OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 OENO IVAS 9 OENO IVAS 2019 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 Key odorants responsible for the sensory spaces defining the different aroma potentials of Grenache and Tempranillo grapes

Key odorants responsible for the sensory spaces defining the different aroma potentials of Grenache and Tempranillo grapes

Abstract

There are yet many gaps in our knowledge about the aroma potential of winemaking grapes and its measurement. Trying to bring some light into this question, a new general strategy based on the accelerated hydrolysis of reconstituted phenolic and aromatic fractions (PAFs) extracted from grapes has been developed. In this paper, we present results obtained by applying such PAFs strategy to the study of 33 different lots of grapes from grenache and Tempranillo from different areas of Spain and different qualities.

Grapes were first crushed and macerated in the presence of ethanol to avoid fermentation. The ethanolic must was pressed and filtered, then, an aliquot was centrifuged, dealcoholized and extracted in a C18 cartridge. Phenols and aroma precursors, PAFs, were eluted with ethanol. This ethanolic fraction was then reconstituted with water and tartaric acid to make a reconstituted wine model (r-PAF; 13.3% ethanol, pH 3.5). Aroma was developed by storing the r-PAFs in complete anoxia at 75ºC for 24h. The 33 ar-PAFs were subjected to different sensory analyses. First, a sorting task to define sensory categories and to select the most representative samples, which were characterized by flash profiling and by gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O).

Samples developed strong aroma nuances over a background of vegetal and dry fruit odors and were classified into six different sensory categories: 1) citrus & floral; 2) dried fruit & floral; 3) wood, toast & red fruit; 4) red fruit, black fruit & dried fruit; 5) vegetable & dried fruit; and vi) vegetable. Vegetal notes were attributed to aroma compounds derived from lipid oxidation (Z-3-hexenal, Z-2-nonenal, E-2-nonenal and 1-octen- 3-one), while the dry fruit background was attributed to β-damascenone and to massoia lactone. Citrus notes were associated to the surprising presence of 3-mercaptohexanol, whose origin has been exclusively associated to fermentation. Woody and toasty character were attributed to guaiacol and 4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol while furaneol and an unknown ester-like odorant could be linked to red fruit notes. Samples from Grenache were more often classified as floral, citrus and dry fruit, while samples from tempranillo were more often classified as woody, toasty, red fruit and vegetal.

Overall, the procedure provides a new insight into the aroma potential of winemaking grapes, which should be helpful in understanding and managing grape quality.

Acknowledgments

Work funded by the Spanish MCIU AGL2017-87373-C3-1R. Y.A. and LAAE acknowledge the Diputación General de Aragón for a predoctoral fellowship, as well as the European Social Fund.

DOI:

Publication date: June 11, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Yohanna Alegre, SaraFerrero-del-Teso, María-Pilar Sáenz-Navajas, Purificación Fernández-Zurbano, Purificación Hernandez-Orte, Vicente Ferreira

Laboratorio de Análisis del Aroma y Enología (LAAE), Department of Analytical Chemistry, Universidad de Zaragoza, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2) (UNIZAR-CITA), Associated unit to Instituto de las Ciencias de la Vid y el Vino (ICVV) (UR-CSIC-GR)

Contact the author

Keywords

Phenolic and aromatic fractions (PAFs), accelerated hydrolysis, sensory analysis ,GC-O 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

The effect of short and long-term water deficit on physiological performance and leaf microbiome of different rootstock and scion combinations

Climate change, particularly drought stress, threatens viticulture sustainability. Understanding scion-rootstock interactions and their link to the grapevine microbiome is key to improving vine health, productivity, and drought resilience.

Evolution of astringency during the ripening of red grapes through the tribological astringency index

The phenolic composition of red grapes is one of the most important quality parameters.

Eliminating Brettanomyces and lactic acid bacteria in wine: the potential of Ultra-High Pressure Homogenization (UHPH)

Ultra-High Pressure Homogenization (UHPH) is an innovative technology that can be seamlessly integrated at various stages of winemaking. Its application helps minimize or even eliminate the need for sulphites and other antimicrobial or antioxidant treatments, offering a faster and more sustainable alternative.

Impact of oenological tannins on microvinifications affected by downy mildew

AIM: Vine diseases are still responsible for economic losses. Previous study in our laboratory, have shown effects of oenological tannins against Botrytis cinerea1,2. According to this, the aim was to evaluate the wine protection by oenological tannins against an another disease, the downy mildew. METHODS: During the 2020 vintage, infected grapes by downy mildew (Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot) were collected from the dispositive ResIntBio. The 100 kg were crushed, destemmed and dispatch into 10 aluminium tanks. SO2 was added at 3 g/hL. Oenological tannins (grape, quebracho, ellagitannin or gallotannin) were added at 100 g/hL into eight different tanks (4×2 tanks). The two last tanks were considered as control without addition of oenological tannins. Alcoholic fermentation was achieved with Actiflore 33® at 20 g/hL. Malolactic fermentation was achieved with Lactoenos B7at 1 g/hL. Finished wines were sulfited to obtain 45 mg/L of total SO2.

Different yield regulation strategies in semi-minimal-pruned hedge (SMPH) and impact on bunch architecture

Yields in the novel viticulture training system Semi-Minimal-Pruned Hedge (SMPH) are generally higher compared to the traditional Vertical Shoot Positioning (VSP). Excessive yields have a negative impact on the vine and wine quality, which can result in substantial losses in yield in subsequent vintages (alternate bearing) or penalties in fruit quality. Therefore yield regulation is essential. The bunch architecture in SMPH differs from VSP. Generally there is a higher amount but smaller bunches with lower single berry weights in SMPH compared to VSP.