Enhancement of the terroir

Abstract

Le terroir est aujourd’hui le facteur de production et de valorisation le plus importante de la filière du vin. Dans un contexte où le défi commercial se déroule tout azimut, la distinction entre pays producteurs traditionnels et « nouveaux » n’est pas seulement une contre position géographique, culturelle et technique mais aussi, et surtout, juridique. En effet, le système des normes présentes dans le « vieux monde » (droits de plantations, décrets de productions, rendements à l’hectare, etc.) qui peut représenter, à court terme sur le marché global, des contraintes au développement et à l’innovation des produits, doit se transformer en opportunité. Mais les menaces deviennent des opportunités, si l’on travaille, de la vigne au marché, en passant par la communication, plutôt sur les éléments de différence que sur ceux d’affinité. Se donner le but d’être différents avant d’être meilleurs.

L’élément « unique » d’un vin, qui peut mettre en exergue les spécificités d’une région, d’une appellation, d’un lieu-dit, d’un site, d’une parcelle, est le terroir. Et l’outil, qui permet de valoriser un terroir est la connaissance, à la bonne échelle, des éléments structuraux, de fonctionnement et d’interaction qui le caractérisent. Mais font partie aussi du terroir d’autres facteurs d’ordre historique, culturel, social et économique qui se sont développés au cours du siècle et qui se sont mélangés et fondus avec la composante géographique du terroir. On pourrait donc, dans l’optique d’une valorisation à 360° d’un vin et de son alentour, concevoir l’esprit géo humain du terroir. Mais pour concevoir cet esprit, il est nécessaire que les acteurs de la filière vin soient capables de réfléchir, au-delà des vignes et des produits, dans une dimension systémique. Les travaux de zonage, qu’à partir des années 80, ont étudié et caractérisé les aires de production, les appellations d’origine et leurs terroirs, ont fort aidé à mettre en exergue les spécificités, à révéler les potentiels qualitatifs, à donner des explications et à mettre au point des outils de valorisation. Il suffit de reprendre les actes des colloques qui ont précédé celui auquel nous sommes en train de participer ainsi que les actes d’autres colloques concernant les paysage viticoles, d’analyser la démarche de l’UNESCO qui a créé un groupe de réflexion « terroirs et cultures » (au pluriel), pour comprendre l’évolution, la perception et l’importance du lien vin-terroir au cours de trois dernières décennies. La lecture et l’analyse des témoignages exposés dans les colloques cités permettent de mieux comprendre le travail qui a été réalisé, mais surtout le travail qui reste à accomplir pour valoriser les terroirs étudiés à travers les informations et les connaissances disponibles.

Aucun produit issu de la terre et du savoir-faire humain a fait l’objet d’autant d’études scientifiques multidisciplinaires et a stimulé des réflexions littéraires et artistiques comme le vin. Une telle richesse bibliographique représente du matériel qu’il faut analyser, adapter et synthétiser pour la valorisation des terroirs à vin. Les spécialistes de marketing ont toujours simplifié la distinction des producteurs de vins en deux catégories:
– Ceux orientés au produit,
– Ceux orientés au marché.
Dans le premier cas, on travaille pour créer des marchés aux vins existants (traditionnels), tandis que dans le deuxième cas, on vise à produire des vins en fonction des exigences des marchés réels ou potentiels. Selon une optique plus moderne, dynamique et évoluée, il serait bien de s’orienter de plus en plus vers le terroir soit pour réaliser des vins spécifiques, soit pour les valoriser sur des marchés de plus en plus exigeants. Les informations disponibles sur le terroir, son environnement géographique et socio-économique, sont des outils à utiliser afin de cibler la caractérisation et de mettre au point les stratégies et les actions, d’individualiser les éléments de valorisation et de protection du « système terroir » et de stimuler les axes d’innovation dans plusieurs aires d’application. Pour résumer les quelques opportunités de valorisation d’un terroir viticole et des paysages associées, on a proposé une matrice permettant de souligner le fort potentiel disponible. Au cours de l’intervention, on analysera, dans les détails, les croisements les plus importants entre les outils et les aires d’application : par exemple l’emploi des résultats d’un zonage pour caractériser le(s) paysage(s), ou pour mettre au point des stratégies de communication.

DOI:

Publication date: December 22, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2006

Type: Article

Authors

Mario FALCETTI

Secrétaire du groupe d’experts « Zonage vitivinicole » OIV, Paris
Directeur Contadi Castaldi, Franciacorta, Italie
Via Colzano, 32, 25030 Adro, Brescia, Italie

Contact the author

Keywords

terroir, valorisation, marché

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2006

Citation

Related articles…

Under-vine management effects on grapevine production, soil properties and plant communities in South Australia

Under-vine (UV) management has traditionally consisted of synthetic herbicide use to limit competition between weeds and grapevines. With growing global interest towards non-synthetic chemical use, this study aimed to capture the effects of alternative UV management at two commercial Shiraz vineyards in South Australia, where the sole management variables were UV management since 2016. In adjacent treatment blocks, cultivation (CU) was compared to spontaneous vegetation (SV) in McLaren Vale (MV), and herbicide was compared to SV in Eden Valley (EV). Soil water infiltration rates were slower and grapevine stem water potential was lower in CU compared to SV in MV, with the latter having a plant community dominated by soursob (Oxalis pes-caprae) during winter; while in EV, there was little separation between the treatments. Yields were affected at both sites, with SV being higher in MV and HE being higher in EV. In MV, the only effect on grape must was a lower 13C:12C isotope ratio in CU, indicating greater grapevine water stress. In the grape must at EV, SV had higher total soluble solids, total phenolics, anthocyanins, and yeast available nitrogen; and lower pH and titratable acidity. Pruning weights were not affected by the treatments in MV, while they were higher in HE at EV. Assessments revealed that the differing soil types at the two sites were likely the main determinants of the opposing production outcomes associated with UV management. In the silty loam soil of MV, the higher yields in SV were likely due to more plant-available water, as a potential result of the continuous soil bio-pores formed by winter UV vegetation. Conversely, in the loamy sand soils of EV with a lower cation exchange capacity, the lower yields and pruning weights in SV suggest the UV vegetation competed significantly with the grapevines for available water and nutrients.

