terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Congress on Grapevine and Wine Sciences 9 2ICGWS-2023 9 Conventional and alternative pest management strategies: a comparative proteomic study on musts

Conventional and alternative pest management strategies: a comparative proteomic study on musts

Abstract

In a context of sustainable agriculture, “agroecological immunity” is an emerging concept to reduce the use of chemical pesticides to protect crops against pathogens. This alternative strategy aims to combine different levers including the use of “bio”solutions. These include biocontrol products, some of which being plant defense elicitors, as well as products authorized in organic farming such as copper or sulfur. In vineyards, depending on climate conditions, powdery and downy mildews can be devastating diseases. So, to guarantee the yield and quality of the harvest, it is usually necessary to treat vines against these diseases from the 5/6-leaf stage to the bunch closure stage. In the present study carried out on a Chardonnay plot located at Lugny (Mâconnais Vineyard, France), we compared, the conventional vineyard protection strategy to the alternative one using “bio” solutions. The latter included the use of copper/sulfur and phosphonate or Bacillus-based products. For the two studied vintages (2020 and 2021), up to 8 treatments were applied whatever the protection strategy used. Besides the evaluation of the protection efficacy against downy and powdery mildews, we performed proteomic analyses (LC-MS/MS) to assess the impact of these two crop protection strategies on must quality. Among the 1041 proteins analyzed, 215 were significantly differentially expressed and the clustering analysis allowed to distinguish the two vintages rather than the protection management strategies. At last, a label-free quantification of proteins using spectral counting was performed from 2021 vintage and finally revealed that less than 2% of proteins were significantly differentially expressed between the two-pest management used.

Acknowledgements: We acknowledge F. Bidaut (Vinipôle Sud Bourgogne, Mâcon, France).

DOI:

Publication date: October 10, 2023

Issue: ICGWS 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Héloir M-C.1*Ϯ, Lemaitre-Guillier C.1 Ϯ, Schaeffer C.2, Strub J-M.2, Deulvot C.1, Adrian M.1

1Agroécologie, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
2 Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse Bio-Organique (LSMBO), IPHC, Univ. de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.

Ϯ: co- first authors

Contact the author*

Keywords

biocontrol, grapevine protection, proteomic analysis, vineyard

Tags

2ICGWS | ICGWS | ICGWS 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Design of microbial consortia to improve the production of aromatic amino acid derived compounds during wine fermentation

Wine contains secondary metabolites derived from aromatic amino acids (AADC), which can determine quality, stability and bioactivity. Several yeast species, as well as some lactic acid bacteria (LAB), can contribute in the production of these aromatic compounds. Winemaking should be studied as a series of microbial interactions, that work as an interconnected network, and can determine the metabolic and analytical profiles of wine. The aim of this work was to select microorganisms (yeast and LAB) based on their potential to produce AADC compounds, such as tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol, and design a microbial consortium that could increase the production of these AADC compounds in wines.

Predicting provenance and grapevine cultivar implementing machine learning on vineyard soil microbiome data: implications in grapevine breeding

The plant rhizosphere microbial communities are an essential component of plant microbiota, which is crucial for sustaining the production of healthy crops. The main drivers of the composition of such communities are the growing environment and the planted genotype. Recent viticulture studies focus on understanding the effects of these factors on soil microbial composition since microbial biodiversity is an important determinant of plant phenotype, and of wine’s organoleptic properties. Microbial biodiversity of different wine regions, for instance, is an important determinant of wine terroir.

Organic mulches slightly influence wine phenolic composition and sensorial properties

Grapevines have traditionally been grown in semi-arid areas, but viticulture is now compromised by climate change. Therefore, it is necessary to implement environmentally friendly viticulture practices to adapt grapevines to current climatic conditions. In this context, organic mulches offer many benefits, such as reduced soil erosion and increased organic matter, soil water content and crop productivity. However, these practices must not compromise grape and wine quality. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect on wine physicochemical and phenolic composition and sensorial properties of different soil management practices on the vine row. Over four years, five soil treatments were examined in two different vineyards.

Control of bacterial growth in carbonic maceration winemaking through yeast inoculation

Controlling the development of the bacterial population during the winemaking process is essential for obtaining correct wines[1]. Carbonic Maceration (CM) wines are recognised as high-quality young wines. However, due to its particularities, CM winemaking implies a higher risk of bacterial growth: lower SO2 levels, enrichment of the must in nutrients, oxygen trapped between the clusters… Therefore, wines produced by CM have slightly higher volatile acidity values than those produced by the destemming/crushing method[2].

Phenolic composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wines from Argentina, Portugal and Spain

Grape and wine phenolic compounds have been shown to be highly related to both wine quality (color, flavor, and taste) and health-promoting properties (antioxidant and cardioprotective, among others). The aim of this work was to evaluate and compare the phenolic contents of Cabernet Sauvignon wines from different geographical areas and climatic conditions, namely from Argentina, Portugal and Spain vintage 2022. In addition, the phenolic profiles of the Portuguese wines from three vintages (2020, 2021, 2022) was compared.