Terclim 2026 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Terclim 9 Terclim 2026 9 Terclim 2026 – Session 4: Current and future sustainability challenges of terroir-driven wines 9 Comparative assessment of water footprint methodologies across global viticultural systems: towards standardization

Comparative assessment of water footprint methodologies across global viticultural systems: towards standardization

Abstract

Context and objective: The increase in drought across most of the world’s current wine-growing regions due to climate change is raising the issue of sustainable water management. While the water footprint (WF) is an essential indicator for quantifying freshwater appropriation, its application in the wine sector is not currently the result of an international methodological consensus and lacks standardisation. This study aims to compare three main water footprint reference frameworks based on field data: the volumetric approach (WFN), the water balance approach (HB) and the LCA-Impact method (AWARE).

Methodology: The study uses a multi-year global dataset covering various soil and climate conditions, explicitly distinguishing between irrigated and non-irrigated systems. We calculated WF measures using site-specific data and global gridded datasets (AgERA5, HWSD). The assessment focuses on the grape production phase (not including winemaking), identified as the main contributor to the sector’s water footprint.

Expected results: Preliminary analyses suggest significant differences between methodologies. We expect the standard WFN approach to overestimate green WF in dry farming regions by not taking into account stomatal regulation in the event of water deficit. Conversely, the HB method should offer greater accuracy by modelling dynamic water storage in the soil. With regard to irrigated systems, the LCA approach demonstrates that “volume consumed” is not synonymous with “environmental impact”, which can significantly alter sustainability rankings depending on the scarcity of local watersheds.

Conclusion: This research argues that a robust international standard cannot rely solely on generic coefficients. It advocates a multi-level approach that integrates soil water dynamics and local scarcity contexts to ensure fair comparative assessment and guide adaptation strategies in a future where water will become increasingly scarce.

References

Boulay, A.-M., Bare, J., Benini, L., Berger, M., Lathuillière, M. J., Manzardo, A., Margni, M., Motoshita, M., Núñez, M., Pastor, A. V., Ridoutt, B., Oki, T., Worbe, S., & Pfister, S. (2018). The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints : Assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(2), 368‑378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8

Herath, I., Green, S., Horne, D., Singh, R., McLaren, S., & Clothier, B. (2013). Water footprinting of agricultural products : Evaluation of different protocols using a case study of New Zealand wine. Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, 159‑167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.008

Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2011). The Water Footprint Assessment Manual (0 éd.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775526

Johnson, M. B., & Mehrvar, M. (2021). From field to bottle: Water footprint estimation in the winery industry. In : Water Footprint: Assessment and Case Studies, Muthu S. S. (Ed.)., Springer, Singapore, 103-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4377-1

Niccolucci, V., Meffo Kemda, M., Marchi, M., Cai, G., Montefrancesco, C., Parri, S., Di Noi, A., & Alberti, E. (2025). An econometric model for crop water footprint assessment. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01520-2

van Leeuwen, C., Benedetto, G., Graça, A., de la Fuente, M., Koundouras, S., Resco, P., Schultz, H. R., Aruani, C., Bois, B., Heizer, M. G., Pitacco, A., Santesteban, G., Alves, F. S., & Marco, T. (2025). Review on methodologies used to calculate water footprint in grape and wine production.  Coordinated by Ruf J.C., Battiston E. & Tellier J.F. OIV publications. ISBN 978-2-85038-116-4.

van Leeuwen, C., Sgubin, G., Bois, B., Ollat, N., Swingedouw, D., Zito, S., & Gambetta, G. A. (2024a). Climate change impacts and adaptations of wine production. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 5(4), 258‑275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00521-5

van Leeuwen, C., Thirza, H., Irvine, A. D., Gowdy, M., Zito, S., Gouot, J., & Bois, B. (2024b). Turning water into wine: the water footprint of winegrape production. Proceedings of the 15th International Terroir Congress, Mendoza, Argentina, 18-22 November 2024, 198-213.

Publication date: June 29, 2026

Issue: Terclim 2026

Type: Oral

Authors

Sébastien Zito1,3,*, Ate Frijters1,2, Cornelis van Leeuwen1

1 EGFV, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRAE, ISVV, 33140 Villenave-d’Ornon, France

2 Water Resources Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands

3 Service Recherche & Développement, Maison Hennessy, rue de la Richonne, F-16101 Cognac, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

grapevine, water footprint, water footprint network, AWARE

Tags

IVES Conference Series | terclim | Terclim 2026

Citation

Related articles…

Dating of old vineyards: A multidisciplinary, non-invasive approach for age validation developed in Campo de Borja (Spain)

The present study aims to develop a multidisciplinary method capable of estimating the age of vineyards within the Protected Designation of Origin (P.D.O.) Campo de Borja in a probabilistic manner.

Investigating impact of terroir on sensory perception of wines made from hybrid grape cultivar ‘Marquette’

In this study we investigated the impact of geography, soil type, and harvest date on grape quality traits (e.g., cluster development, cluster architecture, fruit quality, and wine quality).

Microclimatic effects of tree-based infrastructures in vineyards: A multisource approach combining remote sensing and in situ measurements

Vineyards are particularly sensitive to climatic extremes, especially heatwaves and frost events, whose frequency and intensity are increasing.

High-resolution agroclimatic projections for assessing climate change impacts on French viticulture for the 2030, 2040, and 2050 horizons

Agriculture is extremely vulnerable to climate change. Increases in air temperature, altered rainfall patterns, and more frequent extreme events are key climate impacts influencing crop yields, safety, and quality.

Classic versus integral mean temperature calculations in the estimation of the Winkler index

The use of bioclimatic indexes is a common practice to evaluate the suitability of regions for specific crops or cultivars, particularly in viticulture.