terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Molecular approaches for understanding and modulating wine taste

Molecular approaches for understanding and modulating wine taste

Abstract

Wine consumers generally demand wines having a perception of softer tannins and less ripe, having a heaviness and richness on palate (full-body wine) with a limpid and stable color. However, polyphenol (tannins)-rich wines have been also correlated with unpleasant taste properties such as astringency and bitterness when perceived at high intensities. Modulating these unpleasant properties could be important for consumer’s approval of wines.
Indeed, polyphenols are usually associated with flavor, and particularly with astringency, due to their ability to complex with salivary proteins [1]. Saliva is rich in different SP families described to be involved in astringency, namely basic PRPs, glycosylated PRPs, acidic PRPs, statherin/P-B peptide and cystatins. However, due to saliva being a complex fluid, its protein profile may quantitatively and qualitatively vary under different conditions. Currently, astringency is recognized as a trigeminal sensation although the molecular pathway responsible for its onset is yet to be fully established. Moreover, it is unknown if the many different astringency mouthfeel sub-qualities such as velvet, puckering, harsh, among others, are perceived by different mechanisms. Besides the structural factors and medium conditions, there are some endogenous factors that affect astringency perception such as the physiological response, circadian rhythms, salivary flow rate and time of exposure. Indeed, astringency is perceived as a diffuse stimulus and dynamic process in the oral cavity that requires time to be elicited. It is known that astringency increases upon successive exposures to tannins [2,3].
Wine industry has some strategies to balance astringency and bitterness such as the use of some fining agents and also some winemaking practices (e.g. oak aging, batonnage and microoxygenations) leading to the loss of phenolics and also promoting the chemical change of some of them. While removing phenolic compounds is necessary to fulfill some organoleptic requirements of a beverage, the process must be controlled to avoid some collateral effects such as the loss of flavor [4]. Polysaccharides have been an emerging natural and sustainable option to be used on the modulation of taste properties. In fact, polysaccharides can influence salivary protein-tannin interactions and they could be used to modulate astringency and bitterness.

1. Soares, S., et al., Scientific Reports, 2020, 10, 12638.
2. Lesschaeve, I. and Noble, C. A., Am. J. Clin. Nutr, 2005, 81, 330S-5S.
3. Brand.o, E.; Soares, S.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V., J. Agri. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 9562−9568.
4. Francisco, T., et al., Food Res. Int., 2021, 143, 110261

DOI:

Publication date: February 11, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Victor de Freitas

University of Porto, Faculty of Science, Portugal.
LAQV-REQUIMTE

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

IDENTIFICATION OF NEW RESVERATROL DERIVATIVES FORMED IN RED WINE AND THEIR BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES

Stilbenes are natural bioactive polyphenols produced by grapevine. Recently, we have reviewed the na- tural presence of these compounds in wines [1]. This study showed that the resveratrol and its glycoside, the piceid, are the most abundant stilbenes in wines. Resveratrol is a well-known stilbene with a wide range of biological activities. Due to its specific structure, resveratrol can be oxidized in wines to form various derivatives including oligomers [2]. In this study, we investigate the resveratrol and piceid transformation in wines.

WHICH IMPACT FOR PROANTHOCYANIDIC TANNINS ON RED WINE FRUITY AROMA? SENSORY AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL APPROACHES

Previous research on the fruity character of red wines highlighted the role of esters. Literature provides evidence that, besides these esters, other compounds that are not necessarily volatiles may have an important impact on the overall aroma of wine, contributing to a modulation of its global aromatic expression. The goal of this work was to assess the olfactory consequences of a mixture between esters and proanthocyanidic tannins, through sensory and physico-chemical approaches.
Sensory analysis of numerous aromatic reconstitutions, including triangular tests, detection thresholds, and sensory profiles, were conducted in order to evaluate the sensory impact of tannins on red wine esters perception.

IMPACT OF ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON BIOADHESION PROPERTIES OF BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS

Brettanomyces bruxellensis is an ubiquitous yeast associated with different fermentation media such as beer and kombucha, where its presence is beneficial to bring an aromatic typicity. However, it is a main spoilage yeast in wines, in which it produces volatile phenols responsible for organoleptic deviations causing significant economic losses (Chatonnet et al., 1992). Cellar and winery equipment’s are considered as the first source of contamination, during fermentation and wine ageing process (Connel et al., 2002). Indeed, it is possible to find B. bruxellensis in the air, on walls and floors of the cellars, on small materials, vats and barrels.

INSIGHTS ON THE ROLE OF GENES ON AROMA FORMATION OF WINES

Yeast secondary metabolism is a complex network of biochemical pathways and the genetic profile of the yeast carrying out the alcoholic fermentation is obviously important in the formation of the metabolites conferring specific odors to wine. The aim of the present research was to investigate the relative expression of genes involved in flavor compound production in eight different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Two commercial yeast strains Sc1 (S.cerevisiae x S.bayanus) and Sc2 (S.cerevisiae) and six indigenous S. cerevisiae strains (Sc3, Sc4, Sc5, Sc6, Sc7, Sc8) isolated during spontaneous fermentations were inoculated in Assyrtiko and Vidiano grape must.

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: EVOLUTION IN BOTTLED WINE

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors. The impact on wine aroma is mainly attributed to volatile phenols, while in-mouth hydrolysis of glycosylated forms may be responsible for long-lasting “ashy” aftertastes (1).