Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Une méthode d’étude synthétique du paysage

Une méthode d’étude synthétique du paysage

Abstract

a) le vin, produit qualitatif et convivial à souhait, favorise un support visuel, même pour une étude scientifique car il renvoie à l’image du terroir, en particulier par son paysage visible.
b) le paysage viticole assez ouvert par définition favorise ce type d’approche.
c) le cadre de l’Essai Terroir mené par l’U.R.V.V. (I.N.R.A. – Angers) comporte 15 micro-parcelles de 100 souches, et nécessite à cette échelle des relevés précis du milieu, d’oîi des prises de vue systématiques, du centre de la parcelle, sur 360°, au 50 mm, à 1 m70 su sol et à l’horizontale. Ce type de relevé réalisable aussi au clisimètre ou au téodolithe, permet de saisir la totalité des composantes paysagères environnantes, puis de les grouper en masses homogènes qui, au-dessus des rangs de vigne, peuvent être des masques à l’ensoleillement et au vent. La perspective estompe naturellement l’influence de ces masques avec l’éloignement, par diminution de leur importance visuelle, l’épaisseur de ceux-ci ne peut être fournie que par la photographie aérienne, exploitée ici de source IGN.
Le recours à la photo possède l’avantage sur les appareils de mesure des distance et d’angles solides, d’aboutir à un document souvent flatteur et surtout palpable, mais dont la mise en oeuvre demeure plus longue et coûteuse.
d) la vue frontale sur 360° est scindée en deux panoramiques : l’un centré au Nord, l’autre au Sud par commodité de représentation spatiale quant à leur lecture.
La vue verticale ou aérienne n’est prise en compte que dans un rayon de 500 m du centre de la parcelle, distance semblant raisonnable quant à l’influence des masques sur celle-ci.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

J. ROBINET

I.N.R.A.-I.P.V. Unité de Recherche Vigne et Vin
42, rue Georges Morel, 49071 Beaucouzé cedex, France

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Do natural wines differ from conventionally-produced wines?

In recent years, consumer awareness for consuming healthy and environmental sustainability products has considerably increased [1]. In an ever-changing and highly competitive environment such as the wine sector, production of wines without sulfites, or biodynamic, organic or vegan wines, has experienced an important increase to meet the new needs of consumers [2,3]. Beyond these categories of regulated products, a new concept has emerged: natural wines (NW), for which there is not an established definition or legal regulation. Rather, producers have a personal idea of naturalness under the premise of applying minimal intervention from grape to wine production [4]. In this context, it is hypothesized that self-defined natural wines are different from conventional wines (CW) in their sensory and chemical profile. The predicament of natural wine is based on anecdotic declarations and assumes that minimal intervention guarantees the production of wines with organoleptic properties able to express the “terroir” and thus promote wine diversity, plurality and sensory typicity against the risk of standardization of CW.

The influence of climate on the grapevine phenology and content of sugar and total acids in the must

For the period of 10 years in the condition of Skopje vineyard area, at two regional (Vranec and Smederevka) and two international (Cabernet sauvignon and Chardonnay) grapevine cultivars, the researches are done.

Zoning influence in chromatic parameters in Monastrell grape

Zoning analysis determine homogeneous areas principally from the point of view of the medium, giving as a result a map which cartographic units synthesize the relations between the edaphic factors; morphological factors of the soil and climatic factors

Effect of post-harvest ozone treatment on secondary metabolites biosynthesis and accumulation in grapes and wine

The actual demand by consumers for safer and healthier food and beverage is pushing the wine sector to find alternative methods to avoid the use of sulphur dioxide in winemaking. Ozone is already used in the wine industry to produce sulphur dioxide-free wines through the patented method Purovino®.

Effects of the addition of yeast derived products during aging in chardonnay sparkling winemaking

From the beginning of the yeast autolysis process, several interesting intracellular and cell wall constituyents are released to the media providing different characteristics to the wine, being this process extensively studied in sparkling wines due to their important contribution to their properties (1-2). Yeast derived products (YDs) try to emulate the natural yeast autolysis compounds release enhancing the organoleptic characteristics of resulting wines (2-3). This study is a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the addition of different YDs added to base wine on the chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of the resulting sparkling wines. METHODS: Chardonnay base wine was employed to carry out this study. Three experimental YDs were added at 5 and 10 g/hL to the tirage liqueur: a yeast autolysate (YA), a yeast protein extract (PE) and an inactivated dry yeast from Torulaspora delbrueckii, (TD), and two commercial specific inactivated dry yeast: OPTIMUM WHITE® (OW) and PURE-LONGEVITY®(PL). After second fermentation, measurements were carried out after 3, 6, 9 and 18 months of aging on lees. General enological parameters, proteins, polysaccharides (HPLC-DAD-RID), volatile compounds profile (GC-MS), foaming characteristics (Mosalux), and descriptive sensory analyses were carried out.