Terroir 2010 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Can early defoliation improve fruit composition of Tempranillo grapevines in the semi-arid terroir of Utiel-Requena, Spain?

Can early defoliation improve fruit composition of Tempranillo grapevines in the semi-arid terroir of Utiel-Requena, Spain?

Abstract

Early defoliation has been found a useful tool to reduce cluster compactness and to improve fruit composition in vigorous sites of different viticultural areas. Our objective was to test the usefulness of this technique under the semi-arid climatic conditions of the Utiel- Requena D. O. (Valencia, south-east Spain) with the cv. Tempranillo. In deficit drip irrigated vines, planted in north- south oriented rows with vertical shoot positioning, four treatments were applied during 2008 and 2009. Control (C), non-defoliated vines, were compared with defoliation performed either just before anthesis (phenological stage H, treatment ED), or at fruit set (phenological stage J, treatment LD). In both defoliation treatments leaves from the first 6 nodes, including laterals, were removed. In a fourth treatment, only the leaves facing east from the first 8 nodes were removed at phenological stage H (EED). Sixteen vines per treatment were randomly selected within the vineyard. In the first season, as an average for all defoliation treatments yield was reduced 21 % by leaf pulling. In the second season, there was a heavier reduction in yield (41 %). Flower and berry number per cluster were similar in 2008, but in 2009 flower number decreased for ED, and berry number for ED and LD. In both years, lower berry weights at harvest were obtained in all defoliation treatments. Fruit composition was also modified by early-defoliation. For grapes harvested at the same date, treatment LD increased sugar content in 2009.The malic acid concentration decreased for all defoliation treatments in 2008, and the tartaric acid levels increased for all defoliation treatments in both years. Total acidity decreased for ED and LD in both years, though significantly only in 2008, when it decreased in proportion to the intensity of defoliation. Both ED, and particularly LD, improved berry composition, increasing the concentration of total phenolics, anthocyanins and tannins. The synthesis of phenolic substances was instead not increased by leaf pulling. Overall results indicate that defoliation carried out at fruit set is the most effective treatment to improve berry phenolic concentration and soluble solids. However, growers should take into account the important yield penalty due to defoliation, particularly in the mid-term. In addition, a decrease in malic acid concentration could be also detrimental during wine-making. This indicates that the early defoliation technique needs to be used with caution in the semi-arid and warm terroirs.

DOI:

Publication date: December 3, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2010

Type: Article

Authors

D. Risco, D. Pérez, A. Yeves, J.R. Castel, D.S. Intrigliolo

I.V.I.A. Ctra. Moncada-Naquera km.4.5. 46113. Moncada, Valencia, Spain

Contact the author

Keywords

Fruit set, yield, total soluble solids, malic acid, phenolics

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2010

Citation

Related articles…

Grapevine drought tolerant ideotypes to adapt viticulture to climate change

Climate change is challenging the resilience of grapevine, one of the most important crops worldwide. Adapting viticulture to a hotter and drier future will require a multifaceted approach that must include new management strategies, increased irrigation efficiency, and the identification of more drought tolerant genotypes.

La caracterización de los moscateles

Ya en 1964 GIOVANNI DALMASSO et alii describiendo el Moscato bianco (12) ponían de manifiesto la dificultad realmente ardua en descubrir “si no todas, por lo menos las más importantes variedades que llevan el nombre de Moscateles

Adapting wine production to climate change through the exploration of the diversity of Vitis vinifera cultivars

Major factors involved in wine quality and typicity are soil type, climatic conditions, plant material (rootstock and cultivar), vineyard management practices and winemaking conditions.

Response of the plant: a chief element for the characterisation of wine-growing “terroirs”

Face au risque de banalisation des produits agroalimentaires, un intérêt toujours plus marqué se développe en faveur des produits du terroir.

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain.