terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

Abstract

Grape pomace is one of the main by-products generated after pressing in winemaking.Emerging methods, such as ultrasound-assisted extraction with eutectic mixtures, have great potential due to their low toxicity, and high biodegradability. Choline chloride (ChCl) was used as a hydrogen bond acceptor and its corresponding hydrogen bond donor (malic acid, citric acid, and glycerol: urea). Components were heated at 80 °C and stirred until a clear liquid was obtained. Distilled water was added (30 % v/v). A solid-liquid ratio of 1 g pomace per 10 ml of eutectic solvent was used. Total anthocyanins were determined. Malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside was quantified by HPLC. Metabisulfite bleaching and the viscosity of the extracts were also determined. The highest extraction was obtained for the methanol/water system.The eutectic system that showed the highest extraction was the mixture of choline chloride, urea, and glycerol in a molar ratio of 1:1:1. Glycerol is classified as a polyol. It can modify the polarity of water so it can be used as a co-solvent in the extraction of polyphenols. In addition, it is considered a highly flexible molecule, capable of forming intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds [1]. The higher extraction of choline chloride glycerol and urea (molar ratio 1:1:1) could be due to the influence of the lower polarity of glycerol presenting a higher affinity, probably with malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside, which is less polar than Mv-3-O-glc. In HPLC analysis, malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside was the main anthocyanin identified in all extracts.In eutectic mixtures, viscosity is the property that limits the extraction process compared to conventional solvent extractions. The extract obtained with the choline chloride: urea: glycerol (1:2:2) system had the lowest viscosity values, while the rest of the extracts presented higher viscosities. Viscosity reflects how compact a molecular structure is. Therefore, it can be inferred that the systems with malic acid and citric acid with choline chloride in molar ratios 1:2 present a compact molecular structure with a minimum of holes, which results in less diffusion during the extraction process. The choline chloride: malic acid (1:1) system presented significant resistance to sulfite bleaching at pH 3.5, losing approximately 34 % of color. The choline chloride: urea: glycerol (1:1:1) system lost approximately 50 % of the color, presenting a lower resistance to discoloration.

1. A. P. Abbott, R. C. Harris, K. S. Ryder, C. D’Agostino, L. F. Gladden, and M. D. Mantle, “Glycerol eutectics as sustainable solvent systems,” Green Chem., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2011

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Lilisbet Castellanos-Gallo¹, Lourdes Ballinas-Casarrubias¹, Jose-Carlos Espinoza-Hicks¹,  Johan Mendo-Za-Chacón¹, León Hernandez-Ochoa¹

1. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, C.P. 31170 Chihuahua Mexico

Contact the author*

Keywords

Extraction, malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside, Eutectic solvents, Grape pomace

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

FOLIAR APPLICATION OF METHYL JASMONATE AND METHYL JASMONATE PLUSUREA: INFLUENCE ON PHENOLIC, AROMATIC AND NITROGEN COMPOSITION OFTEMPRANILLO WINES

Phenolic, volatile and nitrogen compounds are key to wine quality. On one hand, phenolic compounds are related to wine color, mouthfeel properties, ageing potential. and are associated with beneficial health properties. On the other hand, wine aroma is influenced by hundreds of volatile compounds. Fermentative aromas represent, quantitatively, the wine aroma, and among these volatile compounds, esters, higher alcohols and acids are mainly responsible for the fermentation bouquet.

UNTARGETED METABOLOMICS ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY A NEW SWEET COMPOUND RELEASED DURING POST-FERMENTATION MACERATION OF WINE

The gustatory balance of dry wines is centered on three flavors, sourness, bitterness and sweetness. Even if certain compounds were already identified as contributing to sweetness, some taste modifications remain largely unexplained1,2. Some empirical observations combined with sensory analyzes have shown that an increase of wine sweetness occurs during post-fermentation maceration³. This step is a key stage of red winemaking during which the juice is left in contact with the marc, that contains the solid parts of the grape (seeds, skins and sometimes stems). This work aimed to identify a new taste-active compound that contributes to this gain of sweetness.

MOVING FROM SULFITES TO BIOPROTECTION: WHICH IMPACT ON CHARDONNAY WINE?

Over the last few years, several tools have been developed to reduce the quantity of sulfites used during winemaking, including bioprotection. Although its effectiveness in preventing the development of spoilage microorganisms has been proven, few data are available on the impact of sulfite substitution by bioprotection on the final product. The objective of this study was therefore to characterize Chardonnay wines with the addition of sulfite or bioprotection in the pre-fermentation stage. The effects of both treatments on resulting matrices was evaluated at several scales: analysis of classical oenological parameters, antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds, non-volatile metabolome and sensory profile.

BIOPROTECTION BY ADDING NON-SACCHAROMYCES YEASTS : ADVANCED RESEARCH ON THIS PROMISING ALTERNATIVE TO SO₂

Sulphur dioxide has been used for many years for its antimicrobial, antioxidant and antioxydasic properties in winemaking but nowadays, it is a source of controversy. Indeed, consumers are more attentive to the naturalness of their foods and beverages and the legislation is changing to reduce the total SO₂ levels allowed in wines. To limit and replace the doses of sulphur dioxide applied, winemakers can now use bioprotection consisting in live yeast addition as alternative,seems to be promising. This process, lightly used in from the food industry, allows to colonize the environment and limit the development or even eliminate undesirable microorganisms without altering the sensory properties of the product.

ABOUT THE ROLE PLAYED BY THE DIFFERENT POLYPHENOLS ON OXYGEN CONSUMPTION AND ON THE ACCUMULATION OF ACETALDEHYDE ANDSTRECKER ALDEHYDES DURING WINE OXIDATION

In a previous work1, it was suggested that the different contents in delphinidin and catechin of the grapes were determinant on the O2 consumption and Strecker aldehyde (SAs) accumulation rates. Higher delphinidin seemed to be related to a faster O2 consumption and a smaller SAs accumulation rate, and the opposite was observed regarding catechin.
In the present paper, these observations were fully corroborated by adding synthetic delphinidin to a wine model containing polyphenolic fractions (PFs) extracted from garnacha and synthetic catechin to a wine model containing PF extracted from tempranillo: The delphinin-containing garnacha model consumed O₂ significantly faster and accumulated significantly smaller amounts of SAs than the original garnacha model, and the catechin-containing tempranillo model, consumed O2 significantly slower and accumulated significantly higher amounts of SAs than the original tempranillo model.