terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Congress on Grapevine and Wine Sciences 9 2ICGWS-2023 9 Use of UHPH to improve the implantation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts

Use of UHPH to improve the implantation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts


Ultra High-Pressure Homogenization (UHPH) is a high-pressure pumping at 300 MPa (>200 MPa) with a subsequent depressurization against a highly resistant valve made of tungsten carbide covered by ceramic materials or carbon nanoparticles. The intense impact and shear efforts produce the nano-fragmentation of colloidal biopolymers including the elimination of microorganism (pasteurization or sterilization depending on in-valve temperature) and the inactivation of enzymes. This technology is extremely gentle with molecules with sensory impact remaining unaffected compounds as terpenes, thiols, and anthocyanins, and protected of ulterior oxidations by the inactivation of oxidative enzymes (PPOs). The use of UHPH in must before fermentation is a powerful technology to eliminate wild microorganism and to facilitate the implantation of non-Saccharomyces inoculated as starters. In this work we show the efficient implantation of several weak-fermenter non-Saccharomyces and the effect on the release of volatile thiols.

Acknowledgements: This research was funded by MICIN, project PID2021-124250OB-I00.


1)  Morata, A. et al. (2020) Front. Nutr.7, 598286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.598286  

2)  Vaquero, C. et al. (2022) Food Bioprocess Technol. 15, 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-022-02766-8  

3)  Loira, I. et al. (2018) Innov. Food. Sci. Emerg. Technol. 50, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.10.005   

4)  Bañuelos, M.A. et al. (2020) Food Chem. 332, 127417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127417


Publication date: October 5, 2023

Issue: ICGWS 2023

Type: Article


Antonio MORATA1*, Iris LOIRA1, Juan Manuel DEL FRESNO1, Carlos ESCOTT1, Felipe PALOMERO1, Carmen LÓPEZ1, Buenaventura GUAMIS2, Mª Antonia BAÑUELOS3, Cristian VAQUERO1, Carmen GONZÁLEZ1

1enotecUPM, Dept. Chemistry and Food Technology, ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 208040; Madrid, Spain
2YPSICON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES S.L, Via Trajana 50-56 Nave 21, 08020, Barcelona, Spain
3enotecUPM, Dept. Biotechnology, ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 208040; Madrid, Spain

Contact the author*


UHPH, Implantation, non-Saccharomyces, Lachancea thermotolerans, terpenes, thiols


2ICGWS | ICGWS | ICGWS 2023 | IVES Conference Series


Related articles…

Time vs drought: leaf age rather than drought drives osmotic adjustment in V. vinifera cv. Pinot Noir

Global warming and increased frequency and/or severity of drought events are among the most threatening consequences of climate change for agricultural crops. In response to drought, grapevine (as many other plants) exhibits osmotic adjustment through active accumulation of osmolytes which in turn shift the leaf turgor loss point (TLP) to more negative values, allowing to maintain stomata opened at lower water potentials1. We investigated the capacity of Pinot noir leaves to modulate their osmotic potential as a function of: (i) time (seasonal osmoregulation), (ii) growing temperatures, and (iii) drought events, to enhance comprehension of the resilience of grapevines in drought conditions. We performed trails under semi-controlled field conditions, and in two different greenhouse chambers (20/15 °C vs 25/20 °C day/night). For two consecutive vegetative seasons, grafted potted grapevines (Pinot noir/SO4) were subjected to two different water regimes for at least 30 days: well-watered (WW) and water deficit (WD).

Oenococcus oeni clonal diversity in the carbonic maceration winemaking

This essay was aimed to describe the clonal diversity of Oenococcus oeni in the malolactic fermentation of the carbonic maceration (CM) winemaking. The free and the pressed liquids from CM were sampled and compared to the wine from a standard winemaking with previous destemming and crushing (DC) of grapes [1]. O. oeni strain typification was performed by PFGE as González-Arenzana et al. described (2014) [2]. Results showed that 13 genotypes, referred as to letters, were distinguished from the 49 isolated strains, meaning the genotype “a” the 27%, the “b” the 14%, the “c” the 12%, the “d and e” the 10 % each other, and the remaining ones less than the 8% each one.

The colour pattern of flower arrangements influence wine tasters’ sensory description

The arrangements of flowers and wine counterparts are inextricably linked. Whether a fundamental aspect of tablescaping or acolytes to broader entertainment rituals, they have an entangled history since ancient times. The aim of this contribution is to verify the influence of visually delicate and robust flower arrangements on individual description of wines. Changes in the sensory description of wines were investigated during subjects’ (thirty-two participants) exposure to three different conditions: the presence of delicate, robust, or totally absent flower arrangements. In each condition, the same two wines were blind tasted: a wine previously defined as delicate – a Pinot Noir from Australia, and a wine known for its robust character – a Tannat from Uruguay.

Plastic debris at vines: carriers of pollutants in the environment?

Modern agriculture employs large amounts of plastics, such as mulching and greenhouse films, thermal covers, plant protection tubes and tying tape. The latter two types are very common in viticulture. Guard tubes are employed to protect young vines from mechanic and atmospheric damage, whilst polymeric tying tape has replaced natural-origin materials to hold the canopy of vines. Both materials are made on synthetic polymers, which include a range of additives to improve their environmental stability remaining in the environment of vineyards for years. During this time, they are exposed to the range of pesticides (fungicides, insecticides and in a lesser extend herbicides) applied to vines.

Comparison of ancestral and traditional methods in the elaboration of sparkling wines; preliminary results

Top quality sparkling wines (SW) are mostly produced using the traditional method that implies a second fermentation into the bottle[1]. That is the case of sparkling wines of reputed AOC such as Champagne, Cava or Franciacorta. However, it seems that the first SW was elaborated using the ancestral method in which only one fermentation takes place[2]. That is the case of the classical SW from the AOC Blanquette de Limoux[3]. In both cases, SW age in the bottle during some time in contact with lees favoring yeast’s autolysis[4]. There is a lot of information about traditional method but only few exists about ancestral method. The aim of this work was to compare SW made by the ancestral method with SW made by the traditional method.