terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Molecular approaches for understanding and modulating wine taste

Molecular approaches for understanding and modulating wine taste

Abstract

Wine consumers generally demand wines having a perception of softer tannins and less ripe, having a heaviness and richness on palate (full-body wine) with a limpid and stable color. However, polyphenol (tannins)-rich wines have been also correlated with unpleasant taste properties such as astringency and bitterness when perceived at high intensities. Modulating these unpleasant properties could be important for consumer’s approval of wines.
Indeed, polyphenols are usually associated with flavor, and particularly with astringency, due to their ability to complex with salivary proteins [1]. Saliva is rich in different SP families described to be involved in astringency, namely basic PRPs, glycosylated PRPs, acidic PRPs, statherin/P-B peptide and cystatins. However, due to saliva being a complex fluid, its protein profile may quantitatively and qualitatively vary under different conditions. Currently, astringency is recognized as a trigeminal sensation although the molecular pathway responsible for its onset is yet to be fully established. Moreover, it is unknown if the many different astringency mouthfeel sub-qualities such as velvet, puckering, harsh, among others, are perceived by different mechanisms. Besides the structural factors and medium conditions, there are some endogenous factors that affect astringency perception such as the physiological response, circadian rhythms, salivary flow rate and time of exposure. Indeed, astringency is perceived as a diffuse stimulus and dynamic process in the oral cavity that requires time to be elicited. It is known that astringency increases upon successive exposures to tannins [2,3].
Wine industry has some strategies to balance astringency and bitterness such as the use of some fining agents and also some winemaking practices (e.g. oak aging, batonnage and microoxygenations) leading to the loss of phenolics and also promoting the chemical change of some of them. While removing phenolic compounds is necessary to fulfill some organoleptic requirements of a beverage, the process must be controlled to avoid some collateral effects such as the loss of flavor [4]. Polysaccharides have been an emerging natural and sustainable option to be used on the modulation of taste properties. In fact, polysaccharides can influence salivary protein-tannin interactions and they could be used to modulate astringency and bitterness.

1. Soares, S., et al., Scientific Reports, 2020, 10, 12638.
2. Lesschaeve, I. and Noble, C. A., Am. J. Clin. Nutr, 2005, 81, 330S-5S.
3. Brand.o, E.; Soares, S.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V., J. Agri. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 9562−9568.
4. Francisco, T., et al., Food Res. Int., 2021, 143, 110261

DOI:

Publication date: February 11, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Victor de Freitas

University of Porto, Faculty of Science, Portugal.
LAQV-REQUIMTE

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

EFFECT OF FUMARIC ACID ON SPONTANEOUS FERMENTATION IN GRAPE MUST

Malolactic fermentation (MLF)¹, the decarboxylation of L-malic acid into L-lactic acid, is performed by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). MLF has a deacidifying effect that may compromise freshness or microbiological stability in wines² and can be inhibited by fumaric acid [E297] (FA). In wine, can be added at a maximum allowable dose of 0.6 g/L³. Its inhibition with FA is being studied as an alternative strategy to minimize added doses of SO₂⁴. In addition, wine yeasts are capable of metabolizing and storing small amounts of FA and during alcoholic fermentation (AF).

EXTRACTIBLE COMPOUNDS FROM MICROAGGLOMERATED CORK STOPPERS

After bottling, the wine continues to evolve during storage. The choice of the stopper is an important factor in this evolution. In addition to the oxygen permeability of the closure, the migration of stopper compounds into the wine can also have an impact on the wine organoleptic properties. Many studies have shown that transfers of volatile compounds from the stoppers into the wine can happen depending on the type of closure used (1). Moreover, when cork-made stoppers are used, the migration of phenolic compounds from the stopper into the wine can also occur (2, 3).

FUNCTIONALIZED MESOPOROUS SILICA IS A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO BENTONITE FOR WINE PROTEIN STABILIZATION

The presence of grape-derived heat unstable proteins can lead to haze formation in white wines [1], an instability prevented by removing these proteins by adding bentonite, a hydrated aluminum silicate that interacts electrostatically with wine proteins leading to their flocculation. Despite effective, using bentonite has several drawbacks as the costs associated with its use, the potential negative effects on wine quality, and its environmental impact, so that alternative solutions are needed.

IMPACT OF CLIMATIC CONDITIONS ON THE SEASONING QUALITY OF OAK WOOD FOR OENOLOGICAL USE (QUERCUS PETRAEA)

For coopers, seasoning and toasting are considered crucial steps in barrel making during which the oak wood develops specific organoleptic properties. Seasoning, carried out in the open air, allows reducing the moisture content of the staves to between 14 and 18% (compared to 70 to 90% after splitting) while modulating the intrinsic composition of the oak wood. Toasting consists of applying different degrees of heat to a barrel for a specific period of time. As the temperature increases, oak wood produces a wide range of chemical compounds through thermal degradation of its intrinsic composition.

MOVING FROM SULFITES TO BIOPROTECTION: WHICH IMPACT ON CHARDONNAY WINE?

Over the last few years, several tools have been developed to reduce the quantity of sulfites used during winemaking, including bioprotection. Although its effectiveness in preventing the development of spoilage microorganisms has been proven, few data are available on the impact of sulfite substitution by bioprotection on the final product. The objective of this study was therefore to characterize Chardonnay wines with the addition of sulfite or bioprotection in the pre-fermentation stage. The effects of both treatments on resulting matrices was evaluated at several scales: analysis of classical oenological parameters, antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds, non-volatile metabolome and sensory profile.