terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Congress on Grapevine and Wine Sciences 9 2ICGWS-2023 9 Conventional and alternative pest management strategies: a comparative proteomic study on musts

Conventional and alternative pest management strategies: a comparative proteomic study on musts

Abstract

In a context of sustainable agriculture, “agroecological immunity” is an emerging concept to reduce the use of chemical pesticides to protect crops against pathogens. This alternative strategy aims to combine different levers including the use of “bio”solutions. These include biocontrol products, some of which being plant defense elicitors, as well as products authorized in organic farming such as copper or sulfur. In vineyards, depending on climate conditions, powdery and downy mildews can be devastating diseases. So, to guarantee the yield and quality of the harvest, it is usually necessary to treat vines against these diseases from the 5/6-leaf stage to the bunch closure stage. In the present study carried out on a Chardonnay plot located at Lugny (Mâconnais Vineyard, France), we compared, the conventional vineyard protection strategy to the alternative one using “bio” solutions. The latter included the use of copper/sulfur and phosphonate or Bacillus-based products. For the two studied vintages (2020 and 2021), up to 8 treatments were applied whatever the protection strategy used. Besides the evaluation of the protection efficacy against downy and powdery mildews, we performed proteomic analyses (LC-MS/MS) to assess the impact of these two crop protection strategies on must quality. Among the 1041 proteins analyzed, 215 were significantly differentially expressed and the clustering analysis allowed to distinguish the two vintages rather than the protection management strategies. At last, a label-free quantification of proteins using spectral counting was performed from 2021 vintage and finally revealed that less than 2% of proteins were significantly differentially expressed between the two-pest management used.

Acknowledgements: We acknowledge F. Bidaut (Vinipôle Sud Bourgogne, Mâcon, France).

DOI:

Publication date: October 10, 2023

Issue: ICGWS 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Héloir M-C.1*Ϯ, Lemaitre-Guillier C.1 Ϯ, Schaeffer C.2, Strub J-M.2, Deulvot C.1, Adrian M.1

1Agroécologie, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
2 Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse Bio-Organique (LSMBO), IPHC, Univ. de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.

Ϯ: co- first authors

Contact the author*

Keywords

biocontrol, grapevine protection, proteomic analysis, vineyard

Tags

2ICGWS | ICGWS | ICGWS 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Moderate wine consumption – part of a balanced diet or a health risk?

Consumption of wine/alcoholic beverages remains a topic of great uncertainty and controversy worldwide. The term “no safe level” dominates the media communication and policy ever since population studies in 2018 [1,2] were published, which denied the existence of a J-curve and suggested that ANY consumption of an alcoholic beverage is harmful to health. The scientific evidence accumulated during the past decades about the health benefits of moderate wine consumption, were questioned and drinking guidelines considered to be too loose.

Entomopathogenic nematodes application for controlling Lobesia botrana in grapevine and their impact on grapevine quality 

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are well-known biological control agents combined with specific adjuvants that now allow their use against aerial pests. Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is one of the major harmful pests detected in worldwide vineyards. Previous studies demonstrated that the EPNs Steinernema feltiae and S. carpocapsae could control L. botrana. The hypothesis was that the best combination of EPN-adjuvant/timing (season/temperatures) will support the use of EPN in the vineyard against L. botrana with no impact on the grape performance.

Sugar accumulation disorder Berry Shrivel – from current knowledge towards novel hypothesis

In contrast to fruit and grape berry ripening, the biological processes causing ripening disorders are often much less understood, although shriveling disorders of fruits are manifold and contribute to yield losses and reduced fruit quality worldwide. Shrinking berries are a common feature for all shriveling disorders in grapevine although their timing of appearance during the berry ripening process and their underlying induction processes distinct them from each other. The sugar accumulation disorder Berry Shrivel (BS) is characterized by a suppression of sugar accumulation short after veraison resulting in berries low in sugar content and anthocyanins in berry skins, while the organic acid content is similar. Recent studies analyzed the biochemical, morphological and molecular processes affected in BS berries and linked early changes to the period of ripening onset [1,2].

Pre-breeding for developing heat stress resilient grape varieties to ensure yield 

Climate change has numerous detrimental consequences and creates new challenges for viticulture around the world. Transitory or constant high temperatures frequently associated with an excess of sunlight (UV) can cause a variety of physiological disorders, such as sunburn. Diverse environmental factors and the plant’s response mechanisms to stress determine the symptoms. Grapevine berry sunburn leads to a drastic reduction in yield, and may eventually decline berry quality. Consequently, this poses a significant risk to the winegrowers.

Foliar application of urea improved the nitrogen composition of Chenin grapes

The nitrogen composition of the grapes directly affects the developments of alcoholic fermentation and influences the final aromatic composition of the wines. The aim of this study was to determine the effect and efficiency of foliar applications of urea on the nitrogen composition of grapes. This study was carried out during 2023 vintage and in the Chenin vineyard located in Estacion Experimental Mendoza (Argentina). Three urea concentrations 3, 6 and 9 Kg N/ha (C1, C2, and C3, respectively) and control (T) were applied in this vineyard at veraison. In all solutions were added 1ml/l of Tween 80 ® surfactant.