Is wine terroir a valid concept under a changing climate?

The OIV[i] defines terroir as a concept referring to an area in which collective knowledge of the interactions between the physical and biological environment (soil, topography, climate, landscape characteristics and biodiversity features) and vitivinicultural practices develops, providing distinctive wine characteristics. Those are perceptible in the taste of wine, which drives consumer preference and, therefore, wine’s value in the marketplace. Geographical indications (GI) are recognized regulatory constructs formalizing and protecting the nexus between wine taste and the terroir generating it. Despite considering updates, GIs do not consider the nexus as a dynamic one and do not anticipate change, namely of climate. Being climate a fundamental feature of terroir, it strongly impacts wine characteristics, such as taste. According to IPCC[ii], many widespread, rapid and unprecedented changes of climate occurred, some being irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. Climatic shifts and atmospheric-driven extreme events have been widely reported worldwide. Recent climatic trends are projected to strengthen in upcoming decades, whereas extremes are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, forcing wines away from GI definitions. Geographical shifts of viticultural suitability are projected, often moving into regions and countries different from current ones. Some authors propose adaptation in viticulture, winemaking and product innovation. We show evidence of climate changing wine characteristics in the Douro valley, home of 270-year-old Port GI. We discuss herein resist or adapt stances for when climate changes the nexus between terroir and wine characteristics. Using the MED-GOLD[iii] dashboard, a tool allowing for easy visual navigation of past and future climates, we demonstrate how policymakers can identify future moments, throughout the 21st century under different emission scenarios, when GI specifications will likely need updates (e.g., boundaries, varieties) to reduce climate-change impacts.

Variety and climatic effects on quality scores in the Western US winegrowing regions

Wine quality is strongly linked to climate. Quality scores are often driven by climate variation across different winegrowing regions and years, but also influenced by other aspects of terroir, including variety. While recent work has looked at the relationship between quality scores and climate across many European regions, less work has examined New World winegrowing regions. Here we used scores from three major rating systems (Wine Advocate, Wine Enthusiast and Wine Spectator) combined with daily climate and phenology data to understand what drives variation across wine quality scores in major regions of the Western US, including regions in California, Oregon and Washington. We examined effects of variety, region, and in what phenological period climate was most predictive of quality. As in other studies, we found climate, based mainly on growing degree day (GDD) models, was generally associated with quality—with higher GDD associated with higher scores—but variety and region also had strong effects. Effects of region were generally stronger than variety. Certain varieties received the highest scores in only some areas, while other varieties (e.g., Merlot) generally scored lower across regions. Across phenological stages, GDD during budbreak was often most strongly associated with quality. Our results support other studies that warmer periods generally drive high quality wines, but highlight how much region and variety drive variation in scores outside of climate.

Influence of grapevine rootstock/scion combination on rhizosphere and root endophytic microbiomes

Soil is a reservoir of microorganisms playing important roles in biogeochemical cycles and interacting with plants whether in the rhizosphere or in the root endosphere. The composition of the microbial communities thus impacts the plant health. Rhizodeposits (such as sugar, organic and amino acids, secondary metabolites, dead root cells …) are released by the roots and influence the communities of rhizospheric microorganisms, acting as signaling compounds or carbon sources for microbes. The composition of root exudates varies depending on several factors including genotypes. As most of the cultivated grapevines worldwide are grafted plants, the aim of this study was to explore the influence of rootstock and scion genotypes on the microbial communities of the rhizosphere and the root endosphere. The work was conducted in the GreffAdapt plot (55 rootstocks x 5 scions), in which the 275 combinations have been planted into 3 blocks designed according to the soil resistivity. Samples of roots and rhizosphere of 10 scion x rootstock combinations were first collected in May among the blocks 2 and 3. The quantities of bacteria, fungi and archaea have been assessed in the rhizosphere by quantitative PCR, and by cultivable methods for bacteria and fungi. The communities of bacteria, fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was analyzed by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene, ITS and 28S rRNA gene, respectively. The level of mycorrhization was also evaluated using black ink coloration of newly formed roots harvested in October. The level of bacteria, fungi and archaea was dependent on rootstock and scion genotypes. A block effect was observed, suggesting that the soil characteristics strongly influenced the microorganisms from the rhizosphere and root endosphere. High-throughput sequencing of the different target genes showed different communities of bacteria, fungi and AMF associated with the scion x rootstock combinations. Finally, all the combinations were naturally mycorrhized. The root mycorrhization intensity was influenced by the rootstock genotype, but not by the scion one. Altogether, these results suggest that both rootstock and scion genotypes influence the rhizosphere and root endophytic microbiomes. It would be interesting to analyze the biochemical composition of the rhizodeposition of these genotypes for a better understanding of the processes involved in the modulation of these microbiomes. Moreover, crossing our data with the plant agronomic characteristics could provide insights into their roles on plant fitness.

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...