Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Terpenoid profiles and biosynthetic gene expression pattern in Asti DOCG white muscat grapes at ripening as affected by different canopy management protocols

Terpenoid profiles and biosynthetic gene expression pattern in Asti DOCG white muscat grapes at ripening as affected by different canopy management protocols

Abstract

Aim: The main goal of this study was to find an efficient canopy management to limit the high temperature-related aroma losses of White Muscat grapes, and consequently to preserve the quality standards of Asti DOCG wines.

Methods and Results: Four different strategies have been tested in two vineyards of the Asti DOCG production area: pre-flowering leaf removal (m1), post-berry set leaf removal (m2), leaf removal at veraison (m3), and clusters thinning (m4). Control vines (m0) did not receive any thinning or defoliation. Grapes were collected at four time points: seven days before the commercial harvest, at the commercial harvest scheduled for “Asti spumante” wine, at the commercial harvest scheduled for “Moscato” wine and overripening. Free and glycosylated terpenoids content (GC-MS) as well as the expression of key genes involved in terpenoids biosynthesis and metabolism (RT-qPCR) were analysed separately in skin and pulp. The results revealed a peak of volatile accumulation, which occurred early and late throughout the sampling times. The treatments m3 and m4 were, in general, those more effective in enhancing the aroma profiles in both tissues analysed. Correspondingly, in these grapes, specific genes, such as VvDXS3 and VvGT14 resulted up-regulated. Other genes, such as VvHDR, showed different expression pattern resulting, in general, more expressed in pulp than skin, regardless the applied treatment.

Conclusions:

Based on these preliminary trials carried out in a specific production area of White Muscat, it seems that m3 and m4 treatments had a significant effect on the volatile’s accumulation in both grape skin and pulp. m1 treatment resulted to be the less effective in inducing changes in the aroma profile and the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway.

Significance and Impact of the Study: Moscato d’Asti DOCG is one of the most characteristic enological products of Piemonte (North-West Italy) wine grapes-growing area. It comes exclusively from White Muscat grapes which are exalted by the climatic and geographical conditions of the production area. Indeed, the interactions between vine and environment, limestone terrain and micro-climate typical of hilly zones leads to a characteristic fruity and sweety aroma. The characteristic aroma of Muscat wine is attributed to the presence of specific terpenoids, mainly linalool, nerol, geraniol, trans-piran linalool oxide and citronellol. The grapevine terpenoids pathway is strongly regulated by endogenous and environmental factors and among them, temperature and light exposure plays a crucial role. As recently observed, the content of these compounds is strongly decreasing due to the increasing temperatures. Higher temperature during the growing season is forcing growers to find ways to reliably control grape composition preserving the typical aroma of Asti DOCG wines. The present study could offer important information to address grower’s choice in term of canopy management that are better suited to the changing climate.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type : Video

Authors

Margherita Modesti1*, Ron Shmulevitz, Stefano Brizzolara1, Daniele Eberle2, Guido Bezzo2, Pietro Tonutti1

1Life Sciences Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 50127 Pisa, Italy
2Consorzio per la Tutela dell’Asti DOCG. Piazza Roma 10, 14100 Asti, Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

Canopy management, Moscato d’Asti DOCG, terpenoid content and biosynthesis, climate change

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Climate, Viticulture, and Wine … my how things have changed!

The planet is warmer than at any time in our recorded past and increasing greenhouse emissions and persistence in the climate system means that continued warming is highly likely. Climate change has already altered the basic framework of growing grapes for wine production worldwide and will likely continue to do so for years to come. The wine sector can continue to play an important role in leading the agricultural sector in addressing climate change. From developing on…

Making sense of available information for climate change adaptation and building resilience into wine production systems across the world

