Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Influence de la nutrition potassique sur le manque d’acidité des vins issus du cépage Negrette

Influence de la nutrition potassique sur le manque d’acidité des vins issus du cépage Negrette

Abstract

Une baisse préoccupante de l’acidité des vins est observée dans beaucoup de régions viticoles, comme le Bordelais (Merlot), la Bourgogne (Pinot Noir), les Côtes-du-Rhône (Grenache) ou la Rioja (Tempranillo). Ce manque d’acidité est particulièrement marqué dans le vignoble Midi-Pyrénéen des Côtes du Frontonnais (Tournier, 1993). Or, l’acidité d’un vin est un des principaux facteurs de sa qualité, en effet, une faible acidité combinée à une structure tannique insuffisante entraîne une oxydation rapide des vins et les fait vieillir prématurément. De multiples travaux font état de la liaison étroite entre la faible acidité d’un moût ou d’un vin grande richesse en potassium (Boulton, 1980 ; Delas et al., 1989 ; Falcetti et al., 1993 ; Champagnol, 1988; Soyer et Molot, 1993).

D’autre part, la teneur en potassium des moûts est corrélée à celle des feuilles (Mattick, 1972 ; Champagnol, 1990) et une corrélation a été mise en évidence entre cette dernière et la fertilisation potassique (Morris et al., 1983 ; Champagnol, 1988, 1990 ; Soyer et Molot, 1993 ; Jourdan, 1993). Cependant, ces liaisons sont discutées par d’autres auteurs comme Dundon et al. (1984), Conradie et Saayman (1989) ou Matthews et al. (1993).
Pour contribuer à résoudre ce problème, nous avons choisi comme matériel d’étude la Négrette, cépage principal des Côtes du Frontonnais et cépage donnant des vins particulièrement peu acides.

Une double expérimentation a été mise en place. La première a été effectuée en culture hors-sol, sous serre. Elle a pour but de déterminer, grâce à l’application de solutions nutritives ayant des équilibres potassium-calcium différents, les relations existant entre les teneurs en potassium du milieu nutritif et celles des feuilles et des moûts, ainsi que leurs répercussions sur l’acidité des vins. La seconde est une expérimentation en champ qui a pour objectif d’étudier les interactions précédentes in situ. Le suivi de l’état nutritionnel de la vigne a été réalisé selon un protocole mis au point par Garcia et al. (1984) et Doux et al. (1985). La sélection des parcelles a été effectuée en s’inspirant de la méthode mise au point par Morlat et Asselin (1992).

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

M. GARCIA (1), C. DAVEREDE (1), P. GALLEGO (1), D. VIGNES (2), J.L. FAVAREL (3), F. DEDIEU (4)

(1) Institut National Polytechnique-ENSAT, 145 av de Muret 31076 Toulouse
(2) CESBIO, 18 av Edouard Belin 31055 Toulouse
(3) Institut Technique de la Vigne et du vin-Gaillac, 52 Place Jean Moulin 81300 Gaillac
(4) Faculté de pharmacie, Chemin des Maraîchers 31062 Toulouse Cédex

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

The modification of cultural practices in grapevine cv. Syrah, does it modify the characteristics of the musts?

The work shows the results of a year of experimentation (2020) in a Syrah variety vineyard in La Roda (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). The trial approach was on a randomized block design with two factors: Irrigation (I) and Pruning (P).
Irrigation schedules were adjusted to apply amounts close to 1,500 m3/ha. With this provision, 2 different irrigation treatments were proposed: I1) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to post-harvest (providing at least 20 % of the total amount of irrigation water to be provided post-harvest); I2) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to harvest (usual irrigation practice in the study area). Pruning was proposed with two treatments, one at the end of January (P1), which is pruning on a conventional date; and P2) pruning carried out at the beginning of budding. In total, 4 repetitions were designed with 4 elementary plots, each one of them representing one of the proposed treatments (I1P1; I1P2; I2P1; I2P2). In total, 16 plots were worked on and each elementary plot consisted of 30 strains, distributed in 3 lines.
The productive response was evaluated with the yield results of the harvest harvested at 23 ºBrix. The qualitative response was measured in the musts through the indices of technological (acidity, pH and potassium) and phenolic maturity and aromatic compounds in free and glycosylated fractions. The treatments tested had, in general, an effect on the different variables analyzed.

Grapevine yield-gap: identification of environmental limitations by soil and climate zoning in Languedoc-Roussillon region (south of France)

Grapevine yield has been historically overlooked, assuming a strong trade-off between grape yield and wine quality. At present, menaced by climate change, many vineyards in Southern France are far from the quality label threshold, becoming grapevine yield-gaps a major subject of concern. Although yield-gaps are well studied in arable crops, we know very little about grapevine yield-gaps. In the present study, we analysed the environmental component of grapevine yield-gaps linked to climate and soil resources in the Languedoc Roussillon. We used SAFRAN data and IGP Pays d’Oc wine yields from 2010 to 2018. We selected climate and soil indicators proving to have a significant effect on average wine yield-gaps at the municipality scale. The most significant factors of grapevine yield were the Soil Available Water Capacity; followed by the Huglin Index and the Climatic Dryness Index. The Days of Frost; the Soil pH; and the Very Hot Days were also significant. Then, we clustered geographical zones presenting similar indicators, facilitating the identification of resources yield-gaps. We discussed the number of zones with the experts of IGP Pays d’Oc label, obtaining 7 zones with similar limitations for grapevine yield. Finally, we analysed the main resources causing yield-gaps and the grapevine varieties planted on each zone. Mapping grapevine resource yield-gaps are the first stage for understanding grapevine yield-gaps at the regional scale.

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

Analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon and Aglianico winegrape (V. vinifera L.) responses to different pedo-climatic environments in southern Italy

Water deficit is one of the most important effects of climate change able to affect agricultural sectors. In general, it determines a reduction in biomass production, and for some plants, as in the case of grapevine, it can endorse fruit quality. The monitoring and management of plant water stress in the vineyard

Mapping and tracking canopy size with VitiCanopy

Understanding vineyard variability to target management strategies, apply inputs efficiently and deliver consistent grape quality to the winery is essential. However, despite inherent vineyard variability, the majority are managed as if they are uniform. VitiCanopy is a simple, grower-friendly tool for precision/digital viticulture that allows users to collect and interpret objective spatial information about vineyard performance. After four years of field and market research, an upgraded VitiCanopy has been created to achieve a more streamlined, technology-assisted vine monitoring tool that provides users with a set of superior new features, which could significantly improve the way users monitor their grapevines. These new features include:
• New user interface
• User authentication
• Batch analysis of multiple images
• Ease the learning curve through enhanced help features
• Reporting via the creation of colour maps that will allow users to assess the spatial differences in canopies within a vineyard.
Use-case examples are presented to demonstrate the quantification and mapping of vineyard variability through objective canopy measurements, ground-truthing of remotely sensed measurements, monitoring of crop conditions, implementation of disease and water management decisions as well as creating a history of each site to forecast quality. This intelligent tool allows users to manage grapevines and make informed management choices to achieve the desired production targets and remain profitable.