GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Berry weight loss in Vitis vinifera (L.) cultivars during ripening

Berry weight loss in Vitis vinifera (L.) cultivars during ripening

Abstract

Abstract: Context and purpose of the study – Berry shriveling (BS) in vineyards are caused by numerous factors such as sunburn, dehydration, stem necrosis. Climate change results in an increase in day and night temperatures, rainfall throughout the year, changes in the timing and quantities, long dry summers and a combination of climatic variability such as floods, droughts and heatwaves). Grape development and its composition at harvest is influenced by the latter as grape metabolites are sensitive to the environmental conditions. The grape berry experiences water loss and an increase in flavour development as a result of the BS. An increased sugar content in grapes will result in higher alcohol wines and concentration of grape aromas which may be detrimental to the final wine quality. More so, crop estimations are negatively impacted as a result of BS which results in lower compensation for grape producers. This pilot study seeked to investigate the berry weight loss in twelve Vitis vinifera (L.) cultivars in WashingtonState.

Material and methods – This study was conducted during the 2018 growing seasons at the Washington State University (WSU) Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center (IAREC) in Prosser, Washington, USA (46°17’N; 119°44’W; 365 m a.s.l.). The vineyard contained 30 wine grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera) separated into 16 main blocks of 13 row seach along with border sections of 5 vines each. All vines were planted at a spacing of m × 2.7 m (2058 vines/hectare). Grape cultivars were separated into groups of either white or red, with all vines planted in a north-south orientation using the Vertical Shoot Positioned (VSP) training system.Each of the 16 main blocks was dedicated too neoffour main cultivars;Merlot,CabernetSauvignon,Chardonnay, orRiesling. Border sections containing the additional 26 cultivars were located on the southern, eastern, and western portionsofthevineyard.Eachborder cultivar sectionconsistedofthreeorfourrepetitionsoffivevineseach.All weather data was gathered from the Roza automated weather station and the WSU AgWeatherNet system (AgWeatherNet2018).Berry fresh weight and total soluble solids were determined just after véraison throughout berry development.

Results – In this study on weight loss in ripening white (Chardonnay, Weisser Riesling, Gewurztraminer, Alvarinho, Muscat blanc and Sémillon) and red grape cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot noir, Grenache, Lemberger, Malbec, Cabernet franc) ripening curves of non-solutes per berry (mostly water) were similar to the berry weight curves. Solutes per berry (mostly sugar) increased to a maximum berry weight for most of the cultivars. Prior to véraison phloem sap is the only source for water and solutes that enter grape berries until maximum berry weight followed by a decrease in the solutes per berry. Later during the ripening stage berry shrinking occurred due to elevated transpiration, which resulted in an increase in ˚Brix (solutes). Grape cultivar, environmental and cultivation practices have an impact on the concentration of berry of solutes, which dictates the composition and will have an impact on the wine quality. However, this study needs to be repeated and the wine quality should be assessed.

DOI:

Publication date: September 18, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Erna BLANQUAERT1*, Markus KELLER2

1 Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland7602, South Africa
2 Irrigated Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, 24106 N. Bunn Road, Prosser, WA99350

Contact the author

Keywords

grape berry, berry weight, berry shrinkage

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Modelling vine water stress during a critical period and potential yield reduction rate in European wine regions: a retrospective analysis

Most European vineyards are managed under rainfed conditions, where seasonal water deficit has become increasingly important. The flowering-veraison phenophase represents an important period for vine response to water stress, which is seldomly thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, we aim to quantify the flowering-veraison water stress levels using Crop Water Stress Indicator (CWSI) over 1986–2015 for important European wine regions, and to assess the respective potential Yield Lose Rate (YLR). Additionally, we also investigate whether an advanced flowering-veraison phase may help alleviating the water stress with improved yield. A process-based grapevine model STICS is employed, which has been extensively calibrated for flowering and veraison stages using observed data at 38 locations with 10 different grapevine varieties. Subsequently, the model is being implemented at the regional level, considering site-specific calibration results and gridded climate and soil datasets. The findings suggest wine regions with stronger flowering-veraison CWSI tend to have higher potential YLR. However, contrasting patterns are found between wine regions in France-Germany-Luxembourg and Italy-Portugal-Spain. The former tends to have slight-to-moderate drought conditions (CWSI<0.5) and a negligible-to-moderate YLR (<30%), whereas the latter possesses severe-to-extreme CWSI (>0.5) and substantial YLR (>40%). Wine regions prone to a high drought risk (CWSI>0.75) are also identified, which are concentrated in southern Mediterranean Europe. An advanced flowering-veraison phase may have benefited from cooler temperatures and a higher fraction of spring precipitation in wine regions of Italy-Portugal-Spain, resulting in alleviated CWSI and moderate reductions of YLR. For those of France-Germany-Luxembourg, this can have reduced flowering-veraison precipitation, but prevalent alleviations of YLR are also found, possibly because of shifted phase towards a cooler growing season with reduced evaporative demands. Overall, such a retrospective analysis might provide new insights towards better management of seasonal water deficit for conventionally vulnerable Mediterranean wine regions, but also for relatively cooler and wetter Central European regions.

Bioclimatic shifts and land use options for Viticulture in Portugal

Land use, plays a relevant role in the climatic system. It endows means for agriculture practices thus contributing to the food supply. Since climate and land are closely intertwined through multiple interface processes, climate change may lead to significant impacts in land use. In this study, 1-km observational gridded datasets are used to assess changes in the Köppen–Geiger and Worldwide Bioclimatic (WBCS)

Impact of climate change on the viticultural climate of the Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (SE Spain)

Protected Designation of Origin “Jumilla” (PDO Jumilla) is located in the Spanish provinces of Albacete and Murcia, in the South-eastern part of the Iberian Peninsula, where most of the models predict a severe impact of climate change in next decades. PDO Jumilla covers an area of 247,054 hectares, of which more than 22,000 hectares

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

Grapevine yield estimation in a context of climate change: the GraY model

Grapevine yield is a key indicator to assess the impacts of climate change and the relevance of adaptation strategies in a vineyard landscape. At this scale, a yield model should use a number of parameters and input data in relation to the information available and be able to reproduce vineyard management decisions (e.g. soil and canopy management, irrigation). In this study, we used data from six experimental sites in Southern France (cv. Syrah) to calibrate a model of grapevine yield limited by water constraint (GraY). Each yield component (bud fertility, number of berries per bunch, berry weight) was calculated as a function of the soil water availability simulated by the WaLIS water balance model at critical phenological phases. The model was then evaluated in 10 grapegrowers’ plots, covering a diversity of biophysical and technical contexts (soil type, canopy size, irrigation, cover crop). We identified three critical periods for yield formation: after flowering on the previous year for the number of bunches and berries, around pre-veraison and post-veraison of the same year for mean berry weight. Yields were simulated with a model efficiency (EF) of 0.62 (NRMSE = 0.28). Bud fertility and number of berries per bunch were more accurately simulated (EF = 0.90 and 0.77, NRMSE = 0.06 and 0.10, respectively) than berry weight (EF = -0.31, NRMSE = 0.17). Model efficiency on the on-farm plots reached 0.71 (NRMSE = 0.37) simulating yields from 1 to 8 kg/plant. The GraY model is an original model estimating grapevine yield evolution on the basis of water availability under future climatic conditions.  It allows to evaluate the effects of various adaptation levers such as planting density, cover crop management, fruit/leaf ratio, shading and irrigation, in various production contexts.