terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Molecular approaches for understanding and modulating wine taste

Molecular approaches for understanding and modulating wine taste

Abstract

Wine consumers generally demand wines having a perception of softer tannins and less ripe, having a heaviness and richness on palate (full-body wine) with a limpid and stable color. However, polyphenol (tannins)-rich wines have been also correlated with unpleasant taste properties such as astringency and bitterness when perceived at high intensities. Modulating these unpleasant properties could be important for consumer’s approval of wines.
Indeed, polyphenols are usually associated with flavor, and particularly with astringency, due to their ability to complex with salivary proteins [1]. Saliva is rich in different SP families described to be involved in astringency, namely basic PRPs, glycosylated PRPs, acidic PRPs, statherin/P-B peptide and cystatins. However, due to saliva being a complex fluid, its protein profile may quantitatively and qualitatively vary under different conditions. Currently, astringency is recognized as a trigeminal sensation although the molecular pathway responsible for its onset is yet to be fully established. Moreover, it is unknown if the many different astringency mouthfeel sub-qualities such as velvet, puckering, harsh, among others, are perceived by different mechanisms. Besides the structural factors and medium conditions, there are some endogenous factors that affect astringency perception such as the physiological response, circadian rhythms, salivary flow rate and time of exposure. Indeed, astringency is perceived as a diffuse stimulus and dynamic process in the oral cavity that requires time to be elicited. It is known that astringency increases upon successive exposures to tannins [2,3].
Wine industry has some strategies to balance astringency and bitterness such as the use of some fining agents and also some winemaking practices (e.g. oak aging, batonnage and microoxygenations) leading to the loss of phenolics and also promoting the chemical change of some of them. While removing phenolic compounds is necessary to fulfill some organoleptic requirements of a beverage, the process must be controlled to avoid some collateral effects such as the loss of flavor [4]. Polysaccharides have been an emerging natural and sustainable option to be used on the modulation of taste properties. In fact, polysaccharides can influence salivary protein-tannin interactions and they could be used to modulate astringency and bitterness.

1. Soares, S., et al., Scientific Reports, 2020, 10, 12638.
2. Lesschaeve, I. and Noble, C. A., Am. J. Clin. Nutr, 2005, 81, 330S-5S.
3. Brand.o, E.; Soares, S.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V., J. Agri. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 9562−9568.
4. Francisco, T., et al., Food Res. Int., 2021, 143, 110261

DOI:

Publication date: February 11, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Victor de Freitas

University of Porto, Faculty of Science, Portugal.
LAQV-REQUIMTE

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

REDUCING NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ALTERS PHENOLIC PROFILES OF VITIS VINIFERA L. CV. CABERNET GERNISCHT WINE OF YANTAI, CHINA

Nitrogen (N) fertilizer is important for grape growth and the quality of wine. It is essential to address the mismatch between N application and wine composition. Cabernet Gernischt (Vitis vinifera L.), as one of the main wine-grape cultivars in China, was introduced to Yantai wine region in 1892. This grape cultivar is traditionally used for quality dry red wine with fruit, spices aroma, ruby red and full-bodied wines. In order to regulate vine growth and improve grape and wine quality, Cabernet Gernischt grapevines were subjected to decreased levels of N treatments, compared to normal N supply treatment, during grape growing seasons of 2019 and 2020.

IMPACT OF ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON BIOADHESION PROPERTIES OF BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS

Brettanomyces bruxellensis is an ubiquitous yeast associated with different fermentation media such as beer and kombucha, where its presence is beneficial to bring an aromatic typicity. However, it is a main spoilage yeast in wines, in which it produces volatile phenols responsible for organoleptic deviations causing significant economic losses (Chatonnet et al., 1992). Cellar and winery equipment’s are considered as the first source of contamination, during fermentation and wine ageing process (Connel et al., 2002). Indeed, it is possible to find B. bruxellensis in the air, on walls and floors of the cellars, on small materials, vats and barrels.

Searching for the sweet spot: a focus on wine dealcoholization

It is well known that the vinification of grapes at full maturation can produce rich, full-bodied wines,
with intense and complex flavour profiles. However, the juice obtained from such grapes may have very
high sugar concentration, resulting in wines with an excessive concentration of ethanol. In addition, the decoupling between technological maturity and phenolic/aromatic one due to global warming, exacerbates this problem in some wine-growing regions. In parallel with the increase of the mean alcohol content of wines on the market, also the demand for reduced alcohol beverages has increased in recent years, mainly as a result of health and social concerns about the risks related to the consumption of alcohol.

EFFECT OF FUMARIC ACID ON SPONTANEOUS FERMENTATION IN GRAPE MUST

Malolactic fermentation (MLF)¹, the decarboxylation of L-malic acid into L-lactic acid, is performed by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). MLF has a deacidifying effect that may compromise freshness or microbiological stability in wines² and can be inhibited by fumaric acid [E297] (FA). In wine, can be added at a maximum allowable dose of 0.6 g/L³. Its inhibition with FA is being studied as an alternative strategy to minimize added doses of SO₂⁴. In addition, wine yeasts are capable of metabolizing and storing small amounts of FA and during alcoholic fermentation (AF).

HOW DO ROOTSTOCKS AFFECT CABERNET SAUVIGNON AROMATIC EXPRESSION?

Grape quality potential for wine production is strongly influenced by environmental parameters such as climate and agronomic factors such as rootstock. Several studies underline the effect of rootstock on vegetative growth of the scions [1] and on berry composition [2, 3] with an impact on wine quality. Rootstocks are promising agronomic tools for climate change adaptation and in most grape-growing regions the potential diversity of rootstocks is not fully used and only a few genotypes are planted. Little is known about the effect of rootstock genetic variability on the aromatic composition in wines; thus further investigations are needed.