Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Terpenoid profiles and biosynthetic gene expression pattern in Asti DOCG white muscat grapes at ripening as affected by different canopy management protocols

Terpenoid profiles and biosynthetic gene expression pattern in Asti DOCG white muscat grapes at ripening as affected by different canopy management protocols

Abstract

Aim: The main goal of this study was to find an efficient canopy management to limit the high temperature-related aroma losses of White Muscat grapes, and consequently to preserve the quality standards of Asti DOCG wines.

Methods and Results: Four different strategies have been tested in two vineyards of the Asti DOCG production area: pre-flowering leaf removal (m1), post-berry set leaf removal (m2), leaf removal at veraison (m3), and clusters thinning (m4). Control vines (m0) did not receive any thinning or defoliation. Grapes were collected at four time points: seven days before the commercial harvest, at the commercial harvest scheduled for “Asti spumante” wine, at the commercial harvest scheduled for “Moscato” wine and overripening. Free and glycosylated terpenoids content (GC-MS) as well as the expression of key genes involved in terpenoids biosynthesis and metabolism (RT-qPCR) were analysed separately in skin and pulp. The results revealed a peak of volatile accumulation, which occurred early and late throughout the sampling times. The treatments m3 and m4 were, in general, those more effective in enhancing the aroma profiles in both tissues analysed. Correspondingly, in these grapes, specific genes, such as VvDXS3 and VvGT14 resulted up-regulated. Other genes, such as VvHDR, showed different expression pattern resulting, in general, more expressed in pulp than skin, regardless the applied treatment.

Conclusions:

Based on these preliminary trials carried out in a specific production area of White Muscat, it seems that m3 and m4 treatments had a significant effect on the volatile’s accumulation in both grape skin and pulp. m1 treatment resulted to be the less effective in inducing changes in the aroma profile and the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway.

Significance and Impact of the Study: Moscato d’Asti DOCG is one of the most characteristic enological products of Piemonte (North-West Italy) wine grapes-growing area. It comes exclusively from White Muscat grapes which are exalted by the climatic and geographical conditions of the production area. Indeed, the interactions between vine and environment, limestone terrain and micro-climate typical of hilly zones leads to a characteristic fruity and sweety aroma. The characteristic aroma of Muscat wine is attributed to the presence of specific terpenoids, mainly linalool, nerol, geraniol, trans-piran linalool oxide and citronellol. The grapevine terpenoids pathway is strongly regulated by endogenous and environmental factors and among them, temperature and light exposure plays a crucial role. As recently observed, the content of these compounds is strongly decreasing due to the increasing temperatures. Higher temperature during the growing season is forcing growers to find ways to reliably control grape composition preserving the typical aroma of Asti DOCG wines. The present study could offer important information to address grower’s choice in term of canopy management that are better suited to the changing climate.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type : Video

Authors

Margherita Modesti1*, Ron Shmulevitz, Stefano Brizzolara1, Daniele Eberle2, Guido Bezzo2, Pietro Tonutti1

1Life Sciences Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 50127 Pisa, Italy
2Consorzio per la Tutela dell’Asti DOCG. Piazza Roma 10, 14100 Asti, Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

Canopy management, Moscato d’Asti DOCG, terpenoid content and biosynthesis, climate change

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Effect of one-year cover crop and arbuscular mycorrhiza inocululation in the microbial soil community of a vineyard

The microbial composition of the soil is an important factor to consider in viticulture, since its influence on the “terroir” and on the organoleptic properties of the wine have been demonstrated. Different agronomic techniques have the potential to modify the composition and functionality of the soil microbial community. Maintaining green covers is known to increase soil microbial diversity. The direct application of inoculum of beneficial microorganisms to the soil has also been used to increase their abundance. However, the environmental conditions of each site seem to have a determining weight in the result of these practices. In this study, we compared the effect on the microbial community of a cover crop with legumes in autumn and the inoculation of grapevines with commercial inoculum bases on Rhizophagus irregularis and Funeliformis mosseae in the previous spring. The study has been carried out in a vineyard in Binissalem, Mallorca, Spain. After applying the treatments, we will analyze the soil microbial communities using the data obtained from Illumina amplification of soil DNA from the 16S and ITS regions to analyze bacteria and fungi community, respectively. In addition, we will record the physicochemical characteristics of the soil at each sampling point. The result showed that agronomic management, in the short term, has less influence than soil characteristics on the composition of the soil microbiome. With these results, we can conclude that in a vineyard, agricultural techniques should focus on improving the characteristics of the soil to improve the biodiversity of the soil microbiota.

