Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Influence of the different cork stoppers and sulfur dose in champagne quality

Influence of the different cork stoppers and sulfur dose in champagne quality

Abstract

As is well known, Champagne is a product of the highest quality recognized in the international market. Champagne is a type of sparkling wine made in the Champagne region (France) using the traditional method of champenoise. Aging in the bottle is the final stage before being consumed, and it is considered a time of maturation in which many chemical and sensory changes occur (1). In addition, the stoppers have a very important influence on the quality of the product during bottle aging (2). Today there are different types of corks with different types of oxygen permeabilities (3). This oxygen transfer rate (OTR) through the cork can cause changes in the color, in the aromatic composition and in the organoleptic sensations of the Champagne, causing a loss of its quality (3, 4). For all these reasons, the main objective of this work is to evaluate the effect of different types of cork stoppers in Champagne with different doses of sulfur (added in bottling) for a year. To carry out the study, five types of corks (C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5) with increasing OTRs values and the control with sheet metal closure (Control), and three different doses of sulfur (0, 10 and 20 mg/L) were used. Of all of them, the basic parameters, color and Cielab coordinates, CO2 pressure, aromatic composition (fermentative, oxidative and reduction aromas), and sensory analysis were analyzed at each of the four sampling points. The analysis times were after bottling (T0) and after 3, 6, 12 months of aging in the bottle (T3, T6, T12). The results showed that the parameter ‘time’ was the main factor in producing differences between the samples, followed by the doses of sulfur and type of cork. In general, the basic parameters of champagne did not show significant differences except for total sulfur content. In general, the color, the CO2 parameters and especially the aromatic composition changed over time, showing the main changes after 12 months in the bottle. The fermentation aromas were decreasing, and the oxidation and reduction aromas were increasing over time. The samples with the highest dose of sulfur (20 mg/L) were less evolved, however they showed greater reductions. In addition, C5 and C3 corks with were the corks that best preserved Champagne in relation to the preservation of fermentative aromas, and in achieving a better balance between oxidation-reduction conditions, after 12 months of aging. However, the C2 was the cork that had the worst preservation of fermentative aromas and the greatest oxidation caused the Champagne. Finally, the sensory analysis on time 12 months corroborated analytics, the best valued Champagne being those closed with C3 and C5 corks, and the worst with C2. Therefore, a good choice about the type of cork and the dose of sulfur in bottling can prolong its optimal moment of consumption in time, while preserving its quality.

DOI:

Publication date: September 14, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Ana Maria Mislata 

1. VITEC – Centre Tecnològic del Vi, Ctra. Porrera Km 1, 43730 Falset (Tarragona), Spain 2. Instrumental Sensometry (i-Sens), Department of Analytical Chemistry and Organic  Chemistry, Campus Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 43007, Spain ,Michelle Rodríguez 2; Christophe Loisel 3; Miquel Puxeu 1; Enric Nart 1; Sergi De Lamo 1; Montserrat Mestres 2 and Raúl Ferrer-Gallego 1  1. VITEC – Centre Tecnològic del Vi, Ctra. Porrera Km.1, 43730 Falset (Tarragona), Spain 2. Instrumental Sensometry (i-Sens), Department of Analytical Chemistry and Organic  Chemistry, Campus Sescelades, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 43007, Spain 3. DIAM Bouchage SAS-Espace Tech Ulrich, 66400 Ceret, France

Contact the author

Keywords

champagne, corks, sulfurous, otr, color, aromatic compounds, sensory analysis

Citation

Related articles…

Bioclimatic shifts and land use options for Viticulture in Portugal

Land use, plays a relevant role in the climatic system. It endows means for agriculture practices thus contributing to the food supply. Since climate and land are closely intertwined through multiple interface processes, climate change may lead to significant impacts in land use. In this study, 1-km observational gridded datasets are used to assess changes in the Köppen–Geiger and Worldwide Bioclimatic (WBCS)

VineyardFACE: Investigation of a moderate (+20%) increase of ambient CO2 level on berry ripening dynamics and fruit composition

Climate change and rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is a concern for agriculture, including viticulture. Studies on elevated carbon dioxide have already been on grapevines, mainly taking place in greenhouses using potted plants or using field grown vines under higher CO2 enrichment, i.e. >650 ppm. The VineyardFACE, located at Hochschule Geisenheim University, is an open field Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experimental set-up designed to study the effects of elevated carbon dioxide using field grown vines (Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon). As the carbon dioxide fumigation started in 2014, the long term effects of elevated carbon dioxide treatment can be investigated on berry ripening parameters and fruit metabolic composition.
The present study aims to investigate the effect on fruit composition under a moderate increase (+20%; eCO2) of carbon dioxide concentration, as predicted for 2050 on both Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon. Berry composition was determined for primary (sugars, organic acids, amino acids) and secondary metabolites (anthocyanins). Special focus was given on monitoring of berry diameter and ripening rates throughout three growing seasons. Compared to previous results of the early adaptative phase of the vines [1], our results show little effect of eCO2 treatment on primary metabolites composition in berries. However, total anthocyanins concentration in berry skin was lower for eCO2 treatment in 2020, although the ratio between anthocyanins derivatives did not differ.
[1] Wohlfahrt Y., Tittmann S., Schmidt D., Rauhut D., Honermeier B., Stoll M. (2020) The effect of elevated CO2 on berry development and bunch structure of Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon. Applied Science Basel 10: 2486

