becoming grapevine yield-gaps a major subject of concern. Although yield-gaps are well studied in arable crops, we know very little about grapevine yield-gaps. In the present study, we analysed the environmental component of grapevine yield-gaps linked to climate and soil resources in the Languedoc Roussillon. We used SAFRAN data and IGP Pays d’Oc wine yields from 2010 to 2018. We selected climate and soil indicators proving to have a significant effect on average wine yield-gaps at the municipality scale. The most significant factors of grapevine yield were the Soil Available Water Capacity; followed by the Huglin Index and the Climatic Dryness Index. The Days of Frost; the Soil pH; and the Very Hot Days were also significant. Then, we clustered geographical zones presenting similar indicators, facilitating the identification of resources yield-gaps. We discussed the number of zones with the experts of IGP Pays d’Oc label, obtaining 7 zones with similar limitations for grapevine yield. Finally, we analysed the main resources causing yield-gaps and the grapevine varieties planted on each zone. Mapping grapevine resource yield-gaps are the first stage for understanding grapevine yield-gaps at the regional scale.

How distinctive are single vineyard Gewürztraminer musts and wines from Alto Adige (Italy) based on untargeted analysis, sensory profiling, and chemometric elaboration?

Vitis vinifera L. ‘Gewürztraminer’ is a historical grape variety of Alto Adige (Südtirol), Italy, which is widely grown in the area of Tramin an der Weinstraße, but is also grown globally. It produces highly aromatic wines that are strongly influenced by the terroir of the vineyard sites where they are grown. This study looked at musts and young wines from ‘Gewürztraminer’ grapes harvested in seven distinct vineyards near Tramin and then processed at Cantina di Termeno, minimizing winemaking protocol variability. Samples were profiled using bidimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography coupled to electrochemical detection, and near-IR spectrometry. The data were subjected to Principle Component Analysis and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis. Sensory discriminant testing was undertaken using the sorting method with a semi-trained panel, and the data were processed using Multidimensional Scaling. Seven must/wine pairs could be distinguished based on their untargeted volatilome profiles and on sensory evaluation. As expected, there were greater differences in the volatile compounds between the wines than between the musts. The wines from vineyards 4 and 5 were nonetheless quite homogenous in terms of chemical and sensory analyses, as were the wines from vineyards 1 and 3. For the phenolic profile, differences were noted between the musts and wines of vineyards 2, 3, and 4, but the musts from vineyards 5 and 7 were similar. Sensory analysis showed the wines from vineyards 6 and 7 to be distinct from the rest. These results reinforce that the composition of ‘Gewürztraminer’ musts and wines is strongly determined by vineyard site, even in a small geographic area with high variability of the terroir (soil and microclimate), and that these differences are apparent in the flavours and aromas of the finished wines. Further confirmation would require a larger sample of wines, preferably from several vintages.

A predictive model of spatial Eca variability in the vineyard to support the monitoring of plant status

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (Vitis vinifera L.) berry skin flavonol and anthocyanin composition is affected by trellis systems and applied water amounts

Trellis systems are selected in wine grape vineyards to mainly maximize vineyard yield and maintain berry quality. This study was conducted in 2020 and 2021 to evaluate six commonly utilized trellis systems including a vertical shoot positioning (VSP), two relaxed VSPs (VSP60 and VSP80), a single high wire (SH), a high quadrilateral (HQ), and a guyot (GY), combined with three levels of irrigation regimes based on different crop evapotranspiration (ETc) replacements, including a 25% ETc, 50% ETc, and 100% ETc. The results indicated SH yielded the most fruits and accumulated the most total soluble solids (TSS) at harvest in 2020, however, it showed the lowest TSS in the second season. In 2020, SH and HQ showed higher concentrations in most of the anthocyanin derivatives compared to the VSPs. Similar comparisons were noticed in 2021 as well. SH and HQ also accumulated more flavonols in both years compared to other trellis systems. Overall, this study provides information on the efficacy of trellis systems on grapevine yield and berry flavonoid accumulation in a currently warming climate.

Combining effect of leaf removal and natural shading on grape ripening under two irrigation strategies in Manto negro (Vitis vinifera L.)

The increasingly frequent heat waves during grape ripening pose challenges for high quality wine grape production. Defoliation is a common practice that can improve the control of diseases in bunches, but also it increases the exposure to sunlight. Grapes exposed to solar radiation reach temperatures over the optimum for berry development and maturation. This makes the development of irrigation and canopy management techniques of great importance to maximize yield and grape quality. A field experiment was carried out during 2021 using Manto negro wine grapes to study the effect of applied irrigation and different light exposure levels on grape quality. Two irrigation treatments were imposed based on the frequency and amount of water doses in a four-block experimental vineyard at Bodega Ribas (Mallorca). Three light exposure treatments were randomly applied in each irrigation plot. The light treatments included exposed clusters from pea size, non-exposed clusters, and shaded clusters after softening. Leaf area index and canopy porosity was estimated every 2 weeks. Midday leaf water potential was measured weekly. Additionally, apparent electrical conductivity was measured between rows to estimate the soil water content variability. Light and temperature sensors were installed at the bunch level to quantify the differences in bunch temperature and light intensity among treatments. The effect of irrigation and cluster light exposure on berry weight, TSS, TA, malic acid, tartaric acid, K+, and pH were analysed at 5 moments along grape ripening. During different heat waves, the natural shading technique decreased the maximum bunch temperature around 10 °C respect to the exposed bunches in both irrigation strategies. The combination of defoliation and shading techniques after softening decreased TSS at harvest and affected most of the quality parameters during the last stages of ripening, showing an interesting technique to delay ripening in warm viticulture areas.