Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Evolution of the appellation of origin concept in the vineyards of Australia

Evolution of the appellation of origin concept in the vineyards of Australia

Abstract

Australia is the seventh largest producer of wine and crushed 1.42 million tonnes of wine grapes in the 2001 vintage.
The Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation Act 1980, and its attached Regulations, created the Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation (“A WBC”) with the following objectives:
• To promote and control the export of grape products from Australia;
• To promote trade and commerce of grape products within Australia;
• To enable Australia to fulfil its obligations under prescribed wine trading agreements; and
• To determine and name the boundaries of the various regions and localities in Australia in which wine grapes are produced

It became obvious in the early 1980’s that Australian wine labels did not give enough information or protection to consumers nor did they always meet importing countries labelling requirements.
In the late 1980’s the Label Integrity Programme became law and was attached to the AWBC Act. Its objective was to help ensure the truth regarding grape variety, Geography Indications origin and vintage date statements on labels, commercial documents, etc.
During the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, the winemakers, the AWBC and the Australian government decided, after much debate, to adopt a Geography Indication system and not a European style AOC system to delineate regions and localities in Australia.
In 1992, to comply with the terms of the EU-Australia wine treaty, a “temporary” list of 423 possible Australian GI’s were inserted into Annex II of the treaty.

In 1994, the AWBC Act was added to by forming a Geography Indications Committee with the function of making determinations of GI’s for wine in relation to regions and localities in Australia. Between 1994 and 2002, the GIC declared and entered into the Register of Protected Names, 94 regions and localities in Australia and deleted a significant number of the “temporary” GI’s in Annex II of the treaty in 1999.
The GIC expects to complete its work in 2003, at which time it will revert to a “care and maintenance” format. The Register of Protected Names will contain 115 entries of GI’s and will replace the “temporary” list contained in Annex II.
Of all the determinations made so far by the GIC, only one (Coonawarra) has been appealed to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, whose decision, in turn, has been appealed to the Federal Court who will hear the case in June 2002. Marketing and promotion of regional GI’s is undertaken by each Regional Association either on its own initiative, or in combination with others, at user pay events organized by State Associations and/or the Australian Wine Export Council. Regional and State Associations also co-operate with Local and State Tourist Authorities who are keen to use wine tourism as a major tourist attraction. Larger wine producers also help market regional GI’s by emphasizing the GI on their well-known, advertised and promoted brands eg, Wynns Coonawarra Cabernet-Sauvignon.

 

 

 

DOI:

Publication date: February 16, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2002

Type: Article

Authors

I. MACKLEY

Australian Wine & Brandy Corporation, National Wine Center, Industry House
CNR hackney & Botanic roads, Adelaïde A 5000

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2002

Citation

Related articles…

Outline for the définition of “Terroirs Viticoles application to the area of El AIjarafe (Seville, Spain)

The grapes producing and wine making regions are différent in their use of agricultural, industrial or agroindustrial means. These means are quite often very original and/or specialised; and lately are also quite competitive. Such means are being defined with increased accuracy in the delimitation and definition of its characteristics (Paneque et al., 1996 a). Human action together with other Elements and Agents involved in the vine growing production (Reyner, 1989) over these means lead to agronomic systems with important characteristics. Finally, the transformation of the vine growing production, through different technologies (Fleet, 1992), results in the creation of products with a different acceptance and economical value in the market.

Geographical indication “Brandy Italiano”: study on the influence of wood barrel toasting and natural seasoning on endogenous and wood-derived compounds of aged distillates

The European geographical indication (GI) Brandy Italiano is exclusively reserved to brandy obtained in Italy from the distillation of wine from grapes grown and vinified in the national territory [1].

Mousy off-flavor detection: a rapid LCMS/MS method

These days, consumers are interested in food products linked to the environment and the concept of naturalness. They prefer “free” products, such as those with no pesticide residues or no added sulfur dioxide (so2) in wines. In fact, so2 is the most widely used preservative in winemaking, as it has multiple properties at low cost: it is antioxidant, antioxidasic and antimicrobial.

What are the optimal ranges and thresholds for berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis?

In wine grape production, canopy management practices are applied to control the source-sink balance and improve the cluster microclimate to enhance berry composition. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal ranges of berry solar radiation exposure (exposure) for upregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and thresholds for their degradation, to evaluate how canopy management practices such as leaf removal, shoot thinning, and a combination of both affect the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) yield components, berry composition, and flavonoid profile under context of climate change. First experiment assessed changes in the grape flavonoid content driven by four degrees of exposure. In the second experiment, individual grape berries subjected to different exposures were collected from two cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot). The third experiment consisted of an experiment with three canopy management treatments (i) LR (removal of 5 to 6 basal leaves), (ii) ST (thinned to 24 shoots per vine), and (iii) LRST (a combination of LR and ST) and an untreated control (UNT). Berry composition, flavonoid content and profiles, and 3-isobutyl 2-methoxypyrazine were monitored during berry ripening. Although increasing canopy porosity through canopy management practices can be helpful for other purposes, this may not be the case of flavonoid compounds when a certain proportion of kaempferol was achieved. Our results revealed different sensitivities to degradation within the flavonoid groups, flavonols being the only monitored group that was upregulated by solar radiation. Within different canopy management practices, the main effects were due to the ST. Under environmental conditions given in this trial, ST and LRST hastened fruit maturity; however, a clear improvement of the flavonoid compounds (i.e., greater anthocyanin) was not observed at harvest. Methoxypyrazine berry content decreased with canopy management practices studied. Although some berry traits were improved (i.e. 2.5° Brix increase in berry total soluble solids) due to canopy management practices (ST), this resulted in a four-fold increase in labor operations cost, two-fold decrease in yield with a 10-fold increase in anthocyanin production cost per hectare that should be assessed together as the climate continues to get hot.

WINE AS AN EMOTIONAL AND AESTHETIC OBJECT: IMPACT OF EXPERTISE

Wine tasting has been shown to provide emotions to tasters (Coste et al. 2018). How will expertise impact this emotional response? Burnham and Skilleås (2012) reported that the cultural, experiential, and aesthetic competencies characterize an expert in wine compared to a novice. Although there is no consensual definition of an aesthetic experience, Burnham and Skilleås (2012) reported that aesthetic appreciation is “disinterested, normative for others and communicable” in comparison to sensory pleasure.