terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Congress on Grapevine and Wine Sciences 9 2ICGWS-2023 9 Conventional and alternative pest management strategies: a comparative proteomic study on musts

Conventional and alternative pest management strategies: a comparative proteomic study on musts

Abstract

In a context of sustainable agriculture, “agroecological immunity” is an emerging concept to reduce the use of chemical pesticides to protect crops against pathogens. This alternative strategy aims to combine different levers including the use of “bio”solutions. These include biocontrol products, some of which being plant defense elicitors, as well as products authorized in organic farming such as copper or sulfur. In vineyards, depending on climate conditions, powdery and downy mildews can be devastating diseases. So, to guarantee the yield and quality of the harvest, it is usually necessary to treat vines against these diseases from the 5/6-leaf stage to the bunch closure stage. In the present study carried out on a Chardonnay plot located at Lugny (Mâconnais Vineyard, France), we compared, the conventional vineyard protection strategy to the alternative one using “bio” solutions. The latter included the use of copper/sulfur and phosphonate or Bacillus-based products. For the two studied vintages (2020 and 2021), up to 8 treatments were applied whatever the protection strategy used. Besides the evaluation of the protection efficacy against downy and powdery mildews, we performed proteomic analyses (LC-MS/MS) to assess the impact of these two crop protection strategies on must quality. Among the 1041 proteins analyzed, 215 were significantly differentially expressed and the clustering analysis allowed to distinguish the two vintages rather than the protection management strategies. At last, a label-free quantification of proteins using spectral counting was performed from 2021 vintage and finally revealed that less than 2% of proteins were significantly differentially expressed between the two-pest management used.

Acknowledgements: We acknowledge F. Bidaut (Vinipôle Sud Bourgogne, Mâcon, France).

DOI:

Publication date: October 10, 2023

Issue: ICGWS 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Héloir M-C.1*Ϯ, Lemaitre-Guillier C.1 Ϯ, Schaeffer C.2, Strub J-M.2, Deulvot C.1, Adrian M.1

1Agroécologie, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
2 Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse Bio-Organique (LSMBO), IPHC, Univ. de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.

Ϯ: co- first authors

Contact the author*

Keywords

biocontrol, grapevine protection, proteomic analysis, vineyard

Tags

2ICGWS | ICGWS | ICGWS 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Accumulation of deleterious mutations in grapevine and its relationship with traits of interest for wine production and resilience

Deleterious mutations that severely reduce population fitness are rapidly removed from the gene pool by purifying selection. However, evolutionary drivers such as genetic drift brought about by demographic bottlenecks may comprise its efficacy by allowing deleterious mutations to accumulate, thereby limiting the adaptive potential of populations. Moreover, positive selection can hitchhike mildly deleterious mutations due to linkage caused by lack of recombination. Similarly, in the context of species domestication, artificial selection mimics these evolutionary processes, which can have undesirable consequences for production and resilience. In this study, we evaluated the extent of the accumulation of deleterious mutations and the magnitude of their effects (also known as genetic load) at the whole-genome scale for ca.

Wine odors: chemicals, physicochemical and perceptive processes involved in their perception

The odors of wines are diverse, complex and dynamic and much research has been devoted to the understanding of their chemical bases. However, while the “basic” chemical part of the problem, namely the identity of the chemicals responsible for the different odor nuances, was satisfactorily solved years ago, there are some relevant questions precluding a clear understanding. These questions are related to the physicochemical interactions determining the effective volatilities of the odorants and, particularly, to the perceptual interactions between different odor molecules affecting in different ways to the final sensory outputs.

Effect of ultraviolet B radiation on pathogenic molds of grapes

The fungicidal effect of UV-C radiation (100-280 nm wavelength) is well known, but its applicability for the control of pathogenic molds of grapes is conditioned by its effect on the host and by the risks inherent in its handling[1].
As an alternative, the effect in vitro of UV-B radiation (280-315 nm) on the main pathogenic molds of grapes has been studied: Botrytis cinerea, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium expansum and Rhizopus stolonifer.

Grape pomace, an active ingredient at the intestinal level: Updated evidence

Grape pomace (GP) is a winemaking by-product particularly rich in (poly)phenols and dietary fiber, which are the main active compounds responsible for its health-promoting effects. GP-derived products have been proposed to manage cardiovascular risk factors, including endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and obesity. Studies on the potential impact of GP on gut health are much more recent. However, it is suggested that, to some extent, this activity of GP as a cardiometabolic health-promoting ingredient would begin in the gastrointestinal tract as GP components (i.e., (poly)phenols and fiber) undergo extensive catabolism, mainly by the action of the intestinal microbiota, that gives rise to low-molecular-weight bioactive compounds that can be absorbed and utilized by the body.

Inert gases persistence in wine storage tank blanketing

It is common to find tanks in the winery with wine below their capacity due to wine transfers between tanks of different capacities or the interruption of operations for periods of a few days. This situation implies the existence of an ullage space in the tank with prolonged contact with the wine causing its absorption/oxidation. Oxygen uptake from the air headspace over the wine due to differences in the partial pressure of O2 can be rapid, up to 1.5 mL of O2 per liter of wine in one hour and 100 cm2 of surface area1 and up to saturation after 4 hours.