GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Berry weight loss in Vitis vinifera (L.) cultivars during ripening

Berry weight loss in Vitis vinifera (L.) cultivars during ripening

Abstract

Abstract: Context and purpose of the study – Berry shriveling (BS) in vineyards are caused by numerous factors such as sunburn, dehydration, stem necrosis. Climate change results in an increase in day and night temperatures, rainfall throughout the year, changes in the timing and quantities, long dry summers and a combination of climatic variability such as floods, droughts and heatwaves). Grape development and its composition at harvest is influenced by the latter as grape metabolites are sensitive to the environmental conditions. The grape berry experiences water loss and an increase in flavour development as a result of the BS. An increased sugar content in grapes will result in higher alcohol wines and concentration of grape aromas which may be detrimental to the final wine quality. More so, crop estimations are negatively impacted as a result of BS which results in lower compensation for grape producers. This pilot study seeked to investigate the berry weight loss in twelve Vitis vinifera (L.) cultivars in WashingtonState.

Material and methods – This study was conducted during the 2018 growing seasons at the Washington State University (WSU) Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center (IAREC) in Prosser, Washington, USA (46°17’N; 119°44’W; 365 m a.s.l.). The vineyard contained 30 wine grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera) separated into 16 main blocks of 13 row seach along with border sections of 5 vines each. All vines were planted at a spacing of m × 2.7 m (2058 vines/hectare). Grape cultivars were separated into groups of either white or red, with all vines planted in a north-south orientation using the Vertical Shoot Positioned (VSP) training system.Each of the 16 main blocks was dedicated too neoffour main cultivars;Merlot,CabernetSauvignon,Chardonnay, orRiesling. Border sections containing the additional 26 cultivars were located on the southern, eastern, and western portionsofthevineyard.Eachborder cultivar sectionconsistedofthreeorfourrepetitionsoffivevineseach.All weather data was gathered from the Roza automated weather station and the WSU AgWeatherNet system (AgWeatherNet2018).Berry fresh weight and total soluble solids were determined just after véraison throughout berry development.

Results – In this study on weight loss in ripening white (Chardonnay, Weisser Riesling, Gewurztraminer, Alvarinho, Muscat blanc and Sémillon) and red grape cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot noir, Grenache, Lemberger, Malbec, Cabernet franc) ripening curves of non-solutes per berry (mostly water) were similar to the berry weight curves. Solutes per berry (mostly sugar) increased to a maximum berry weight for most of the cultivars. Prior to véraison phloem sap is the only source for water and solutes that enter grape berries until maximum berry weight followed by a decrease in the solutes per berry. Later during the ripening stage berry shrinking occurred due to elevated transpiration, which resulted in an increase in ˚Brix (solutes). Grape cultivar, environmental and cultivation practices have an impact on the concentration of berry of solutes, which dictates the composition and will have an impact on the wine quality. However, this study needs to be repeated and the wine quality should be assessed.

DOI:

Publication date: September 18, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Erna BLANQUAERT1*, Markus KELLER2

1 Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland7602, South Africa
2 Irrigated Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, 24106 N. Bunn Road, Prosser, WA99350

Contact the author

Keywords

grape berry, berry weight, berry shrinkage

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Estimating bulk stomatal conductance of grapevine canopies

In response to changes in their environment, grapevines regulate transpiration using various physiological mechanisms that alter conductance of water through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. Expressed as bulk stomatal conductance at the canopy scale, it varies diurnally in response to changes in vapor pressure deficit and net radiation, and over the season to changes in soil water deficits and hydraulic conductivity of both soil and plant. It is necessary to characterize the response of conductance to these variables to better model how vine transpiration also responds to these variables. Furthermore, to be relevant for vineyard-scale modeling, conductance is best characterized using data collected in a vineyard setting. Applying a crop canopy energy flux model developed by Shuttleworth and Wallace, bulk stomatal conductance was estimated using measurements of individual vine sap flow, temperature and humidity within the vine canopy, and estimates of net radiation absorbed by the vine canopy. These measurements were taken on several vines in a non-irrigated vineyard in Bordeaux France, using equipment that did not interfere with ongoing vineyard operations. An inverted Penman-Monteith equation was then used to calculate bulk stomatal conductance on 15-minute intervals from July to mid-September 2020. Time-series plots show significant diurnal variation and seasonal decreases in conductance, with overall values similar to those in the literature. Global sensitivity analysis using non-parametric regression found transpiration flux and vapor pressure deficit to be the most important input variables to the calculation of bulk stomatal conductance, with absorbed net radiation and bulk boundary layer conductance being much less important. Conversely, bulk stomatal conductance was one of the most important inputs when calculating vine transpiration, further emphasizing the need for characterizing its response to environmental changes for use in vineyard water use modeling.