Effect of partial net shading on the temperature and radiation in the grapevine canopy, consequences on the grape quality of cv. Gros Manseng in PDO Pacherenc-du-vic-Bilh

As elsewhere, southwestern France vineyards face more recurrent summer heat waves these last years. Among the possibilities of adaptation to this climate changing parameter, the use of net shading is a technique that allow for limiting canopy exposure to radiations. In this trial, we tested net shading installed on one face of the canopy, on a north-south row-oriented plot of cv. Gros Manseng trained on VSP system in the PDO Pacherenc-du-Vic-Bilh. The purpose was to characterize the effects on the ambient canopy temperatures and radiations during the season and to observe the consequences on the composition of grapes and wines. Two sorts of net were used with two levels of obstruction (50% and 75%) of the photosynthesis active radiation (PAR). They have been installed on the west side of the canopy and compared to a netless control. Temperature and PAR sensors registered hourly data during the season. On specific summer day (hot and sunny) manual measurements took also place on bunches (temperature) and in different spots of the canopy (PAR). The results showed that, on clear days, the radiation is lowered by the shade nets respecting the supplier criteria. The effects on the ambient canopy temperature were inconstant on this plot when we observed the data from the global period of shading between fruit set and harvest. However, during hot days (>30°C), the temperature in the canopy was reduced during afternoon and the temperature of the bunch surface was reduced as well comparing to the control. A decrease of the maturity parameters of the berries, sugar and acidity, was also observed. Concerning the wine aromatic potential, no differences clearly appeared.

The concept of terroir: what place for microbiota?

Microbes play key roles on crop nutrient availability via biogeochemical cycles, rhizosphere interactions with roots as well as on plant growth and health. Recent advances in technologies, such as High Throughput Sequencing Techniques, allowed to gain deeper insight on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities associated with soil, rhizosphere and plant phyllosphere. Over the past 10 years, numerous scientific studies have been carried out on the microbial component of the vineyard. Whether the soil or grape compartments have been taken into account, many studies agree on the evidence of regional delineations of microbial communities, that may contribute to regional wine characteristics and typicity. Some authors proposed the term “microbial terroir” including “yeast terroir” for grapes to describe the connection between microbial biogeography and regional wine characteristics. Many factors are involved in terroir including climate, soil, cultivar and human practices as well as their interactions. Studies considering “microbial terroir” greatly contributed to improve our knowledge on factors that shape the vineyard microbial structure and diversity. However, the potential impact of “microbial terroir” on wine composition has yet not received strong scientific evidence and many questions remain to be addressed, related to the functional characterization of the microbial community and its impact on plant physiology and grape composition, the origins and interannual stability of vineyard microbiota, as well as their impact on wine sensorial attributes. The presentation will give an overview on the role of microbiota as a terroir component and will highlight future perspectives and challenges on this key subject for the wine industry.

Making sense of available information for climate change adaptation and building resilience into wine production systems across the world

Effects of climate change on viticulture systems and winemaking processes are being felt across the world. The IPCC 6thAssessment Report concluded widespread and rapid changes have occurred, the scale of recent changes being unprecedented over many centuries to many thousands of years. These changes will continue under all emission scenarios considered, including increases in frequency and intensity of hot extremes, heatwaves, heavy precipitation and droughts. Wine companies need tools and models allowing to peer into the future and identify the moment for intervention and measures for mitigation and/or avoidance. Previously, we presented conceptual guidelines for a 5-stage framework for defining adaptation strategies for wine businesses. That framework allows for direct comparison of different solutions to mitigate perceived climate change risks. Recent global climatic evolution and multiple reports of severe events since then (smoke taint, heatwave and droughts, frost, hail and floods, rising sea levels) imply urgency in providing effective tools to tackle the multiple perceived risks. A coordinated drive towards a higher level of resilience is therefore required. Recent publications such as the Australian Wine Future Climate Atlas and results from projects such as H2020 MED-GOLD inform on expected climate change impacts to the wine sector, foreseeing the climate to expect at regional and vineyard scale in coming decades. We present examples of practical application of the Climate Change Adaptation Framework (CCAF) to impacts affecting wine production in two wine regions: Barossa (Australia) and Douro (Portugal). We demonstrate feasibility of the framework for climate adaptation from available data and tools to estimate historical climate-induced profitability loss, to project it in the future and to identify critical moments when disruptions may occur if timely measures are not implemented. Finally, we discuss adaptation measures and respective timeframes for successful mitigation of disruptive risk while enhancing resilience of wine systems.