terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 ASSESSMENT OF GRAPE QUALITY THROUGH THE MONITORING OFPHENOLIC RIPENESS AND THE APPLICATION OF A NEW RAPID METHOD BASED ON RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY

ASSESSMENT OF GRAPE QUALITY THROUGH THE MONITORING OFPHENOLIC RIPENESS AND THE APPLICATION OF A NEW RAPID METHOD BASED ON RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY

Abstract

The chemical composition of grape berries at harvest is one of the key aspects influencing wine quality and depends mainly on the ripeness level of grapes. Climate change affects this trait, unbalancing technological and phenolic ripeness, and this further raises the need for a fast determination of the grape maturity in order to quickly and efficiently determine the optimal time for harvesting. To this end, the characterization of variety-specific ripening curves and the development of new and rapid methods for determining grape ripeness are of key importance.

As part of this ongoing project, 35 vineyards (26 cv. Nebbiolo, 9 cv. Barbera) from Langhe, Roero, and Monferrato terroirs (Piemonte, Italy) were monitored during two consecutive vintages (2021-2022). The Nebbiolo vineyards were further classified, based on historical data, into ripening classes according to the harvest period estimation (early, medium, and late Nebbiolo). To study the evolution of grape ripening, four grape samples were taken from each vineyard during the ripening period (mid-August – late September), and grape quality assessment was performed by means of parameters commonly used in wine industry: juice technological maturity and phenolic ripeness parameters (total and extractable anthocyanins-EA%, share of tannins from seeds-Mp%). Preliminary results showed differences among cultivars and ripening classes, with a strong influence of the climatic conditions of the vintage, being both hot vintages with a strong water deficit (and decrease in berry weights and anthocyanin accumulation) for the 2022 vintage.

To have a more in-depth insight into the phenolic changes of the grapes during ripening, total extractions of the skins and seeds phenolics were carried out to better characterize the composition of Nebbiolo and Barbera berries. Lastly, this data was used to train a new approach based on Raman spectroscopy (RS), in an attempt to develop a method for the rapid determination of berry quality. At each sampling point, the acquisition of the grape Raman spectra was carried out in parallel with the other chemical analyses, developing a prediction model by correlating technological and phenolic ripening parameters with RS results.

Acknowledgments: The QUALSHELL project is funded by the PSR 2014-2020 Regione Piemonte (Italy), op. 16.1, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. We thank Martina Tarditi, Daniele Ronco, Alessandro Bottallo and the wineries supplying grape samples.

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Lorenzo Ferrero¹, Alessio Sacco², Massimo Guaita³, Walter Salvano⁴, Andrea M. Rossi², Luca Rolle¹, Antonella Bosso³, Simone Giacosa¹

1. Università degli Studi di Torino, Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari. Corso Enotria 2/C, 12051 Alba, Italy
2. Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica. Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy
3. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura, Centro di Ricerca Viticoltura ed Enologia. Via P. Micca 35, 14100 Asti, Italy
4. Terre del Barolo. Via Alba-Barolo 8, 12060 Castiglione Falletto, Italy

Contact the author*

Keywords

Grape quality, Phenolic ripeness, Anthocyanins, Red wines

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

IMPACT OF ACIDIFICATION AT BOTTLING BY FUMARIC ACID ON RED WINE AFTER 2 YEARS

Global warming is responsible for a lack of organic acid in grape berries, leading to wines with higher pH and lower titrable acidity. The chemical, microbiological and organoleptic equilibriums are impacted by this change of organic acid concentration. It is common practice to acidify the wine in order to prevent these imbalances that can lead to wine defects and early spoilage. Tartaric acid (TA) is most commonly used by winemaker for wine acidification purposes. Fumaric acid (FA), which is authorized by the OIV in its member states for the inhibition of malolactic fermentation, could also be used as a potential acidification candidate since it has a better acidifying power than tartaric acid.

AGEING REVEALS THE TERROIR OF AGED RED BORDEAUX WINES REGARDLESS OF THE VINTAGES! TARGETED APPROACH USING ODOROUS COMPOUNDS LEVELS INCLUDING TERPENES AND C13 NORISOPRENOIDS

The chemistry of wine is notably complex and is modified by ageing of the bottles. The composition of wines is the result of vine production (under the influence of vintage, climate and soils); yeast production (under the influence of juice composition and fermentation management); lactic bacteria production (under the influence of young wine composition and malolactic fermentation management); and of the ageing process either in vats, barrels or bottles or both. The composition is linked to the quality perceived by consumers but also to their origin, sometimes associated to the “terroir” concept.

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: EVOLUTION IN BOTTLED WINE

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors. The impact on wine aroma is mainly attributed to volatile phenols, while in-mouth hydrolysis of glycosylated forms may be responsible for long-lasting “ashy” aftertastes (1).

EFFECT OF FUMARIC ACID ON SPONTANEOUS FERMENTATION IN GRAPE MUST

Malolactic fermentation (MLF)¹, the decarboxylation of L-malic acid into L-lactic acid, is performed by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). MLF has a deacidifying effect that may compromise freshness or microbiological stability in wines² and can be inhibited by fumaric acid [E297] (FA). In wine, can be added at a maximum allowable dose of 0.6 g/L³. Its inhibition with FA is being studied as an alternative strategy to minimize added doses of SO₂⁴. In addition, wine yeasts are capable of metabolizing and storing small amounts of FA and during alcoholic fermentation (AF).

IMPACT OF MUST NITROGEN DEFICIENCY ON WHITE WINE COMPOSITION DEPENDING ON GRAPE VARIETY

Nitrogen (N) nutrition of the vineyard strongly influences the must and the wine compositions. Several chemical markers present in wine (i.e., proline, succinic acid, higher alcohols and phenolic compounds) have been proposed for the cultivar Chasselas, as indicators of N deficiency in the grape must at harvest [1]. Grape genetics potentially influences the impact of N deficiency on grape composition, as well as on the concentration of potential indicators in the wine. The goal of this study was to evaluate if the che- mical markers found in Chasselas wine can be extended for other white wines to indicate N deficiency in the grape must.