terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Molecular approaches for understanding and modulating wine taste

Molecular approaches for understanding and modulating wine taste

Abstract

Wine consumers generally demand wines having a perception of softer tannins and less ripe, having a heaviness and richness on palate (full-body wine) with a limpid and stable color. However, polyphenol (tannins)-rich wines have been also correlated with unpleasant taste properties such as astringency and bitterness when perceived at high intensities. Modulating these unpleasant properties could be important for consumer’s approval of wines.
Indeed, polyphenols are usually associated with flavor, and particularly with astringency, due to their ability to complex with salivary proteins [1]. Saliva is rich in different SP families described to be involved in astringency, namely basic PRPs, glycosylated PRPs, acidic PRPs, statherin/P-B peptide and cystatins. However, due to saliva being a complex fluid, its protein profile may quantitatively and qualitatively vary under different conditions. Currently, astringency is recognized as a trigeminal sensation although the molecular pathway responsible for its onset is yet to be fully established. Moreover, it is unknown if the many different astringency mouthfeel sub-qualities such as velvet, puckering, harsh, among others, are perceived by different mechanisms. Besides the structural factors and medium conditions, there are some endogenous factors that affect astringency perception such as the physiological response, circadian rhythms, salivary flow rate and time of exposure. Indeed, astringency is perceived as a diffuse stimulus and dynamic process in the oral cavity that requires time to be elicited. It is known that astringency increases upon successive exposures to tannins [2,3].
Wine industry has some strategies to balance astringency and bitterness such as the use of some fining agents and also some winemaking practices (e.g. oak aging, batonnage and microoxygenations) leading to the loss of phenolics and also promoting the chemical change of some of them. While removing phenolic compounds is necessary to fulfill some organoleptic requirements of a beverage, the process must be controlled to avoid some collateral effects such as the loss of flavor [4]. Polysaccharides have been an emerging natural and sustainable option to be used on the modulation of taste properties. In fact, polysaccharides can influence salivary protein-tannin interactions and they could be used to modulate astringency and bitterness.

1. Soares, S., et al., Scientific Reports, 2020, 10, 12638.
2. Lesschaeve, I. and Noble, C. A., Am. J. Clin. Nutr, 2005, 81, 330S-5S.
3. Brand.o, E.; Soares, S.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V., J. Agri. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 9562−9568.
4. Francisco, T., et al., Food Res. Int., 2021, 143, 110261

DOI:

Publication date: February 11, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Victor de Freitas

University of Porto, Faculty of Science, Portugal.
LAQV-REQUIMTE

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

RED WINE AGING THROUGH 1H-NMR METABOLOMICS

Premium red wines are often aged in oak barrel. This widespread winemaking process is used, among others, to provide roundness and complexity to the wine. The study of wine evolution during barrel aging is crucial to better ensure control of wine quality.
¹H-NMR has already been proved to be an efficient tool to monitor winemaking process [1]. Indeed, it is a non-destructive technique, it requires a small amount of sample and a short time of analysis, yet it provides clues about several chemical families.

IMPACT OF ACIDIFICATION AT BOTTLING BY FUMARIC ACID ON RED WINE AFTER 2 YEARS

Global warming is responsible for a lack of organic acid in grape berries, leading to wines with higher pH and lower titrable acidity. The chemical, microbiological and organoleptic equilibriums are impacted by this change of organic acid concentration. It is common practice to acidify the wine in order to prevent these imbalances that can lead to wine defects and early spoilage. Tartaric acid (TA) is most commonly used by winemaker for wine acidification purposes. Fumaric acid (FA), which is authorized by the OIV in its member states for the inhibition of malolactic fermentation, could also be used as a potential acidification candidate since it has a better acidifying power than tartaric acid.

BIOPROTECTION BY ADDING NON-SACCHAROMYCES YEASTS : ADVANCED RESEARCH ON THIS PROMISING ALTERNATIVE TO SO₂

Sulphur dioxide has been used for many years for its antimicrobial, antioxidant and antioxydasic properties in winemaking but nowadays, it is a source of controversy. Indeed, consumers are more attentive to the naturalness of their foods and beverages and the legislation is changing to reduce the total SO₂ levels allowed in wines. To limit and replace the doses of sulphur dioxide applied, winemakers can now use bioprotection consisting in live yeast addition as alternative,seems to be promising. This process, lightly used in from the food industry, allows to colonize the environment and limit the development or even eliminate undesirable microorganisms without altering the sensory properties of the product.

ANALYZING THE ROLE OF ELEMENTAL SULFUR IN GRAPE JUICE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLYFUNCTIONAL MERCAPTANS IN SAUVIGNON BLANC WINES

Sauvignon blanc is characterized by distinctive aromas, both fruity and herbaceous. The “green” character has been attributed to the methoxypyrazines, while the “fruity” character is associated with polyfunctional mercaptans . Polyfunctional mercaptans are of great significance due to their high impact on wines and associated low perception thresholds.
Elemental sulfur (S⁰) is widely used to protect grapevines from powdery mildew.

MOVING FROM SULFITES TO BIOPROTECTION: WHICH IMPACT ON CHARDONNAY WINE?

Over the last few years, several tools have been developed to reduce the quantity of sulfites used during winemaking, including bioprotection. Although its effectiveness in preventing the development of spoilage microorganisms has been proven, few data are available on the impact of sulfite substitution by bioprotection on the final product. The objective of this study was therefore to characterize Chardonnay wines with the addition of sulfite or bioprotection in the pre-fermentation stage. The effects of both treatments on resulting matrices was evaluated at several scales: analysis of classical oenological parameters, antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds, non-volatile metabolome and sensory profile.