OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 OENO IVAS 9 OENO IVAS 2019 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 Trials with machine harvested sauvignon blanc: the importance of grape transport time and temperature

Trials with machine harvested sauvignon blanc: the importance of grape transport time and temperature

Abstract

It is well known that free varietal thiols, in particular 3-mercaptohexanol (3MH) and 3-mercaptohexyl ace-tate (3MHA), are important constituents to the aroma of New Zealand Sauvignon blanc wines. This along with the popular practice of machine harvesting in New Zealand were the motivation for the following two pilot studies.
Firstly, it was examined if the presence of 3MH and 3MHA could be influenced by a change in transporta-tion time of machine harvested grapes. This came about as it was noticed that some Marlborough wineries process grapes incoming from multiple growing regions. Here, the thiol precursor contents, Glut-3MH and Cys-3MH, of 21 lab scale wines were examined after experiencing different simulated transportation times (0, 1.5, 3 and 4.5 h).

Results suggested that significant (p < 0.05) increases in the amount of Cys-3MH and Glut-3MH for some of the treatments associated to longer transportation times was possible. However, after fermentation while some of the experimental wines did not display any significant difference between the transportation times trialled, others displayed an opposite (downward) trend for the presence of 3MH and 3MHA across the increasing time points.

Secondly, as machine harvesting can occur throughout the day and night, of which atmospheric changes in temperature are anticipated, it was hypothesised that the skin contact taking place due to the nature of the machine harvesting can occur at different temperatures. For this study a holding period of 2h was chosen to represent the transport time of harvested grapes to a processing winery while the grape holding tempera-tures investigated were 6, 15 and 24 °C. Cys-3MH and Glut-3MH were quantified both before and after the different temperature treatments of the machine harvested grapes. ANOVA and Tukey HSD did not reveal any significant (p > 0.05) differences in thiol precursor levels before the 2h holding period. However, after this time a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 6 and 15°C for both Cys-3MH and Glut-3MH was established. Following fermentation, the levels of 3MH and 3MHA were also quantified and revealed similar levels of these thiols between all of the experimental wines with no significant differences (p > 0.05) detec-ted between the holding temperatures investigated.

DOI:

Publication date: June 10, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Katie Parish-Virtue 1, Mandy Herbst-Johnstone 1, Flo Bouda 2, Rebecca Deed 1, and Bruno Fedrizzi 1, Claire Grose 3, Mandy Herbst-Johnstone 1, Damian Martin 3

1) Wine Science Programme, School of Chemical Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
2) Delegat Limited, 172 Hepburn Rd, Henderson, Auckland, New Zealand
3) Viticulture and Oenology Group, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd, Blenheim, New Zealand

Keywords

Transport time, Temperature, Machine harvesting, Thiols, Sauvignon blanc 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Different soil types and relief influence the quality of Merlot grapes in a relatively small area in the Vipava Valley (Slovenia) in relation to the vine water status

Besides location and microclimatic conditions, soil plays an important role in the quality of grapes and wine. Soil properties influence…

Grape berry size is a key factor in determining New Zealand Pinot noir wine composition

Making high quality but affordable Pinot noir (PN) wine is challenging in most terroirs and New Zealand’s (NZ) situation is no exception. To increase the probability of making highly typical PN wines producers choose to grow grapes in cool climates on lower fertility soils while adopting labour intensive practices. Stringent yield targets and higher input costs necessarily mean that PN wine cost is high, and profitability lower, in line-priced varietal wine ranges. To understand the reasons why higher yielding vines are perceived to produce wines of lower quality we have undertaken an extensive study of PN in NZ. Since 2018, we established a network of twelve trial sites in three NZ regions to find individual vines that produced acceptable commercial yields (above 2.5kg per vine) and wines of composition comparable to “Icon” labels. Approximately 20% of 660 grape lots (N = 135) were selected from within a narrow juice Total Soluble Solids (TSS) range and made into single vine wines under controlled conditions. Principal Component Analysis of the vine, berry, juice and wine parameters from three vintages found grape berry mass to be most effective clustering variable. As berry mass category decreased there was a systematic increase in the probability of higher berry red colour and total phenolics with a parallel increase in wine phenolics, changed aroma fraction and decreased juice amino acids. The influence of berry size on wine composition would appear stronger than the individual effects of vintage, region, vineyard or vine yield. Our observations support the hypothesis that it is possible to produce PN wines that fall within an “Icon” benchmark composition range at yields above 2.5kg per vine provided that the Leaf Area:Fruit Weight ratio is above 12cm2 per g, mean berry mass is below 1.2g and juice TSS is above 22°Brix.

A predictive model of spatial Eca variability in the vineyard to support the monitoring of plant status

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Photoselective shade films affect grapevine berry secondary metabolism and wine composition

Grapevine physiology and production are challenged by forecasted increases in temperature and water deficits. Within this scenario, photoselective overhead shade films are promising tools in warm viticulture areas to overcome climate change related factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the vulnerability of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grape berry to solar radiation overexposure and optimize shade film use for berry integrity. A randomized complete block design field study was conducted across two years (2020-2021) in Oakville, Napa Valley, CA, with four shade films (D1, D3, D4, D5) differing in the percent of radiation spectra transmitted and compared to an uncovered control (C0). Integrals for gas exchange parameters and mid-day stem water potential were unaffected by the shade films in 2020 and 2021. By harvest, berries from uncovered and shaded vines did not differ in their size or primary metabolism in either year. Despite precipitation exclusion during the dormant season in the shaded treatments, yield did not differ between them and the control in either season. In 2020, total skin anthocyanins (mg/g fresh mass) in the shaded treatments was greater than C0 during berry ripening and at harvest. Conversely, flavonol concentrations in 2020 were reduced in shaded vines compared to C0. The 2020 growing season highlighted the impact of heat degradation on flavonoids. Flavonoid concentrations in 2021 increased until harvest while flavonoid degradation was apparent from veraison to harvest in 2020 across shaded and control vines. Wine analyses highlighted the importance of light spectra to modify wine composition. Wine color intensity, tonality and anthocyanin values were enhanced in D4 whereas antioxidant properties were enhanced in C0 and D5 wines. Altogether, our results highlighted the need of new approaches in warm viticulture areas given the impact that composition of light has on berry and wine quality.