Effects of climate change on viticulture systems and winemaking processes are being felt across the world. The IPCC 6thAssessment Report concluded widespread and rapid changes have occurred, the scale of recent changes being unprecedented over many centuries to many thousands of years. These changes will continue under all emission scenarios considered, including increases in frequency and intensity of hot extremes, heatwaves, heavy precipitation and droughts. Wine companies need tools and models allowing to peer into the future and identify the moment for intervention and measures for mitigation and/or avoidance. Previously, we presented conceptual guidelines for a 5-stage framework for defining adaptation strategies for wine businesses. That framework allows for direct comparison of different solutions to mitigate perceived climate change risks. Recent global climatic evolution and multiple reports of severe events since then (smoke taint, heatwave and droughts, frost, hail and floods, rising sea levels) imply urgency in providing effective tools to tackle the multiple perceived risks. A coordinated drive towards a higher level of resilience is therefore required. Recent publications such as the Australian Wine Future Climate Atlas and results from projects such as H2020 MED-GOLD inform on expected climate change impacts to the wine sector, foreseeing the climate to expect at regional and vineyard scale in coming decades. We present examples of practical application of the Climate Change Adaptation Framework (CCAF) to impacts affecting wine production in two wine regions: Barossa (Australia) and Douro (Portugal). We demonstrate feasibility of the framework for climate adaptation from available data and tools to estimate historical climate-induced profitability loss, to project it in the future and to identify critical moments when disruptions may occur if timely measures are not implemented. Finally, we discuss adaptation measures and respective timeframes for successful mitigation of disruptive risk while enhancing resilience of wine systems.

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Modulation of berry composition by different vineyard management practices

High concentration of sugars in grapes and alcohol in wines is one of the consequences of climate change on viticulture production in several wine-growing regions. In order to investigate the possibilities of adaptation of vineyard management practices aimed to reduce the accumulation of sugar during the maturation phase without reducing the accumulation of anthocyanins in grapes, a study with severe shoot trimming, shoot thinning, cluster thinning and date of harvest was conducted on Merlot variety in Istria region (Croatia), under the Mediterranean climate. Four factors which may affect grape maturation and its composition at harvest were investigated in a two-years experiment; severe shoot trimming applied at veraison when >80% of berries changed colour (in comparison to untreated control), shoot thinning (0 and 30%), cluster thinning (0 and 30%), and the date of harvest (early and standard harvest dates). Shoot thinning had no significant impact on berry composition, despite the obtained reduction in yield per vine. Lower Brix in grapes were obtained with earlier harvest date and if no cluster thinning was applied, although at the same time a reduction in the concentration of anthocyanins in berries was observed in these treatments. On the other hand, if severe shoot trimming was applied when >80% of berries changed colour, a reduction of Brix was obtained without a negative impact on berry anthocyanins concentration. We conclude that in cases when undesirably high sugar concentrations at harvest are expected, severe shoot trimming at 80% veraison may effectively be used in order to obtain moderate sugar concentration in berries together with the adequate phenolic composition.

Postveraison shoot trimming in Tannat and Merlot: preliminary results on yield components, plant balance and berry composition

There is currently a trend towards the production of wines with low alcohol content. To achieve this, grapes with low sugar content must be used. There are techniques at the vineyard level that can delay ripening and avoid excessive sugar accumulation without, a priori, affecting the final polyphenol content. Postveraison shoot trimming (PVST) is experimentally evaluated for these purposes, but its impact under Uruguayan climatic conditions with high interannual variability is not known. The aim of this work is to assess the PVST in Tannat and Merlot cultivars and their impact on yield components, plant balance and berry primary composition. In this study, two commercial vineyards of 10 years old Tannat and Merlot (grafted on SO4) at Canelones Department were selected. During the 2020-201 growing season, grapevines were submitted to PVST when grapes reached 15º Brix. In a randomized block, trimmed (T) and control (C) plants were evaluated with three repetitions each cultivar. Evaluation of the evolution of primary berry composition during ripening, measurement of yield components and plant balance were performed. For both cultivars, PVST did not affect yield components. Merlot reached 5.4 kg per plant and Tannat 7.1 kg, with not statistical significance between treatments. However, statistical differences were observed in terms of plant balance. In Merlot Ravaz Index reached a difference of 5.3 (12.0 in T and 6.7 in C) meanwhile Tannat reached 3.5 of statistical difference (13.7 in T and 10.2 in C). The tendency to imbalance for the treated plants had an impact on the final grape composition. Merlot grapes showed statistical difference in final total acidity (0.3 g of difference between treatments) while treatments impact final sugar content on Tannat grapes (10.0 g of difference between treatments). Further studies are needed to assess the impact of different canopy management techniques in our conditions.