The performance of grapevines on identified terroirs in Stellenbosch, South Africa

Abstract

A terroir can be defined as a natural unit that is characterised by a specific agricultural potential, which is imparted by natural environmental features, and is reflected in the characteristics of the final product. Preliminary terroirs were defined for Stellenbosch for Sauvignon blanc and Cabernet Sauvignon using decision trees built on analyses of viticultural, oenological and environmental data measured on a network of plots over 7 seasons. This study was considered to be a preliminary approach to determine the validity of terroir studies for the South African wine industry.
It was expected that measurement of viticultural and oenological variables would serve to validate or refine the decision trees constructed with the first set of data and that the measurement of ecophysiological parameters on a separate network of reference plots would facilitate improved understanding of the grapevine x terroir interaction. Three plots of 10 vines each were therefore identified in selected commercial vineyards of Cabernet Sauvignon and Sauvignon blanc using remote sensing as a tool to identify homogenous plots where possible. These vineyards were representative of dominant terroir units that were identified for each cultivar. This network of experimental plots was monitored with respect to their ecophysiological response to the growing environment. This included dynamics of canopy development, vegetative growth, dynamics of berry growth and composition and wine character. Pre-dawn leaf water potential was determined at different stages during the growth season. The growing environment was characterised with respect to soil and climate by means of direct observations and measurements and interpolated values from the agroclimatic weather station network.
This paper will examine the results from three seasons for selected Sauvignon blanc and Cabernet Sauvignon vineyards from this network and compare these results to previous findings.

DOI:

Publication date: December 8, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2008

Type : Article

Authors

Victoria A CAREY (1), Valérie BONNARDOT (2), Zelmari COETZEE (3) & Laure DU COS DE ST BARTHELEMY (4)

(1) Lecturer and 3 Technical assistant, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland, South Africa
(2) Agroclimatological consultant, Bureau d’Études et de Recherches en Climatologie Appliquée à la Viticulture
(4) Masters student, SupAgro Montpellier and affiliated student, Stellenbosch University

Contact the author

Keywords

Sauvignon blanc, Cabernet Sauvignon, soil, ecophysiology, Stellenbosch

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2008

Citation

Related articles…

Climate ethnography and wine environmental futures

Globalisation and climate change have radically transformed world wine production upsetting the established order of wine ecologies. Ecological risks and the future of traditional agricultural systems are widely debated in anthropology, but very little is understood of the particular challenges posed by climate change to viticulture which is seen by many as the canary in the coalmine of global agriculture. Moreover, wine as a globalised embedded commodity provides a particularly telling example for the study of climate change having already attracted early scientific attention. Studies of climate change in viticulture have focused primarily on the production of systematic models of adaptation and vulnerability, while the human and cultural factors, which are key to adaptation and sustainable futures, are largely missing. Climate experts have been unanimous in recognising the urgent need for a better understanding of the complex dynamics that shape how climate change is experienced and responded to by human systems. Yet this call has not yet been addressed. Climate ethnography, coined by the anthropologist Susan Crate (2011), aims to bridge this growing disjuncture between climate science and everyday life through the exploration of the social meaning of climate change. It seeks to investigate the confrontation of its social salience in different locations and under different environmental guises (Goodman 2018: 340). By understanding how wine producers make sense of the world (and the environment) and act in it, it proposes to focus on the co-production of interdisciplinary knowledge by identifying and foreshadowing problems (Goodman 2018: 342; Goodman & Marshall 2018). It seeks to offer an original, transformative and contrasted perspective to climate change scenarios by investigating human agency -individual or collective- in all its social, political and cultural diversity. An anthropological approach founded on detailed ethnographies of wine production is ideally placed to address economic, social and cultural disruptions caused by the emergence of these new environmental challenges. Indeed, the community of experts in environmental change have recently called for research that will encompass the human dimension and for more broad-based, integrated through interdisciplinarity, useful knowledge (Castree & al 2014). My paper seeks to engage with climate ethnography and discuss what it brings to the study of wine environmental futures while exploring the limitations of the anthropological environmental approach.

Mapping grape composition in the field using VIS/SWIR hyperspectral cameras mounted on a UTV

Assessing grape composition is critical in vineyard management. It is required to decide the harvest date and to optimize cultural practices toward the achievement of production goals. The grape composition is variable in time and space, as it is affected by the ripening process and depends on soil and climate conditions.

Grapevine responses to Botrytis cinerea infection: noble rot versus grey rot

The intricate relationship between the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea and grape berries (Vitis vinifera spp.) can lead to the development of either the desirable noble rot (NR) or the unfavourable grey rot (GR), depending on the prevailing weather conditions.

Climate and the evolving mix of grape varieties in Australia’s wine regions

The purpose of this study is to examine the changing mix of winegrape varieties in Australia so as to address the question: In the light of key climate indicators and predictions of further climate change, how appropriate are the grape varieties currently planted in Australia’s wine regions? To achieve this, regions are classified into zones according to each region’s climate variables, particularly average growing season temperature (GST), leaving aside within-region variations in climates. Five different climatic classifications are reported. Using projections of GSTs for the mid- and late 21st century, the extent to which each region is projected to move from its current zone classification to a warmer one is reported. Also shown is the changing proportion of each of 21 key varieties grown in a GST zone considered to be optimal for premium winegrape production. Together these indicators strengthen earlier suggestions that the mix of varieties may be currently less than ideal in many Australian wine regions, and would become even less so in coming decades if that mix was not altered in the anticipation of climate change. That is, grape varieties in many (especially the warmest) regions will have to keep changing, or wineries will have to seek fruit from higher latitudes or elevations if they wish to retain their current mix of varieties and wine styles.

Terroir factors causing sensory and chemical variation in Riesling wines

The term “terroir”, originated in France, comprises the interaction of soil, climate, and topography with the vines of a specific variety and may be extended to the human impact due to the active choice of viticultural and oenological treatments.