How can historical cultivars mitigate the effects of climate change?

IFV, INRAe and the national network “Partenaires de la Sélection Vigne” representing 37 organizations from the different wine regions, have been working increasingly closely over the last 2 decades towards the preservation of the French varietal patrimony. There are approximately 600 patrimonial varieties according to INRAe and SupAgro Montpellier experts, including ancient cultivars (400) and intravarietal crossbreeds obtained since the 19th century. In the context of a drastic reduction in such varieties from the mid 1980’s in favor of mainstream varieties, it was essential to carry out an inventory of old vines and vineyards. INRAe Vassal collection plays a key role here as it holds the largest diversity available, along with a rich bibliography and herbariums, offering us the opportunity to document and double check the identity of a cultivar, consolidating the expertise of ampelographers. The work is carried out in several stages, from verifying the existence of a variety in a small region, through to rehabilitation. During this session, the authors present the process that leads to the official registration of a variety. After this, IFV selection center takes over to initiate the process of selection and propagation. A specific focus within regions such as the Alps, Champagne and the South-West will provide details of the full procedure. Bia, Bouysselet, Chardonnay rose, Mecle and the aptly named Tardif, are some of the cultivars that have followed this procedure. Furthermore, a recent regulation established by INAO on “varieties of interest for adaptation purposes” might boost uptake by growers. Since 2006, 36 historical cultivars have been registered. Most of these have been neglected in the past due to late maturity, lack of sugar and high titratable acidity at harvest time. Such characteristics are today considered as positive qualities, not only in mitigation of the effects of climate change, but also as an opportunity for restoring diversity…

Pruned vine biomass exclusion from a clay loam vineyard soil – examining the impact on physical/chemical properties

The wine industry worldwide faces increasing challenges to achieve sustainable levels of carbon emission mitigation. This project seeks to establish the feasibility of harvesting winter pruned vineyard biomass (PVB) for potential use in carbon footprint reduction, through its use as a renewable biofuel for energy production. In order to make this recommendation, technical issues such as the potential environmental impact, chemical composition and fuel suitability, and logistical challenges of harvesting biomass needs to be understood to compare with the results from similar studies. Of particular interest is the role PVB plays as a carbon source in vineyard soils and what effect annual removal might have on soil carbon sequestration. A preliminary trial was established in the Waite Campus vineyard (University of Adelaide) to test current management strategies. Vines are grown in a Eutrophic, Red Dermosol clay loam soil with well managed midrow swards. A comparison was undertaken of mid-row treatments in two 0.25 Ha blocks (Shiraz and Semillon), including annual cultivation for seed bed preparation, the deliberate exclusion of PVB (25 years) and incorporation of PVB (13 years) at an average of 3.4 and 5.5 Mg/Ha-1 for Shiraz and Semillon respectively. In both 0-10cm and 10-30cm soil core sample depths, combined soil carbon % measures in the desired range of 1.80 to 3.50, were not significantly different between treatments or cultivars and yielded an estimated 42 Mg/ha-1 of sequestered soil carbon. Other key physical and chemical measures were likewise not significantly different between treatments. Preliminary results suggest that in a temperate zone vineyard, managed such as the one used in this study, there is no long term negative impact on soil carbon sequestration through removing PVB. This implies that growers could confidently harvest PVB for use in several end fates including as a bio fuel.

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

A predictive model of spatial Eca variability in the vineyard to support the monitoring of plant status

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...