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Frost risk projections in a changing climate are highly sensitive in time and space to frost modelling approaches

Late spring frost is a major challenge for various winegrowing regions across the world, its occurrence often leading to important yield losses and/or plant failure. Despite a significant increase in minimum temperatures worldwide, the spatial and temporal evolution of spring frost risk under a warmer climate remains largely uncertain. Recent projections of spring frost risk for viticulture in Europe throughout the 21st century show that its evolution strongly depends on the model approach used to simulate budburst. Furthermore, the frost damage modelling methods used in these projections are usually not assessed through comparison to field observations and/or frost damage reports.
The present study aims at comparing frost risk projections simulated using six spring frost models based on two approaches: a) models considering a fixed damage threshold after the predicted budburst date (e.g BRIN, Smoothed-Utah, Growing Degree Days, Fenovitis) and b) models considering a dynamic frost sensitivity threshold based on the predicted grapevine winter/spring dehardening process (e.g. Ferguson model). The capability of each model to simulate an actual frost event for the Vitis vinifera cv. Chadonnay B was previously assessed by comparing simulated cold thermal stress to reports of events with frost damage in Chablis, the northernmost winegrowing region of Burgundy. Models exhibited scores of κ > 0.65 when reproducing the frost/non-frost damage years and an accuracy ranging from 0.82 to 0.90.
Spring frost risk projections throughout the 21st century were performed for all winegrowing subregions of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté under two CMIP5 concentration pathways (4.5 and 8.5) using statistically downscaled 8×8 km daily air temperature and humidity of 13 climate models. Contrasting results with region-specific spring frost risk trends were observed. Three out of five models show a decrease in the frequency of frost years across the whole study area while the other two show an increase that is more or less pronounced depending on winegrowing subregion. Our findings indicate that the lack of accuracy in grapevine budburst and dehardening models makes climate projections of spring frost risk highly uncertain for grapevine cultivation regions.

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.

Revealing the Barossa zone sub-divisions through sensory and chemical analysis of Shiraz wine

The Barossa zone is arguably one of the most well-recognised wine producing regions in Australia and internationally; known mainly for the production of its distinct Shiraz wines. However, within the broad Barossa geographical delimitation, a variation in terroir can be perceived and is expressed as sensorial and chemical profile differences between wines. This study aimed to explore the sub-division classification across the Barossa region using chemical and sensory measurements. Shiraz grapes from 4 different vintages and different vineyards across the Barossa (2018, n = 69; 2019, n = 72; 2020, n = 79; 2021, n = 64) were harvested and made using a standardised small lot winemaking procedure. The analysis involved a sensory descriptive analysis with a highly trained panel and chemical measurement including basic chemistry (e.g. pH, TA, alcohol content, total SO2), phenolic composition, volatile compounds, metals, proline, and polysaccharides. The datasets were combined and analysed through an unsupervised, clustering analysis. Firstly, each vintage was considered separately to investigate any vintage to vintage variation. The datasets were then combined and analysed as a whole. The number of sub-divisions based on the measurements were identified and characterised with their sensory and chemical profile and some consistencies were seen between the vintages. Preliminary analysis of the sensory results showed that in most vintages, two major groups could be identified characterised with one group showing a fruit-forward profile and another displaying savoury and cooked vegetables characters. The exploration of distinct profiles arising from the Barossa wine producing region will provide producers with valuable information about the regional potential of their wine assisting with tools to increase their target market and reputation. This study will also provide a robust and comprehensive basis to determine the distinctive terroir characteristics which exist within the Barossa wine producing region.